Synchronous Learning

Sharlie Husted Anthony Spittell Laleh Shahriaree GED 580 Synchronous Learning As technology use continues to increase inside the classroom, teachers are stepping away from the traditional methods of teaching, such as face-to-face instruction and shifting towards more current techniques of online education (Wang, 2008). One such method of online education is synchronous learning, where students through computer-mediated communication, interact with others simultaneously, by chat or instant messaging (Johnson, 2008). Synchronous communication can be applied in a variety of ways in the classroom and is known to have valuable effects on students’ success and achievement. Teachers of a language arts class, for example, can set up an online chat room to discuss the current lesson or reading. Students present in class, as well as those absent, but with internet access, can then participate in teacher-facilitated discussions or share personal ideas and opinions on the topic (Moeller, 2005). Synchronous communication can also be applied in a science class where the teacher can have students interact with experts in a field they are studying or go on an online class field trip and discuss their findings (Keefe, 2003). In a foreign language class, through synchronous communication students can be connected to native speakers worldwide (Zha, 2006). They can practice the language either orally through video chat or in writing through instant messaging. There are many benefits to synchronous learning. It has shown to increase student participation and motivation especially with students who feel shy communicating face-to-face (Wang, 2008). They feel more comfortable and confident expressing their opinions online. Students work more diligently knowing that their work will be seen by others and their

understanding of the learning improves (Kadirire, 2007). Also, synchronous communication enables students to learn anytime and anywhere (Roberts, 2004). There is no need for students working on a group project to find the right time to meet in person. They can chat together online from wherever they are. Another great advantage is the fact that students can request help or receive feedback from a teacher or peer without waiting a long time for a response (Glazer, 2004).

References: Alvarez-Torres, Maria. (2003). On “Chatting” in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Clearing House, 74(6), 313-316. Glazer, Evan (2004). K-12 Mathematics and the web. Computers in School, 21(3/4), 37-43. Johnson, Genevieve (2008). The relative learning of synchronous and asynchronous text-based discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 166-169. Kadirire, J. (2007). Instant messaging for creating interactive and collaborative m-learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 114. Keefe, D. (2003). Integrating a video learning center into the curriculum at an elementary school. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (pp. 253-256). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Moeller. (2005). Online Discussion Boards in the Classroom and Their Affect on Reading and Writing. English Journal, 93(2), 36-41. Roberts, A. (2004). Analyzing patterns and relationships around a bond of common text: purposes, dilemmas, and possibilities of a virtual community. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 1-27. Wang, Shiang-Kwei (2008). The effects of a sychronous communication tool on online learners’ sense of community and their multimedia authoring skills. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 59-74. Zha, S., Kelly, P., Park, M., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). An investigation of communicative competence of ESL students using electronic discussion boards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 349-367.