IPM REGIONAL REVIEW AND
COORDINATION WORKSHOP 2006 DISTRICT AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
RAMECHHAP, NEPAL by
Harihar Adhikari, M. Sc. Ag. Plant Pathology Plant Protection Officer DADO, Ramechhap Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
1
Powerpoint Presentation Layout Ramechhap Slide content
Slide No
Attention
1-2
Ramechhap Terrain / Agriculture
3-12
Irrigation structure problems
13-15
Agricultural marketing Ramechhap
16-18
Farmers’ priorities
19-20
Role of DADO/PPO/HDO/AEO
21-32
IPM review Ramechhap
33-43
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
2
@&+%)Ú
/fd]5fksf] gSzf
*%+%)Ú
*^+#%Ú
p
@&+%)Ú
gS;f–!
/fd]5fk
cjl:ylt gS;f u'Db]n
l;Gw'kfNrf]s r'r'/]
uf}Zjf/f 7f];]
6f]s/k'/ lbdLkf]v/L a]yfg
lxn]b]jL vlgofkfgL /fsfy'd
bf]/Daf
88'jf
vfF8fb]jL ufun ebf}/] dem'jf dfsfb'd lk+v'/L eL/kfgL
u'Kt]Z j/
a]tfnL gfdf8L
km'nf;L
k'/fgfufpF
u'G;L
jfDtL
/:gfn'
e6f}nL
kmk'{
ltNk'ª
lr;fkfgL
dGynL ;'gf/kfgL ;fn'kf6L
en'jfhf]/ /fd]5fk
l;Gw'nL
e'hL b'/fufpF ;}k'
gfubx
s7hf]/
ks/jf;
;f]n'v'Da'
lvDtL
u]n' rgv'
lk|tL
:yn L s'e 'sf
bf]nvf
nvgk'/
sfe|]knf~rf]s
lah'n Lsf]6
uf]7ufpF b]p/fnL ;fF3'6f/
cf]v|]gL
cf]vn9'+uf
lxdu+uf
;'sfhf]/ /fdk'/
@&+@*Ú
@&+@*Ú
;+s]t lrGx lhNnf l;dfgf uflj; l;dfgf
^ *%+%)Ú
)
^
!@ ls=dL=
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
*^+#%Ú
3
lgdf{0f tyf ljsf;M dfgj ;+zfwg ljsf; s]Gb| /fd]5fk
Land Terrain : Agriculture Ramechhap lxdu+uf uf=lj=;=
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
4
River Basin based Cereals and Vegetables Pocket Bhatauli-Pakarbas-Bhaluwajor Manthali-Khurkot Road
ks/jf; uf= lj= ;=
tfdfsf]zL gbL
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
5
Agriculture Ramechhap
dem'jf uf=lj=;=, /fd]5fk Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
6
Agricultural Statistics Ramechhap Almost all crops are grown (500 -4500 m) S.No
Area Under cultivation
Production volume
Crop productivity (ton/ha)
Maize
23008
66723.2
2.9
Millet
5057
6068.4
1.20
Rice
9408
36220.8
3.85
Wheat
483
108.6.0
2.25
Citrus
1139
11092.0
11.8
Vegetables
530
6148.0
11.6
Potato
3040
29913.5
9.84
Pulses
370
306.0
1.02
Oilseed crops
437
349.6
0.8
Major Crop
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
7
d'uL6f/ kmfF6df Joj;flos t/sf/L v]tL
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
8
wfg kmfF6, dGynL ;b/d'sfd Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
9
h'gf/ au}+rfdf tf]/Lsf] cGt/–jfnL
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
10
Agriculture Ramechhap
dlxnfx? sf]bf] uf]8b}
tf]/L af/L, df8L kmfF6
cf]v|]gLdf h'gf/ ju}rf
Jo=t/sf/L v]tL, ks/jf; Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
ks/jf; uf=lj=;=df ux'F v]tL
jGbfsf] ;'o{d'vk'Ltv]nLsf tL, dGynL nfef{x? 11
Agriculture Ramechhap j=s[=lj=c= :ofp cjnf]sg ub}{
kl/jf/, s[lif / kz'
j]df};dL t/sf/L a]gf{ pTkfbg e'ld:yfg hgHof]lt cfO{=lk=Pd= s[ifs kf7zfnf ;+rflnt ks]6 If]qdf lgl/If0f ub}{ jfu=lj=c=
lh=s[=lj=sf= sf] ;xof]udf s[ifs ;d"x4f/f kfgL kf]v/L lgdf{0f
l;Tvf kmfF6 l;+rfO{ cfof]hgf, dem'jf uf=lj=;= Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
t/sf/L v]tLsf nfuL u[lxl0f4f/f kfgL ;+sng 12
a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx? a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
13
a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
a]zL kmfF6df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
14
a] z L kmfF 6 df l;+ r fO{ ;+ / rgfsf ;d:ofx? a]zL kmfF6 -dGynL_df l;+rfO{ ;+/rgfsf ;d:ofx?
