SCM & Logistics in Military Services Professor: Dr.Farahani By: Mohammad Molana E-mail:
[email protected]
01:10
1
Contents:
Definitions Origins of military logistics SCM & Anticipatory Logistics Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain Revolution in Military Logistics (RML) E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic Can Finnish Defense Forces (FDF) Benchmark U.S. Military to meet its logistics needs? Case Study: Iran’s NEZAJA Logistics Model Refrences
01:10
2
Definitions
Military supply:[1]
the procurement, distribution, maintenance while in storage and salvage of supplies, including the determination of kind and quantity of supplies. The producer phase of a military supply extends from determination of procurement schedules to acceptance of finished supplies by the military services. The consumer phase of a military supply extends from receipt of finished supplies by the military services through issue for use or consumption.
Military supply chain management:[1]
a cross-functional approach to procuring, producing, and delivering products and services. The broad management scope includes sub-suppliers, suppliers, internal information and funds flow.
Military supply chain management:[7]
the discipline that integrates acquisition, supply, maintenance, and transportation functions with the physical, financial, information, and communications networks in a results-oriented approach to satisfy joint force materiel requirements.
01:10
3
Definitions (cont’d.) Military logistics:[2] the art and science of planning and carrying out the movement and maintenance of military forces. In its most comprehensive sense, it is those aspects or military operations that deal with: Design, development, acquisition, storage, distribution, maintenance, evacuation, and disposition of material. Movement, evacuation, and hospitalization of personnel. Acquisition or construction, maintenance, operation, and disposition of facilities. Acquisition or furnishing of services.
Logistics is the lifeblood of any Army [13] Changing how we fight influences changes in how we support.
01:10
4
Origins of military logistics[2]
The word “logistics” is derived from the Greek adjective “logistikos” meaning “skilled in calculating” . Research indicates that its first use in relation to an organized military administrative science was by the French writer, Antoine-Henri Jomini, in 1838 The first administrative use of the word was in Roman and Byzantine times when there was a military administrative official with the title Logista. At that time, the word apparently implied a skill involved in mathematical computations. The military activity known as logistics probably is as old as war itself. In the early history Each warrior was his own logistician. The men who provided support to the fighters constituted the first logistics organization. 01:10
5
Origins of military logistics[2] (cont’d.)
judgments must be based not only upon professional knowledge of the numerous aspects of logistics itself but also upon an understanding of the interplay of closely related military considerations such as strategy, tactics, intelligence, training, personal and finance. In major military conflicts, logistics matters are often crucial in deciding the overall outcome of wars. More generally, protecting one's own supply lines and attacking those of an enemy is a fundamental military strategy. For instance, tonnage war- the bulk sinking of cargo ships - was a crucial factor in World war II. The failure of the German Navy to sink enough cargo in the Second Battle of the Atlantic allowed Britain to stay in the war. Military logistics has pioneered a number of techniques that have since become widely deployed in the commercial world. Operational Research grew out of WWII military logistics efforts.
01:10
6
Anticipatory Logistics: The Army's Answer to Supply Chain Management [3]
Anticipatory logistics uses technologies, information systems, and procedures to predict and prioritize customer requirements and provide appropriate sustainment.
Future logisticians will use current and future technologies as tools to monitor supply levels and equipment conditions for combat units. They also will use decision support software to determine the best use of combat service support assets.
The Army is experimenting with the concept of anticipatory logistics for class III (petroleum, oils, and lubricants), class V (ammunition), and maintenance.
