Nasa 148184main Shuttle Brief 20060428

  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Nasa 148184main Shuttle Brief 20060428 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 6,162
  • Pages: 28
1 NASA OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 303 E STREET, S.W., #P WASHINGTON, D.C. 20546 (202) 358-1600

"Space Shuttle Program Update on STS-121" SPEAKERS: MICHAEL GRIFFIN, Administrator, NASA WAYNE HALE, Manager, Space Shuttle Program BILL GERSTENMAIER, Associate Administrator, Space Operations KEN WELZYN, External Tank Chief Engineer [Moderated by Dean Acosta]

11:10 a.m. through 11:41 a.m., EST Friday, April 28, 2006

[TRANSCRIPT PREPARED FROM A NASA TV WEBCAST RECORDING.]

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

2

1

P R O C E E D I N G S

2

MR. ACOSTA:

Good morning.

Welcome from

3

Headquarters here in Washington, D.C., for today's Space

4

Shuttle Update.

5

Administrator Michael Griffin, Space Operations Associate

6

Administrator Bill Gerstenmaier.

7

Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, we have Space Shuttle

8

Program Manager Wayne Hale and External Tank Chief Engineer

9

Ken Welzyn.

Today's participants include NASA

From the Marshall Space

10

We will have some short opening remarks followed

11

by some questions and answers, starting here in Washington

12

first, and then we will go around to reporters at the

13

centers.

14

As is customary, please identify yourself and

15

your organization before asking your question and also

16

address whoever you are asking your question to as well.

17 18 19

As another reminder, please turn off all cell phones and blackberries before we get started. All right.

It is now my pleasure to introduce

20

NASA Administrator Mike Griffin.

21

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

22

Thanks, Dean.

[Inaudible] want us all to hear from first is Wayne. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

3

1

MR. ACOSTA:

2

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

Okay. I'm primarily here for

3

top-level issues, and if we get one of those, I'll handle

4

it.

5 6

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

Wayne, we will go to

you first, and let's hear your opening remarks.

7

MR. HALE:

Thank you, and good morning,

8

everybody.

9

we have had here to discuss the status of the Space

I appreciate the interest and the turnout that

10

Shuttle, and I want to start out by saying that we have

11

celebrated the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Space

12

Shuttle just a few days ago, and it is a remarkable thing

13

to think about, all of the folks that worked to design this

14

incredible vehicle, 30 years ago, to its first maiden

15

flight, 25 years ago, and all the incredible activities

16

that we have been able to do in space because we have this

17

wonderful machine.

18

But as you know, we do have a serious concern

19

with debris, particularly debris coming off the external

20

tank and the foam that can come off the tank.

21

clearly something that we had not carefully considered

22

before the Columbia accident or as carefully as we should MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

It was

4

1

have, and we have spent this past considerable period of

2

time working to make the debris situation, the potential

3

for liberation of foam off of the tank, as small as we

4

possibly can.

5

I am reminded of the words of Dr. Diane Vaughan

6

who talked about NASA in a book about an earlier problem

7

that we had that foam is, in her definition, "an unruly

8

technology," and what she meant by that and what I

9

understand that she meant by that is that it is not well

10

understood in the way that we understand metals and some

11

other aspects of engineering.

12

understanding of the mechanical properties of foam.

13

Insulation is something that we are going to be working on

14

for some time.

15

It is a science, the

What we have done in the Space Shuttle Program is

16

to take a look at our largest potential areas of threat

17

from foam loss and attach each one of them.

18

first area to work on was the 1.6 pounds of foam that we

19

lost during the Columbia launch that caused that accident.

20

We have eliminated the bipod ramps off the outside of the

Clearly, the

21

external tank, so that there is no continued threat from

22

that large piece of foam. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

5

1

We made improvements in a number of areas and

2

then decided to fly what we have termed our "first of two

3

test flights," STS-114, to see if we had, in fact, done

4

enough to mitigate foam loss, and as you frequently do in

5

test flights, we found that there was another mechanism

6

that we had not considered, another opportunity to lose

7

foam that we should address when we lost a

8

just-over-one-pound piece of foam off what we call the

9

protuberance airload ramp, the PAL ramp, and the pass

10

several months, we had been working very hard to eliminate

11

that ramp and make sure that we can fly without that large

12

piece of foam.

