November 2009 Aeronautical Engineering Performance Of Schools
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View November 2009 Aeronautical Engineering Performance Of Schools as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 192
- Pages: 1
PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER (AERONAUTICAL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION) FIRST TIMERS SCHOOL
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
REPEATERS
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
% % % PASSED FAILED TOTAL PASSED FAILED TOTAL PASSED PASSED PASSED
CEBU AERONAUTICAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL
0
4
4
0%
0
3
3
0%
0
7
7
0%
CENTRAL ILOCANDIA COLLEGE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
0
0
0
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
FEATI UNIVERSITY
0
0
0
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
MATS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
1
1
2
50%
0
1
1
0%
1
2
3
33%
PATTS SCHOOL OF AERONAUTICS
13
27
40
33%
3
21
24
13%
16
48
64
25%
PHILIPPINE AIR FORCE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS-LAPU-LAPU
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
2
2
0%
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS-PASAY
8
8
16
50%
1
0
1
100%
9
8
17
53%
NOTHING FOLLOWS---------------------Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.
PASSED FAILED TOTAL
REPEATERS
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
% % % PASSED FAILED TOTAL PASSED FAILED TOTAL PASSED PASSED PASSED
CEBU AERONAUTICAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL
0
4
4
0%
0
3
3
0%
0
7
7
0%
CENTRAL ILOCANDIA COLLEGE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
0
0
0
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
FEATI UNIVERSITY
0
0
0
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
MATS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
1
1
2
50%
0
1
1
0%
1
2
3
33%
PATTS SCHOOL OF AERONAUTICS
13
27
40
33%
3
21
24
13%
16
48
64
25%
PHILIPPINE AIR FORCE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS-LAPU-LAPU
0
1
1
0%
0
1
1
0%
0
2
2
0%
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS-PASAY
8
8
16
50%
1
0
1
100%
9
8
17
53%
NOTHING FOLLOWS---------------------Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.
Related Documents
Radtech November 2009 Performance Of Schools
June 2020 3