01:10
7
SCM’s components [3] SCM has seven components Corporate
Military
Suppliers
Suppliers
Procurement
Procurement
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Order management
Order management
Transportation
Transportation
Warehousing
Warehousing
Customers
Customers (soldiers)
01:10
8
SCM’s essential success factors [3] SCM has essential success factors Corporate
Military
Consumer demand
Customer needs
Information and communication technologies
Information and communication technologies
Globalization
Deployment within and outside the continental United States
Competition
Joint interoperability
Government regulations
Department of Defense regulations
Environmental concerns
Environmental concerns (to include enemy forces)
01:10
Mission requirements
9
Corporate & Army SCM models [3]
01:10
10
Corporate & Army SCM models [3] (cont’d.) Most notable significant differences are the dual directional arrows on the chart for transportation and for distribution and warehousing in the Army SCM model. These illustrate that the Army may retrograde equipment and components for maintenance or retrograde personnel for medical care. Other differences are in the external factors that affect the supply chain. These factors include Joint interoperability among the services' command, control, communications, computer, and intelligence systems. Deployment of forces. Soldier and mission requirements. The supply chain reflects the Army's focus on mission accomplishment as opposed to business' focus on profitability. 01:10
11
SCM & Anticipatory Logistics [3] Like the corporate world, the Army faces two diametrically opposing forces: 1.
The need to support combat maneuver forces better, more responsively, and at a lower cost.
2.
The need to reduce the logistics footprint of the Army's future forces.
The Army is exploring how to better support brigade combat teams (BCTs) by using some underlying SCM concepts, such as information and communication technologies, order management, and transportation using current and new technologies.
01:10
12
Some Actions for enhancing Anticipatory Logistics [3]
In an endeavor to revolutionize anticipatory logistics at the wholesale level, the Army is forming a strategic alliance with SAP to integrate and streamline the wholesale logistics process. The benefits will include a synchronized global supply, distribution, and financial network that will increase weapon system readiness and manage mission-based requirements more responsively.
The Department of Defense also is researching advanced technologies that will bring quantum improvements in joint military logistics, including force deployment, to enhance the readiness of all military forces.
01:10
13
Future of SCM & Anticipatory Logistics [3]
Industry's SCM and the Army's anticipatory logistics for supporting future combat forces are similar. Whereas anticipatory logistics concentrates on the wholesale and tactical (brigade and below levels), which is a small slice of the supply chain that culminates with the customer, SCM takes a holistic approach to the entire supply chain.
Both anticipatory logistics and SCM share various fundamental concepts in order to meet their respective goals and objectives.
The future of logistics in the Army is evolving toward a holistic approach, much like business' SCM efforts, to improve its logistics capability while reducing its logistics footprint.
01:10
14
Performance Based Logistics (PBL) [8]
PBL is a strategy for weapon system product support that meets performance goals for a weapon system through a support structure based on long-term performance agreements with clear lines of authority and responsibility.
The development and management of PBL arrangements consist of 12 discrete steps.
Each step contains directions to support the successful completion of each step, as well as supporting materials to provide users the resources they need.
01:10
15
12 Steps of PBL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
01:10
[7]
Integrate Requirements & Support Form the PBL Team Baseline the System Develop Performance Outcomes Select Product support Integrator Workload Allocation Strategy Supply Chain Management Strategy Establish Performance-Based Agreements Business Case Analysis Award Contracts Financial Enablers Implement & Oversight 16
12 Steps of PBL [7] (cont’d.)
01:10
17
PBL & SCM [4] Military supply Chain
01:10
18
DoD & SCM [4]
The DoD supply chain process encompasses those government and private-sector organizations, processes, and systems that individually or collectively play a role in planning for, acquiring, maintaining, or delivering material resources for military or other operations conducted in support of the United States national defense interests.
The common private sector terminology for those financial, administrative and flow of materials processes that achieve the steady and accurate availability of parts and goods from manufacturers to customers is commonly referred to as supply chain management.
In DoD the description of this same overarching function is more correctly termed Logistics Chain Management.
01:10
19
DoD & Supply System [4] The DoD supply system is predicated upon Wholesale and Retail supply processes, similar to the private sector.
Wholesale items are generally stored in distribution warehouses, sometimes called inventory control points. Wholesale warehouses are often collocated with Defense Depots or Integrated Materiel Management Centers or, in the case of Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) items may be stored in regional supply centers or forward located distribution points.
01:10
In many cases (i.e. DLA) the assets are not even procured or owned by the military Services.
20
DoD & Supply System [4] (cont’d.)