13

That change constitutes the largest aerodynamic

14

change that we have made to the Space Shuttle launch system

15

since it first flew, and we are approaching that with a

16

great deal of care, doing the work necessary to prove that

17

the aerodynamics will still be good, that we have not

18

introduced an aerodynamic loads problem that could cause

19

the structure underlying to come to grief.

20

intricate process, and that still faces us for our next

21

flight, and we will be working on ensuring that the removal

22

of the PAL ramp was a safe thing to do, almost up to the MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

That is a very

6

1

Flight Readiness Review.

2

report out of the loads assessment people and the

3

aerodynamics people just before the Flight Readiness

4

Review.

5

We expect to have our final

At the same time, we know that past the PAL ramp,

6

there is further work we would like to do on the tank.

7

There are more areas where we have seen historically foam

8

loss, and yesterday -- or I should say that we know the

9

next largest area that we are concerned about is something

10

called "ice frost ramps," which I have got a model of and

11

we will talk about in a minute, and some months ago, we

12

determined that if we were going to modify the ice frost

13

ramps during this preparation for the STS-121 flight, that

14

the appropriate time to modify those ice frost ramps would

15

be the first week in May.

16

Every Thursday, we have programmatic review

17

board, and we had pencilled in sometime back, April 27th as

18

being the date that we would review whether it is

19

appropriate or not to make a change to the ice frost ramps.

20

We had that review yesterday.

It was an

21

outstanding review.

22

of literally hundreds of people, many, many tests, many

It represented the culmination of work

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

7

1

designs.

2

been going on in the wind tunnels around the country where

3

we have put some of these test articles to see how they

4

will work out, and we reached a conclusion yesterday that

5

it was mixed conclusion, as many of the decisions that are

6

brought to the program manager's desk are.

Some of you had been following the work that's

7

There are folks that have opinions on both sides,

8

people that come from strong technical backgrounds and give

9

me and the other management team great advice, and

10

yesterday was a typical day in that we got some mixed

11

recommendations and made a decision.

12

Let me talk a little bit about what we've got.

13

On my left, your right, here is a test article that has got

14

one of the ice frost ramps in a test configuration where we

15

have been using it here at the Marshall Space Flight Center

16

to see the effects on the back side of this piece-part

17

model.

18

that we can see how the foam will react to that, whether it

19

will keep ice from forming, whether it will crack, whether

20

other things might happen.

21 22

Cryogenic liquids helium is normally introduced, so

These ramps are spread out over the rank, and by way of background, we have over 4,000 pounds of foam MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

8

1

insulating the external tank.

2

is robotically sprayed onto the outside of the tank.

3

one-quarter of that foam is applied manually.

4

frost ramps are applied manually.

5

About three-quarters of that About

These ice

I have a scale model which perhaps shows even

6

better.

7

the vertical, we have the big 17-inch LOX line, liquid

8

oxygen line, coming down to the right, and then we have the

9

other protuberances.

10

On the outside of the tank, looking at the tank in

Remember, we talked about the

protuberance airload ramp.

11

We have a cable tray that carries instrumentation

12

from the bottom to the top of the tank.

13

pressurization lines, one for the hydrogen and one for the

14

oxygen, that run from the engines in the Space Shuttle

15

orbiter up to the top of those two tanks to keep them

16

pressurized during flight.

17

We have two

All of these things are connected to the

18

underlying aluminum tank with metal brackets, and if that

19

metal were uninsulated in the warm and humid environment in

20

Florida, ice would form, and that would be unacceptable to

21

us.

22

So we apply foam to the outside of those brackets. Historically, we have seen as much as 2- or MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

9

1

3-ounce pieces of foam come off these brackets, these "ice

2

frost ramps" as we call them.

