Stigmatised - A Nation Paralysed By Fear!

Stigmatised – A Nation paralysed by Fear! As the furore of the past few days, in which Nick Griffin of the British National Party appeared on the BBC's flagship political debate program, continues to dominate the headlines, how many times did we all hear the “R” word mentioned? Yes that terribly frightening and obnoxious word RACIST! In a World that is so PC that it is in fear of bordering on paranoia, a recent article published by the Daily Telegraph illustrated the point. An article entitled “Toddlers who dislike spicy food 'racist'” clarified that, “Toddlers who turn their noses up at spicy food from overseas could be branded racists by a Government-sponsored agency.” It named the Agency concerned as it continued, “The National Children's Bureau, which receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations, has issued guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to be alert for racist incidents among youngsters in their care. This could include a child of as young as three who says "yuk" in response to being served unfamiliar foreign food.” So, according to this fine piece of educated research by the “loony leftist Common Purpose” children (and I'm guessing that they are white, as surely no Asian could be branded a racist for disliking spicy food?) and in particular white children who dislike spicy food are “Racists?” The National Children's Bureau was set up in 1963 at the end of Harold Macmillan's wearisome term as Prime Minister for the Conservative Party. They state that they are, “dedicated to advancing the health and well-being of all children and young people across every aspect of their lives..” I have no doubt that, over the many years that they have been operating, they have remained true to their values but children as young as three Racist? Come on! I don't eat spicy food and I can confidently state “YUK!”. Am I a Racist? No! I don't eat spicy food because I have gastric ulcers. It is interesting to note that the New York Times ran an article entitled, “EATING SPICY FOOD: WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS?” Some of the effects were highlighted thus, “the burning produced by capsaicin, the irritating chemical in chilli peppers, can be very painful. When preparing peppers it is wise to wear rubber gloves or hold the peppers in a paper towel or plastic wrap. Fingers that have handled hot peppers should be washed thoroughly and kept out of the eyes and other sensitive tissues, including those of the pelvic region. If you should get capsaicin on sensitive tissues, flush quickly with lots of water to reduce the irritation.” Is it any wonder that a small white child with an undeveloped stomach and newly forming digestive processes would say “Yuk?” This is a relatively new phenomena as spicy foods have only recently been introduced to state schools. As more and more Ethnic Minority children began to swell the ranks of British State

Schools there was an obvious requirement to cater to their individual tastes! But hold on a minute! What is this Country called again? Great Britain? I'm sorry can you run that one past me again? GREAT BRITAIN! Hmm... I think that I am missing something here? I assumed that Bacon and Eggs, Chip Butties, Roast Beef, Pork or Lamb with Vegetables and Gravy, Shepherds Pie, Welsh Rarebit, Scotch Eggs, Irish Stew were staples of all the peoples of this land? Just supposing that an Asian or African Caribbean 3 yr old child spat their Roast Pork out and cried “Yuk?” Would that constitute Racism? I hardly think so! It would seem to me that each individual race has it's own culinary tastes which can seem totally alien to that of another. And this brings me to a fundamental point of RACE.

According to British law, racial group means "any group of people who are defined by reference to their race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origin". Note that included in this racial grouping are both Nationality and National Origin. Like many of the Indigenous peoples of this Nation I can trace my ancestry back at least 200 yrs. That is the History of my “National Origin.” My ancestors originally came from the cotton mills of Lancashire and as the years progressed they migrated to Leicestershire where they spent most of the 19th and early 20th centuries in the Hosiery and Shoemaking industry (and no it's not a load of old anything!) When I came on the scene Leicester was already starting to feel the effects of mass immigration and by the time we left in the late 70's we were three of the only “indigenous national origin” families on the block. Those of ,“national origin”, like myself, feel alienated in a country that has taken away my identity, eroded my heritage, my culture and my tradition. According to British Law I am defined as having a race, although I am not allowed to identify with it. According to British Law I am defined as being of “national origin” but I have no right to defend my tradition, culture or heritage because if I do I am deemed to be a racist! I am alienated in my own Country, Great Britain, but who is there to listen? Who is there to defend my Race? When the Multicultural “experiment” was reeled out to the masses during the 50's following the initial Windrush landings in Tilbury, it was soon obvious that integration was not apparent. Those of African Caribbean race formed their own community, with their own culture, with their own foods etc, etc. Soon to follow were the Asian race again with their own community, with their own culture, own foods etc, etc. However, a new and untested element entered with the latter (Asian). A totally alien concept of Religion. For many years this Country had worshipped and upheld Christian principles. The African Caribbean race had embraced Christianity many years previous and it was, for many, the mainstay of their culture. As the Asian race developed in Britain, there was to be no embracing of this Christian Religion and so the communities remained apart and isolated, each doing their own thing. Catastrophically the gates of Immigration have remained open and thousands