The retail supply systems are owned and managed by the individual military Service Departments, and are usually located at operating locations, either in the Continental United States (CONUS) or outside the United States (OCONUS). In general, all retail supply functions are operated by organic DoD personnel, including military personnel where applicable. *********
In general, the Military Departments have a strong preference for organic operation of the retail supply function. Conversely, there is no strong preference for ownership or management of wholesale supply activities.
01:10
21
Categories of supply support items in DoD [4]
Unique Reparable Items: They are usually sourced by the Prime Vendor/Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of the system.
Common Reparable Items: They are usually managed organically within the DoD materiel management process but are also candidates for corporate PBL contracts.
Unique Consumable Items: usually sourced by the Prime Vendor/OEM of the system. Strong consideration should be given to allocating responsibility for acquisition of these items to the Prime Vendor.
Common Consumable Items: These are generally managed and provided by DLA.
01:10
22
DoD & SCM [4] (cont’d.)
In the private sector, the vast majority of items transitioning through a supply chain originate as newly manufactured items, while in DoD a significant percentage of items used to meet supply requirements come from repaired items.
The differences in complexity, management, and efficiency are significant, and necessarily involve other functions primarily maintenance, which multiplies the problems of developing and executing an efficient, effective supply process.
Supply chain management in DoD is an integrated process that begins with planning the acquisition of customer-driven requirements for material and services and ends with the delivery of material to the operational customer, including the material returns/disposal segments of the process and the flow of required information in both directions among suppliers, logistics managers, and customers. [5]
01:10
23
DoD & SCM [5] (cont’d.) To supply materiel and logistics services to DoD units throughout the world, the DoD Components maintain a supply chain consisting of : weapon system support contractors, retail supply activities, distribution depots, transportation networks including contracted carriers, Military Service and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) integrated materiel managers (IMMs), weapon system program offices, commercial distributors and suppliers including manufacturers, commercial and organic maintenance facilities and other logistics activities (e.g., engineering support activities (ESAs), testing facilities, cataloging services, reutilization and marketing offices).
01:10
24
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain[4] Although efforts have been made to reflect the DoD supply chain process in the SCOR model (primarily through use of the “Make/Repair” process shown in the graphic), its use and application within DoD is still evolving.
01:10
25
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain [6] (cont’d.) The goal in planning for supply chain management is to facilitate integration between business partners, including suppliers and customers. In DoD, organizational realities and the constraint of out-moded systems and legal requirements must be taken into consideration. The challenge for DoD is to develop and maintain planning coordination and integration across organizations and over time to reduce costs, increase customer satisfaction and improve weapon system readiness.
01:10
26
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain [9] (cont’d.) In government, material sourcing involves a number of distinct, but related activities. These include: Schedule deliveries from suppliers; receive, verify, and transfer product; and authorize supplier payments. Identify and select supply sources when not predetermined, as for engineer-to-order product. Manage business rules, assess supplier performance, and maintain data. Manage inventory, capital assets, incoming product, supplier network, import/export requirements, and supplier agreements.
01:10
27
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain [10] (cont’d.) Activities included in make-repair include: Process returned items Schedule production activities, issue product, produce and test, package, stage product, and release product to deliver. Finalize engineering for engineer-to-order product. Manage rules, performance, data, in-process products (WIP), equipment and facilities, transportation, production network, and regulatory compliance for production.
01:10
28
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain [11] (cont’d.) In government, material delivery involves a number of distinct, but related activities. These include: All order management steps from processing customer inquiries and material orders to routing shipments and selecting carriers. Warehouse management from receiving and picking product to load and ship product. Transporting material from source to destination. Receive and verify product at customer site and install, if necessary. Invoicing customer. Manage Deliver business rules, performance, information, finished product inventories, capital assets, transportation, product life cycle, and import/export requirements.