3

hard to come up with a shape that will not lose foam, but

4

will at the same time insulate these brackets.

5

is still ongoing.

6

We have been trying very

That work

The decision that we had to come to yesterday was

7

a question of whether it is appropriate to make more than

8

one major change to the aerodynamic outer shell of the

9

vehicle.

10

When we came right down to it, the recommendation

11

that I came to and provided to the Administrator and to the

12

Associate Administration is that we are in a flight test

13

program, classical flight test if you look at aircraft or

14

other experimental vehicles.

15

you should fly that major change without other major

16

changes to see how it performed, and then if you have

17

subsequent changes to be made, you make those in subsequent

18

flights.

19

When you make a major change,

The reason we had such an interesting discussion

20

-- and I would say that it was not outside the usual kind

21

of interesting discussion we have at our requirements board

22

-- is because there is a foam loss that we have seen and we MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

10

1

will expect to see off of the ice frost ramps on the next

2

flight.

3

ramps as they exist.

4

It is not without risk to fly these ice frost

There was a strong concerted opinion from several

5

folks that we should wait until we have a good design on

6

these pieces of foam and then change them as well before we

7

go fly.

8

very strongly.

9

back to the fact that it is more appropriate to make one

That is not without merit, and we considered it However, at the end of the day, we came

10

change at a time, to take care of the biggest problem that

11

we have, and then work our way to the next situation that

12

we would like to improve, and I expect that will be the

13

story of the external tank for the remainder of the life of

14

the Space Shuttle Program.

15

I surely hope and plan that the next vehicle that

16

we as an agency make will have eliminated this kind of

17

concern in its basic design and we won't have to worry

18

about it.

19

they go on to the Moon that will involve risk decisions in

20

the future as well.

21 22

Clearly, they will have plenty of challenges as

So, at the end of the day yesterday, the decision going forward was to fly, leaving these ice frost ramps as MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

11

1

is, knowing that we will expect to have some small foam

2

loss that could pose a risk to us, or occur during the next

3

flight or maybe two, while we continue to investigate how

4

well our major aerodynamic change performs, and then we

5

will proceed to deal with these smaller areas of foam loss.

6

That is about all I have to say, and I will ask

7

if anybody else has an opening statement or if we are ready

8

to go to questions.

9 10

MR. ACOSTA:

Gerst?

MR. GERSTENMAIER:

I think Wayne has covered it

11

really well.

12

got a chance to hear and see the work that the team has

13

done over this period of time.

14

tribute to the team that has pulled this work together.

15

I think he described the discussions that we

I think it is a real

You know, we started kind of last September with

16

this overall plan of where we were going to do this testing

17

and when the analysis was going to be complete, and through

18

that entire period, all that work has been accomplished by

19

the teams pretty much on schedule that allowed us to have

20

this meeting yesterday to make this decision.

21

look all the way back from September to where we are today,

22

the teams have executed that plan through lots of problems. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

So, if you

12

1 2 3

The hurricane didn't help with all that, but the teams worked through all that stuff. They continue to do a great job to bring us a

4

good set of data yesterday.

5

tunnel work has gone into this.

6

they have worked in getting these wind tunnel tests done.

7

They are not easy, to run these wind tunnel tests.

8

not easy to understand this data.

9

A tremendous amount of wind I can't stress how hard

It is

The team did a phenomenal job to get all of this

10

stuff together in as clean a format as we could hear

11

yesterday from the team.

12

this team perform and get ready to make a tough decision,

13

but to get all of the data together and in place, it took

14

multiple months and took a lot of personal work from a lot

15

of folks, and I am really proud of Wayne and his team for

16

doing this activity.

17

MR. ACOSTA:

So it was really a tribute to see

I have learned not to ask Mike if he

18

has an opening statement.

19

straight to questions and answers.

20

Washington, D.C.

21 22

So we will go ahead and go We will start here in

Again, I ask that you identify yourself and your organization before asking your questions, and then we will MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

13

1

go to other centers around the country.

2 3

We will go ahead and start off with

QUESTIONER:

Guy Gugliotta from The Washington

Guy.