continue to make their way to the supposedly all embracing British Nation. These now include many of the EU states, who also hold dear to their Christian roots but, unfortunately they are still a symptom of uncontrolled Immigration. As I have already pointed out, there is no embracing here. What there is has been defined as “white flight.” Under the headline, “White flight is a fact of British life”, George Walden of the Telegraph continues, “Not that you have to be very clever to realise that, while insisting on decent treatment for immigrants already here, and understanding why many felt driven to come, it is wise to recognise that, for many indigenous folk lower down the social scale, mass immigration has brought severe problems.” Again Warwick Mansell and Polly Curtis of the Guardian acknowledge, "Segregation in schools fuelled by 'white flight', report warns" " Schools in parts of England are becoming increasingly segregated, deserted by white parents if they find their children becoming outnumbered by pupils from ethnic minorities, a report by a thinktank set up to promote community cohesion has warned." It added: "We heard strong evidence of 'white flight' in a number of areas." So, it appears that the British race whose "national origin" has been defined by Law are literally fleeing areas of Britain as “ they find their children becoming outnumbered by pupils from ethnic minorities.” Why do people flee a community that, they are both familiar with and have forged roots within that same community? I believe, and this is by no means definitive, that it is fear! Fear of what? You may well ask!

To feel safe within any community a citizen requires three staples: •

Shared values and responsibilities

•

Security

•

Respect

So, Let's take a look at Shared Values and Responsibilities from the perspective of a British Citizen of “national origin.” •

Religion – Christianity

According to the BBC's “Religion and Ethics website – Christianity”, “We tend to associate the arrival of Christianity in Britain with the mission of Augustine in 597 AD. But in fact Christianity arrived long before then, and in the 1st Century AD, there wasn't an organised attempt to convert the British.” It continues “ a single religion with a single God appealed to the Roman Emperor Constantine. He saw that Christianity could be harnessed to unite his Empire and achieve military success. From 313 AD onwards, Christian worship was tolerated within the Roman Empire.”

•

Law - Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

The Supreme Court is defined as per it's website, “In October 2009, The Supreme Court replaced the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords as the highest court in the United Kingdom. The Supreme Court’s 12 Justices maintain the highest standards set by the Appellate Committee, but are now explicitly separate from both Government and Parliament. The Court hears appeals on arguable points of law of the greatest public importance, for the whole of the United Kingdom in civil cases, and for England, Wales and Northern Ireland in criminal cases.” •

Head of State – HM Queen Elizabeth II

The Head of State as defined at http://www.royal.gov.uk/ “The Queen is Head of State in the United Kingdom. As a constitutional monarch, Her Majesty does not 'rule' the country, but fulfils important ceremonial and formal roles with respect to Government. She is also Fount of Justice, Head of the Armed Forces and has important relationships with the established Churches of England and Scotland.” •

Language – British English

Language of the UK and it's colonies- “The Welsh language is officially protected by the Welsh Language Act 1993 and the Government of Wales Act 1998, and since 1998 it has been common, for example, for almost all British Government Departments to provide both printed documentation and official websites in both English and Welsh. According to the 2001 census Scottish Gaelic has 58,652 speakers (roughly 1% of the population of Scotland). In total 92,400 people aged three and over in Scotland had some Gaelic language ability in 2001.According to a 1996 estimate of the General Register Office for Scotland 30% of the Scottish population speak Scots (approximately 1.5 million speakers). In Northern Ireland, about 7% of the population speak Irish according to the 2001 census (around 110,000 speakers) and 2% speak Ulster Scots, seen by some as a language distinct from English. Cornish, a Celtic language related to Welsh and quite distinct from English, is spoken by roughly 3,500 people as a result of a revival initiated by Henry Jenner in 1903. The Cornish were officially recognised as an indigenous national minority of the United Kingdom in the last United Kingdom Census 2001 and since 2002 the Cornish language has been recognised by the United Kingdom government as a UK official minority language under the Council of Europe's European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. English is the main language (being spoken mono lingually by more than 70% of the UK population) and is thus the de facto official language.”

