Ob Clinical Paperwork Grading Criteria

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Ob Clinical Paperwork Grading Criteria as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 5,610
  • Pages: 29
Aquinas College ASN Program Grading Guidelines Syllabus Contents: Labor and Delivery Meds

2

Labor and Delivery Questionnaire

4

Labor and Delivery Article

5

Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring

6

Labor and Delivery Assessment

7

Observation Report

8

Observation Article

9

Postpartum Meds

10

Postpartum Article

12

Postpartum Care Plan

13

Postpartum Teaching

16

Newborn Assessment

21

Newborn Meds

22

Newborn Article

23

Newborn Teaching

24

1

Labor and Delivery Medication Sheet

Student Name _________________________________________________ Cytotec Pregnancy Classification Drug Classification identified All routes identified (there should be 3 here) Specific L/D usage (with dose range and route) cited Induction use PP Hemorrhage use IUFD use Side Effects Evaluation

Magnesium Sulfate Pregnancy Classification Drug classification identified Route identified (looking for 2 here) Correct dosage for each use Identification of PTL usage and dose Identification of PIH usage and dose Written out Side Effects Evaluation Oxytocin Pregnancy Classification Drug classification identified All routes identified (should be 2) Specific use and dosage for L/D Induction Post delivery Side Effects Evaluation

Terbutaline (ASK THE L&D NURSE!) Pregnancy Classification Drug classification identified All routes identified (should be 3) Specific usage and dosage for L/D cited Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/3 pts

_____/9 pts _____/2 pts _____/4 pts

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/ 2 pts _____/3 _____/3 _____/2 _____/2 _____/4

pts pts pts pts pts

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts

_____/6 pts _____/2 pts _____/4 pts

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/3 pts _____/7 pts _____/2 pts _____/4 pts

2

Methergine Pregnancy Classification Drug classification identified All routes identified (should be 2) Specific usage and dosage for L/D cited Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/6 pts _____/2 pts _____/4 pts

Hemabate Pregnancy Classification Drug classification identified All routes identified Specific usage and dosage for L/D cited Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1pt _____/1 pt _____/1 pt _____/3 pt _____/2 pts _____/4 pts _____

Additional Deductions for spelling errors, leading or trailing zeroes, etc. (0.5pt each up to 10 points) Total Score

_____ _____/100

Graded by______________________________________ Date ______________________________

3

L/D Questionnaire Grading Guide Student Name ______________________________________

Prenatal Labs

_____/24

Labor True Labor False Labor Tests for ROM

_____/3 _____/3 _____/3

Wt gain Excessive wt gain Too little wt gain Fluid Blood stained Green

_____/3 _____/3 _____/3

Ruptured >24 hours Vaginal Delivery EBL C/S EBL

_____/3 _____/3 _____/3

_____/2 _____/2

Stages of Labor 1st 2nd 3rd

_____/4 _____/4 _____/4

G T P A L

_____/3 _____/3 _____/3 _____/3 _____/3

EDC LMP EGA

_____/2 _____/2 _____/2

Drug Classification System for Pregnancy A B C D X NR Total

_____/2 _____/2 _____/2 _____/2 _____/2 _____/2 _____/100

Graded by ____________________________________________ Date ___________________________________________

4

Labor and Delivery Article Grading Rubric Student Name__________________________________________ Article Selection

5 Appropriate for patient care provided

Nursing Reference Time frame

5 Within designated time-frame (2004-2009)

Reference

Article Summary

Thoughts

3 Appropriate for clinical setting but not for care provided 5 Article from a nursing journal

20 Concise summary of article demonstrating clear understanding of content; well written and easy to follow

5 Referenced and using APA format 15 Accurate summary of article, but scattered thoughts and difficult to follow

3 Referenced but not with APA format 8 Article not well summarized; reader has poor understanding of article content

10 Good thoughts with opinion given and rationale

5 Random or generic thoughts with no real opinion given of article content or style

Additional Deductions Late Submission (5 pts per day) Spelling or Grammatical Errors (0.5pt per error up to 10 pts)

0 Not related to clinical setting or care provided 0 Article from a non-nursing journal 0 Article not within designated time frame (before 2004) 0 No reference

0 no summary

0 No summary of thoughts given

_____ _____ Total Score ____/50

Graded by________________________ Date____________________________ 5

Fetal Monitoring Grading Guide Student Name _______________________________________________ Early Decelerations Description Cause Treatment

