Search Engines And Digital Libraries

  • Uploaded by: Ram Sagar Mourya
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Search Engines And Digital Libraries as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,560
  • Pages: 42
part 1: search engines part 2: digital libraries © Tefko Saracevic

1

dictionary definitions search COMPUTING (transitive verb) to examine a computer file, disk, database, or network for particular information

engine something that supplies the driving force or energy to a movement, system, or trend

search engine a computer program that searches for particular keywords and returns a list of documents in which they were found, especially a commercial service that scans documents on the Internet © Tefko Saracevic

2

about definition of search engines • oh well … search engines do not search only for keywords, some search for other stuff as well • and they are really not “engines” in the classical sense  but then mouse is not a “mouse”

© Tefko Saracevic

3

use of search engines … among others

© Tefko Saracevic

4

How Search Engines Work (Sherman 2003)

Crawler URL1 URL2

Indexer

The Web URL3

Search Engine Database

URL4

Eggs?

© Tefko Saracevic

Eggs.

All EggsAbout - 90% Eggo Your Eggs - 81% Browser Egoby40% Huh? S. I.-Am 10% 5

how do search engines work? elaboration • crawlers, spiders: go out to find content  in various ways go through the web looking for new & changed sites  periodic, not for each query 

no search engine works in real time

 some search engines do it for themselves, others not 

buy content from companies such as Inktomi

 for a number of reasons crawlers do not cover all of the web – just a fraction  what is not covered is “invisible web” © Tefko Saracevic

6

elaboration … • organizing content: labeling, arranging  indexing for searching – automatic keywords and other fields  arranging by URL popularity - PageRank as Google 

 classifying as directory 

mostly human handpicked & classified

• as a result of different organization we have basically two kinds of search engines: search – input is a query that is then searched & displayed  directory – classified content – a class is displayed © Tefko Saracevic – 

7

elaboration (cont.) • databases, caches: storing content  humongous files usually distributed over many computers

• query processor: searching, retrieval, display  takes your query as input 

engines have differing rules how handled

 displays ranked output 

some engines also cluster output and provide visualization

• at the other end is your browser © Tefko Saracevic

8

elaboration… similarities, differences • all search engines have these basic parts in common • BUT the actual processes – methods how they do it – are based on various algorithms & they differ  most are proprietary with details kept mostly secret but based on well known principles from information retrieval or classification  to some extent Google is an exception – they published their method

© Tefko Saracevic

9

case of • developed by Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page while students at Stanford  in the beginning run on Stanford computers

• basic approach has been described in their famous paper “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine”

 well written, simple language, has their pictures  in acknowledgement they cite the support by NSF’s Digital Library Initiative i.e. initially, Google came out of government sponsored research  describe their method PageRank - based on ranking hyperlinks as in citation indexing  “We chose our system name, Google, because it is a © Tefkocommon Saracevic spelling of googol, or ten on hundredth 10

coverage differences • no engine covers more than a fraction of WWW  estimates: none more than 16%  hard (even impossible) to discern & compare coverage, but they differ substantially in what they cover

• in addition:  many national search engines  own coverage, orientation, governance  many specialized or domain search engines  own coverage geared to subject of interest  many comprehensive sources independent of search engines © Tefko Saracevic  some have compilations of evaluated web sources

11

searching differences • substantial differences among search engines on searching, retrieval display  need to know how they work & differ in respect to defaults in searching a query  searching of phrases, case sensitivity, categories  searching of different fields, formats, types of resources  advance search capabilities and features  possibilities for refinement, using relevance feedback  display options © Tefko Saracevic personalization options 

12

business model differences several business models • public good - have independent budget 

e.g. PubMed, Librarians’ Index to Internet

• earn revenue from provision of information  all commercial search engines

• using search engines to promote their other activities 

e.g. telephone directories

© Tefko Saracevic

13

sponsorship differences • need to understand treatment of sponsorship – they influence what they search & how they display results  some list separately results from sponsored sites so you are reasonably clear what is there because it is sponsored & not  some have display-per-pay - showing first sites that paid most & do not even tell you that  some have pay per update of sites

• imperative to find sources that explain these models for different engines to © Tefko Saracevic

14

limitations • every search engine has limitation as to  coverage 

meta engines just follow coverage limitations & have more of their own

 search capabilities  finding quality information

• some have compromised search with economics  becoming little more than advertisers

