Sample Ballot

SAMPLE BALLOT COORDINATED ELECTION OFFICIAL BALLOT SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO November 3, 2009 SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1 SCHOOL DIRECTOR AT-LARGE FOUR YEAR TERM (Vote for THREE) Sheila Groneman Guy William Pacot J Kent McHose Janelle R. (Jan) Losh Margaret Carlson Barrie J. Stimson Cathe Sander T. Antonieta Butler

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

WEST GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT #1-JT SCHOOL BOARD DIRECTOR AT-LARGE FOUR YEAR TERM (Vote for FOUR ) □ □ □ □ □

Susan Ritschard Christina Whitmer Audrey Gasvoda Timothy Thomson Brendan Gale

WEST GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT #1-JT SCHOOL BOARD DIRECTOR AT-LARGE TWO YEAR TERM (Vote for ONE ) □ □

David Skinner Brett Davidson

‘Ballot issues referred by the general assembly or any political subdivision are listed by letter, and ballot issues initiated by the people are listed numerically. A ‘yes’ vote on any ballot issue is a vote in favor of changing current law or existing circumstances, and a ‘no’ vote on any ballot issue is a vote against changing current law or existing circumstances.’ TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE PROPOSED REFERRED TABOR MEASURE: 2A (Vote Yes or No) SHALL THE TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE, COLORADO, WITHOUT CREATING ANY NEW TAX OR INCREASING ANY CURRENT TAXES, BE PERMITTED TO RETAIN AND SPEND THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE TOWN TAXES, GRANTS AND ALL OTHER REVENUE COLLECTED FROM ALL SOURCES INCLUDING ALL REVENUE RECEIVED IN 2010 AND EACH SUBSEQUENT YEAR, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY REVENUE OR EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONS INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION? □ Yes □ No

TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 2B (Vote Yes or No) Shall the Home Rule Charter of the Town of Silverthorne, Colorado, be amended to provide that the Regular Town Elections shall be held on the first Tuesday in April commencing in the year 2010, and in each even numbered year thereafter? Yes No

TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 2C (Vote Yes or No) Shall Section 2.7 of the Home Rule Charter of the Town of Silverthorne, Colorado, concerning nomination petitions be repealed in its entirety thereby defaulting to the requirements of State Statute? Yes No TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT NO. 2D (Vote Yes or No) Shall Section 2.8 of the Home Rule Charter of the Town of Silverthorne, Colorado, concerning Notice of Election be repealed in its entirety thereby defaulting to the requirements of State Statute? Yes

No

TOWN OF MONTEZUMA BALLOT QUESTION 2E (Vote Yes or No) “SHALL THE TOWN OF MONTEZUMA, COLORADO, WITHOUT CREATING ANY NEW TAX, BE PERMITTED TO RETAIN AND SPEND THE FULL AMOUNT OF TOWN TAXES, GRANTS AND ALL OTHER REVENUE COLLECTED FROM ALL SOURCES, COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2009 AND CONTINUING THEREAFTER, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY REVENUE OR EXPENDITURE LIMITATIONS INCLUDING THOSE CONTAINED IN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION (TABOR) AND C.R.S. § 29-1-301 (THE 5.5% PROPERTY TAX REVENUE GROWTH CAP)?” Yes No

TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE BALLOT QUESTION 2F (Vote Yes or No) Shall the electors of the Town of Breckenridge adopt an amendment to the Breckenridge Town Code, effective January 1, 2010, removing all criminal penalties under Town law for the possession of one ounce or less of marijuana and related paraphernalia by persons twenty-one years of age or older? □ Yes □ No WEST GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.1-JT. REFERRED QUESTION 3A ADDITIONAL MILL LEVY: (Vote YES or NO)

SHALL WEST GRAND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1-JT TAXES BE INCREASED $419,000 IN TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2010, AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES TO BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF EDUCATION WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO FUNDING NEW COSTS NECESSARY FOR LOWERING CLASS SIZES IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, EXPANDING EDUCATIONAL OFFERINGS SUCH AS VOCATIONAL AND CAREER AT THE HIGH SCHOOL, FUNDING NEW COSTS FOR TECHNOLOGY, AND FUNDING NECESSARY FACILITY MAINTENANCE, BY AN ADDITIONAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY AT A RATE SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED ABOVE, WHICH TAXES SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE DISTRICT, SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO ANY PROPERTY TAXES THAT OTHERWISE COULD BE LEVIED FOR THE GENERAL FUND, SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF ANY OTHER TAX LEVY WHETHER OR NOT APPROVED BY THE VOTERS, AND SHALL CONSTITUTE A VOTER APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE THAT MAY BE COLLECTED AND SPENT WITHOUT FURTHER VOTER APPROVAL, NOTWITHSTANDING THE LIMITATIONS OF ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR ANY OTHER LAW? Yes No