Presentation Paper 2
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Presentation Paper 2 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,051
- Pages: 28
THIRD INTERNATIONAL TWIN CITIES CONVENTION SESSION 1: MELAKA AS A CITY 16 APRIL 2003 PRESENTED BY: AKBAR BIN ALI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MELAKA STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
SCOPE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY 4. CONCLUSION PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
1. INTRODUCTION CHART 1: LEVEL URBANIZATON (%) SELECTED COUNTRIES, 2000
OF OF
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
3 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
MELAKA & MALAYSIA CHART 1 : LEVEL OF URBANIZATION (%) OF SELECTED COUNTRIES, 2000 100 89
%
88 79
80
75 67.3 61.8
60
40
20
0 UK
NETHERLAND
JAPAN
USA
MELAKA
MALAYSIA
NOTE:
1.
IN 1991, URBANISATION RATE IN MELAKA WAS ONLY 38.7% (BELOW NATIONAL URBANISATION RATE – 50.7%) & INCREASED TO 67.3% IN 2000; HIGHER THAN NATIONAL URBANISATION RATE - 61.8%.
2.
BY 2005, 3/4 OF MELAKA WILL BE URBANISED; HIGHER THAN MALAYSIA – 2/3 URBANISED. 4
SOURCE: US CENSUS BUREAU, TIMES ATLAS OF THE WORLD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, MALAYSIA, 2000 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES NO
INDICATOR
1.
POPULATION
YEAR
1.1 TOTAL POPULATION 2002 (‘000)
2.
USA
HONG KONG
JEPUN
S’PORE
M’SIA
280,562.5 7,303.3 126,771.6 4,452.7 24,526.5 (2001)
MELAKA
673.9
1.2 BIRTH RATE (PER 1,000 POPULATION)
2002
14.1
10.92
10.04 (2001)
12.78
24.22
20.28
1.3 DEATH RATE (PER 1,000 POPULATION)
2002
8.7
6.11
8.34 (2001)
4.28
5.16
5.57
2002
6.69
5.73
3.88 (2001)
3.6
5.7
7.5
2002 2002
75 80
71 83
77 84
77 83
70 75
67 74
SOCIAL 2.1 INFANT MORTALITY RATE (PER 1,000 LIVE BIRTHS) 2.2 LIFE EXPECTANCY A) MALE B) FEMALE
OURCE: THE WORLD FACTBOOK, 2002, UNSD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, 2002
5
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES NO
INDICATOR
YEAR
USA
HONG KONG
JEPUN
S’PORE
M’SIA
MELAKA
3.1 GDP (PURCHASING 2001 POWER PARITY) – US$
$10.082 TRILLION
$180 BILLION
$3.15 TRILLION
$106.3 BILION
$200 BILION
$5.9 BILION
3.2 GDP PER CAPITA (PPP) – US$
2001
$36,300
$25,000
$24,900 (2000)
$24,700
$8,329
$9,098
2001
2
0
2
7.9 (2002) 38.7 (2002) 53.4 (2002)
4.1 (2002) 32.8 (2002) 63.1 (2002)
3. ECONOMIC
3.3 GDP BY SECTOR (% TO GDP) A) AGRICULTURE
2001
18
14
35
NEGLI GIBLE 33
2001
80
86
63
67
-0.7
2 (2001)
1.8
1.8
4.7
4.2
3.2 (Q4, 2002)
2.2 (Q4, 2002)
B) INDUSTRIES # C) SERVICES 3.4 INFLATION RATE (%)
2002 2.8 (2001) -2 (2001)
3.5 UNEMPLOYMENT 2002 5 5 (2001) RATE (%) NOTE: # MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION & MINING
6
OURCE: THE WORLD FACTBOOK, 2002, UNSD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
2.
