Experience transfer Safety Alerts Svein Flogeland Product Manager, Offshore Class DNV Technical seminar on Mobile Offshore Units Mumbai, February 15th 2008
Damages and incidents
Damages like cracks and indentations as well as incidents with potential for serious injury or loss of life are reported to the central units supporting DNV’s classed MOUs in operation
Damages are logged in a data base and used for improvement of Inservice Inspection programs on a continuous basis
Incidents are analysed for root cause often in co-operation with Owners
Experience which may serve to prevent simlar incidents in the future are communicated with Owners at our annual Rig Owners’ Committee meetings as well as with surveyors at the annual Rig Co-ordinators’ Colloquium
Safety alerts may be issued directly to Owners and through IACS if a damage or incident is considered serious with likelihood of appearing also on other, similar units
Version
Some examples of incidents The following incidents have happened over the last year:
Aker H3 Cracks
Bolt Corrosion on Shuttle Valve on BOP
Excessive friction in fairlead
Insulation of Hot Surfaces
Near Casualty during Tank Inspections
Explosion in Ballast Tank
Steam piping failure
Version
Recent Experience – One Arrangement
Version
Recent Experience – Another Arrangement
Version
Crack revealed after removal of bracket
Crack under fillet
Version
BOP Shuttle Valve Failure
While testing the functions on a subsea BOP, North Sea 2005, a shear ram shuttle valve failed, reducing the BOP functionality considerably.
On pulling the BOP, it was noted that bolts holding the shuttle valve body together had sheared off.
Bolts were sent to the DNV Laboratory in Oslo for analysis.
Bolts sheared at points A & B
Version
BOP Shuttle Valve Failure Results from the laboratory analysis were:
Fractured bolts were low-alloy steel (CrMo type) meeting the mechanical requirements for ISO 898-1, Class 12.9. A thin layer of baked epoxy for corrosion control was noted.
Valve body and endplate found to be AISI 303. These steels notoriously susceptible to corrosion in marine environments. DNV advise against use of such grades in potentially corrosive environment, including fluids for hydraulic control systems that may become contaminated by seawater.
The failure mechanism was found to be stress corrosion cracking (SCC). High strength steels with SMYS > 1,000 MPa are generally recognised as susceptible to SCC also in absence of stimulators for hydrogen absorption such as H2S.
DNV recommend a maximum strength of bolts for subsea applications corresponding to Property Class 8/8 or 9/8 (i.e. UTS 800MPa and 900 MPa).
DNV recommend bolting carefully looked at during subsea BOP overhauls.
Version
Loss of winching power due to friction
Unit carried out renewal survey
Operator demanded ‘acceptance test’ of winches
Test showed that up to 50% pulling power was lost at lower fairlead
Owners should look carefully at available ‘pulling power’ as a lot of safety cases assume unit can winch off location up wind in an emergency
Version
New Pinion
Version
Fairlead Pinion damage
Version
Fairlead Pinion Bearing Damage
Version
Insulation of hot surfaces
Oil leakage hitting hot spots on engines is the most common cause of engine room fires
More than 60% of all engine room fires have been initiated by a hot spot
DNV and IACS requires all Surfaces above 220°C to be insulated to avoid ignition of flammable liquids
SOLAS Ch II-2 Reg 15.2.10 implemented July 1998 introduced same rule
Version
Hot surfaces Common trouble areas are:
-Indicator valves
-Cut outs for pressure/temperature sensors
-Cylinder covers
-Exhaust pipe from each cylinder
-Transition in to exhaust manifold
-Exhaust manifold, in particular overlaps between steel sheets and laggings
-Foundation and lifting lugs on exhaust ducts and manifolds
-Turbochargers, in particular flanges to such
-Boilers Version
Version
Version
Recent Fire due to Missing Shielding
Ignition area of the fire close to noninsulated area
Ventilation helped spread the fuel onto the hot exposed surface of the turbocharger flange
Missing shielding to protect air intake
Fuel leaked from the gasket of the fuel filter
Version
Conclusion
More emphasis will be taken on surveys of insulation of engines
During renewal surveys if surveyor suspects problems, more thorough evaluation may be required. - Use of laserbased Infrared Heat Tracers - Infrared Thermoscanning Video Equipment
Version
Near casualty during Surveys
Normal precautions had been carried out - Gas freed - Watch man posted
Team prepared to enter tank
As they adjusted eyes (tropical daylight to dark tank), they realised grating on platform was not in position.
Version
Picture of tank access
Version
Picture of Tank Access
Version
Recommendations
New safe working procedures recommended, including reference in access checklists to check grating is in place.
A warning signboard placed inside each hatch coaming WARNING! BEFORE ENTERING THE TANK, MAKE SURE THAT THE HINGED GRATING PLATFORM IS IN CLOSED POSITION.
Version
Explosion in Ballast Tank Course of Events
Repair job in a pre load tank
Workers using gas torch
During a break, the gas torch valves were closed
Workers return from break and tank explodes when torch is ignited
2 workers seriously burned, one died in hospital
Version
Explosion in Ballast Tank Probable Cause
Most probable cause was ignition of gas coming from gas torch
Investigation revealed valve on torch was not tight, gas had accumulated in the tank during the break as there was no proper ventilation
Version
Explosion in Ballast Tank Lessons Learned
The conditions for the issuance of a hot work permit can change quickly and need regular follow up
Continuous ventilation should be a condition of the permit. This may have prevented or reduced the accumulation of gas
Gas equipment should be well maintained
Isolation of gas torch should include isolation of gas bottles
Version
Steam piping failure
During a conversion of a Tanker to FPSO a 10” cross-over steam pipeline was installed between an existing boiler in the machinery space and a new process boiler on the process deck area
Version
Steam piping failure
The cross-over line suffered from two instances of malfunction during service 1. A tee-piece cracked during commissioning. Pipe stress analysis showed that the tee-piece had been exposed for very high stresses (displacement stresses), which was due to limited flexibility in the piping system 2. An expansion joint (belly) was wrongly installed (tie-rods had not been released), in combination with the fact that no “line stop” or “anchor” support was installed to “direct” the thermal expansion in the axial direction towards the expansion joint. The result was that the expansion joint tie-rods were ripped off (as a combination of pressure thrust forces and thermal displacement forces). The line moved approx. 250mm off position until it stopped against a bulkhead.
Version
Steam piping failure
Version
Steam piping failure
Version
Steam piping failure
The risk potential of this incident was very high. Four people were working in the machinery space, close to the expansion joint when this happen. Luckily the expansion joint (belly) did not rupture, if that had happen the four workers most likely had been killed.
Lesson learned 1. When doing newbuilding- or ”As-carried out” survey of steam piping systems inspect closely expansion joints (belly type) in order to secure that the tierods is properly released. Remove insulation if necessary 2. Inspect that supports and anchors are installed according to approved drawings 3. Note that expansion loops are recommended in preference to expansion joints (belly type) 4. If any doubt of pipe line integrity, contact OUiO, Høvik
Version
Steam piping failure
The steam pipe was repaired changing out the tee-piece and changing the expansion joint (belly type) with expansion loop. Additonal supports were installed.
Version
Version