Referance
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Referance as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,475
- Pages: 51
Table 1 Showing Age level
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Below 25 26-35 36 to 45 Above 45 Total
No of Respondents 5 12 10 3 30
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents are in age group of below 25. • 40% of the respondents are in age group of 26 to 35. • 33% of the respondents are in age group of 36 to 45. • 10% of the respondents are in age group of above 45.
Percentage of Respondents 17 40 33 10 100
Chart 1 Showing Age Classification
Below 25
26-35
36 to 45
Above 45
Table 2 Showing Qualification of Employees
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source UG PG Professional Others Total
No of Respondents 14 17 4 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 47 23 13 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 47% of the respondents are under graduates. • 23% of the respondents are post graduates. • 13% of the respondents are professional qualified. • 17% of the respondents are have responded other qualifications.
Chart 2 Showing Qualification of Employees.
17
47
13
23
UG
PG
Professional
Others
Table 3 Showing Monthly Income
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Below 5000 5000 to 10000 10000 to 15000 Above 15000 Total
No of Respondents 5 7 15 3 30
Percentage of Respondents 17 23 50 10 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents earn less than Rs.5000. • 23% of the respondents earn between Rs.5000 to Rs.10000. • 50% of the respondents earn between Rs.10000 to Rs.15,000. • 10% of the respondent earn more than Rs.15000.
Chart 3 Showing Monthly Income
50 50 40 30
23 17
20
10 10 0
1
Below 5000
5000 to 10000
10000 to 15000
Above 15000
Table 4 Showing Period of Service in the Organization
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Less than 2 years 2 to 5 years 2 to 10 years Above 10 years Total
No of Respondents 6 11 8 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 20 37 26 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 20% of the respondents have less than 2 years of service in the organization. • 37% of the respondents have 2 to 5 years of service in the organization. • 26% of the respondents have 5 to 10 years of service in the organization. • 17% of the respondents have above 10 years of service in the organization.
Chart 4 Showing Period of Service In The Organization
17
20
26
37 Less than 2 years
2 to 5 years
2 to 10 years
Above 10 years
Table 5 Showing Period of Departmentations.
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Marketing Dept. Finance Dept. Human Resources Service Dept. Total
No of Respondents 7 5 12 6 30
Percentage of Respondents 23 17 40 20 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 23% of the respondents are from Marketing department. • 17% of the respondents are from finance department. • 40% of the respondents are from Human Resource department. • 20% of the respondents are from Service department.
Chart 5 Showing Period of Departmentation
20
23
17 40
Marketing Dept.
Finance Dept.
Human Resources
Service Dept.
Table 6 Showing Factors Contributing Toward Job Satisfaction
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Salary & Parks Recognition Work Atmosphere Superior – Subordinate relationship Total
No of Respondents 9 10 5
Percentage of Respondents 30 33 17
6 30
20 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 30% of the respondents are satisfied because of salary • 33% of the respondents are satisfied due to recognition. • 17% of the respondents are satisfied by work atmosphere • 20% of them are happy with their job because of superior- subordinate relationship.
Chart 6 Showing Factors Contributing Towards Job Satisfaction
20 30
17
33 Salary & Parks Recognition Work Atmosphere Superior - Subordinate relationship
Table 7
Showing System of Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Promotion Transfer Training Pay Fixation Total
No of Respondents 18 4 3 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 60 13 10 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents responded that promotion is the appraisal system to be adopted in the organization. • 10% of the respondents responded that training is the appraisal system adopted. • 13% of the respondents responded that transfer is the appraisal system adopted. • 17% of the respondents responded that paying fixation is the appraisal system adopted.
Chart 7 Showing System of Appraisal
70 60
60
50 40 30 20
13
10
17 10
0 Promotion
Transfer
Training
Pay Fixation
Table 8 Showing Factors of Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Performance/ Target Completion Leadership Skills Loyalty Abilities & Skills Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
15 5 7 3 30
60 17 23 10 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents responded that performance/target completion is common factor of appraisal. • 17% of the respondents responded for leadership skills. • 23% of the respondents responded for loyalty. • 10% of the respondents for abilities and skills.