_____/5 _____/10 _____/10

Variable Decelerations Description Cause Treatment

_____/5 _____/10 _____/10

Late Decelerations Description Cause Treatment

_____/5 _____/10 _____/10

Variability definition

_____/5

Other definitions Absent variability Minimal variability Moderate variability Marked variability

_____/5 _____/5 _____/5 _____/5

Total

_____/100

Graded by _______________________________________ Date _____________________________________

6

Labor and Delivery Assessment Grading Guide Student Name ______________________________________ Demographic Data

_____/3

Admission V/S

_____/2

Prenatal Labs

_____/2

History of Labor

_____/2

Medications

_____/2

Problems Past Current

_____/2 _____/2

Vaginal Exam information

_____/3

Labor Data Stage I Stage II Delivery data Stage III

_____/3 _____/2 _____/2 _____/2 _____/2

Infant Data

_____/3

Infant Behavior

_____/3

Parental Responses

_____/5

Hour by Hour Notes

_____/10

Total

_____/50

Graded by ______________________________________ Date _______________________________________

7

Observation Report Grading Rubric Student Name__________________________________________ Article Summary

20 Concise summary of day giving details of experience AND this section is 51100 words.

10 Concise summary of day giving details of experience AND this section contains only 2550 words.

5 Accurate summary of day’s events, but scattered thoughts and difficult to follow OR this section contains less than 25 words. 3

Thoughts

10

5 Excellent and thoughtful reflection of day’s events and evaluation of them AND this section is 25-50 words. 5

No evidence of personal reflection on the day’s events OR this section is less than 25 words.

Benefit

Excellent and thoughtful reflection of day’s events and evaluation of them AND this section is 51-100 words. 10

3

0

Thoughtful reflection of benefit of this observation experience AND this section is at least 25-50 words. 5

No evidence of personal reflection of benefit of this observation experience OR this section is less than 25 words. 3

Question not answered

Changes

Thoughtful reflection of benefit of this observation experience AND this section is at least 51-100 words. 10 Thoughtful suggestions on how this experience could be changed or not changed to be more beneficial for future students.

Additional Deductions Late Submission (5 pts per day) Spelling or Grammatical Errors (0.5pt per error up to 10 pts)

0 no summary

0 No summary of thoughts given

0 Question not answered

_____ _____ Total Score ____/50

Graded by________________________ Date____________________________

8

Observation Article Grading Rubric Student Name__________________________________________ Article Selection

5 Appropriate for patient care provided

Nursing Reference Time frame

5 Within designated time-frame (2004-2009)

Reference

Article Summary

Thoughts

3 Appropriate for clinical setting for not for care provided 5 Article from a nursing journal

20 Concise summary of article demonstrating clear understanding of content; well written and easy to follow

5 Referenced and using APA format 15 Accurate summary of article, but scattered thoughts and difficult to follow

3 Referenced but not with APA format 8 Article not well summarized; reader has poor understanding of article content

10 Good thoughts with opinion given and rationale

5 Random or generic thoughts with no real opinion given of article content or style

Additional Deductions Late Submission (5 pts per day) Spelling or Grammatical Errors (0.5pt per error up to 10 pts)

0 Not related to clinical setting or care provided 0 Article from a non-nursing journal 0 Article not within designated time frame (before 2004) 0 No reference

0 no summary

0 No summary of thoughts given

_____ _____ Total Score ____/50

Graded by________________________ Date____________________________ 9

Postpartum Medication Sheet Student Name _______________________________________ Percocet

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Route identified Correct range and frequency of dosage Indication for use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/4 pts

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Route identified Indication for use Correct range and frequency of dosage Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/4 pts

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Route identified Indication for use Correct range and frequency of dosage Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/4 pts

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Route identified Correct range and frequency of dosage Indication for use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/4 pts

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Correct route identified (should be 2) Correct range and frequency of dosage Indication for use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/4 pts

Motrin

Colace

Rhogam

Toradol

10

Ampicillin

Pregnancy Classification

_____/1pt

Drug classification identified Correct route identified (should be 2) Correct range and frequency of dosage Indication for use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/2 pts _____/4 pts

Name

_____/3 pts _____

Additional Deductions for spelling errors, leading or trailing zeroes, etc. (0.5pt each up to 10 points)

Total Score

_____

_____/100 Graded by ______________________________________ Date _________________________

11

Postpartum Article Grading Rubric Student Name__________________________________________ Article Selection