2.1
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY BIG POPULATION
CHART 2: TOP 10 CITIES OF THE WORLD, 2002 – RANKED BY POPULATION
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
CHART 2 : TOP 10 CITIES OF THE WORLD, 2002 – RANKED BY POPULATION
30.0
28.0
POPULATION 25.0 (MILLION) 20.0
15.0
18.1
18.0
17.7
16.6 14.2
13.5
13.1
12.9
12.4
10.0
5.0
0.0
l n ia co SA r ia ina ina dia SA azi pa nd ex i ig e ent Ch ,U Br , In y, U s i, I g , , Ja , N M a t i e a i r t o a , l , a t s e y C h ul ky mb go s, A lc u ng rk ng Cit Pa To La ir e Mu Ca ha sA Yo co ao A i S o S x s w L Ne Me eno Bu
NOTE: KUALA LUMPUR – 1.5 MILLION; MELAKA – 673,900; WORLD – 6,293.7 MILLION
8 URCE: US CENSUS BUREAU & TIMES ATLAS OF THE WORLD 10TH EDITION & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, MALAYSIA 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY
2.2 EXCITING SHOPPING, SIGHTSEEING, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATION, EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT, ETC.
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
2.3
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY HIGH INCOME
CHART 3: HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS IN MALAYSIA (RM), 1990 & 1999 CHART 4: URBAN & JIANGSU
PER CAPITA INCOME OF RURAL RESIDENTS IN (YUAN), 1997 – 2001
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
MALAYSIA
CHART 3 : HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS (RM), 1990 & 1999 RM
4,000 3,103
2,000
1,718
1,606 957
0 1990 Household Income of Urban Residents
1999 Houseld Income of Rural Residents
SOURCE : THE THIRD OUTLINE PERSPECTIVE PLAN, 2001 – 2010
11
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
JIANGSU
CHART 4 : PER CAPITA INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS (YUAN), 1997 - 2001 YUAN
8,000.0
7,375.1 6,800.2
6,538.2 6,000.0
4,000.0
6,018.0
5,765.0
3,269.9
3,377.0
3,495.2
3,595.1
3,784.7
2,000.0
0.0 1997
1998
Per Capita Income of Urban Residents
1999
2000
2001
Per Capita Income of Rural Residents
SOURCE : PROTOCAL & INFORMATION DIVISION, JIANGSU PROVINCIAL FOREIGN AFFAIRS
12
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY
2.4 THE OF
PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN COUNTRY; NORMALLY SEAT GOVERNMENT.
2.5
TOURIST ATTRACTION – 4S
CHART 5: NUMBER OF TOURIST ARRIVALS, 1995 – 2002
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
MELAKA
CHART 5 : NUMBER OF TOURIST ARRIVALS, 1995 2.98 2002 3 2.57
NO. OF TOURIST (MILLION) 2
2.17 1.71 1.33
1.37
1.41
1995
1996
1997
1.45
1
0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
NOTES:
1.
THE NUMBER OF TOURISTS HAVE INCREASED RAPIDLY SINCE 1999 (1.71 MILION) TO 2.98 MILLION (2002) – 74.3%.
2.
2002 – NO. OF TOURIST ARRIVALS IN MALAYSIA – 13.3 MILION PERSONS. 14
SOURCE : TOURISM PROMOTION UNIT, MELAKA CHIEF MINISTER DEPARTMENT 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1 MERCER’S STUDY IS BASING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A FULL CITY STATUS ON DETAILED ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATION OF 39 KEY QUALITY OF LIFE DETERMINANTS, GROUPED IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: 3.1.1 POLITICAL & SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT (POLITICAL STABILITY, CRIME, LAW ENFORCEMENT, ETC) 15 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.2 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ( CURRENCY EXCHANGE REGULATIONS, BANKING SERVICES, ETC) 3.1.3 SOCIO – CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT (CENSORSHIP, LIMITATIONS ON PERSONAL FREEDOM, ETC) 3.1.4
MEDICAL AND HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS (MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES, INFECTIOUS DISEASES, SEWAGE, WASTE DISPOSAL, AIR POLLUTION, ETC) 16 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.5 SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION (STANDARD AND AVAILABILITY OF SCHOOLS, ETC) 3.1.6
