Pasthun Leadership

Page 1 of 2

Today is: Saturday, April 04, 2009, Rabi-us-Sani 07, 1430 A.H.

Home Top Stories Peshawar News Home News Quetta News Afghanistan News Lahore News New Editorial Articles Letters Business News Sports News Facts are sacred New Magazine New Daily Pictures Archives Send Letter to the Editor Company Profile Contact Us Today's Cartoon

Rss Feeds Top Stories Peshawar News Home News Quetta News Afghanistan News Editorials Articles Letters Business News Sports News

Develop Your WebSite

Send to a Friend | Printer Friendly Version Pakhtun leadership: A historic review Dr Tanvir Orakzai Pakthuns have been living for centuries in the distant mountains and valleys of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Despite being more than 50 million on both sides of the border, Pakhtuns have remained a tribal society, where each individual is loyal to his clan only. Divided they may live but for invaders, they are one unified nation, once the crisis is over, each tribe goes back to its enclave with its leaders subsiding in their individual tribe. In such a way of life, where every tribe is independent and loyal to itself only, crisis of leadership is natural to arise. Sher Shah Suri can be considered the first Pakhtun King. Sher Shah was a soldier, who became tutor to the Mughal prince and then minister in Mughal court, but soon he controlled the kingdom of Bihar (India). In 1539, he defeated the Mughal Emperor Humayun and assumed the title of Sher Shah. Sher Shah rose from the rank of private tutor to the King of India, reorganised the administration and army, including improvement of police and postal services in his kingdom. However, he could not produce a competent heir to carry on his legacy. Lodhis ruled India from 1451 to 1526 AD. Lodhis were originally Ghilzai (Khilji) from Afghanistan and the dynasty was founded by Bhalul Khan Lodhi. Bahlul Lodhi was an able administrator; who quelled rebellion and put various Afghan chiefs on important posts to consolidate his regime. He nominated his son Sikander Shah, who had a strong and charismatic personality that won him over various Afghan chieftains. Sikander's successor, Ibrahim Lodhi failed all expectations and lost his kingdom at the hands of Babur in 1526. During the Moghul rule, the Pakhtuns tribesmen were crucial defenders of Moghul Empire from the West. Khushal Khan Khattak was famous warrior poet, who fought for Pakhtun unification during the revolt of 1672. The initial Mughal expedition met a miserable fate with only four men surviving to tell the wretched tale. The revolt led to almost total collapse of the Mughal authority in the Frontier region until Aurangzeb took the charge and overcame the resurrection at a heavy cost. The British fought a number of wars in North West Frontier Province, including two campaigns in Afghanistan with disastrous consequences. After losing these wars, British resorted to install puppet rulers, however it neither improved the political stability nor could British resolve the Pakhtun problem till Pakistan's independence. Soviets repeated the same mistake of installing puppet rulers, such as Karmal and Najib who were not representatives of Pakhtuns. The result was collapse of the Afghanistan, as soon as Russians left. Similar to Karmal and Najib, Karazi is also standing in the air without any feet. Being an excellent actor, Karzai wears designer clothes and lectures flawlessly about democracy and human rights along with his cabinet of warlords, drug lords and declared criminals amid the blooming poppy fields and unstoppable bombing. The crucial question is, when West will stop making pipe dreams? Democracy was established in the West after the struggle of hundreds of years; while Afghanistan has always been a fiefdom of warlords, what Western democracy has to do with Afghanistan? Pakhtuns like tough and charismatic leaders; who can maintain Pakhtun sense of freedom. For centuries despite facing perdition, Pakhtun leaders fought back and suffered for the Pakhtun cause. Sher Shah, Ahmad Shah Durrani, Khushal Khan Khattak and Bacha Khan, all were strong and enigmatic leaders, who were willing to battle for Pakhtun cause with enemies stronger than them. A true leader is willing to stand and suffer and steer his people in peace and in crisis. A leader may not always be winner, such as Khushal Khan, who lost war, but made Mughal suffer profoundly. Similarly Bacha Khan was not victorious in finding a homeland, but he suffered for Pakhtun cause that made him a great leader. Unfortunately Pakhtuns leadership for centuries revolved around a personality that yielded good result as long as the leader was in command. After the demise of leader; there was no legacy or institution to take forward the process of nation building, the result has been a tribal society stuck up in medieval times. The West has to develop a viable strategy for Pakhtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan and need to create a leadership that has not only popular support but can help in unifying all the warring factions on both sides of the border; failing which will be a dreadful omen for the world. Pakhtuns may have not been united politically due to their intrinsic culture; however they were always united on a single cause, chase out the invaders at all cost - with or without a leader. [email protected] Go to Home Page | More Articles

http://us.mg2.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.gx=1&.rand=29mf724ij40u5

6/4/2009