Ou 24 Ppts > Ouhunnar

Organisation Understanding

Hunnar Shaala Foundation for building technology and innovations By Prasoon Raghuwanshi (24024) Apurb Shakti (24046) 1

Contents       

Objective of the study Scope of the study Methodology Identity of the organisation Purpose Structure Participants 2

Contents- Contd….        

Enablers Activities Deliverables Influences Culture Performance Future Plans Conclusion 3

Objective of the study 



To gain an understanding of the functioning and culture of an organisation. To understand the application of theoretical concepts in practical manner

4

Scope of the study  

Hunnar Shaala Departments Project beneficiaries

5

Methodology 

Discussion with the Hunnar Shaala  





Interview of CEO Formal interviews with the departmental heads Interaction with operating core

Analysis of secondary data

6

Identity of the organisation 

Hunnar Shaala 

Created as shelter cell of Abhiyan



Not for profit organisation



Limited company registered under section 25

7

Purpose 





Promote alternative and innovative technologies in building construction To promote eco-friendly, cost-effective, low energy building materials and techniques that utilize locally appropriate inputs To work with and further the interests of building artisans

8

Structure Board of Directors CEO Design

Project

Mati

Space Frame

DEWAT’S

Administration

In-Charge

In-Charge

In-Charge

In-Charge

In-Charge

Architects

Engineers

Artisans

Artisan

Artisan

Draftsmen

Supervisors

Manager Accountant Secretary

•Mix of professional bureaucracy and simple structure •Horizontal Differentiation (based on function and specialization) 9

Participants   



Board of trustees Clients- Institutions and individuals Partners/Alliances- IISC, CSR Auroville and Abhiyan Funding agencies- HDFC, NDDB, KFW and American Indian Foundation (AIF)

10

Enablers 





Skills- Civil Engineers, Architects, Diploma holders Core competencies- Alternative technologies and innovation i.e. DEWAT’S Relationship- Solicited by UNDP, Peace Winds Japan and Housing Foundation of Iran



Technology- Perrow’s framework 

Engineering technology (high task variability and high problem analysability ) 11

Enablers- Financial Resources 

Fixed Assets- Rs.6,175 (Physical verification of assets was under process)

 

Cash- Rs.1,14,615 Grants- Rs.20,12,521

12

Activities 

Promotion alternate technologies and innovation in building construction



Consultancy (i.e. Technical Audit)

13

Deliverables      

Architectural Service Project monitoring and supervision Space Frames for Roofs Solid Waste Management DEWATS Landscapes

14

Influences 

According to Emery and Trist Disturbed-reactive environment (complex and changing)

15

Culture 

Dominant Culture 



Management style 



Core values are largely shared by majority Paternalistic attitude

Rules and customs  

Informal mode of communication Lack of proper HR guidelines 16

Performance 

Cost escalation and time overruns



Absence of organized financial records



Absence of MIS

17

Future Plans 

To cater to the needs of the mainstream



Computerisation of information system

18

Conclusion  

First mover advantage Need to remove inefficiencies 



Cost and time overruns

Impact from competitors 

Substitute for alternative technologies

19

Thank You

20