PUBLIC SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION (ELECTRICITY, WATER, PUBLIC TRANSPORT, TRAFFIC CONGESTION, ETC) 3.1.7 RECREATION (RESTAURANTS, THEATRES, CINEMAS, SPORTS AND LEISURE, ETC) 3.1.8
CONSUMER GOODS (AVAILABILITY OF FOOD/ DAILY CONSUMPTION ITEMS, CARS, ETC)
17 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.9 HOUSING (HOUSING, HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, FURNITURE, MAINTENANCE SERVICES, ETC) 3.1.10 NATURAL (CLIMATE, NATURAL DISASTERS)
ENVIRONMENT RECORD OF
18 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3.2 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : TOP 20 CITIES (NEW YORK = 100) RANK
CITY
COUNTRY
2003 2002
INDEX 2003
2002
1
1
ZURICH
SWITZERLAND
106.5
106.5
2
2
VANCOUVER
CANADA
106
106
2
2
VIENNA
AUSTRIA
106
106
2
4
GENEVA
SWITZERLAND
106
105.5
5
4
SYDNEY
AUSTRALIA
105
105.5
5
6
AUCKLAND
NEW ZEALAND
105
105
5
6
COPENHAGEN
DENMARK
105
105
5
6
FRANKFURT
GERMANY
105
105
5
10
BERN
SWITZERLAND
105
104.5
10
10
MUNICH
GERMANY
104.5
104.5
NOTE: MERCER RANKS ONLY THOSE CITIES WHERE CLIENTS HAVE ASKED FOR DATA,
NOT NECESSARILY ALL MAJOR CITIES IN THE WORLD.
19
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE 3.2 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : TOP 20 CITIES
RANK
CITY
COUNTRY
2003 2002
(NEW YORK = 100) INDEX 2003
2002
10
12
AMSTERDAM
NETHERLANDS
104.5
104
12
15
BRUSSELS
BELGIUM
104
103.5
12
15
DUSSELDORF
GERMANY
104
103.5
12
18
TORONTO
CANADA
104
103
15
12
MELBOURNE
AUSTRALIA
103.5
104
15
12
STOCKHOLM
SWEDEN
103.5
104
15
18
LUXEMBOURG
LUXEMBOURG
103.5
103
15
22
BERLIN
GERMANY
103.5
102.5
15
22
WELLINGTON
NEW ZEALAND
103.5
102.5
20
18
PERTH
AUSTRALIA
103
103
NOTE:
KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA (RANKING 73 IN THE WORLD) 20
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE 3.3 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : 10 WORLD’S WORST CITIES A) BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO (RANKING 215 IN THE
WORLD) B) (214)
BANGUI,
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
C)
BAGHDAD, IRAQ (213)
D)
POINTE, CONGO (212)
E)
KHARTOUM, SUDAN (211)
F)
OUAGADOUGOU, BURKINA FASO (210)
J) ARABIC
N’DJAMENA, CHAD & SANAA, REPUBLIC OF YEMEN (208)
H) LUANDA, NOUAKCHOTT,
ANGOLA MAURITANIA (206)
&
21 SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3.4 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: TOP 20 CITIES RANK CITY
COUNTRY
2003
NOTE:
(NEW YORK = 100) INDEX 2003
1
LUXEMBOURG
LUXEMBOURG
133.5
2
BERN
SWITZERLAND
126.5
2
GENEVA
SWITZERLAND
126.5
2
HELSINKI
FINLAND
126.5
2
SINGAPORE
SINGAPORE
126.5
2
ZURICH
SWITZERLAND
126.5
7
KATSUYAMA
JAPAN
122
7
KOBE
JAPAN
122
7
NAGOYA
JAPAN
122
7
OMUTA
JAPAN
122
* CRIME & INTERNAL STABILITY & LAW INFORCEMENT
22
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3.4 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: TOP 20 CITIES RANK CITY
COUNTRY
2003
INDEX 2003
7
OSAKA
JAPAN
122
7
TOKYO
JAPAN
122
7
TSUKUBA
JAPAN
122
7
YOKKAICHI
JAPAN
122
7
YOKOHAMA
JAPAN
122
16
VIENNA
AUSTRIA
120
17
STOCKHOLM
SWEDEN
119.5
18
COPENHAGEN
DENMARK
115
18
DUBLIN
IRELAND
115
18
DUSSELDORF
GERMANY
115
(NEW YORK = 100) NOTE:
* CRIME & INTERNAL STABILITY & LAW INFORCEMENT
KUALA LUMPUR & JOHOR BAHRU, MALAYSIA (RANKING 73 IN THE WORL 23
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3.5 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: 10 WORLD’S MOST UNSAFE CITIES: A) BANGUI, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC (RANKING 215 IN THE WORLD) B) ABIDJAN, IVORY COAST (214) C) POINTE & BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO; LUANDA, ANGOLA (211) D) JERUSALEM, ISRAEL (210) E) LAGOS, NIGERIA (209) F)
MEDELLIN, COLOMBIA (208)
G) BOGOTA, COLOMBIA (207) H) KINSHASA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO (206) 24
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 200 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
4.
