Quantitative Paper

RUNNING HEAD: A CRITIQUE OF

1

A Critique of a Quantitative Article by Jenna Shields

A Paper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of NU304 Evidence Based Practice University of South Alabama College of Nursing Fall 2009

A Critique of a Quantitative Article

RUNNING HEAD: A CRITIQUE OF

2

Introduction “Onset of Sexual Activity: Implications in Incarcerated Women” is quantitative article written by Jenny Ahmed, Barbara A. Davis, Erin Gottman, and Heather Payne. It discusses the problem of whether early age (in years) of onset of sexual activity is related to the number of sexually related health difficulties in women who are incarcerated ((Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006)). The problem is clearly stated in the abstract and at the end of the introduction of the paper. The reader had no difficulties in finding it, and it informed the reader what the focus of the paper is about without her having to read the entire article to discover it. The purpose of this paper was to conduct a critique of a quantitative research study. Background The literature review was clear and concise. It identified many gaps in the research, as well as gaps in knowledge and gaps in the literature. The researcher does not explain how the review was done or what databases or journals were searched, nor does he say how many were searched, so the reader does not know if the review of literature was thorough or not. The researcher does, however, cite many authors in the review, which increases his credibility to the reader. No theoretical framework was identified by the researcher in this paper. The hypothesis was clearly identified at the end of the literature review. The reader understood immediately that it was the hypothesis and understood the components of it without difficulty. The population, independent variable, and dependent variable were identified. No extraneous variables were identified by the researcher. Methods The research design was a descriptive correlational design, which was fitting for the study because the researchers were examining the relationship between two or more variables in a situation, but they did not know the reason for the relationship (Boswell and Cannon, 2007). It was set in a county jail, which was fitting because that is specified in the population they were testing: incarcerated women in the county jail of a small Midwestern city in January of 2004 (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). The sample was a convenience sample that consisted of fifty women, which is a small sample. A larger sample may have given more accurate results for this study. Convenience sampling was appropriate for this study because the only place the researchers were looking for a population from was in this particular jail. The only criteria for the sample were that the participants had to be women in this particular county jail who were willing to participate and give their written consent to participate (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). It may have been more beneficial for the researchers to divide the sample up into populations based on consensual sexual activity v. non-consensual activity to get a more accurate view of why some of the women had psychosocial problems and why some did not. No control group existed, as is appropriate for correlational design. The researcher discusses legal and ethical issues by stating that he received approval from an institutional review board and an agency. He also made it clear that he obtained written consent from each inmate before her participation in the study. To collect the data, the researchers began by asking female inmates if they would like to participate in the study. This was fitting for the study and population sample. All of the inmates who agreed to participate were briefed about the study in detail and asked to give written consent. One researcher then interviewed each of the inmates over the closed communication phone in the visitation area of the cellblock, and only the researcher and participant heard the interview. The interview was a nineteen question questionnaire, where the researcher read the questions and the inmates answered yes or no. The questions were brief, clearly stated and simple to understand. Each interview was about fifteen minutes long (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). This was an appropriate way to gather the information. It ensured that the

RUNNING HEAD: A CRITIQUE OF

3

participant was fully informed of the study and its implications, and it also ensured privacy and confidentiality. Also, the use of one researcher to interview all of the women standardized the interviews, limiting variations and biases based on the researcher’s reactions to the inmates’ responses. The briefness of the interview most likely ensured that the inmates answered thoughtfully and truthfully instead of trying to hurry through the interview. Instrumentation and Data Analysis The instrument used for the data collection was the nineteen question health survey tool (questionnaire). The researchers clearly defined the age of onset of sexual activity as the age of the first time of oral, anal, or vaginal sexual activity (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). This is great because it limited confusion and ensured that the participants understood exactly what the researchers were asking them. Instead of asking if the participants had had any sexually related problems, the researchers asked separate questions about physical factors and psychosocial factors that were directly related to sexual activity (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). The problems were included in the questions in a simple format. For example, instead of asking if the participant had low self-esteem, the researcher would ask if she had ever felt bad about herself. This was good because it eliminated confusion and made it so that anyone could understand the questions and accurately answer them, which in turn increased the accuracy of the results. The researchers addressed validity by testing the face validity of the health survey tool with the first fifteen women (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). The researchers used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 12.0 to analyze the data. They also used Pearson’s r correlation to see if there was a relationship between the age of onset of sexual activity and the number of health problems related to sexual activity (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). Frequency data was determined by using statistics such as ethnicity, age of onset of sexual activity, age, and total risk survey scores (Ahmed, Davis, Gottman, & Payne, 2006). This method of analysis is a good way to examine the correlation in the problem statement. The frequency data may also be helpful to further break down the data or to provide data for new experiments to be performed off of with regards to race, ethnicity, age, or age of onset of sexual activity. Discussion The conclusions of the data analysis were that the findings supported the hypothesis. The reader agrees with this based on the method of analyzing the data being relevant and trustworthy. The researcher includes many limitations of the study in his discussion, which leads the reader to believe that he is honest about his study and the results. He also includes many implications for practice in his conclusion. The implications are clear and realistic and useful to those in the nursing profession as well as those in other health care professions. The use of the articles researched in the literature review increased the level of evidence of this paper. Conclusion This article was brief, well-written, clear, and concise. It was easy for a novice researcher like the reader to read and understand the exact implications of the research. The reader had no difficulty dissecting the different parts of the article and discerning their importance to the study. The researcher was very honest and forthcoming with the methods, possible biases, and limitations of the study. He included every component that a quantitative article needs. References

RUNNING HEAD: A CRITIQUE OF Ahmed, J., Davis, B.A., Gottman, E., & Payne, H. (2006). Early onset of sexual activity: implications in incarcerated women. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 12(2), doi: 10.1177/1078345806288908. Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2007). Introduction to nursing research: incorporating evidencebased practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

4