Now, Let's take a look at Security from the perspective of a British Citizen of “national origin.” •

Armed Forces – Army, Navy and Air Force

“The Defence Vision MOD website The key principles which provide the basis of work for Defence. Defending the United Kingdom and its interests Strengthening international peace and stability” •

Security Services – MI5

According to the Security Service website MI5 gives the following description of its objectives,

“The Security Service Act 1989 (new window) defines our role as being "the protection of national security and, in particular, its protection against threats from espionage, terrorism and sabotage, from the activities of agents of foreign powers and from actions intended to overthrow or undermine parliamentary democracy by political, industrial or violent means." •

Police

All regions of the UK have their own police force. However, under the heading of ,“Mission and values”, the Met Police (London) state: “Our mission Working together for a safer London Our values Working together with all our citizens, all our partners, all our colleagues: We will have pride in delivering quality policing. There is no greater priority We will build trust by listening and responding We will respect and support each other and work as a team We will learn from experience and find ways to be even better We are one team - we all have a duty to play our part in making London safer.” •

Community Groups

These are varied and many but one of the more successful has been Neighbourhood Watch. The following information is taken from their website. “Neighbourhood Watch (in some areas known as Home Watch), is one of the biggest and most successful crime prevention schemes ever. It is based on simple ideas and values that are shared by many people around the country: 'Getting together with your neighbours to reduce local crime and disorder in the bid to make your neighbourhood a safe and better place to live, work and play'. Neighbourhood Watch is not just about reducing crime – it is about building community spirit and good relations. It brings local people closer together with common goals; to tackle crime and disorder and to keep an eye on each other's property.” Finally, let's take a look at Respect from the perspective of a British Citizen of “national origin.” Collins English Dictionary defines respect as “n 1. consideration, respect for my feelings, 2. an attitude of deference or esteem, 3. the state of being honoured or esteemed, 4. a detail or characteristic, in virtually all respects boys develop more slowly than girls, 5. ◇ in respect of or with respect to in reference or relation to, 6. ◇ respects polite greetings, he paid his respects to her and left, vb 1. to have an attitude of esteem towards, she is the person I most respect and wish to emulate, 2. to pay proper attention or consideration to, he called on rebel groups to respect a cease-fire, Latin respicere to pay attention to”

Without doubt the principles and core values of these established staples should, in theory, fulfil the necessary requirements of “feeling safe” for all British Citizens of “national origin.” So, the question remains, why are so many white British citizens engaging in the“white flight” syndrome? Recent articles creeping into National News items provide us with some clues as to the reasons! “Labour 'Encouraged Mass Immigration To UK' Steve Davies, Sky News Online”, “Labour ministers deliberately encouraged mass immigration to diversify Britain over the past decade, a former Downing Street adviser has claimed.” “The Outrageous Truth slips out: Labour cynically plotted to transform the entire make-up of Britain without telling us”, by Melanie Phillips Daily Mail “This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.” “Our leaders are queuing to prove their virtue........ ” , by Melanie Phillips Daily Mail “Stigmatised.......” Regarding mass immigration, Islamisation and the loss of sovereignty to the EU. she says, ”These are all legitimate concerns which are widely held by people who fear the loss of Britain's historic identity but which are stigmatised as beyond the pale by an intelligentsia which considers any such expression of nationalistic sentiment to be a form of racism.” It is increasingly difficult to understand the reasons for such a genocidal destruction of an entire Nation, but let's try and draw some conclusions?

It has not passed without notice that David Cameron the Conservative leader has made recent alliances and continues to lobby with what are to be considered “far right” parties of Europe including those of Poland (PiS), Czech (Civic Democratic Party) and Latvias (For Fatherland and Freedom party). Can we derive from this that the Conservative Party are inherently Right Wing? I do not believe that this is the case. Conservatism holds close to its preservation of the Nation. However, the party has finally realised what it is up against. For many years the British National Party has known the intentions of the Marxist, Communist and Socialist infiltration of the increasingly corruptible Labour Party.