CONCLUSION
4.1 CONSIDER PARTICIPATING QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY. 4.2
IN
MERCER’S
THE MOVEMENT WAS BASED ON 5 PRINCIPLES:
4.2.1
REDUCE HEALTH INEQUALITIES
4.2.2 EMPHASIS ON HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTION OF DISEASES. 4.2.3
INTER-SECTORAL COOPERATION
4.2.4
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
4.2.5
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
(ADOPT & ADAPT) 25 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
4.
CONCLUSION
4.3
GOAL – TO ACHIEVE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & CULTURAL PROSPERITY, POLITICAL STABILITY, SPIRITUAL AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH OPTIMAL UTILIZATION OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES.
4.4
BENCH-MARKING
26 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
4.
CONCLUSION
4.5
DEVELOP & EXPLOIT THE RICH HERITAGE TO CONCRETIZE THE THEME “VISIT HISTORICAL MELAKA MEANS VISIT MALAYSIA”.
4.6
FRIENDLY CITY.
27 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
THANK YOU
SCOPE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY 4. CONCLUSION PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
1. INTRODUCTION CHART 1: LEVEL URBANIZATON (%) SELECTED COUNTRIES, 2000
OF OF
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
3 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
MELAKA & MALAYSIA CHART 1 : LEVEL OF URBANIZATION (%) OF SELECTED COUNTRIES, 2000 100 89
%
88 79
80
75 67.3 61.8
60
40
20
0 UK
NETHERLAND
JAPAN
USA
MELAKA
MALAYSIA
NOTE:
1.
IN 1991, URBANISATION RATE IN MELAKA WAS ONLY 38.7% (BELOW NATIONAL URBANISATION RATE – 50.7%) & INCREASED TO 67.3% IN 2000; HIGHER THAN NATIONAL URBANISATION RATE - 61.8%.
2.
BY 2005, 3/4 OF MELAKA WILL BE URBANISED; HIGHER THAN MALAYSIA – 2/3 URBANISED. 4
SOURCE: US CENSUS BUREAU, TIMES ATLAS OF THE WORLD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, MALAYSIA, 2000 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES NO
INDICATOR
1.
POPULATION
YEAR
1.1 TOTAL POPULATION 2002 (‘000)
2.
USA
HONG KONG
JEPUN
S’PORE
M’SIA
280,562.5 7,303.3 126,771.6 4,452.7 24,526.5 (2001)
MELAKA
673.9
1.2 BIRTH RATE (PER 1,000 POPULATION)
2002
14.1
10.92
10.04 (2001)
12.78
24.22
20.28
1.3 DEATH RATE (PER 1,000 POPULATION)
2002
8.7
6.11
8.34 (2001)
4.28
5.16
5.57
2002
6.69
5.73
3.88 (2001)
3.6
5.7
7.5
2002 2002
75 80
71 83
77 84
77 83
70 75
67 74
SOCIAL 2.1 INFANT MORTALITY RATE (PER 1,000 LIVE BIRTHS) 2.2 LIFE EXPECTANCY A) MALE B) FEMALE
OURCE: THE WORLD FACTBOOK, 2002, UNSD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, 2002
5
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
TABLE 1: SELECTED INDICATORS OF A FEW DEVELOPED COUNTRIES NO
INDICATOR
YEAR
USA
HONG KONG
JEPUN
S’PORE
M’SIA
MELAKA
3.1 GDP (PURCHASING 2001 POWER PARITY) – US$
$10.082 TRILLION
$180 BILLION
$3.15 TRILLION
$106.3 BILION
$200 BILION
$5.9 BILION
3.2 GDP PER CAPITA (PPP) – US$
2001
$36,300
$25,000
$24,900 (2000)
$24,700
$8,329
$9,098
2001
2
0
2
7.9 (2002) 38.7 (2002) 53.4 (2002)
4.1 (2002) 32.8 (2002) 63.1 (2002)
3. ECONOMIC
3.3 GDP BY SECTOR (% TO GDP) A) AGRICULTURE
2001
18
14
35
NEGLI GIBLE 33
2001
80
86
63
67
-0.7
2 (2001)
1.8
1.8
4.7
4.2
3.2 (Q4, 2002)
2.2 (Q4, 2002)
B) INDUSTRIES # C) SERVICES 3.4 INFLATION RATE (%)
2002 2.8 (2001) -2 (2001)
3.5 UNEMPLOYMENT 2002 5 5 (2001) RATE (%) NOTE: # MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION & MINING
6
OURCE: THE WORLD FACTBOOK, 2002, UNSD & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
2.