Chart 8 Showing Factors of Appraisal
10 23 60 17
Performance/ Target Completion Leadership Skills Loyalty Abilities & Skills
Table 9 Showing Completion of Projects Classification
S.No.
Source 1 Yes 2 No Total
No of Respondents 23 7 30
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 77% of the respondents responses are favorable. • 23% of the respondents responses are unfavorable.
Percentage of Respondents 77 23 100
Chart 9 Showing Completion of Project Classification
23
77
Yes
No
Table 10 Showing the factors of motivation
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making Total
No of Respondents 10 10 5
Percentage of Respondents 33 33 17
5 30
17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 33% of the respondents responded for allowances and bonus as the factors of motivation. • 17% of the respondents responded of recognition and greater responsibility.
Chart 10 Showing Factors of Motivation
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
33
33
17
17
1 Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making
Table 11 Showing the Training Methods
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Rotation of Position Special Projects Special Course & Lecturers Management Games Total
No of Respondents 7 11
Percentage of Respondents 23 37
12 0 30
40 0 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred • 23% of the respondents responded for rotation of position. • 37% of the respondents responded for special projects. • 40% of the respondents responded for special courses & lectures as the training methods adopted and none of them responded for management games.
Chart 11 Showing the Training Methods
0 23 40
37
Rotation of Position
Special Projects
Special Course & Lecturers
Management Games
Table 12 Showing superiors Guidance
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Paper Guidance Support Encouragement Others Total
No of Respondents 13 5 7 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 43 17 23 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 43% of the respondents responded for proper guidance by superiors help them in improving their performance. • 17% of the respondents said support. • 23% of the respondents said Encouragement and 17% of the respondents said for others.
Chart 12 Showing Superiors Guidance
50 45
43
40 35 30 23
25 17
20
17
15 10 5 0 Paper Guidance
Support
Encouragement
Others
Table 13 Showing Company’s Decision – Making Process
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Organization decision Group Decision Operative decision None of these Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
4 14 4 8 30
13 47 13 27 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 1% of the respondents are involved in organization decision. • 47% of the respondents are involved in group decision. • 13% of the respondents are involved in operative decision.
• 27% of the respondents are not involved in any decision – making process.
Chart 13 Showing Company’s Decision – Making Process
47
50 45 40 35
27
30 25 20 15
13
13
10 5 0 Organization decision
Group Decision
Table 14
Operative decision
None of these
Showing Selection Techniques
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Written Exams Tests Business Games Interviews Total
No of Respondents 10 0 0 20 30
Percentage of Respondents 33 0 0 67 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 33% of the respondents for written exams. • 67% of the respondents said that interview is the selection technique adopted by the company.
Chart 14 Showing Selection Techniques
33
0
67
0
Written Exams
Tests
Business Games
Interviews
Table 15 Showing Usage of Abilities and Skills
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Decision making Greater responsibility Identifying training and development needs None of these Total
No of Respondents 3 7
Percentage of Respondents 10 23
5 15 30
17 50 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 23% of the respondents responded for greater responsibility. • 17% of the respondents responded for Identifying Training & Development needs. • 50% of the respondents said that their abilities & skills are not properly used.
Chart 15 Showing Usage of Abilities and Skills
50 50 40 23
30 20
17
10
10 0
1 Decision making Greater responsibility Indentifying training and development needs None of these
Table 16 Showing Classification of Transfer
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Transfer due to vacancy Promotion Transfer Request Transfer Compulsory Transfer Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
6 14 5 5 30
20 46 17 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 20% of the respondents responded for transfer due to vacancy. • 46% of the respondents responded that promotion transfer is the need for transferring an employee. • 17% of the respondents responded for request transfer. • 17% of the respondents responded for compulsory transfer.
