Revfy2010cfsa-072009

  • Uploaded by: Susie Cambria
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Revfy2010cfsa-072009 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 580
  • Pages: 3
Susie Cambria, MSW Public Policy Consulting Changes to Child and Family Services Agency in Revised FY 2010 Budget as Proposed by Mayor Fenty (Publication Date 7/20/09)

July 17, 2009 CFSA Gap Closing Actions by Program Program

Budget Change

FTE Change

Agency Management Program (AMP)

-502

0

Child Welfare Program (CWP)

-585

0

Community-Based Program (CBP)

-1,261

0

Out-of-Home Care and Support Services (OCS) Adoption and Guardianship Subsidy Program (AGSP) Total

-3,734 -1,865

0 0

-7,947

0

July 17, 2009 CFSA Gap Closing Actions by Program -502, 6% -1,865, 23%

-585, 7% AMP

-1,261, 16%

CWP CBP OCS AGSP

-3,734, 48%

CFSA Gap Closing Actions Proposed by Mayor Fenty July 17, 2009 Gap Closing

Program

Budget Change

FTE Change

Align employee transportation services with utilization

AMP

-94

0

Cost savings from reduction in IT consulting contracts

AMP

-318

0

Terminate MOU with DCHR due to services no longer used

AMP

-217

0

Reduction in budget for court supervision

AMP

-67

0

Cost savings in staff training Subtotal Agency Management Program

AMP

-23 -502

0 0

Align abscondance contract with utilization and competitive bid

CWP

-201

0

Reduction in costs for parent advocate program

CWP

-10

0

(Transfer-in) Eliminate transfer of funds to Department of Disability Services for family group decision making

CWP

100

0

Reduce one-time designated grants Subtotal Child Welfare Program

CWP

-474 -585

0 0

CBP

-1,261

0

-1,261

0

Align Collaborative contracts with historic utilization and trends in service need Subtotal Community-Based Program Reduction in administrative costs associated with home licensing for out-of-District placements

OCS

-183

0

Reduction in Foster Parent Association contract

OCS

-15

0

Align Rapid Housing Program with historical Cost savings in contract for non-special education transportation services

OCS OCS

-490 -71

0 0

Cost savings from paid tutoring services while maintaining same level of services

OCS

-500

0

Standardize group home rates to align with actual cost for services

OCS

1,520

0

Standardize foster home rates to align with actual cost for services

OCS

-3,995

0

-3,734

0

Subtotal Out-of-Home Care and Support Align adoption subsidies with historical budget and projected need

AGSP

-1,000

0

Maintain sustainable funding level to Grandparents Subsidy Program

AGSP

-865

0

-1,865

0

Subtotal Adoption and Guardianship Subsidy Program

CFSA’s approach to the gap-closing is one that focuses on core practice, aligning funding and work where they are demonstrated to be needed. Thus: • The approach CFSA took to the gap closing effort was to focus on core practice, ensuring services improve child safety, permanence, and well-being and strengthening families needing support. • Making reductions in indirect service area that will have only a minimal impact on services for children, youth and families. • Budget reductions are shared internally and externally. • CFSA continues to analyze contracted services expenditures, seeking to understand variances in price for comparable services so that is can make adjustments (standardize) in the various placement types. • CFSA will achieve a $1.3 million reduction in contracts with the communitybased Collaboratives, aligning resources with historic utilization and service need trends. • The new adoption subsidy mark is in line with historical levels and projected need. • Proposal allocates funding more in line with historical figures and potential in the future to maintain services rather than disrupt services with large increases one year and decreases the next. The “Gap-Closing Initiatives” narrative in the budget documents does not reflect the changes which were actually made/proposed. The narrative will be corrected in the budget that goes to the Hill.

More Documents from "Susie Cambria"