Eclipse Design & Materials, Inc. A System Solution Technology Company Fossil Fuel Fired Power Plant
Pollution Control System
ECLIPSE POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM
Eclipse Design and Materials, Inc. has the solution to one of our nation’s
biggest environmental problem : Smoke-Stack Toxic Gas Emission
Business Confidential
Objectives I. To provide the industry with the system that will comply with: 1. The EPA Clean Air Act 2. The U. N. Kyoto Global Warming Protocol, II. To acquire funding for manufacturing scale-up.
Business Confidential
Concept Revolutionary Green technology which virtually eliminates toxic gas emissions from fossil fuel fired power plant. Eclipse Pollution Control SystemTM is a ceramic-based electronic device capable of breaking down exhaust pollution emissions into their nonpollutant elements. Capable of handling any size of exhaust emission without restricting the exhaust flow.
Can be retrofitted to accommodate any size stack without significant modification to the stack or plant structure.
Business Confidential
Technological Advantages Significantly increased efficiency over comparable technologies Significantly reduced expense footprint in development, construction, installation and operation unit Modular and scaleable: can handle small to large exhaust emission flow rate and any size emission stack No moving part Lower cost per parts No solid or liquid waste residue Flue gas is the only fluid No hazardous or pollutant by-products Maintenance free Low power consumption Long life expectancy Greater strength and robustness Greater simplicity in design and construction Business Confidential
Decomposition
Business Confidential
CO2
C + O2
CO
C + O2
NOX
N2 + O2
SOX
S + O2
HC
H2 + C
H2O
H2 + O2
Principle of Operation
Business Confidential
Smoke Stack System Design
Business Confidential
Reactor Modules Location
Business Confidential
Reactor Module Design
Business Confidential
Reactor Membrane Design
Business Confidential
Technological Comparisons Eclipse technology can do what none of these approaches have been able to do: Ammonia-based selective catalytic reduction
Non-selective catalytic reduction Selective non-catalytic reduction Electron beam irradiation
Wet scrubbers Dry absorption processes.
Business Confidential
Technological Comparisons The disadvantages of these approaches include: Uncertain catalyst life
Waste disposal requirements
Uncertain reliability Inability to deal with high flow rate
Inefficiency of pollutant reduction High implementation and operation costs
Business Confidential
Conclusion Eclipse Green Technology Device is the only available state of the art pollution control device that will deliver significant results immediately. The technology will satisfy any current and future national and international Clean Air Acts, from the EPA Clean Air Act to the Kyoto Global Warming Protocol requirement for the reduction of green house gases. The Eclipse technology utilizes inexpensive, simple, ceramic electrochemical flow-through technology that can be implemented to existing and future power plant installations with a minimum of expense, time and modification when compared to other existing technologies.
Business Confidential
Delphi Test Summary Test setup and collection process: Raw engine exhaust was pulled from a Fiat modern common-rail direct injection diesel engine out sampling port normally used for collecting engine out emissions. The exhaust was piped to the test device through a heated sample line. The emission analyzer used for this test was a Mass Spectrometer. The Mass Spectrometer has two heated probes with one measurement head. The test device was setup between the two sample streams. The sample probe one allowed us to collect base engine exhaust emissions and to measure the sample flow through the systems. The second stream was used to measure the emissions after the test device. In order to collect the data for these tests, engine out base measurement was taken first, then switched probes and measured the post test device emissions values through the test device. Due to the interference problems between some of the gases, the emissions sampling process were taken twice for both sample locations of engine out and post device. The CO and CO2 values were collected last. The engine speed and load for the test was set at 2400 rpm and 80 n-m of torque because it is standard test point that Delphi use and have background data for. The total flow through the exhaust system at this point is 52.9 gm/sec (2451126.437 cc/min).
Engine Out Emissions (in ppm level) H2O Methane NO NO2 O2 Propane Propene CO CO2 Toluene
: 26633.93 ppm : 3.2572 ppm : 187.9627 ppm : 53.9344 ppm : 155658.3 ppm : 2.3000 ppm : 10.7284 ppm : 224.9955 ppm : 154414.6 ppm : 0.1657 ppm
Post Device Emissions (in ppm level) First test sets, unit was operated at 1 Volt, 3 Ampere, and 100 cc/min H2O Methane NO NO2 O2 Propane Propene CO CO2 Toluene
: 17475.52 ppm : 1.0154 ppm : 5.1093 ppm : 3.5485 ppm : 233371.1 ppm : 0.9411 ppm : 4.2389 ppm : -9.8404 ppm : 3120.499 ppm : 0.0507 ppm
Second test sets, unit was operated at 0.5 Volt, 0.8 Ampere, and 500 cc/min H2O Methane NO NO2 O2 Propane Propene CO CO2 Toluene
: 18549.32 ppm : 2.3864 ppm : 20.506 ppm : 6.0974 ppm : 1971059 ppm : 0.5312 ppm : 3.0406 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.012 ppm
Second test sets, unit was operated at 1 Volt, 0.8 Ampere, and 500 cc/min H2O Methane NO NO2 O2 Propane Propene CO CO2 Toluene
: 16111.71 ppm : 1.8254 ppm : 0.1296 ppm : 0.0518 ppm : 201548.1 ppm : 0.2137 ppm : 1.0064 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.0056 ppm
Second test sets, unit was operated at 2.0 Volt, 0.8 Ampere, and 500 cc/min H2O Methane NO NO2 O2 Propane Propene CO CO2 Toluene
: 15737.8 ppm : 1.8242 ppm : 0.1200 ppm : 0.0366 ppm : 204930.9 ppm : 0.1119 ppm : 0.5778 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.0000 ppm : 0.0046 ppm