2.1
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY BIG POPULATION
CHART 2: TOP 10 CITIES OF THE WORLD, 2002 – RANKED BY POPULATION
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
CHART 2 : TOP 10 CITIES OF THE WORLD, 2002 – RANKED BY POPULATION
30.0
28.0
POPULATION 25.0 (MILLION) 20.0
15.0
18.1
18.0
17.7
16.6 14.2
13.5
13.1
12.9
12.4
10.0
5.0
0.0
l n ia co SA r ia ina ina dia SA azi pa nd ex i ig e ent Ch ,U Br , In y, U s i, I g , , Ja , N M a t i e a i r t o a , l , a t s e y C h ul ky mb go s, A lc u ng rk ng Cit Pa To La ir e Mu Ca ha sA Yo co ao A i S o S x s w L Ne Me eno Bu
NOTE: KUALA LUMPUR – 1.5 MILLION; MELAKA – 673,900; WORLD – 6,293.7 MILLION
8 URCE: US CENSUS BUREAU & TIMES ATLAS OF THE WORLD 10TH EDITION & DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, MALAYSIA 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY
2.2 EXCITING SHOPPING, SIGHTSEEING, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATION, EDUCATION, EMPLOYMENT, ETC.
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
2.3
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY HIGH INCOME
CHART 3: HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS IN MALAYSIA (RM), 1990 & 1999 CHART 4: URBAN & JIANGSU
PER CAPITA INCOME OF RURAL RESIDENTS IN (YUAN), 1997 – 2001
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
MALAYSIA
CHART 3 : HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS (RM), 1990 & 1999 RM
4,000 3,103
2,000
1,718
1,606 957
0 1990 Household Income of Urban Residents
1999 Houseld Income of Rural Residents
SOURCE : THE THIRD OUTLINE PERSPECTIVE PLAN, 2001 – 2010
11
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
JIANGSU
CHART 4 : PER CAPITA INCOME OF URBAN & RURAL RESIDENTS (YUAN), 1997 - 2001 YUAN
8,000.0
7,375.1 6,800.2
6,538.2 6,000.0
4,000.0
6,018.0
5,765.0
3,269.9
3,377.0
3,495.2
3,595.1
3,784.7
2,000.0
0.0 1997
1998
Per Capita Income of Urban Residents
1999
2000
2001
Per Capita Income of Rural Residents
SOURCE : PROTOCAL & INFORMATION DIVISION, JIANGSU PROVINCIAL FOREIGN AFFAIRS
12
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
2.
COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF A CITY
2.4 THE OF
PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN COUNTRY; NORMALLY SEAT GOVERNMENT.
2.5
TOURIST ATTRACTION – 4S
CHART 5: NUMBER OF TOURIST ARRIVALS, 1995 – 2002
PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
MELAKA
CHART 5 : NUMBER OF TOURIST ARRIVALS, 1995 2.98 2002 3 2.57
NO. OF TOURIST (MILLION) 2
2.17 1.71 1.33
1.37
1.41
1995
1996
1997
1.45
1
0
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
NOTES:
1.
