Official - Subject To Final Review

  • Uploaded by: TFT
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Official - Subject To Final Review as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,000
  • Pages: 4
Official - Subject to Final Review

1

you just mean they have authority to regulate the land?

2

MR. ELIASBERG:

That's correct.

But that's

3

the way the statute is written, under Federal

4

jurisdiction, so I believe that those two terms --

5

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

Well, I suppose they

6

have jurisdiction to regulate a lot of -- lot of land

7

that they don't own.

8 9

MR. ELIASBERG:

Well I think that in this

case when the government is actually -- there's quite a

10

bit of case law -- we set forth some in our brief --

11

where they talk about the government's power over land

12

that's within a national preserve, so I do think that

13

the criminal statutes may very well apply.

14

It certainly would be a barrier to the VFW's

15

thinking, well, no risk to us if we tear this cross

16

down.

17

believe one of the Justices and I don't remember

18

which -- the government has been required to go back and

19

put up a plaque that says:

20

of the foreign war dead.

21

believe for the VFW --

22 23 24 25

In addition, the government is required, as I

This cross erected in honor

It would be very odd indeed, I

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

What else -- what

else does the plaque say. MR. ELIASBERG:

The plaque says:

"This

cross" -- in big letters -- "erected in honor of the 37 Alderson Reporting Company

Official - Subject to Final Review

1

dead of foreign wars."

2 3

I think it would be very --

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

And that's it?

Nothing else?

4

MR. ELIASBERG:

Nothing else.

I think it

5

would be very odd indeed for the VFW to feel that it was

6

free to take down the cross and put up, for example, a

7

statues of a soldier which would honor all of the people

8

who fought for America in World War I, not just

9

Christians, and say:

Well, we were free to do that

10

because even though there's the sign that says, this

11

cross is designated to honor all the --

12

JUSTICE SCALIA:

The cross doesn't honor

13

non-Christians who fought in the war?

14

that --

15 16

MR. ELIASBERG:

Is that -- is

I believe that's actually

correct.

17

JUSTICE SCALIA:

18

MR. ELIASBERG:

Where does it say that? It doesn't say that, but a

19

cross is the predominant symbol of Christianity and it

20

signifies that Jesus is the son of God and died to

21

redeem mankind for our sins, and I believe that's why

22

the Jewish war veterans --

23

JUSTICE SCALIA:

It's erected as a war

24

memorial.

I assume it is erected in honor of all of the

25

war dead.

It's the -- the cross is the -- is the most 38 Alderson Reporting Company

Official - Subject to Final Review

1

common symbol of -- of -- of the resting place of the

2

dead, and it doesn't seem to me -- what would you have

3

them erect?

4

Star of David, and you know, a Moslem half moon and

5

star?

6

A cross -- some conglomerate of a cross, a

MR. ELIASBERG:

Well, Justice Scalia, if I

7

may go to your first point.

8

common symbol of the resting place of Christians.

9

have been in Jewish cemeteries.

10

The cross is the most I

There is never a cross

on a tombstone of a Jew.

11

(Laughter.)

12

MR. ELIASBERG:

So it is the most common

13

symbol to honor Christians.

14

JUSTICE SCALIA:

I don't think you can leap

15

from that to the conclusion that the only war dead that

16

that cross honors are the Christian war dead.

17

that's an outrageous conclusion.

18

MR. ELIASBERG:

I think

Well, my -- the point of

19

my -- point here is to say that there is a reason the

20

Jewish war veterans came in and said we don't feel

21

honored by this cross.

22

because it is a religious symbol of another religion.

23

This cross can't honor us

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Am I wrong?

Can I get back to

24

your plaque question?

25

government told us the plaque reads: 39 Alderson Reporting Company

I think the "The cross erected

Official - Subject to Final Review

1

in memory the dead of all wars, erected 1934 by members

2

of Veterans of Foreign Wars, Death Valley Post 2884."

3 4

MR. ELIASBERG: Justice, and I apologize.

5

That is correct, Mr. Chief I forgot --

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

That's a big

6

difference.

I mean, the whole point is that the plaque

7

tells you, this is not a government memorial, government

8

structure.

9

Foreign Wars, Death Valley Post 2884.

10

MR. ELIASBERG:

It was put up by members of the Veterans of

Mr. Chief Justice, the

11

context of your question was would VFW feel constrained

12

to keep the cross up?

13

And my point was --

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

The context of my

14

question was what does the plaque say?

15

MR. ELIASBERG:

Well -- I -- I apologize for

16

not giving the full text, that was not my intention to

17

-- to mislead the Court or to you, Mr. Chief Justice.

18

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS:

19

MR. ELIASBERG:

All right.

My only point is that in

20

that scenario, because did I believe we were talking

21

about, is the VFW free to do this, and I was pointing to

22

the criminal statute that I said I believe said that

23

they couldn't -- wouldn't feel free to take this down.

24

But second of all, that it would be odd indeed for them

25

to take it down when there is a big plaque that says 40 Alderson Reporting Company

Related Documents

Final Review
December 2019 26
Final Review
April 2020 17
Final Review
November 2019 26
Final Review
May 2020 17
Final Review
June 2020 17

More Documents from ""