Chart 16 Showing Classification of Transfer
17
20
17
46
Transfer due to vacancy Request Transfer
Promotion Transfer Compulsory Transfer
Table 3 Showing Monthly Income
Table 17 Showing Classification of Alternative Solution to Problems and Challenges
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Challenges the solution Dismisses it as nonviable Accepts it half heartedly Expresses doubt about it Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
5
17
7
23
8
27
10 30
33 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents responded that their superior challenges the solution. • 23% of the respondents responded that their superior dismisses the suggestions as non viable. • 27% of the respondents responded that their superior accepts it half heartedly. • 33% of the respondents responded that their superior expresses doubt about the suggestions and ideas given to them.
Chart 17 Showing Classification of Alternative Solution to Problems and
35 30
27 23
25 20
33
Challenges
17
15 10 5 0 Challenges Dismisses it Accepts it Expresses the solution as nonhalf doubt about viable heartedly it
Table 18 Showing how Frequently Appraisal done
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Monthly Quarterly Half Yearly Annually
No of Respondents 0 5 5 20
Percentage of Respondents 0 17 17 66
Total
30
100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents said that appraisal is done either quarterly & half yearly. • 66% of the respondents said that appraisal is done annually.
Chart 18 Showing how Frequently Appraisal done
66
70 60 50 40 30 20
17
17
10 0
Quarterly
Half Yearly
Table 19
Annually
Showing Classification of Present System of appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Employee Promotion Effective relationship between subordinate and superior Greater Authority No discrimination Total
No of Respondents 18
Percentage of Respondents 60
7 5 0 30
23 17 0 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents said that present system of appraisal can be improved by employee promotion. • 23% of the respondents said for effective relationship between subordinate and superior. • 17% of the respondents said for greater authority.
Chart 19 Showing Classification of Present System of appraisal
17
23
0
60
Employee Promotion Effective relationship between subordinate and superior Greater Authority No discrimination
Table 20 Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source 25% 50% 75% 100% Total
No of Respondents 3 11 9 7 30
Percentage of Respondents 10 37 30 23 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 10% of the respondents and 25% satisfied. • 37% of respondents responded that they are 50% satisfied regarding all aspects. • 30% of the respondents are 75% satisfied. • 23% of the respondents are 100% satisfied.
Chart 20 Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
10
23
37 30
25%
50%
75%
100%
Showing Factors Contributing Toward Job Satisfaction
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Salary & Parks Recognition Work atmosphere Superior – Subordinate relationship Total
No of Respondents 9 10 5
Weighted Average 27 40 5
6 30
12 84
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 2.8% of the Respondent lies in the category of Recognition and work atmosphere.
Showing System of Appraisal
S.No.
Source 1 Promotion 2 Transfer 3 Training 4 PAY FIXATION Total
No of Respondents 15 5 7 3 30
Weighted Average 15 10 21 12 58
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 1.93% of the respondents falls under the category promotion and Transfer.
Showing the factors of motivation
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making Total
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that
No of Respondents 10 10 5
Weighted Average 40 30 10
5 30
5 85
• 2.8% of the respondents are under the category of bonus and recognition.
Showing the Training Methods
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Rotation of Position Special Projects Special Course & Lecturers Management Games Total
INTERPRETATION:
No of Respondents 7 11
Weighted Average 28 33
12 0 30
24 0 85
From the above table it is inferred that • 2.8% of the respondents are in the category of special projects and special course and lectures.
Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source 25% 50% 75% 100% Total
No of Respondents 3 11 9 7 30
Weighted Average 12 44 27 7 90
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 3% of the respondents are in the category of the overall satisfaction regarding the performance appraisal.