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
15
Agricultural Marketing Ramechhap dlxnf ;d"x t/sf/L j]Rb} dlxnf ;d"x t/sf/L j]Rb}
dlxnf ;d"x
s[ifsx? h'gf/ jf]s]/ NofpFb}
df;' sf/f]jf/
dGynL xf6, /fd]5fk Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
16
Agricultural Marketing Ramechhap
/fd]5fk xf6 jhf/, /fd]5fk–( Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
17
Meat Marketing Ramechhap
l;Tvf kmfF6 l;+rfO{ cfof]hgf Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
18
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
Farmers' Priorities
Acquire land Legalise ownership Arrange for family experiences Socio-cultural considerations Cropping pattern based on topography Family interest and market value Seeding, broadcasting or transplanting Irrigation and weeding management Intercultural operations & pest management (IPM) Crop maturity and harvest Processing and storage Marketing of surplus product Family expenditure and the continuum Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
19
A typical mid-hill farmer, Okhreni VDC
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
20
Problematic insect pests of crops in Ramechhap • • • • • • • • • • • •
Citrus green bug Citrus scale insect DBM Mango stone weevil Cut worms Red ants Termites Epilachna beetle Red spider mite Litchi leaf curl mite Litchi bug Banana bunch beetle
Fruit fly of cucurbits Citrus fruit fly Various aphids, Citrus aphids Cucurbit stem splitter Potato tuber moth Rice leaf folder Red pumpkin beetle Cabbage bud grasshopper Citrus nematode Brinjal fruit and shoot borer Banana stem borer Chilly thrips
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
21
Problematic diseases of crops in Ramechhap • • • • • • • • • •
Citrus gummosis Damping off of vegetables Wilt of solanaceae Papaya virus Alternaria of brassicas Blast of rice Chilly mosaic virus Yellow rust of wheat Cauliflower boron deficiency Blight of potato
Leaf spot of maize Leaf spot of rice Chilly anthracnose Blight of chilly Powdery mildew of citrus Downy mildew of cucurbits Gummy stem blight of BG Black rot of crucifers Bacterial soft rot of cabbage
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
22
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
Rofp v]tL ljsf; dGynLdf Rofp v]tL
/fd]5fk jhf/df Rofp v]tL
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
23
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
df}/L ljsf;df k|fljlws ;xof]u gf=k|f=;= s[i0f jxfb'/ e'h]n rfsf lgl/If0f ub}{}{
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
24
Role of DADO / IPM Officer
cf]v|]gL–&, x'lbndf /]zd sfo{qmd
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
25
/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u
Joj:yfkg gePsf] ju}+rf Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
26
/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u
;fdfGo Joj:yfkg ePsf] ju}+rf / v'zL au}+rf wgL Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
27
/f]u tyf sL/f lgoGq0fdf k|fljlws ;xof]u ;d:of lgbfg cleofg -k|bz{g ljt/0f_ -lgnf] t'yf], r'gf, vgLh t]n ljt/0f_
Joj:yfkg gePsf] ju}+rf
;fdfGo Joj:yfkg ePsf] ju}+rf
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
28
lhNnf :t/df b]lvPsf sL/fx?sf] k|sf]k
aGbfsf] k'tnLsf km'nsf] y'k|f]
wld/f
aGbfsf] k'tnLsf nfef{x?