01:10
29
Relating SCOR Model to DoD Logistic Chain [12] (cont’d.) In the government, a material return involves a number of distinct, but related activities. These include: Returning defective product including authorizing return; scheduling product return; receiving, verifying, and disposition of defective product; and return replacement or credit. Returning maintenance, repair & overhaul (MRO) products including authorizing and scheduling return, determining product condition, transferring product, verifying product condition, disposition, and request return authorization. Returning excess product including identifying excess inventory, scheduling shipment, receiving returns, approving request authorization, receiving excess product return in Source, verifying excess, and recover and disposition of excess product. Managing Material Returns based on business rules that include performance targets, data collection, returning inventory, capital assets, transportation, network configuration, and regulatory requirements and compliance. Whether customers are returning that materiel so it can be repaired or stored for immediate use or as excess to current needs, the time, quality, cost, and variability incurred in the return process represents value to DoD activities.
01:10
30
Revolution in Military Logistics (RML) [13]
The Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA) has stated "the transformation objective is to field a force that is strategically responsive and dominant every point on the spectrum of operations ".
This transformation challenges the Army to balance near-term readiness and force modernization in an environment of increased missions and fewer resources.
At the joint level, change started with Joint Vision 2010 and Focused Logistics; at the Army level, change started with the Revolution in Military Logistics (RML).
‘Revolution in Military Logistics’ is a concept being evolved to create a capabilitybased, modular and a flexible organization capable of anticipating and predicting logistic requirements with the creation of matching infrastructure and facilities. [16]
It proposes a dynamic, distribution-based logistic system that could be projected rapidly and operated efficiently to provide widely-distributed combat forces with uninterrupted fuel and supplies. [16]
The RML is not only central to preparing for future military operations; it is the fulcrum of the Army’s effort to balance readiness and modernization.
01:10
31
Revolution in Military Logistics [13] (cont’d.)
Army transformation is about changing the way we fight.
It is the process of converting the army’s focus and structure from a Cold War construct to a full spectrum combat force that is strategically responsive and dominant at every point on the spectrum of conflict.
It is more than technology; it’s doctrine, training, leadership, organizations, materiel readiness, installations, and soldiers.
The first wave of RML focuses on exploiting improvements in automation; communications; business practices; reshaping command and control relationships to provide better unity of command and reduced logistics footprint.
01:10
32
Revolution in Military Logistics & Automation [13]
The precision delivery of combat service support (CSS) is anticipatory; it provides significant efficiencies in both supply and distribution.
As the Army continues to streamline its operations, both in peace and in combat, a passive approach to logistics simply is not acceptable. Waiting for support is not a strategy.
To harness these economies, the Army must capture, process, and manage the disparate data and communications systems that make CSS occur.
01:10
33
Revolution in Military Logistics & Automation [13] (cont’d.)
At the heart of the CSS information system is the Global Support System-Army (GCSS-Army).
GCSS-Army is much more than a close combat coordination and CSS delivery information system. It integrates and fuses information from the factory to the foxhole - coordinating, expediting, and managing the numerous activities in between.
GCSS-Army is an evolutionary logistics information system that builds on the functions and processes of existing systems to generate data, integrate databases, and fuse CSS information from external sources as necessary to execute the RML.
GCSS-Army modernizes CSS automation through its integration of three hardware configurations, seven operating systems, eight programming languages, and five communication protocols into a single system baseline.
01:10
34
Revolution in Military Logistics & Automation [13] (cont’d.) GCSS-Army software will be delivered in a number of modules, according to the particular function needed: • • • • •
maintenance module property accountability module Ammunition and supply modules The integrated materiel management center (IMMC) module management module
Without doubt, GCSS-Army is an ambitious program. But it is well within the bounds of current technological capabilities and war fighting doctrine.
01:10
35
Revolution in Military Logistics & Communications [13] A seamless logistics system that ties all parts of the logistics community into one network of shared situational awareness and unified action can be achieved only in an environment dominated by global, wireless, assured communications. Global wireless communications will provide soldiers the capability to reach and "see" virtually anywhere on the battlefield or in the world. These technologies can provide the capability to receive, transmit, store, and retrieve information in a single seamless logistics system supporting a modern force in tomorrow's Army: • • • • 01:10
Putting up more satellites Increase the speed of information flow Competition for market share Battery life 36
Revolution in Military Logistics & Best Business Practices [13]
Methodologies and applications used in private industry that elevate a commercial enterprise above the competition are referred to as "commercial best practices.“
Best practices enable leading-edge organizations to deliver world-class standards of performance to their customers.