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Below 25 26-35 36 to 45 Above 45 Total
No of Respondents 5 12 10 3 30
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents are in age group of below 25. • 40% of the respondents are in age group of 26 to 35. • 33% of the respondents are in age group of 36 to 45. • 10% of the respondents are in age group of above 45.
Percentage of Respondents 17 40 33 10 100
Chart 1 Showing Age Classification
Below 25
26-35
36 to 45
Above 45
Table 2 Showing Qualification of Employees
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source UG PG Professional Others Total
No of Respondents 14 17 4 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 47 23 13 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 47% of the respondents are under graduates. • 23% of the respondents are post graduates. • 13% of the respondents are professional qualified. • 17% of the respondents are have responded other qualifications.
Chart 2 Showing Qualification of Employees.
17
47
13
23
UG
PG
Professional
Others
Table 3 Showing Monthly Income
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Below 5000 5000 to 10000 10000 to 15000 Above 15000 Total
No of Respondents 5 7 15 3 30
Percentage of Respondents 17 23 50 10 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents earn less than Rs.5000. • 23% of the respondents earn between Rs.5000 to Rs.10000. • 50% of the respondents earn between Rs.10000 to Rs.15,000. • 10% of the respondent earn more than Rs.15000.
Chart 3 Showing Monthly Income
50 50 40 30
23 17
20
10 10 0
1
Below 5000
5000 to 10000
10000 to 15000
Above 15000
Table 4 Showing Period of Service in the Organization
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Less than 2 years 2 to 5 years 2 to 10 years Above 10 years Total
No of Respondents 6 11 8 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 20 37 26 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 20% of the respondents have less than 2 years of service in the organization. • 37% of the respondents have 2 to 5 years of service in the organization. • 26% of the respondents have 5 to 10 years of service in the organization. • 17% of the respondents have above 10 years of service in the organization.
Chart 4 Showing Period of Service In The Organization
17
20
26
37 Less than 2 years
2 to 5 years
2 to 10 years
Above 10 years
Table 5 Showing Period of Departmentations.
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Marketing Dept. Finance Dept. Human Resources Service Dept. Total
No of Respondents 7 5 12 6 30
Percentage of Respondents 23 17 40 20 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 23% of the respondents are from Marketing department. • 17% of the respondents are from finance department. • 40% of the respondents are from Human Resource department. • 20% of the respondents are from Service department.
Chart 5 Showing Period of Departmentation
20
23
17 40
Marketing Dept.
Finance Dept.
Human Resources
Service Dept.
Table 6 Showing Factors Contributing Toward Job Satisfaction
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Salary & Parks Recognition Work Atmosphere Superior – Subordinate relationship Total
No of Respondents 9 10 5
Percentage of Respondents 30 33 17
6 30
20 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 30% of the respondents are satisfied because of salary • 33% of the respondents are satisfied due to recognition. • 17% of the respondents are satisfied by work atmosphere • 20% of them are happy with their job because of superior- subordinate relationship.
Chart 6 Showing Factors Contributing Towards Job Satisfaction
20 30
17
33 Salary & Parks Recognition Work Atmosphere Superior - Subordinate relationship
Table 7
Showing System of Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Promotion Transfer Training Pay Fixation Total
No of Respondents 18 4 3 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 60 13 10 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents responded that promotion is the appraisal system to be adopted in the organization. • 10% of the respondents responded that training is the appraisal system adopted. • 13% of the respondents responded that transfer is the appraisal system adopted. • 17% of the respondents responded that paying fixation is the appraisal system adopted.
Chart 7 Showing System of Appraisal
70 60
60
50 40 30 20
13
10
17 10
0 Promotion
Transfer
Training
Pay Fixation
Table 8 Showing Factors of Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Performance/ Target Completion Leadership Skills Loyalty Abilities & Skills Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
15 5 7 3 30
60 17 23 10 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents responded that performance/target completion is common factor of appraisal. • 17% of the respondents responded for leadership skills. • 23% of the respondents responded for loyalty. • 10% of the respondents for abilities and skills.
