Multinational Trials

  • Uploaded by: api-3810976
  • 0
  • 0
  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Multinational Trials as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 656
  • Pages: 17
MULTINATIONAL TRIALS - Ajay Kumar P

Why?  Rapid patient enrollment  Expediting the development of new medicine  conducting a trial that otherwise might be impossible  To compare patients  Patients with a rare disease are to be studied

In which therapeutic areas?  Those have similar diagnosis, incidence,

classification & treatment in the participating countries are considered for the enrollment.  Many bacterial & viral infections leads to multinational trials.

In which phases of development?  Phase 1: single country.  Phase 2: few countries(pilot trials)  Phase 3: acceptable to conduct multinational

trials by keeping similar groups  Phase 4: safety surveillance studies.

 Safety versus efficacy

 Are multinational trials necessary if a disease

has a low incidence or prevalence?

Other factors affecting M Ts  Existence or prevalence of disease

ex: topical diseases, hypotention etc  Genetic background of patients

ex: g6pd deficiency  Differences in culture :-

1. Language 2. Ethics 3. Diet 4. Customs 5. Religion

Ethics Committes/ Institutional Review Boards: According to section 3.1.1 of ICH GCP guidelines:

“An IRB/IEC should safeguard the rights, safety & well being of all trial subjects. Special attention should be paid to trials that may include vulnerable subjects”. EC in UK, ~250 LRECs

10 MRECs COREC in London Trust’s R&D department

EC in France, CCPPRB( comite consultatif de protection des personnes dons la recherche) 

 EC in Canada, REB, Canadian claimant to a multinational

clinical trial (CCMC)

Flexibility of Protocol Design (1)

 Primary Objective should be same

 Secondary Objective should be same additional item is possible

Flexibility of Protocol Design (2)  Study Population    patients diagnosed with similar assessment  Inclusion Criteria main criteria should be same

 Exclusion Criteria main criteria should be same

Flexibility of Protocol Design (3)  Washout Period should be similar

 Dose and Mode of Administration same  Duration of Treatment should be same

should be

Flexibility of Protocol Design ( 4 )  Excluded medication should be similar pharmacological class

 Dose and Mode of Active control should be same

Flexibility of Protocol Design ( 5 )  Primary Endpoint should be same

 Secondary Endpoint should be same additional item is possible

Flexibility of Protocol Design ( 6 )  Vital signs main items should be same  Clinical Laboratory tests central laboratory should be utilized or main items should be same

Flexibility of Protocol Design ( 7 )  Record adverse events definition, severity, causality should be assessed using same categories  Dropouts and/or End of Study should be assessed using same categories

Increased Number of Clinical Trials Local

120

Multi

100 30

80

60 17 40 5

57 45

20

42

42

42

31

28

27

`99

`00

`01

18 0

67 38

3

1 `90

18

`91

`92

`93

`94

`95

`96

`97

`98

`02

`03. 9

Common problems with Foreign Trials  Concomitant medications may be unknown in host country.  Devices may be called by different names in host country  Diseases may be diagnosed or classified differently in host      

country Concomitant therapies may be common, unreported, or unconventional. Inclusion/exclusion requirements may be difficult in local medical practice Language idioms may not have equivalent translations English is not the same everywhere . Smaller US banks may not be familiar with wire transfers. Numbers & dates may be written differently.

Tips & suggestions for conducting Foreign Trials           

Keep trial design simple. Use only one or two endpoints. Use objective not subjective end points. Have investigator critically review protocol for practical implications. Use two-part case report forms, one part on home language, one part in host language. Use a locally-based CRO Use monitors accustomed to device trials. Don’t pool data from different countries. Double translate all trial documents. Monitor heavily. Conduct a limited feasibility study first to test the protocol.

Related Documents

Multinational Trials
November 2019 39
Multinational Companies
April 2020 13
Trials & Triumphs
May 2020 16
Clinical Trials
November 2019 28
Trials & Tests
May 2020 14