The emergence of commercial best practices took place because of downsizing and a hunger for profitability, or doing more with less, so it stands to reason that there could be a great deal of benefit to Army implementation of these best practices.
01:10
37
Revolution in Military Logistics & Best Business Practices [13] (cont’d.) These technologies can provide the capability to receive, transmit, store, and retrieve information in a single seamless logistics system supporting a modern force in tomorrow's Army: • • • • • • •
01:10
Integrated supply chain management, Industry's changing view of logistics, Electronic commerce, Automated identification technology, Direct vendor delivery, load optimization, Outsourcing, Smart simple design
38
Revolution in Military Logistics & Army Support Provider (ASP) [13] The Army Materiel Command (AMC) will transform into a more responsive Army Support Provider (ASP). This ASP will ensure:
sustainability is designed into future systems with enormous improvements in reliability, availability, and maintainability;
a single command, control, communication, computers/information and technology architecture provides logistics information at all levels;
centralized contracting information is always available;
embedded diagnostics/prognostics and Automatic Identification Technology (AIT).
01:10
39
Revolution in Military Logistics & Single Stock Fund (SSF) [13] The Single Stock Fund (SSF) was a Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), initiative to reengineer inventory management functions and associated financial processes throughout the Army.
Once completed, the SSF will consolidate management of current wholesale, theater, corps/installation, and division authorized stockage list inventories into a seamless logistics and financial system, thus creating a single, virtual supply and maintenance organization.
SSF is fundamental to achieving the Revolution in Military Logistics.
01:10
40
Revolution in Military Logistics & Infrastructure and Reduced Logistical Footprint [13] The RML requires increased agility in a number of dimensions. Army logistics will have to become more agile - structurally, physically, and mentally -in order to cope with the demands of dynamic RML support to the agile and mobile forces of the Objective Force, the goal of the current Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA). •
Structural agility will be accomplished through total integration of all Army components, as well as incorporation of support teams from other services, allies, and the Army's partners in industry to meet the demands of specific missions.
•
Physical agility enhances the ability to deploy and maneuver the operational infrastructure of the distribution-based logistics system.
•
Mental agility refers to attitude. RML logistics is fast logistics. All logistics managers in the supply chain need to think several steps ahead, all of the time.
Acquisition AGLITY is a key Army goal in RML
01:10
41
Revolution in Military Logistics & Distribution-Based Logistics [13]
The operational concept Distribution-based logistics (DBL) relies on distribution velocity and precision, rather than redundant supply mass, to provide responsive support to war fighters.
DBL will comprise a system of innovative policies, doctrine and concepts; reengineered logistic functional processes; redesigned organizations; new materiel systems with embedded sensors and prognostics; advanced information, decision-support and command and control systems; and well-led, highly trained soldiers and civilians to operate and manage it.
It reduces the mass required to compensate for the lethal uncertainties of war by reducing uncertainty across the Joint Theater. DBL rests on three pillars: visibility, capacity, and control.
01:10
42
Revolution in Military Logistics & Distribution-Based Logistics [13] (cont’d.)
Visibility: The acquisition of near real-time situational understanding, or visibility, has been a major objective of Force XXI. Visibility can be grouped into three major categories. First, there is visibility of the supported war fighting units, The second category of visibility is logistic capabilities and constraints, The third category of visibility includes logistic requirements and priorities to the supporting organizations at the theater and strategic levels.
Capacity: The logistics force must have the physical capacity to act on the knowledge provided by real time visibility. This includes the array of materiel systems: the lean but adequate inventories; road, rail and facilities infrastructure; and skilled personnel.
Control: Some of the most important logistics modernization efforts fall under the tenet of control. These include the tactical force structure of the brigade combat teams; the theater support command; and the single seamless Army logistics organization, the Army Readiness Command.