Chart 8 Showing Factors of Appraisal
10 23 60 17
Performance/ Target Completion Leadership Skills Loyalty Abilities & Skills
Table 9 Showing Completion of Projects Classification
S.No.
Source 1 Yes 2 No Total
No of Respondents 23 7 30
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 77% of the respondents responses are favorable. • 23% of the respondents responses are unfavorable.
Percentage of Respondents 77 23 100
Chart 9 Showing Completion of Project Classification
23
77
Yes
No
Table 10 Showing the factors of motivation
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making Total
No of Respondents 10 10 5
Percentage of Respondents 33 33 17
5 30
17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 33% of the respondents responded for allowances and bonus as the factors of motivation. • 17% of the respondents responded of recognition and greater responsibility.
Chart 10 Showing Factors of Motivation
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
33
33
17
17
1 Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making
Table 11 Showing the Training Methods
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Rotation of Position Special Projects Special Course & Lecturers Management Games Total
No of Respondents 7 11
Percentage of Respondents 23 37
12 0 30
40 0 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred • 23% of the respondents responded for rotation of position. • 37% of the respondents responded for special projects. • 40% of the respondents responded for special courses & lectures as the training methods adopted and none of them responded for management games.
Chart 11 Showing the Training Methods
0 23 40
37
Rotation of Position
Special Projects
Special Course & Lecturers
Management Games
Table 12 Showing superiors Guidance
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Paper Guidance Support Encouragement Others Total
No of Respondents 13 5 7 5 30
Percentage of Respondents 43 17 23 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 43% of the respondents responded for proper guidance by superiors help them in improving their performance. • 17% of the respondents said support. • 23% of the respondents said Encouragement and 17% of the respondents said for others.
Chart 12 Showing Superiors Guidance
50 45
43
40 35 30 23
25 17
20
17
15 10 5 0 Paper Guidance
Support
Encouragement
Others
Table 13 Showing Company’s Decision – Making Process
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Organization decision Group Decision Operative decision None of these Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
4 14 4 8 30
13 47 13 27 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 1% of the respondents are involved in organization decision. • 47% of the respondents are involved in group decision. • 13% of the respondents are involved in operative decision.
• 27% of the respondents are not involved in any decision – making process.
Chart 13 Showing Company’s Decision – Making Process
47
50 45 40 35
27
30 25 20 15
13
13
10 5 0 Organization decision
Group Decision
Table 14
Operative decision
None of these
Showing Selection Techniques
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Written Exams Tests Business Games Interviews Total
No of Respondents 10 0 0 20 30
Percentage of Respondents 33 0 0 67 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 33% of the respondents for written exams. • 67% of the respondents said that interview is the selection technique adopted by the company.
Chart 14 Showing Selection Techniques
33
0
67
0
Written Exams
Tests
Business Games
Interviews
Table 15 Showing Usage of Abilities and Skills
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Decision making Greater responsibility Identifying training and development needs None of these Total
No of Respondents 3 7
Percentage of Respondents 10 23
5 15 30
17 50 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 23% of the respondents responded for greater responsibility. • 17% of the respondents responded for Identifying Training & Development needs. • 50% of the respondents said that their abilities & skills are not properly used.
Chart 15 Showing Usage of Abilities and Skills
50 50 40 23
30 20
17
10
10 0
1 Decision making Greater responsibility Indentifying training and development needs None of these
Table 16 Showing Classification of Transfer
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Transfer due to vacancy Promotion Transfer Request Transfer Compulsory Transfer Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
6 14 5 5 30
20 46 17 17 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 20% of the respondents responded for transfer due to vacancy. • 46% of the respondents responded that promotion transfer is the need for transferring an employee. • 17% of the respondents responded for request transfer. • 17% of the respondents responded for compulsory transfer.