4 5

All right.

Post.

6

I guess for Wayne, does this mean that you have

7

not up to now hit on a new design for the ice frost ramps

8

that is an improvement over the old design?

9

MR. HALE:

We have been working very diligently

10

-- I should say the folks particularly here at Marshall

11

Space Flight Center, along with our Lockheed Martin

12

contractors that build the external tank for us, have been

13

working extremely hard to come up with a new shape for the

14

ice frost ramps that provides both of the characteristics

15

that we desire, which is to say does not form ice during

16

the time that we are sitting on the launch pad with the

17

cryogenics present and also will hold together and not shed

18

foam for any reason during the launch phase as we

19

accelerate to supersonic speeds through the lower

20

atmosphere.

21 22

That is not an easy process. perfect or final design in place today.

We do not have the There are a couple

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

14

1

of conceptual designs.

2

expect in the next month to 6 weeks, we will come forward

3

with a really good design that we will implement on

4

subsequent tanks.

Great progress is being made.

I

5

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

6

QUESTIONER:

Keith Cowing, NASAwatch.com, for

7 8 9

Next question, Keith.

Wayne. I have gotten some really interesting feedback from people in and around this meeting.

Some thought you

10

were too conservative in making this decision.

11

thought you were being risky.

12

that you finally just, you know, have a process in place

13

where you can listen to the hardware, so to speak, and just

14

make a decision.

15

time into it.

16

Some

Some thought it was great

Others thought that you didn't put the

This has been a long path since you have been

17

sitting in this position, answering this question, but do

18

you feel that schedule pressure is still there, or has it

19

morphed into something that you can at least cut off in

20

pieces and chew a little bit better?

21 22

MR. HALE:

Well, you know, I'm mindful of the

fact, we just had a big project management conference in MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

15

1

NASA, and it got reemphasized to us that a good project or

2

program manager does have to consider cost and schedule

3

along with the technical performance that he is trying to

4

achieve, that the program or project is trying to achieve.

5

In this particular instance, however, I felt that

6

this was an important enough decision that we should

7

divorce cost and schedule from this decision and make it on

8

purely technical grounds and then deal with the fallout.

9

We have a schedule.

It is important to have a

10

schedule.

11

Station in the next 4-1/2 years, but that didn't drive this

12

particular discussion, and we are trying to make

13

appropriate decisions in light of the schedule and not let

14

it drive us to overly risky or foolish decisions just to

15

make a schedule that we know has some time in it to allow

16

for engineering problems to be solved.

17

We intend to complete the International Space

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

We will take one more

18

question here in Washington, and then we will go to JSC.

19

We will go to Beth.

20 21 22

QUESTIONER:

Beth Dickey with Government

Executive. Given that you have now got one more foam issue MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

16

1

to deal with after you fly the next flight, for any of the

2

three of you, is this going to alter the plan to have two

3

flights as a return-to-flight test, or might you add a

4

third now?

5

MR. HALE:

Beth, we're going to take this one

6

step at a time, and we currently have plans to launch the

7

next two flights, so that they have full daylight coverage,

8

so that we can get the best data back from the tank to see

9

how the foam performed.

10 11

We will make that decision

following the next flight or two to see how we are doing. After that, we also have the radar, which is

12

tracking any debris that might be shed off the vehicle.

13

You know, we made quite a sizeable investment in

14

considerable new radar that can do quite an interesting job

15

of finding small things that come off the launch vehicle,

16

and we have new cameras that are oriented in a direction

17

where we -- some people believe at least that the light

18

from the solid rocket boosters would provide sufficient

19

illumination to still have good visual evidence through

20

what we call "first stage" or the first 2 minutes of

21

Shuttle flight to see what is going on.

22

see where the data leads us.

So we are going to

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

17

1

Obviously, it is in the interest of getting on

2

with Space Station assembly to be able to return to night

3

launch operations, and that is where we would like to get,

4

but we will measure that one flight at a time.

5 6

MR. ACOSTA:

Let's go to the Johnson

Space Center in Houston for a couple questions.