01:10
43
Integration of Electronic Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic Setting A conceptual approach [14]
The main goal of this paper is to examine briefly the current EC scenario for DND and to present a conceptual framework to develop an EC system in a military logistic environment.
They are four dimensions to any EC model: ¾ Type of market: B2C (Business-to-Commerce) , B2B (Business-toBusiness), and C2C (Consumer-to-Consumer) ¾ Type of product: physical goods, information content, and services ¾ Environment: Web-based, brick and mortar ¾ Geographic: regional, national, and international.
B2B can consist of a variety of possible activities such as E-procurement, Expense Management systems (EMS), and Supply Chain Management (SCM).
01:10
44
E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic [14] (cont’d.) Business processes in a military logistic system
Traditional communication media such as phone calls, fax, and purchase orders by mail are used to purchase goods.
Goods are shipped to the customer, verified, and stored. The output of this process is an invoice.
Consistent product catalogs are sometimes unavailable and an inefficient order entry (fax, mail, etc.) takes place. Long delivery times occur and processing costs increase.
01:10
45
E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic [14] (cont’d.) Useful technologies for the development and integration of Open EC Systems
If an organization works with members of its supply chain in an electronic fashion, a number of benefits can accrue.
Military business units have to be an early adopter of B2B systems, with open buying on the Internet, to do sound business in electronic markets.
Figure presents the technologies that are needed to support the electronic business processes in military logistic systems.
01:10
46
E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic [14] (cont’d.) Relationship between DND's business entities and business partners
DND needs an EC portal on the Internet to establish a B2B commerce environment with its business partners. There should be a standard EC framework for secure and interoperable B2B Web commerce (Internet Consortium). These electronic linkages can tighten the chain by making it quicker, more accurate, more reliable and/or more secure.
01:10
47
E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic [14] (cont’d.) Important determinants to consider during the development of EC systems describe the factors that stakeholders (DND, Top Government Officers) and end users should consider while developing and building military EC systems.
01:10
48
E-Commerce in a Canadian Military Logistic [14] (cont’d.) Evaluation framework for the EC system
Two key features should characterize the back-end evaluation function for the EC system as presented in Figure: ¾ A continuous formative evaluation during the development and implementation of the EC system assuring the quality of the Web-based electronic markets for business entities in DND. ¾ A summative evaluation process during the post-implementation operation of the EC system to assure a 100%-quality assurance.
The main goal of the evaluation program is to assess the 'real' outcomes of the EC subsystem
01:10
49
Can Finnish Defense Forces (FDF) Benchmark U.S. Military to meet its logistics needs? [15]
Finland's neighboring countries are Sweden, Norway, and Russia. Finland has a population of 5.2 million. Finland's security policy is based on nonparticipation in military alliances and on a credible national defense. Finland participates in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace program. Finland's military doctrine is based on a territorial defense that will be adjusted to meet future threats. The strength of the wartime FDF is 470,000 men; this will be reduced to 350,000 men by the year 2008.
01:10
50
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15]
The new, asymmetric battlefield creates new requirements for logistics systems. Many countries and their armed forces face the same challenges: reorganizing the armed forces and reducing defense budgets. The dilemma all nations face is whether to change their military logistics systems or to depend on old principles and doctrines. As U.S. Army logistics is being transformed as a part of the Revolution in Military Affairs, Many nations look to the United States for guidance. As U.S. National Security Strategy and National Military Strategy, the U.S. Armed Forces must respond to the full spectrum of crises all over the world. Both logistics systems must be able to provide support operations at home, overseas, and during international crises.
The FDF focuses mainly on logistics operations on its own soil and the U.S. Army concentrates on operations abroad.
01:10
51
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.)
The tools to achieve effectiveness and efficiency are the characteristics of logistics shown in the table below:
Comparison of Logistics Characteristics
01:10
52
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.) The comparison of U.S., Finnish, and business logistics characteristics in the table shows that : The basic meanings behind different terms are almost the same. The U.S. Army's logistics functions are clearer. The U.S. and FDF military logistics characteristics with business logistics characteristics reveals that they are very much alike. No contradictions, so the direction of development appears to be the same among them all. The characteristics of the FDF are comparable, although they are expressed in different, less concise terms.