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
29
Damage by Red Spider Mite
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
30
Role of IPM Officer
IPM FFS
/QmsfnL cfO{=lk=Pd= s[ifs kf7zfnf, ;'sfhf]/–# d'8fhf]/df ;xhLs/0f ub}{ af=;=c= xl/x/ clwsf/L, jfujfgL ljsf; clws[t e/t jxfb'/ cfrfo{ / ;]=s]=sf k|f=;= hxfg jxfb'/ sfsL{ Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
31
Pesticide use on crops Ramechhap
• Pesticide use is minimal and is applied in commercial chilly, potato, cucurbits, etc. • Nuvan for almost all insects, bed bugs, animal shed, sleeping bed (palang) • Rogor, Dimethoate for citrus green bug, scale insects, aphids, lepidopterous larvae • Mineral oil for citrus scale insects • Dithane M-45, Krylaxyl gold and Bavistin for blights of potato, vegetables, chilly, etc Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
32
VDCwise FFS Conducted Ramechhap (12/55) S No
VDC
Crop
Location
Farmer Facilitator
AEO (2057.5-)
PPO (2060.8-)
HDO (2061.11-)
1
Sukajor
Cau, Junar
S-3, 6, 9
2
-
2
2
2
Okhreni
Cab, Junar
O-8
1
1
-
-
3
Pakarbas
Rice, Chilly
P–3
-
1
1
-
4
Khimti
TPS, Rice
K–1
1
1
-
-
5
Ramechhap
Cauli, Junar
R–4
-
1
1
-
6
Tilpung
Rice
T–9
2
-
-
-
7
Manthali
Rice
M – 1, 4
-
2
-
-
8
Bhatauli
TPS
B–2
-
1
-
-
9
Bhaluwajor
Cauliflower
B–1
-
1
-
-
10
Chisapani
Rice
C–8
1
-
-
-
11
Gelu
Rice
G–7
1
-
-
-
12
Phulasi
Rice
P–1
1
-
-
-
9
8
4
2
Total FFS(21)
5
15
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
33
FFS REPORTING FORMAT (270 PAGES) v08 !M s[ifs kf7zfnfsf] clGtd r]sln:6 tyf k|ltj]bg -kfgf (%_ ;xh stf{n] kf7zfnf ;+rfng ug{ dfu u/]sf] lgj]bg kfgf ! clGtd r]sln:6 kfgf % ljj/0ffTds k|ltj]bg kfgf % afnL rqm, n}=lj=, tof/L j}7s, ;fKtflxs xflhl/, sfo{tflnsf kfgf @^ rf/ pk;d"x k|To]ssf] AESA COMPILATION kfgf * t'ngfTds ;fKtflxs ;f/f+z s[ifs tl/sf kfgf !^ t'ngfTds ;fKtflxs ;f/f+z cfO{ lk Pd tl/sf kfgf !^ s[ifs kf7zfnfsf] ;fKtflxs l/kf]6{ kfgf !^ s[ifs lbazdf pkl:ylt / lg0f{o k|ltlnlk kfgf @ kmf]6f] !@ k|lt, Jofg/ yfg ! v08 @M s[lif kof{j/0f k|0ffnL ljZn]if0f -kfgf !@*_ rf/ pk–;d"x k|To]ssf] s[ifs tl/sfdf s[lif kof{j/0f k|0ffnL ljZn]if0f kfgf $ x !^ = ^$ rf/ pk–;d"x k|To]ssf] cfO{ lk Pd tl/sfdf s[lif k= k|= lj= kfgf $ x !^ = ^$ v08 #M vr{ ljj/0f -kfgf $&_ kmd{ g+ ! kfgf @ kmd{ g+ @ kfgf ! kmd{ g+ # ;+u ;DjlGwt ef}r/ kfgf ^ ef}r/ ;+Vof ! b]lv !( sf] kfgf !( ;fbf sfuhdf 6fF; u/L ef}r/df gTyL u/LPsf] lan ekf{O{ ;+Vof kfgf !( Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
34
PPO / IPM Trainer: Harihar Adhikari* (IPM Training: 2056, Rice, Janakpur)
FFS Facilitated S.N.
FFS Name
Location
Crop
Fund Source PPD
DADO
FFS date
Farmer Facilitator's Name
ASC Technician
1
Kalapani IPM FFS
Phulasi-1
Rice
*
-
2060/03/16-2060/8/05
Dipsikha Dahal
-
2
Kalikadevi IPM FSS
Sukajor-6
Junar
-
*
2060/7/22-2060/11/17
-
Jahan Bdr karki
3
Janajyoti IPM FSS
Khimti-1
Paddy
*
-
2061/03/21- 2061/7/23
Dipsikha Dahal
-
4
Chanaute Dhande IPM FSS
Tilpung-9
Paddy
*
-
2061/03/28- 2061/7/24
Dipsikha Dahal
-
5
Raktakali IPM FSS
Sukajor-3
Cauliflower
-
*
2061/8/12 - 2061/12/13
-
Jahan Bdr karki
Bhimsen IPM FSS
Chisapani-8
Paddy
*
-
2062/3/05 -2062/08/25
Dipsikha Dahal Somesh Thapa
Cauliflower
-
*
Cauliflower
*
-
Rice
*
-
6 7 8
Kartike Taja Tarkari Utpadan
Ramechhap-4
Bhumithan Janajtoti IPM FSS
Sukajor-9
9 Manakamana IPM FFS 10
Trishakti Janajagaran IPM FSS
*2046-2054 in Sericulture
Gelu-7
Sukajor-9
Cauliflower
*
-
Narayan Kumar magar Jahan Bdr Karki
2062/ 08/ - 2062/11/ 2062/08/01-2062/12/26
Padam Lama Hari Bahadur Ghising
2063/03/14 - 2063/08/
Dipsikha Dahal Somesh Thapa Shankha Bir Majhi
2063/04/5- 2063/
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
Padam Lama Hari Bahadur Ghising
Jahan Bdr Karki
Jahan Bdr Karki
2057-2060 M. Sc. Study Leave 35
HDO/ IPM Trainer : Bharat Bahadur Acharya (IPM Training 2058, Vegetable) FFS conducted S.N.
