One Plus One Is Not Two-2

  • Uploaded by: Kay Kim
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View One Plus One Is Not Two-2 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 958
  • Pages: 3
Beware! When one plus one is not two Who is paying for the $200,000 the court spends on Kay Kim? Does the judgment fit the crime? Since 2004 Kay Kim has been charged with four misdemeanor cases: trespassing on her own property(2004) trespassing on city county building while making an official filing(2005) disorderly conduct on her own property(2006) battery and resisting police arrest (2008). Kay Kim was arrested four times for each of the alleged offence. At the time of detention she was evaluated by the different prison psychiatrists and given blood test for substance abuse. All tests were negative and she does not suffer from any psychosis. Since 2004 Kay Kim has been in and out of the Marion Criminal Superior Court more than 20 times. No judges in the Marion Criminal Courts want to take her case. One magistrate judge ruled in 2005 that she can represent herself but has to vacate his ruling a week later because of court politics. The Indiana Supreme Court appointed a special judge J. Proffitt from another county to take her cases in 2007. The judge asked a private attorney who claimed to be her public defender to go for in house treatment in Winona Woman Hospital. Kay Kim refused to go unless there is an official court order. After that nothing happens and we did not hear from the court at all. Kay Kim assumed that her cases would have been dismissed because the statue of limitations for the first three cases has long expired. Kay wanted the trials to go on so that she can prove her innocence. She wanted to represent herself. The prosecutor does not have any evidence to convict her. All he wanted was for the court to certify that she is incompetent to stand trial and commit her to a mental institution instead of a fair and speedy trial. Since Kay Kim was evaluated by two psychologists (Dr. Olive and Dr. Callaway) and three times by Dr. Parker. As requested by the court Dr. Parker reversed his own 2005 evaluation and with medical certainty claimed that Kay Kim cannot represent herself and cannot assist counsel. He also recommended that she should not be committed to a mental institution. (2006). However in 2008 he was again pressured by the Judge to give a third evaluation that certified with medical certainty that Kay Kim cannot represent herself and she should be committed to a mental institution if the court concurs. According to Indiana Law the psychiatrist must commit a patient to involuntary commitment if he feels that she is a danger to herself or to the community. What didn’t Dr. Parker commit her? Since November 6, 2008 (Kay Kim has never got convicted for any crime before) till today there is no evidence of violence in her. Kay Kim has been in the Marion County Jail for September 25, 2009 till October 14, 2009 but the prison warden did not put her in a psychiatric ward and did not see any violence. Why does the State leave her in the Marion County Jail for 20 days without a charge? The Court stripped Kay Kim of her rights to represent herself without a competency hearing. (42 USC 14141) The Court violated her rights to due process as accorded by the US Constitutions (5th amendment) by not dismissing her first three cases and allowing them to be a part of Dr. Parker’s final evaluation. The Court violated Kay Kim rights to cross the testimony of the psychiatrist in the court (US Constitutions - 6th Amendment). The One Plus One is not two 1

psychiatrist appointed by the court must be a disinterested party in the case. Dr. Parker has a personal vested interest to ensure the continued prosperity of the mental institution business. Dr. Parker is currently being sued by Kay Kim in the US Federal Court and his testimony should not be allowed to be used to commit Kay Kim. If you go into life imprisonments you must be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of your peer. In this case Kay Kim can be committed indefinitely in the mental Institution at the whim and fancy of Dr. Parker. This punishment does not fit the crime committed. I understand that the court is paying Dr. Parker a lot of money for his evaluations and that he has to meet the instructions of the Court if he wants to continue to be their expert witness. That is why Dr. Parker is changing his report each time to reflect what the Judge asked for. Currently Kay Kim is in the Logonsport State Hospital which is about 100 miles from where I live. I believe that within the first 90 days the State has to treat her in a local facility for evaluation. The State wanted to prescribe all kinds of medications and tests on her even though Dr. Parker certified with medical certainty there is no cure. Her stay in the hospital is costing you and the State $800/day. As I write you have already paid $22,400 for the last 28 days and the tab is keep on growing until something is done. Unlike a psychiatrist, I am an Engineer by profession and do not deal in subjective matters. I use scientific formula and tables to calculate every thing. From the above descriptions by now you can tell one plus one is not two. Someone is lying for whatever reason or motive. I pray that: “God, grant you the serenity To accept the things you cannot change, Courage to change the things you can, And the wisdom to know the difference.” God Bless you.

Charles Chuang e/m: retypeunitedstates @ gmail.com

One Plus One is not two 3

Related Documents

One
April 2020 19
One
May 2020 17
One
June 2020 7
One
April 2020 19
One
May 2020 14

More Documents from ""