Table Iii C

  • Uploaded by: Joseph Anbarasu
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Table Iii C as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 647
  • Pages: 9
Table II - B Minimum point norms of API as provided in Table I and Weightage for Expert Assessment to be applied for the promotion of teachers in Colleges under CAS

Jump over it or Stay where you are

Assistant Professor: Equivalent cadres: AGP increase from Rs. 6000 to Rs. 7000 60/year

• Teaching - learning, Evaluation Related Activities (Category – I)

20/ Year

• Co-curricular, Extensions, & Profession related activities (Category – II)

100/ Year

• Minimum total average annual Score under categories I & II

5/ Year

(20/ assessment Period Screening Committee No separate points. Screening Committee verify API SCORE

• Research and academic contribution (III) – mini. Annual score required to assess cumulatively • Expert Assessment System • % distribution of Weightage Points in the Expert Assessment (Total = 100)

Assistant Professor: Equivalent cadres: AGP increase from Rs. 7000 to Rs. 8000 60/year

• Teaching - learning, Evaluation Related Activities (Category – I)

20/ Year

• Co-curricular, Extensions, & Profession related activities (Category – II)

100/ Year

• Minimum total average annual Score under categories I & II

10/ Year (50/ assessment Period) Screening Committee No separate points. Screening Committee verify API SCORE

• Research and academic contribution (III) – mini. Annual score required to assess cumulatively • Expert Assessment System

• % distribution of Weightage Points in the Expert Assessment (Total = 100)

Associate Professor: Equivalent cadres: Promotion with AGP of Rs. 9000 60/year

• Teaching - learning, Evaluation Related Activities (Category – I)

20/ Year

• Co-curricular, Extensions, & Profession related activities (Category – II)

100/ Year

• Minimum total average annual Score under categories I & II

15/ Year (45/ assessment Period) Selection Committee 20% - Research Evaluation 60% - Domain Knowledge 20%

• Research and academic contribution (III) – mini. Annual score required to assess cumulatively • Expert Assessment System

• Percentage distribution of Weightage Points in the Expert Assessment (Total = 100)

10% of the Posts of Professor Promotion in Colleges: AGP of Rs. 10000 60/year

• Teaching - learning, Evaluation Related Activities (Category – I)

20/ Year

• Co-curricular, Extensions, & Profession related activities (Category – II)

100/ Year

• Minimum total average annual Score under categories I & II

20/ Year (60/ assessment Period) Selection Committee 30% - Research Evaluation 50% - Domain Knowledge - 20%

• Research and academic contribution (III) – mini. Annual score required to assess cumulatively • Expert Assessment System

• Percentage distribution of Weightage Points in the Expert Assessment (Total = 100)

Explanatory Notes for the Table

Key Points • It is a verifiable API System • It should be prepared within THREE months from the date of notification of this regulation. • IQAC cell has to document and collate information annually • Therefore, all the teachers shall submit the duly filled-in Performance Based Appraisal System (PBAS) annually. • However, the collection of information for 2009 – 2010 will be difficult. It is planned to implement API progressively and prospectively. • Categories I and II will be implemented in 2009 – 2010 based on the existing systems in the college (with minimum scores). • This annualized API can then be compounded progressively as and when the teacher is eligible for CAS promotion.

Other Key Points • The Aggregate minimum can be earned from any other two broad categories, subject to the minimum prescribed in each category. • For Category 3 (Research and academic contributions), each has kept past record. In this category, a aggregate minimum score is required for promotion over each stage. Alternatively, a teacher should acquire the required minimum aggregate score over two previous stages, taken together. • Candidate should offer themselves for assessment for promotion, if they fulfill the minimum API scores indicated in the table, by submitting an application and the required proforma. They can give it three month before the due date if they consider themselves eligible.

Related Documents

Table Iii C
June 2020 16
Table Iii
June 2020 4
Iii C
October 2019 15
William C Mudge Iii
December 2019 35
Unidad Iii - C
May 2020 2
Fatima Iii C[1]
April 2020 5

More Documents from ""

India - Perspectives
December 2019 37
Zen: Primer
April 2020 23
Labour
November 2019 40
Materials
December 2019 46
Delivering Lecture
April 2020 29