The Marxist website http://www.marxist.net/states as part of it's Perspective and Tasks document the following “4. In the recent period conditions have forced us to shift emphasis away from work in and through the Labour Party, while defending the methods that have established the organisation over the years. But those methods have never precluded new initiatives, tactical turns or new organisational forms when demanded by the objective situation and the needs of the tendency. In the long term, especially in Britain, where there exists an unbreakable link between the Labour Party and the trade unions, entrism will remain a central plank in our strategy to build a powerful revolutionary party.” It is also interesting to note how how Socialist Extremists Took Over the New Zealand Labour Party! In a series of articles NewZeal, an online discussion group, describes how, over many decades, this was accomplished. “Maoist infiltration of the Labour Party began in earnest in the early '70s. Student radicals, associated with the "Progressive Clubs" and "Socialist Societies" active on most campuses, worked with and eventually took over many university Labour Clubs.” The recent activity outside the BBCs London Studio was promoted as a fight against Racism and Fascism. This demonstration was fronted by the Unite against Fascism Organisation (UAF). However, when one investigates deeper the Leaders and main financial supporters of this organisation are a collective of political ideologies all united, for now, in one cause. Of course the rank and file, of the Organisation in general, have no idea what the hidden objective is, other than that of a supposed fight against racism. I am not going to list all of the various parties involved or their executives, as there are far too many involved, but I will take a closer look at the views of the joint secretary of the umbrella group of the UAF. Weyman Bennett: a member of the Socialist Workers Party and joint secretary of UAF. The SWP has been criticised by some in the direct action, anti-capitalist, and anarchist movements for its perceived attempts to manipulate them for its own ends . These criticisms were echoed by some within the anti-war movement. The SWP, for its part, tends to promote the view that reliance on direct action by small groups is elitist, and instead favours mass mobilisations, strikes, and the most militant mass action that can be achieved at any given time. The SWP has been accused of being overly accommodating to the allegedly reactionary concerns of some practising Muslims; for example its anti-Zionist stance has been accused of being antiSemitic and it has also been accused of side-lining the issues of gay rights and abortion. Much of this criticism was directed at the policies of the Respect coalition of which the SWP was a large component. The SWP responds that there is also a clear distinction between racist prejudice against Jews and opposition to the policies of the state of Israel. It is here that I ask you to recall my mention of “a new and untested element entered with the latter (Asian). A totally alien concept of Religion.” Islam and Christianity have never been and never can be compatible. They are two totally opposed theologies. Britain and the Westernised civilisation has never prescribed to Islam as a Theology or as an Ideology. Yet we recognise the power and fear factor it generates. Islam and the Jewish faith inc the evolution of Christianity have always been opposed since Antiquity. They have been the two most powerful driving forces of World Religion and politics, in an unceasing head to head confrontation. We have always known the extent to which a person driven by faith will go to defend it! We have many examples of Martyrdom from Christian to Buddhist, Muslim to Jew. It is only in recent times however, that the Western world has been able to understand and comprehend the extent to which a person can defend their faith by more extreme and radical methods.

On 31st October 2009 Islam4UK, a radical Islamic organisation, pro Jihad, pro Shari a Law, anti Jewish and anti Democracy, will march on Trafalgar Square to proclaim the arrival of Shari a Law in Britain. This is not a new phenomena as 85 such courts already exist in the UK. However, this is a political statement to the World. Islam and its followers are proclaiming their dominance to the World! It is these very people that the likes of the UAF are now courting in their efforts to bring about the total destruction of Democracy. The Labour Party under the traitorous leadership of Tony Blair devised the plan previously explored re: mass immigration, to break the Nation and to break any resistance that may raise it's head to the European super state. Gordon Brown in his eagerness to take the reins did not initially realise that he had been set up as the fall guy but by God he knows it now! Labour is a totally spent force. It has ceased to be because, as previously explored and as the word spreads, more and more MPs are racing to resign their commission in favour of a nice pay off courtesy of the Tax-Payer. Whilst the internal tensions and struggles continue unabated in the UK. Silently and methodically Tony Blair is realising his almost unopposed ambition. That of European President! David Cameron knows this but is now paralysed by fear to not rock the boat with the UK General Election approaching and so, rather than speaking out, he relies on lobbying those Countries that have still to ratify the Lisbon treaty. There is of course only one Country holding out on ratification that of the Czech (Civic Democratic Party). How long they can hold back the ferocity of the European juggernaut is anybody's guess but is is highly likely that the one signature required will be gained very soon.

What will happen in the future I cannot, and I am damn sure many cannot, predict the outcome but Spicy Food? YUK !!! Compiled by Ian Holt 26th October 2009