Association for Learning Technology Journal Confidential Reviewer’s comments 1. Paper title: 2. Reviewer’s recommendation: Accept subject to minor amendments The article is suitable for publication but requires some corrections or small additions. Accept subject to major amendments This article is suitable for publication but some sections require re-working.
Recommend major amendments and resubmission This article has the potential to be suitable for publication, but re-working of some or all sections of the paper is required. The extent of the required revisions necessitates resubmission and rereview. Reject The article is unsuitable for publication in ALT-J.
3. General points about the paper: Please write Yes, No or Not Applicable and add brief comments where appropriate. Have the aims of the paper been clearly stated and met?
Are the key terms and concepts adequately defined?
Is the content logically developed with a beginning, middle and end? Do the conclusions relate logically to the results/discussion?
Is the content relevant, timely or “cutting-edge”?
Does the paper make a significant contribution to the learning technology field?
Is there any relevant literature that has not been cited? (please list at end of this report)
Are the references complete and in the correct format? (If no, please list which references are incomplete/incorrect at the end of this report)
ALT-J Reviewers Feedback Form Page 1, Updated January 2006
4. Specific comments on the paper Please refer to the Reviewers Guidelines. Comments should provide an overview of the overall standard of written work and indicate the strengths and weaknesses of the paper. Where appropriate, comments specific to each of the sections within the paper should also be included.
5. Confidentiality Please tick I understand that this review is given on a confidential basis and will be shared only between myself, the ALT- J editors and the article authors.
ALT-J Reviewers Feedback Form Page 2, Updated January 2006