On Ultra Metric Space

  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View On Ultra Metric Space as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 854
  • Pages: 3
69

Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 31, No. 2, 2001, 69-71

ON ULTRAMETRIC SPACE Ljiljana Gaji´ c1 Abstract. Using well-known result about ultrametric spaces (see [3]) the fixed point theorem for a class of generalized contractive mapping on ultrametric space is proved. AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (1991): 47H10 Key words and phrases: ultrametric space, spherically complete, fixed point

1. Introduction Let (X, d) be a metric space. If the metric d satisfies strong triangle inequality: for all x, y, z ∈ X d(x, y) ≤ max{d(x, z), d(z, y)} it is called ultrametric on X [2]. Pair (X, d) now is ultrametric space. Remark. Let X 6= ∅, metric d being defined on X by ½ 0, if x = y d(x, y) = 1, if x 6= y, so-called discrete metric is ultrametric. Example For a ∈ R let [a] be the entire part of a. By d(x, y) = inf{2−n : n ∈ Z, [2n (x − e)] = [2n (y − e)]} (here e is any irrational number) an ultrametric d on Q is defined which determines the usual topology on Q.

2. Result In [1] the authors proved a generalization of a result from [2] for multivalued contractive function. We are going to generalize the result from [2] for single valued generalized contraction. 1 Institute

of Mathematics, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Yugoslavia

70

Lj. Gaji´c

Theorem 1. Let (X, d) be spherically complete ultrametric space. If T : X → X is a mapping such that for every x, y ∈ X, x 6= y, (1)

d(T x, T y) < max{d(x, T x), d(x, y), d(y, T y)}

then T has a unique fixed point. Proof. Let Ba = B(a; d(a, T a)) denote the closed spheres centered at a with the radii d(a, T a), and let A be the collection of these spheres for all a ∈ X. The relation Ba ≤ Bb iff Bb ⊆ Ba is a partial order on A. Now, consider a totally ordered subfamily A1 of A. Since (X, d) is spherically complete we have that \ Ba = B 6= ∅. Ba ∈A1

Let b ∈ B and Ba ∈ A1 . Let x ∈ Bb . Then (2)

d(x, b) ≤ d(b, T b) ≤ max{d(b, a), d(a, T a), d(T a, T b)} = max{d(a, T a), d(T a, T b)}.

For d(T a, T b) ≤ d(a, T a) implies that d(x, b) ≤ d(a, T a). In opposite case, d(T a, T b) > d(a, T a), and from (2) follows that d(x, b) ≤ d(b, T b) ≤ d(T a, T b) < max{d(a, T a), d(a, b), d(b, T b)} = max{d(a, T a), d(b, T b)} Now for d(b, T b) ≤ d(a, T a) we have d(x, b) ≤ d(a, T a). The inequality d(b, T b) > d(a, T a) implies that d(b, T b) < d(b, T b) which is a contradiction. So we have proved that for x ∈ Bb (3)

d(x, b) ≤ d(a, T a).

Now we have that d(x, a) ≤ d(a, T a). So x ∈ Ba and Bb ⊆ Ba for any Ba ∈ A1 . Thus Bb is the upper bound for the family A. By Zorn’s lemma A has a maximal element, say Bz , z ∈ X. We are going to prove that z = T z.

Quasi contraction nonself . . .

71

Let us suppose the contrary, i.e. that z 6= T z. Inequality (1) implies that d(T z, T (T z)) < d(z, T z). Now if y ∈ BT z then d(y, T z) ≤ d(T z, T (T z)) < d(z, T z) so d(y, z) ≤ max{d(y, T z), d(T z, z)} = d(T z, z). This means that y ∈ Bz and that BT z ⊆ Bz . On the other hand z 6∈ BT z since d(z, T z) > d(T z, T (T z)) so BT z $ Bz . This is a contradiction with the maximality of Bz . Hence, we have that z = T z. Let u be a different fixed point. For u 6= z we have that d(z, u) = d(T z, T u) < max{d(T z, z), d(z, u), d(u, T u)} = d(z, u) which is a contradiction. The proof is completed.

2

Remark. Since in ultrametric space the inequality d(T x, T y) ≤ max{d(T x, x), d(x, y), d(y, T y)}, x, y ∈ X, is always satisfied so we can suppose only that for x 6= y d(T x, T y) 6= max{d(T x, x), d(x, y), d(y, T y)}.

References [1] Kubiaczyk, J., Mostafa Ali, N., A Multivalued Fixed Point Theorem in Non Archimedean Vector Spaces, Novi Sad, Journ. of Math. Vol 26, No 2, (1996), 111-116. [2] Petalas,C., Vidalis, F., A fxed point theorem in non Archimedean vector spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1993), 819-821. [3] van Roovij, A. C. M., Non Archimedean Functional Analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1978.

Received by the editors April 10, 2001

Related Documents

On Ultra Metric Space
April 2020 3
Ultra Triple Space Model
December 2019 19
Ultra
May 2020 22
Ultra
October 2019 49
Metric
November 2019 34