Chart 16 Showing Classification of Transfer
17
20
17
46
Transfer due to vacancy Request Transfer
Promotion Transfer Compulsory Transfer
Table 3 Showing Monthly Income
Table 17 Showing Classification of Alternative Solution to Problems and Challenges
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Challenges the solution Dismisses it as nonviable Accepts it half heartedly Expresses doubt about it Total
No of Respondents
Percentage of Respondents
5
17
7
23
8
27
10 30
33 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents responded that their superior challenges the solution. • 23% of the respondents responded that their superior dismisses the suggestions as non viable. • 27% of the respondents responded that their superior accepts it half heartedly. • 33% of the respondents responded that their superior expresses doubt about the suggestions and ideas given to them.
Chart 17 Showing Classification of Alternative Solution to Problems and
35 30
27 23
25 20
33
Challenges
17
15 10 5 0 Challenges Dismisses it Accepts it Expresses the solution as nonhalf doubt about viable heartedly it
Table 18 Showing how Frequently Appraisal done
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Monthly Quarterly Half Yearly Annually
No of Respondents 0 5 5 20
Percentage of Respondents 0 17 17 66
Total
30
100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 17% of the respondents said that appraisal is done either quarterly & half yearly. • 66% of the respondents said that appraisal is done annually.
Chart 18 Showing how Frequently Appraisal done
66
70 60 50 40 30 20
17
17
10 0
Quarterly
Half Yearly
Table 19
Annually
Showing Classification of Present System of appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Employee Promotion Effective relationship between subordinate and superior Greater Authority No discrimination Total
No of Respondents 18
Percentage of Respondents 60
7 5 0 30
23 17 0 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 60% of the respondents said that present system of appraisal can be improved by employee promotion. • 23% of the respondents said for effective relationship between subordinate and superior. • 17% of the respondents said for greater authority.
Chart 19 Showing Classification of Present System of appraisal
17
23
0
60
Employee Promotion Effective relationship between subordinate and superior Greater Authority No discrimination
Table 20 Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source 25% 50% 75% 100% Total
No of Respondents 3 11 9 7 30
Percentage of Respondents 10 37 30 23 100
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 10% of the respondents and 25% satisfied. • 37% of respondents responded that they are 50% satisfied regarding all aspects. • 30% of the respondents are 75% satisfied. • 23% of the respondents are 100% satisfied.
Chart 20 Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
10
23
37 30
25%
50%
75%
100%
Showing Factors Contributing Toward Job Satisfaction
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Salary & Parks Recognition Work atmosphere Superior – Subordinate relationship Total
No of Respondents 9 10 5
Weighted Average 27 40 5
6 30
12 84
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 2.8% of the Respondent lies in the category of Recognition and work atmosphere.
Showing System of Appraisal
S.No.
Source 1 Promotion 2 Transfer 3 Training 4 PAY FIXATION Total
No of Respondents 15 5 7 3 30
Weighted Average 15 10 21 12 58
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 1.93% of the respondents falls under the category promotion and Transfer.
Showing the factors of motivation
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Allowances Bonus Recognition Greater Responsibility in decision making Total
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that
No of Respondents 10 10 5
Weighted Average 40 30 10
5 30
5 85
• 2.8% of the respondents are under the category of bonus and recognition.
Showing the Training Methods
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source Rotation of Position Special Projects Special Course & Lecturers Management Games Total
INTERPRETATION:
No of Respondents 7 11
Weighted Average 28 33
12 0 30
24 0 85
From the above table it is inferred that • 2.8% of the respondents are in the category of special projects and special course and lectures.
Showing overall Satisfaction Regarding Performance Appraisal
S.No. 1 2 3 4
Source 25% 50% 75% 100% Total
No of Respondents 3 11 9 7 30
Weighted Average 12 44 27 7 90
INTERPRETATION: From the above table it is inferred that • 3% of the respondents are in the category of the overall satisfaction regarding the performance appraisal.
Related Documents
Referance
November 2019 2