7 8

All right.

QUESTIONER:

This is Mark Carreau from the

Houston Chronicle.

9

Could you explain the number of ice frost ramps

10

that are really on the tank and how many of them, if not

11

all of them, that you are really concerned about?

12

MR. HALE:

I hate to say it, but here in

13

Huntsville, we could not hear the question.

14

low.

15

MR. ACOSTA:

Sure.

It was very

I will read the question,

16

Wayne.

17

ramps are on the vehicle or on the external tank and what

18

the --

19 20 21 22

The question was can you explain how many ice frost

PARTICIPANT:

How many of those are you concerned

with. MR. ACOSTA:

Yeah.

And how many of those are you

concerned with. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

18

1 2

MR. HALE: conference.

Ken -- I brought him to the press

We need to let him answer one question.

3

So, Ken, I will let you take that.

4

MR. WELZYN:

Okay.

There are a total of 34 ice

5

frost ramps on the external tank.

6

on the liquid oxygen tank and 16 on the liquid hydrogen

7

tank, and I believe the balance is on the inner tank.

8

The main concern that we have from a debris

9

There are, I believe, 12

standpoint turns out to be about the top four on the

10

hydrogen tank.

11

warm up as the liquid level drains from the tank during the

12

time of flight when debris poses a risk to the Shuttle.

13

These are in an area where thermally they

Obviously, we are concerned about foam loss from

14

all of them, but those are the ones that are primary

15

concern for us.

16

MR. ACOSTA:

17

[No response.]

18

MR. ACOSTA:

Next question from Johnson?

19

QUESTIONER:

This is Mark Carreau.

All right, Mark?

I'm sorry we

20

didn't hear anything, but let me ask a follow-up.

21

the expected mass and the allowable mass of foam loss that

22

you are going to work with on this next mission? MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

What is

19

1

MR. ACOSTA:

That sounded like Charlie Brown's

2

teacher asking a question.

3

that one.

4

All right.

I think we may have to repeat

We are going to come back to

5

Washington and see if we can work out some of those bugs of

6

those questions.

We will go to Jeff Morris over here.

7

QUESTIONER:

8

Daily, I guess for Wayne or Ken.

9

Hi.

Jeff Morris with Aerospace

You said 2- to 3-ounce pieces historically of

10

foam have been observed coming off.

11

what is kind of the worst-case scenario of damage that a

12

piece that size or maybe multiple pieces could do.

13

MR. HALE:

I was just wondering

Our aerodynamics folks and materiel

14

science folks tell us that the worst case, if it came off

15

with the maximum mass, which would be on the order of 3 or

16

3-1/2 ounces, and comes off at the worst time and follows

17

the worst-possible trajectory to the most vulnerable part

18

of the orbiter, it would not be what we would like to have.

19 20

I don't know how to characterize it more than that. would cause what we call "critical damage."

21 22

It

So our goal is to eliminate or mitigate -- thank you.

That's the word I was thinking of.

To mitigate that

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

20

1

hazard to the maximum extent that we possibly can, and we

2

intend to do that, and you know, once we deal with the ice

3

frost ramps, then we are going to move on to the next area

4

of the tank that we are concerned about that is potentially

5

shedding even smaller pieces and work on that one.

6

will be a continuous improvement process throughout the

7

life of the program.

8 9 10 11

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

So this

Now we are going to go

to Marshall Space Flight Center where Wayne is to get a couple of questions. QUESTIONER:

Hi.

This is Shelby Spires with the

12

Huntsville Times, and this question is either for the

13

Administrator or Wayne.

14

Wayne, you mentioned that you are committed to

15

finishing or completing the International Space Station,

16

but given that there is 3-1/2, 4 years left, do you think

17

you will make the flight rate?

18

has been reported of 16 to 18 flights doable, and is the

19

2010 date still the retirement date for the Shuttle, or is

20

that a solid date?