• but search engines are also many times victims of spamindexing © Tefko Saracevic

 affecting what is included and how ranked

15

spamming a search engine • use of techniques that push rankings higher than they belong is also called spamdexing  methods typically include textual as well as link-based techniques  like e-mail spam, search engine spam is a form of adversarial information retrieval 

the conflicting goals of accurate results of search providers & high positioning by content page rank

© Tefko Saracevic

16

meta search engines • meta engines search multiple engines getting combined results from a variety of engines

• do not have their own databases but have their own business models affecting results

• a number of techniques used interesting ones: clustering, statistical © Tefko analyses Saracevic 17

how to find a search engine? • variety of resources that list or categorize engines • SearchEngines.com search for engines by topic, geography, reference

Search Engine Guide engines categorized by topic; other engine information

Search Engine Colossus  international directory of search engines by country, topic from 198 countries and 61 territories; engines in choice of languages

Phil Bradley’s country based search engines over 2000 serach engines from countries all over the globe © Tefko Saracevic

18

sample of meta engines - with organized results Dogpile results from a number of leading search engines; gives source, so overlap can be compared; (has also a (bad) joke of the day)

Surfwax gives statistics and text sources & linking to sources; for some terms gives related terms to focus

Teoma results with suggestions for narrowing; links resources derived; originated at Rutgers

Turbo10 provides results in clusters; engines searched can © Tefko Saracevic 19 be edited

meta search engines (cont.) • Large directory 

Complete Planet 

directory of over 70,000 databases & specialty engines

• Results with graphical displays 

Vivisimo 



clusters results; innovative

Webbrain 

results in tree structure – fun to use

Kartoo results in display by topics of query © Tefko Saracevic

20

domain engines & catalogs • cover specific subjects & topics • important tool for subject searches  particularly for subject specialist  valued by professional searchers

• selection mostly hand-picked rather than by crawlers, following inclusion criteria  often not readily discernable  but content more trustworthy © Tefko Saracevic

21

domain engines … sample Open Directory Project 

large edited catalog of the web – global, run by volunteers

BUBL LINK 

selected Internet resources covering all academic subject areas; organized by Dewey Decimal System – from UK

Profusion search in categories for resources & search engines

Resource Discovery Network

– UK

“UK's free national gateway to Internet resources the learning, teaching and research © Tefko for Saracevic

22

domain engines … sample Think Quest – Oracle Education Foundation •

education resources, programs; web sites created by students

All Music Guide •

resource about musicians, albums, and songs

Internet Movie Database •

treasure trove of American and British movies

Genealogy links and surname search engines well.. that is getting really specialized (and popular)

Daypop

searches the “living web” “The living web is composed of sites that update on a daily basis: newspapers, online magazines and weblogs” © Tefko Saracevic

23



science, scholarship engines …sample free access

Psychcrawler - Amer Psychological Association 



web index for psychology

Entrez PubMed – Nat Library of Medicine biomedical literature from MEDLINE & health journals



CiteSeer 

- NEC Research Center scientific literature, citations index; strong in computer science

Scholar Google searches for scholarly articles & resources

Infomine scholarly internet research collections

Scirus © Tefko Saracevic scientific

information in journals & on the web

24

science, scholarship engines …sample commercial access

• an addition to freely accessible engines many provide search free but access to full text paid  by subscription or per item  RUL provides access to these & many more: ScienceDirect Elsevier: “world's largest electronic collection of science, technology and medicine full text and bibliographic information”

ACM Portal Asoc. for Computing Machinery: access to ACM Digital Library & Guide to Computing

© Tefko Saracevic

25

where to find out? • information about search engines in sources that have updates, news, tips for searching and more – a MUST for searchers : 

Search Engine Watch 



ratings, news, statistics, charts, explanations, tutorials

Search Engine Showdown 

“The users’ guide to web searching” - run by a librarian, news links, ratings

Virtual Chase a site about “Teaching Legal Professionals How To Do Research;,” this section has very good tips and links for consideration of quality on the web © Tefko Saracevic

26

where? …. SiteLines a blog, written by Rita Vine, a professional librarian, & web search trainer; many evaluations in archive

ResourceShelf “Resources and News for Information Professionals,” edited by Gary Price, a librarian & author of Invisible Web – has extensive archive

