Ojt Practicum Performance Rating Report

  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Ojt Practicum Performance Rating Report as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 250
  • Pages: 2
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES ON-THE-JOB TRAINING / PRACTICUM PERFORMANCE RATING REPORT Name of Student Trainee: MALING, JUN DEE OSMILLO Name of Company : LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AUTHORITY Address : LRTA COMPOUND, ANDREWS AVENUE PASAY CITY Telephone No. : 854-0913 Period Covered : ___________________________________________ No. of Completed Training Hours : ____________________ MAXIM UM POINTS

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 .

Job Knowledge - Ability to apply knowledge and use sound judgment in the performance of assigned tasks Learning Ability - Has very good potential to learn new knowledge and methods Quality of work - Ability to work with accuracy, thoroughness and neatness Dependability - Ability to execute and complete work as instructed and when needed Communication skills - Ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing Attendance and Punctuality - Shows exemplary attendance and punctuality Conduct - Demonstrates Filipino values, industry-desired values and global citizen values Cooperativeness - Takes direction and guidance from superiors openly and positively Human relations - Observance of proper decorum in dealing with everyone in the workplace Compliance with the general guidelines and requirements of the company pertaining to on-the-job training/practicum GRAND TOTAL

POINTS EARNED

15 15 15 15 10 10 5 5 5 5 100 POINTS

REMARKS

_________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________ RATING: 96 – 100 91 – 95 86 – 90

Outstanding Very Satisfactory Moderate Satisfactory

81 – 85 75 – 80

Slightly Satisfactory Needs Improvement

MR. JUNELITO P. VERGARA Signature Over Printed Name of Evaluator

Related Documents