THE NUMBER OF TOURISTS HAVE INCREASED RAPIDLY SINCE 1999 (1.71 MILION) TO 2.98 MILLION (2002) – 74.3%.
2.
2002 – NO. OF TOURIST ARRIVALS IN MALAYSIA – 13.3 MILION PERSONS. 14
SOURCE : TOURISM PROMOTION UNIT, MELAKA CHIEF MINISTER DEPARTMENT 2002 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1 MERCER’S STUDY IS BASING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A FULL CITY STATUS ON DETAILED ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATION OF 39 KEY QUALITY OF LIFE DETERMINANTS, GROUPED IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES: 3.1.1 POLITICAL & SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT (POLITICAL STABILITY, CRIME, LAW ENFORCEMENT, ETC) 15 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.2 ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ( CURRENCY EXCHANGE REGULATIONS, BANKING SERVICES, ETC) 3.1.3 SOCIO – CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT (CENSORSHIP, LIMITATIONS ON PERSONAL FREEDOM, ETC) 3.1.4
MEDICAL AND HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS (MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES, INFECTIOUS DISEASES, SEWAGE, WASTE DISPOSAL, AIR POLLUTION, ETC) 16 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.5 SCHOOLS AND EDUCATION (STANDARD AND AVAILABILITY OF SCHOOLS, ETC) 3.1.6
PUBLIC SERVICES AND TRANSPORTATION (ELECTRICITY, WATER, PUBLIC TRANSPORT, TRAFFIC CONGESTION, ETC) 3.1.7 RECREATION (RESTAURANTS, THEATRES, CINEMAS, SPORTS AND LEISURE, ETC) 3.1.8
CONSUMER GOODS (AVAILABILITY OF FOOD/ DAILY CONSUMPTION ITEMS, CARS, ETC)
17 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3. CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON MERCER’S STUDY FOR A FULL CITY STATUS 3.1.9 HOUSING (HOUSING, HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, FURNITURE, MAINTENANCE SERVICES, ETC) 3.1.10 NATURAL (CLIMATE, NATURAL DISASTERS)
ENVIRONMENT RECORD OF
18 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3.2 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : TOP 20 CITIES (NEW YORK = 100) RANK
CITY
COUNTRY
2003 2002
INDEX 2003
2002
1
1
ZURICH
SWITZERLAND
106.5
106.5
2
2
VANCOUVER
CANADA
106
106
2
2
VIENNA
AUSTRIA
106
106
2
4
GENEVA
SWITZERLAND
106
105.5
5
4
SYDNEY
AUSTRALIA
105
105.5
5
6
AUCKLAND
NEW ZEALAND
105
105
5
6
COPENHAGEN
DENMARK
105
105
5
6
FRANKFURT
GERMANY
105
105
5
10
BERN
SWITZERLAND
105
104.5
10
10
MUNICH
GERMANY
104.5
104.5
NOTE: MERCER RANKS ONLY THOSE CITIES WHERE CLIENTS HAVE ASKED FOR DATA,
NOT NECESSARILY ALL MAJOR CITIES IN THE WORLD.