5 Appropriate for patient care provided

Nursing Reference Time frame

5 Within designated time-frame (2004-2009)

Reference

Article Summary

Thoughts

3 Appropriate for clinical setting for not for care provided 5 Article from a nursing journal

20 Concise summary of article demonstrating clear understanding of content; well written and easy to follow

5 Referenced and using APA format 15 Accurate summary of article, but scattered thoughts and difficult to follow

3 Referenced but not with APA format 8 Article not well summarized; reader has poor understanding of article content

10 Good thoughts with opinion given and rationale

5 Random or generic thoughts with no real opinion given of article content or style

Additional Deductions Late Submission (5 pts per day) Spelling or Grammatical Errors (0.5pt per error up to 10 pts)

0 Not related to clinical setting or care provided 0 Article from a non-nursing journal 0 Article not within designated time frame (before 2004) 0 No reference

0 no summary

0 No summary of thoughts given

_____ _____ Total Score ____/50

Graded by________________________ Date____________________________ 12

Postpartum Care Plan Grading Rubric Student Name____________________________

Patient History

10 Thorough history of pt labor/ infant status

Diagnosis #1

10 Appropriate and highest priority

Goals

15 Specific and measurable

Interventions

7 A few missing elements of pt history (<3)

5 3-6 missing elements

3 > 6 missing elements

0 no patient history included

5 Appropriate Diagnosis but not accurately prioritized

0 Not a good diagnoses choice for this patient

10 Specific, but not measurable

7 Too general

0 Not specific or measurable

30 Excellent list of interventions, considering specific needs of individual pt.

25 Good interventions, but not considering individual needs of patient

20 Need for > 3 additional interventions

15 Many appropriate interventions omitted (>5) or 25-50% interventions listed are not done

10 Good interventions listed, but >50% not performed

Rationale

15 Good explanation of need for specific intervention

10 25% of interventions without rationale

7 50% of interventions without rationale

5 75% of interventions without rationale

0 no rationale

Evaluation

10 Good evaluation of goals with measurable information

7 Evaluation accurate, but without measurable information

5 Interventions not evaluated in relationship to GOALS

0 No evaluation

13

Postpartum Care Plan Grading Rubric, p. 2 Student Name____________________________

Diagnosis #2

10 Appropriate and highest priority

Goals

15 Specific and measurable

Interventions

5 Appropriate Diagnosis but not accurately prioritized

0 Not a good diagnoses choice for this patient

10 Specific, but not measurable

7 Too general

0 Not specific or measurable

30 Excellent list of interventions, considering specific needs of individual pt.

25 Good interventions, but not considering individual need of patient

20 Need for > 3 additional interventions

15 Many appropriate interventions omitted (>5) or 25-50% interventions listed are not done

10 Good interventions listed, but >50% not performed

Rationale

15 Good explanation of need for specific intervention

10 25% of interventions without rationale

7 50% of interventions without rationale

5 75% of interventions without rationale

0 no rationale

Evaluation

10 Good evaluation of goals with measurable information

7 Evaluation accurate, but without measurable information

5 Interventions not evaluated in relationship to GOALS

0 No evaluation

Comments:

14

Postpartum Care Plan Grading Rubric, p. 3 Student Name____________________________

Diagnosis #2

10 Appropriate and highest priority

Goals

15 Specific and measurable

Interventions

5 Appropriate Diagnosis but not accurately prioritized

0 Not a good diagnoses choice for this patient

10 Specific, but not measurable

7 Too general

0 Not specific or measurable

30 Excellent list of interventions, considering specific needs of individual pt.

25 Good interventions, but not considering individual need of patient

20 Need for > 3 additional interventions

15 Many appropriate interventions omitted (>5) or 25-50% interventions listed are not done

10 Good interventions listed, but >50% not performed

Rationale

15 Good explanation of need for specific intervention

10 25% of interventions without rationale

7 50% of interventions without rationale

5 75% of interventions without rationale

0 no rationale

Evaluation

10 Good evaluation of goals with measurable information

7 Evaluation accurate, but without measurable information

5 Interventions not evaluated in relationship to GOALS

0 No evaluation

Comments: Total Score____________

Graded by_______________________________________________ Date__________________

15

Postpartum Teaching Grading Rubric Student Name Pain Management Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

Vaginal Discharge Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

16

Pericare/Hygiene/Bathing Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

Rationale

Sources

Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Comments:

Elimination Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

17

Diet/Exercise Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

Breast Care Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

18

Emotional Changes Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

Sexuality/Family Planning Teaching

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

19

C/S Incision Care Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 3 Presentation A good amount of given with little reading or little reading. No information added information added by instructor by instructor during teaching during session. presentation Comments: (*Note to Clinical Instructor: If student is teaching

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

a Vaginal Delivery patient, please give full 4 points here for presntation)

When to call doctor Teaching

4 Thorough Information included; Easy to read and follow.

2 Good amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

1 Fair amount of information; scattered and not well organized.

0 No submission.

0 No rationale given

2 A good amount of reading and/or lots of information added by instructor during session

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Mostly read and/or lots of information added by instructor during teaching session.