Activities
district
Number
budget source
PPD
DADO
SSMP
FFS Location
Crop
FFS start date
1
IPM FFS Vegs.
Dolakha
1
*
-
-
Bhimeshwor M-10
Cauliflower
2058-10
2
IPM FFS Vegs.
Dolakha
1
-
*
-
Bhimeshwor M-1
Cauliflower
2058-10
3
IPM FFS Vegs.
Dolakha
1
*
-
-
Bhimeshwor M-2
Cauliflower
2059-07
4
IPM FFS Vegs.
Dolakha
1
-
*
-
Bhimeshwor M-10
Cauliflower
2059-10
5
IPM FFS Vegs.
Dolakha
1
-
*
-
Bhimeshwor M-2
Cauliflower
2060-07
6
IPNS FFS Vegs
Dolakha
1
-
-
*
Bhimeshwor M-1
Cauliflower + Maize
2059-07
7
IPNS FFS Vegs
Dolakha
1
-
-
*
Bhimeshwor M-2
Cauliflower + Maize
2059-07
8
IPNS FFS Vegs
Dolakha
1
-
-
*
Bhimeshwor M-10
Cauliflower + Maize
2060-08
9
IPM FFS Vegs
Ramechhap
1
-
*
-
Ramechhap-4
Cauliflower
2062-07
10
IPM FFS Vegs
Ramechhap
1
*
-
-
Sukajor-9
Cauliflower
2063-04
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
36
Benefits of IPM Adoption to Farmers • Empowers farmers for field problem identification and agroecology analysis. • Helps farmers to judicially use pesticide based on insect pest, disease or severity. • Social cooperation and understanding is increased. • Commercial farmers in pocket areas are more benefited. • IPM brought awareness on their own friends, the "natural enemies of insect pests, weeds and diseases".
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
37
Experiences from IPM FFS •
•
• • •
Small plot trials (simulation trials) helps progressive farmers to design and test small farming problems on their own field. Due to balanced fertilizer use, proper doses and frequency of pesticide use, quantity as well as quality of agriculture produce is increased, farming cost is decreased. Conservation of natural enemies is enhanced. Participants could diagnose field problems and solve it by themselves. Overall package of production practices helps farm families to sustain their agriculture. Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
38
ISSUES OF IPM IMPLEMENTATION •
•
• • •
IPM is an ecological approach to agriculture and needs more labour and understanding, which is in short supply even in the farm families. Educated family members do not want to continue agriculture occupation; their parents guide their children to search occupations that are more rewarding. Consumers have not focused their interests to get healthy or good quality products. Therefore, there is no support to IPM. There is no any social, moral or intellectual value of agriculture from elite groups. Different trainings, workshops, meetings, seminars are entertained nowadays, but the field allowance for IPM farmer facilitators are stagnant since a decade. Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
39
ISSUES OF IPM IMPLEMENTATION -----continued • Policy advocacy and reform initiative should come from those who actually use it. • Technology and policy generation centres such as Agricultural Colleges, NARC, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Local Governance, etc should be guided by progressive farmers and their trade associations; they should not remain as passive adopters.
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
40
Recommendations to improve farming situations All basic infrastructures such as land holding size, irrigation water, access to reasonably priced supplies and road networks, packaging and transportation discounts, access to free education and health services provided in integrated way can sustain agriculture and farming tradition. Farmers should be empowered to fix prices of their products, and they should not be compelled to sell their products in compulsion or due to poverty.
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
41
Recommendations to improve IPM Adoption • Participants should all be commercial farmers, but may not be available in such numbers required at one pocket. • Second FFS on another crop should be given to the same group to increase learning habit (environment). • The FFS should be conducted on economically important crop, incorporating significant bottlenecks (more on rice?). • Farmer trainer him/her-self should be commercial farmer, & known for his/her performance in farming. • More than one FFS per week by a single IPM trainer may not be so effective. • Facilitator allowance should be increased to Rs 600/week. • Adoption can not be enforced, facilitation may help it. Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
42
PROBLEMS ON IMPLEMENTING IPM • Farmers, students and school teachers want to participate the FFS on Saturdays when the IPM facilitator is legally obliged to take rest. • When commercial pocket areas are far from either DADO or ASC offices, the IPM facilitator must be ready to spent 2-3 days; 3-5 hours walk one way, each week is certainly difficult. • Follow-up programs, such as monthly meetings, monthly savings, or linkages with ASCs are poor. • Professional videos on IPM / ICM / IDM / IPNS / ICWMP are far better effective medium of communication for the public, than the FFS, but are not created or are costly or not available. 43 Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
HDO
DPA Himganga VDC SADO
THANK YOU Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
44
THE END
Regional IPM Review and Coordination Workshop, Ramechhap
45