19
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE 3.2 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : TOP 20 CITIES
RANK
CITY
COUNTRY
2003 2002
(NEW YORK = 100) INDEX 2003
2002
10
12
AMSTERDAM
NETHERLANDS
104.5
104
12
15
BRUSSELS
BELGIUM
104
103.5
12
15
DUSSELDORF
GERMANY
104
103.5
12
18
TORONTO
CANADA
104
103
15
12
MELBOURNE
AUSTRALIA
103.5
104
15
12
STOCKHOLM
SWEDEN
103.5
104
15
18
LUXEMBOURG
LUXEMBOURG
103.5
103
15
22
BERLIN
GERMANY
103.5
102.5
15
22
WELLINGTON
NEW ZEALAND
103.5
102.5
20
18
PERTH
AUSTRALIA
103
103
NOTE:
KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA (RANKING 73 IN THE WORLD) 20
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE 3.3 OVERALL RANKINGS – MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003 : 10 WORLD’S WORST CITIES A) BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO (RANKING 215 IN THE
WORLD) B) (214)
BANGUI,
CENTRAL
AFRICAN
REPUBLIC
C)
BAGHDAD, IRAQ (213)
D)
POINTE, CONGO (212)
E)
KHARTOUM, SUDAN (211)
F)
OUAGADOUGOU, BURKINA FASO (210)
J) ARABIC
N’DJAMENA, CHAD & SANAA, REPUBLIC OF YEMEN (208)
H) LUANDA, NOUAKCHOTT,
ANGOLA MAURITANIA (206)
&
21 SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
3.4 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: TOP 20 CITIES RANK CITY
COUNTRY
2003
NOTE:
(NEW YORK = 100) INDEX 2003
1
LUXEMBOURG
LUXEMBOURG
133.5
2
BERN
SWITZERLAND
126.5
2
GENEVA
SWITZERLAND
126.5
2
HELSINKI
FINLAND
126.5
2
SINGAPORE
SINGAPORE
126.5
2
ZURICH
SWITZERLAND
126.5
7
KATSUYAMA
JAPAN
122
7
KOBE
JAPAN
122
7
NAGOYA
JAPAN
122
7
OMUTA
JAPAN
122
* CRIME & INTERNAL STABILITY & LAW INFORCEMENT
22
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3.4 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: TOP 20 CITIES RANK CITY
COUNTRY
2003
INDEX 2003
7
OSAKA
JAPAN
122
7
TOKYO
JAPAN
122
7
TSUKUBA
JAPAN
122
7
YOKKAICHI
JAPAN
122
7
YOKOHAMA
JAPAN
122
16
VIENNA
AUSTRIA
120
17
STOCKHOLM
SWEDEN
119.5
18
COPENHAGEN
DENMARK
115
18
DUBLIN
IRELAND
115
18
DUSSELDORF
GERMANY
115
(NEW YORK = 100) NOTE:
* CRIME & INTERNAL STABILITY & LAW INFORCEMENT
KUALA LUMPUR & JOHOR BAHRU, MALAYSIA (RANKING 73 IN THE WORL 23
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 2003 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
3.5 PERSONAL SAFETY RANKING* - MERCER’S QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY 2003: 10 WORLD’S MOST UNSAFE CITIES: A) BANGUI, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC (RANKING 215 IN THE WORLD) B) ABIDJAN, IVORY COAST (214) C) POINTE & BRAZZAVILLE, CONGO; LUANDA, ANGOLA (211) D) JERUSALEM, ISRAEL (210) E) LAGOS, NIGERIA (209) F)
MEDELLIN, COLOMBIA (208)
G) BOGOTA, COLOMBIA (207) H) KINSHASA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO (206) 24
SOURCE: MERCER HUMAN RESOURCE CONSULTING, 200 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
4.
CONCLUSION
4.1 CONSIDER PARTICIPATING QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY. 4.2
IN
MERCER’S
THE MOVEMENT WAS BASED ON 5 PRINCIPLES:
4.2.1
REDUCE HEALTH INEQUALITIES
4.2.2 EMPHASIS ON HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTION OF DISEASES. 4.2.3
INTER-SECTORAL COOPERATION
4.2.4
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
4.2.5
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
(ADOPT & ADAPT) 25 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
4.
CONCLUSION
4.3
GOAL – TO ACHIEVE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC & CULTURAL PROSPERITY, POLITICAL STABILITY, SPIRITUAL AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH OPTIMAL UTILIZATION OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES.
4.4
BENCH-MARKING
26 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
CONTINUE
4.
CONCLUSION
4.5
DEVELOP & EXPLOIT THE RICH HERITAGE TO CONCRETIZE THE THEME “VISIT HISTORICAL MELAKA MEANS VISIT MALAYSIA”.
4.6
FRIENDLY CITY.
27 PROPRIETARY TO THE STATE OF MELAKA REPRESENTED BY THE STATE ECONOMIC ACTION COUNCIL
THANK YOU
Related Documents
Presentation Paper 2
June 2020 0
Paper Presentation
June 2020 2
Paper Presentation
June 2020 2
Research Paper Presentation
November 2019 2
Paper+presentation+rules.pdf
April 2020 2