WebsearchAbout not evaluative, but provides news, capabilities, sources, articles about web searching © Tefko Saracevic

27

art of searching search engines

© Tefko Saracevic

28

part 2: digital libraries

© Tefko Saracevic

29

definition • digital libraries are viewed from several perspectives  technical: “Digital library is a managed collection of information, with associated services, where information is stored in digital format and accessible over a network.” (Arms, 2000)

 institutional: “Digital libraries are organizations that provide the resources, including the specialized staff, to select, structure, offer intellectual access to, interpret, distribute, preserve the integrity of, and ensure the persistence over time of collections of digital works so that they are 30 © Tefko Saracevic

a bit of context • short but volatile history  research & development took of by start/mid 1990’s  in the next decade phenomenal growth worldwide  large investment in research & building

• number of communities involved  computer science, primarily in research  many subjects: digital libraries in their domain  library & information science: operations, studies of users, use, usability © Tefko Saracevic

31

libraries & digital resources • libraries (particularly research, academic & special) directed massive funding toward such resources  electronic journals  databases  catalogs  digitization of parts of collection

• thus becoming in effect digital libraries – or more accurately hybrid libraries  with graphic and digital versions or types of © Tefko Saracevic resources

32

emphasis here • on large academic or research digital libraries that also are related to searching  provide search capabilities or access to search engines  provide electronic journals that provide full text of articles after a search

• such libraries have become also search portals of sort, essential for their users  in education, research & related activities © Tefko Saracevic

33

sample New York Public Library Digital “NYPL Digital is your gateway to The New York Public Library’s rare and unique collections in digitized form.” Includes access to searchable databases

U California Berkeley Digital Library SUNsite “builds digital collections and services while providing information and support to digital library developers worldwide.

The British Library “The world’s knowledge.” Includes “Services fro library and information Professionals.”

Los Angeles Public Library Kids’ Path ©resources Tefko Saracevic for

children; search through directory

34

sample … New Zealand Digital Library searching of a number of digital collections, including humanity development library

Research Library Group “RLG is a not-for-profit organization of over 150 research

libraries, archives, museums, and other cultural memory institutions.” Includes links to a number of searchable collections

Public Library of Science “PLoS is a nonprofit organization of scientists and physicians committed to making the world's scientific and medical literature a public resource.” Publishes open access journals © Tefko Saracevic

35

Rutgers libraries – digital components • strategic planning in developing digital access • rich & complex content of digital resources  several hundred indexes & databases for searching  some 20,000 electronic journals  thousand & more digital reference sources  subject research guides  Searchpath & other tutorials  electronic reserve Tefko Saracevic • ©affected teaching, learning, research by 36

some critical issues for searching • no way yet to do federated searching in digital libraries  to search several indexes at the same time  each source has to be searched separately 

most have very different search features, capabilities

• finding items in indexes does not mean that always able to get full text • thus, searching time-consuming, chaotic © Tefko Saracevic

37

where to find out? • information about digital libraries LibWeb U California, Berkeley “lists currently over 7200 pages from libraries in over 125 countries”

Digital Library Federation “a consortium of libraries and related agencies that are pioneering the use of electronic-information technologies to extend their collections and services”

D-Lib Magazine “a solely electronic publication with a primary focus on digital library research and development, including but not limited to new technologies, applications, and contextual social and economic issues” © Tefko Saracevic

38

where? … Ariadne (UK) “to report on information service developments and information networking issues worldwide, keeping the busy practitioner abreast of current digital library initiatives”

Information Technology and Libraries ALA publication; “related to all aspects of libraries and information technology, including digital libraries”

Journal of Digital Information “Publishing papers on the management, presentation and uses of information in digital environments”

Biblio Tech Review “Information Technology for Libraries” – monthly news and review magazine © Tefko Saracevic

39

in conclusion • search engines are great but you have to KNOW what is under the hood  as to coverage, business model, search features, outputs …  they are NOT for every kind of information need

• digital libraries are great for searching but you have to KNOW requirements for searching different resources that are included  there is no federated searching as yet, or for the time to come © Tefko Saracevic

40

art of searching digital libraries

© Tefko Saracevic

41

and rewards …

© Tefko Saracevic

42

Related Documents

Search Engines
May 2020 15
Search Engines
April 2020 22
Search Engines
June 2020 14
List Of Search Engines
June 2020 10

More Documents from "Ram Sagar Mourya"