Rationale

Sources Presentation

4 Presentation given with little reading. No information added by instructor during presentation

3 A good amount of reading or little information added by instructor during teaching session.

0 Sources not listed 0 Not prepared for presentation on day assigned.

Comments:

Additional deductions for spelling and grammatical errors (0.5pts each up to 10 pts) ____________

Total Score _______/ 100 Graded by_________________________________ Date_________________

20

NEWBORN ASSESSMENT Grading Guide Student Name __________________________________________________

Normal Findings and Common Variations Be detailed and give all possible findings

_____/100

Deductions will be 0.5 pt for each identified piece of missing information or lack of specificity in information

Assessment of Your Baby Be specific

_____/100

Deductions will be 1 pt for each identified piece of missing information or lack of specificity in information

Teaching needs Related to Normal Newborn Clients What might the parents need to be told regarding care of their infant based on possible and actual assessment findings?

_____/50

Deductions will be 0.5pt for each identified piece of missing information or lack of specificity in information

Total

_____/250

Date_________________________________________________________

Graded by_____________________________________________________

21

Newborn Nursery Medication Sheet Student Name __________________________________________ EES ophthalmic ointment Drug classification identified Route identified Correct dosage range and frequency identified Identification of use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/5 pts

Vitamin K Drug classification identified Route identified Correct dosage range and frequency identified Identification of use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/5 pts

Hepatitis B Drug classification identified Route identified Correct dosage range and frequency identified Identification of use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/5 pts

Sucrose Drug classification identified Route identified Correct dosage range and frequency identified Identification of use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/5 pts

EMLA Cream Drug classification identified Route identified Correct dosage range and frequency identified Identification of use Specific dosage for patient identified Side Effects Evaluation

_____/1 pt _____/2 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/3 pts _____/5 pts _____

Addition Deductions for spelling errors, leading or trailing zeroes, etc. (0.5pt each up to 10 points)

_______

Total Score

_____/100

Graded by __________________________________________ Date ______________________________________

22

Nursery Article Grading Rubric Student Name__________________________________________ Article Selection

5 Appropriate for patient care provided

Nursing Reference Time frame

5 Within designated time-frame (2004-2009)

Reference

Article Summary

Thoughts

3 Appropriate for clinical setting for not for care provided 5 Article from a nursing journal

20 Concise summary of article demonstrating clear understanding of content; well written and easy to follow

5 Referenced and using APA format 15 Accurate summary of article, but scattered thoughts and difficult to follow

3 Referenced but not with APA format 8 Article not well summarized; reader has poor understanding of article content

10 Good thoughts with opinion given and rationale

5 Random or generic thoughts with no real opinion given of article content or style

Additional Deductions Late Submission (5 pts per day) Spelling or Grammatical Errors (0.5pt per error up to 10 pts)

0 Not related to clinical setting or care provided 0 Article from a nonnursing journal 0 Article not within designated time frame (before 2004) 0 No reference

0 no summary

0 No summary of thoughts given

_____ _____ Total Score ____/50

Graded by________________________ Date____________________________ 23

Newborn Teaching Grading Rubric Student Name Bulb Syringe Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Positioning Baby Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

24

Bottle Feeding Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Breast Feeding Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

25

Elimination Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Bathing/Skin Care Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

26

Cord Care Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Circumcision Care Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

27

Thermometer Use Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information 1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed 1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Jaundice Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

28

When to Call MD Teaching

5 Thorough Information presented without reading; No need for instructor to add additional information

4 Thorough, but information mostly read to client; no need for instructor to add additional information

3 Good information given and presented without reading; Necessary for instructor to add little information

2 Good information given but information mostly read to client; little information added by instructor

Rationale

Sources

Written documentation

2 Information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Weak on amount of information presented to client with little reading; Instructor added a good amount of additional information

0 Weak on amount of information presented to client and mostly read to client.

1 Thorough and good rationale 1 Sources listed

0 No rationale given 0 Sources not listed 0 No information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

1 Some information added by instructor during teaching session included in documentation

Comments:

Name included _____/1 Total Score _______/ 100

Graded by_________________________________ Date______________

29

Related Documents

Paperwork
July 2020 11
Ob
June 2020 40
Ob
November 2019 69
Required Paperwork
June 2020 3
Required Paperwork
June 2020 5