01:10
53
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.) An analysis of the comparison reveals that the FDF needs to update two characteristics:
The first is survivability-the ability of CSS elements to prevail in the face of potential destruction and the ability to protect support functions. One way to reinforce the FDF's logistics survivability is to increase the combat capabilities of its CSS units when reviewing their organization and equipment.
The second characteristic that the FDF needs to update is integration. CSS operations must be synchronized with all aspects of operations. The national logistics system must be able to support international operations without special arrangements. Although the FDF has a long history of sending units to peacekeeping missions around the world, the support system does not respond fully to today's requirements for rapid reaction and force deployment.
01:10
54
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.) Comparison of Logistics Functions
01:10
55
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.)
The CSS functions of the FDF are similar to U.S. Army logistics functions. (See the table above.) The main difference is that combat health is a logistics function for the FDF and a personnel function for the U.S. Army.
The old system was based on independent branches of logistics, such as ordnance.
The new logistics functions are supply, combat health, field services, maintenance, and transportation.
The effects of this change are widespread and create the need to streamline many things.
Areas needing improvement include not only manuals but also CSS unit organizations, the ideology of older logisticians who are used to doing things the old way, and CSS personnel training systems.
01:10
56
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.)
The FDF supply classification system correlates with the U.S. Army classification only in principle, because the FDF uses neither the U.S. Army supply class system nor the NATO classification system.
The supply classification system is an integral part of the supply system.
Making the FDF supply system compatible with U.S. or NATO systems undoubtedly would increase its usefulness.
01:10
57
Comparison FDF & U.S. Military Logistics [15] (cont’d.) A fundamental difference between FDF and U.S. Army ideology is the method the FDF uses to support its combat forces. The main principle of U.S. Army logistics doctrine is to release operational commanders from worrying about logistics arrangements by giving the responsibility to logisticians. Army's organizational modularity makes it possible to provide interchangeable and tailor able units to meet changing needs. In the FDF, the commander has total responsibility at all levels, which is why organizations at brigade and below are fixed. They are also more logistically independent, because forward support battalion-level capability is built into the brigade organization. This [FDF’s approach] has proved to be a foresighted strategy since it is the direction the U.S. Army is taking in developing new concepts to respond to future challenges. U.S. CSS units above brigade level are not fully modular and therefore are not fully able to respond to tomorrow's requirements. 01:10
58
Case Study: Iran’s NEZAJA Logistics Model
59
ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اي ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻟﺸﻜﺮي ½ ﺳﺘﺎد و ارﻛﺎن ½ ﮔﺮدان ﻧﮕﻬﺪاري و ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮات ½ ﮔﺮدان ﺑﻬﺪاﺷﺖ و درﻣﺎن ½ ﮔﺮدان ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ½ ﮔﺮدان آﻣﺎد و ﺗﺮاﺑﺮي ½ زاﻏﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺎت ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻴﭗ /ﮔﺮدان /ﮔﺮوﻫﺎن /دﺳﺘﻪ
01:10
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ از ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ
60
01:10
References [1]. URL: http://www.answers.com/topic/military-supply-chain-management-1Wikipedia from DoD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms [2]. URL: http://www.answers.com/topic/military-logisticsWikipedia [3]. URL: http://www.almc.army.mil/ALOG/issues/SepOct02/MS774.htm [4]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=32523 [5]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46502 [6]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46490 [7]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=22412 from jp4-09 [8]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=32529 [9]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46491 [10]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46492 [11]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46493 [12]. URL: https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=46494 [13]. Aundre F. Piggee, ‘Transformation – Revolution in Military Logistics’ , USAWC strategy research project, U.S. Army War College CARLISLE BARRACKS, PENNSYLVANIA 17013 [14]. URL: http://www.rmc.ca/academic/busadm/staff/stpierre/research/icis2000_e.html [15]. URL: http://www.almc.army.mil/ALOG/issues/JanFeb03/MS788.htm
01:10
61