21 22

MR. HALE:

Is that flight rate that

I am going to take the easy part of

that first and tell you that, yes, that number of flights MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

21

1

in the next 4-1/2 years is immanently doable and well

2

within the kind of flight rate that the Shuttle has

3

provided the Nation before.

4

we can complete the International Space Station in the time

5

that we have been asked to do it, and we will have to be

6

very diligent in looking at this aging vehicle and make

7

sure that it is safe to fly every time we get ready to go

8

fly it, but I think we have the resources and the

9

capability to do that.

10

So I am very optimistic that

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

11

piece of that.

12

date.

13

And I will pick up my

The short answer is, yes, 2010 is a firm

Let me expand a little bit on the reasons for

14

that.

15

of a nature that it was dominated by the variable cost of

16

flight, the cost of flying each individual flight, then the

17

right thing to do would be to plan a certain number of

18

flights for budgetary purposes and execute that number

19

because then we would have known budgetary requirements and

20

we would be done, but this is a program whose marginal cost

21

of flight is actually quite reasonable, but for which the

22

fixed costs of ownership are quite high and variously, you

If this program, if the Space Shuttle program were

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

22

1

know, known to be about $4.5 billion a year.

2

So we at NASA, we, in fact, in the Federal

3

Government, cannot do budgetary planning for this program

4

unless we pick a date when we will be done with it.

5

have to pick a year that will be the last year we will fly

6

Shuttle flights and stick with that, and that is what we

7

are doing, and those are the reasons.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

We

Let's come back to

Washington here and see if there are any follow-up questions.

Let's go to Guy. QUESTIONER:

Guy Gugliotta again from The

Washington Post for Wayne. How has the removal of the PAL ramp affected the performance of the ice frost ramps, if at all? MR. HALE:

That is exactly the kind of question,

16

not just the ice frost ramp performance, but all the other

17

areas of the external tank and, in fact, the integrated

18

stack with the orbiter and the solid rocket boosters on it

19

that we are looking at.

20

Clearly, there are increased aerodynamic loads on

21

some structural elements.

22

the protuberances, that the PAL ramp was put on there to

In particular, we talked about

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

23

1

provide some aerodynamic relief from.

2

things we are concerned about is the cable tray and the

3

attached brackets that underlie that cable tray and how

4

they fit onto the skin of the tank and these two

5

pressurization lines and, in fact, the big 17-inch liquid

6

oxygen line as well.

7

analysis that has gone forward to demonstrate both the wind

8

tunnels computational fluid dynamics and structural

9

analysis that those parts will hold together under

So the principal

So that is exactly the kind of

10

increased load because, without the PAL ramp, there will be

11

increased loading, and, in fact, we are looking at the

12

whole integrated structure, solid rocket booster attachment

13

points, the orbiter, and all other areas to ensure that we

14

have not introduced some unanticipated consequence that

15

would be untoward.

16

So the performance of the overall vehicle has got

17

to be satisfactory from a mechanical and structural

18

standpoint.

19

That, we have yet to complete the analysis on.

In terms of other performance, the good news is

20

that is about 37 pounds of weight that we no longer will be

21

carrying to orbit that we can devote to additional supplies

22

to the International Space Station, for example. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

24

1

MR. ACOSTA:

2

MR. GERSTENMAIER:

3

Gerst, did you want to follow that? I would add one thing to that.

In the discussion that I listened to yesterday, we are

4

really kind of pushing this state-of-the-art over analysis

5

and wind tunnel capabilities throughout the country.

6

is not really one wind tunnel where you can simulate all

7

the proper conditions that are going on with the tank.

8

There is not really one test facility where you can

9

simulate all these things that come together in a Shuttle

10 11

There

launch. The tank expands when it is pressurized.

It

12

contracts when it is cooled down.

13

solid rocket motors cause vibration through the tank

14

structure which go through the bracketry, those press lines

15

that Wayne showed you.

16

through them.

17

dynamically moving in and out.

18

difficult to simulate in our test facilities and to put

19

together in computational flight dynamics.

20

The vibration from the

Those have fluid or gasses flowing

They are moving up and down.

They are

All of that is tremendously

So, at some point, you really need to go to

21

flight, and you need to go to flight with some

22

instrumentation, so you can monitor that performance and MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

25

1

see how the device and design you put together with the

2

best of your engineering capabilities actually performs in

3

flight, and that is exactly what we are doing here.

4

We are going to have some new cameras on the

5

solid rocket boosters that we can look at these areas.

6

should be able to see the ice frost ramps.

7

able to see the small foam liberation that we expect to see

8

come off, and then that data is going to be invaluable to

9

go back and improve our wind tunnel models and improve our

We should be

10

computational fluid dynamics and take a piece-wise

11

incremental step in the improvement in the design.

12

We

So we continue to monitor on each flight.

We

13

take all the data we can get from the flight.

14

together with all of our ground assets.

15

decision, and we move incrementally better on each flight.

16

MR. ACOSTA:

wants to ask a question?

18

[No response.]

19

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

Well, it looks like we

are going to be wrapping up a little earlier today.

21 22

We make the best

Zach or anybody else up front that

17

20

We put it

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

Anything back from

Houston? MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

26

1 2

MR. ACOSTA:

We do not.

So thank you for asking,

Mike.

3

Any closing remarks from Wayne?

4

MR. HALE:

Just that we are continuing to work

5

toward the July 1st launch opportunity.

6

amount of work ahead of us, but we have a good plan I think

7

and we have many dedicated people that are working very

8

hard here at the Marshall Space Flight Center.

9

Space Center, Johnson, and the other NASA centers around

10 11

We have a huge

Kennedy

the agency have really stepped up to help us. I particularly want to thank the folks at the

12

Arnold Engineering Laboratories as well as Glenn Research

13

Center and Ames Research Center where we have been doing

14

all of this wonderful wind tunnel testing and using the

15

super computers at the Ames Research Center to do our

16

computational fluid dynamics work that makes all of this

17

possible for us to feel confident when we go fly.

18

MR. ACOSTA:

19

Gerst?

20

MR. GERSTENMAIER:

21

MR. ACOSTA:

22

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

Thanks, Wayne.

Okay.

Nothing to add. Mike? No.

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

27

1 2

MR. ACOSTA:

All right.

Well, that is going to

conclude today's Space Shuttle Update.

3

I would like to remind folks that 2:00 Eastern

4

today, we are going to have the Exploration Workshop Media

5

Telecon.

6

I think, Mike, you wanted to mention a little

7

something about the Exploration Workshop that has been

8

going on.

9

ADMINISTRATOR GRIFFIN:

Yes.

I haven't been able

10

to attend it, but I keep getting reports that the people

11

who are there are really pretty happy with it.

12

following the release of our architectural blueprint, I

13

guess I should say, for returning to the Moon.

14

first major conference or major event we have had where

15

people can gather together and get to the interesting stuff

16

which is what do we want to do when we get there.

17

This is

This is the

When we don't have the transportation capability,

18

which, of course, is where we are right now, all the focus

19

has been on re-creating the lunar transportation system

20

that we once had and doing so in a manner that will allow

21

us to have the maximum transferability to Mars later on,

22

and I think we have done that. MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

28

1

But the really interesting part is what do we do

2

when we get off the Earth again for the first time in

3

decades, and that is what this conference has been devoted

4

to.

5

countries and folks from the program out there, and I am

6

looking forward to hearing how that went at 2:00 myself.

We have had folks from industry and folks from other

7

MR. ACOSTA:

8

Deputy Administrator Shana Dale along with

9

That will be great.

Exploration Systems Mission Director, Deputy Doug Cooke,

10

will be the participants in that media telecon.

11

invite everybody here that is certainly here and out at the

12

centers that want to take part to take part in today's

13

telecon, which will also be streamed on NASA.gov.

14

All right.

That is going to do it for today's

15

Space Shuttle Update.

16

have a great afternoon.

17 18

So we

We thank you for joining us, and

[End of Space Shuttle Program Update on STS-121.] - - -

MALLOY TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE (202) 362-6622

Related Documents