Marketing Myopia

  • Uploaded by: Diwakar Chaturvedi
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Marketing Myopia as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 430
  • Pages: 10
PRESENDED BYDIWAKAR CHATURVEDI

1

MARKETING MYOPIA MARKETING MYOPIA LITERALLY MEANS SHORT SIGHTEDNESS. THE INEFFICIENCY OF THE TOP MANAGEMENT TO BROADLY DEFINE ITS BUSINESS AND MEET CUSTOMERS NEEDS RESULTING TO A DECLINE OF THE PRODUCT.

2

FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR MYOPIA  FAILURE OF TOP MANAGEMENT TO

PREDICT THE FUTURE DEMAND.  THE BELIEF THAT THERE IS NO COMPETITIVE SUBSTITUTE FOR THE PRODUCT.  EMPHASIS ON MASS PRODUCTION AND IN ECONOMIES OF SCALE i.e. BEING PRODUCT ORIENTED RATHER THAN CUSTOMER ORIENTED  LACK OF RESEARCH WHAT THE CUSTOMER WANTS. 3

CASE: BRAND : AMBASSADOR  COMPANY: HINDUSTAN MOTORS  AGENCY: MUDRA/ EQUUS  BRAND ANALYSIS COUNT: 326

4

HISTORY: CALLED AS THE FIRST INDIAN CAR  OWNES ITS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY

TO BRITISH CAR MODEL MORRIS OXFORD BUILT BY MORRIS MOTOR Co AT OXFORD U.K.  HINDUSTAN MOTORS LAUNCHED THE INDIANISED VERSION OF MORRIS OXFORD AS AMBASSODOR IN 1958.  OCCUPIED & RULED INDIAN CAR MARKET FORM 1958-1980 5

FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR GROWTH OF AMBY OVER DECASES.  ONLY CAR WITH DIESAL OPTION.  LARGE SPACED.  PERCEPTION, STURDY CAR IDEAL FOR

INDIAN MADE.  PERCEPTION OF BEING LESS EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN.  OVER 16% BRAND SALES CAME FROM GOVERNMENT.

6

REASONS ATTRIBUTED TO BRAND FAILURE FOR FOUR DECADES THE BRAND HAS

BEEN TABING ITS CUSTOMERS FOR GRANTED.  IF WE LOOK AT THE PRODUCT, AMBY NEVER

CHANGED WITH TIMES.  HIGHLY PRICES – OVER TIME.  BRAND TRIED TO MAKE A FEW CHANGES AND

UPGRADES WERE MADE NAMED AS MARK 2, MARK 3, MARK4 BUT LOOK AND BUILT IN QUALITY REMAINED SAME.

 HM NEVER BOTHERED TO RATIONALIZE THE

PRICE OF BRAND.  ACHIEVED FULL DEPRECIATION IN 2000 BUT NEVER THOUGHT OF PASSING ON THE

7

CONTNUIED: INDICA TOOK AWAY TAXI CAR MARKET AND

  



CUSTOMERS GOT A NEW OPTION FOR DIESAL CAR WHICH WAS A MODERN ONF IMMENSE COMPETITION. CUSTOMER IS SPOILT WITH CHOICES. IN 2002 Mr. ATAL BIHARI VAJPAI REPLACED AMBASSADOR WITH A BMW Limo, FROM THEN IT LOST THE POSITION OF BEING FIRST POLITICICANS’ CHOICE . THE CAR LACKED THE QUALITY AND REFINEMENT & RATTLING SOUNDS AND RUSTLING WAS COMMON COMPLAINTS.

8

LESSON: A BRAND EXISTS IN THE MARKET TILL IT BECOMES DATED. ONCE THE BRAND BECOMES DATED, IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO REJUVENATE THE BRAND.  BRAND MUST GO TO THE CONSUMER FOR

IDEAS.  CHANGES IN PRODUCT OR PROMOTION CAN SUSTAIN THE BRAND EVEN IN EMERGING COMPETITION.  AMBY SHOULD LEARN FROM MARUTI 800. THE BRAND IS STILL SURVIVING BECAUSE IT MADE CHANGES ALONG WITH CHANGING CONSUMER VALUES.

9

THANKS DIWAKAR CHATURVEDI

10

Related Documents

Marketing Myopia
May 2020 26
Marketing Myopia
June 2020 24
Marketing Myopia
April 2020 27
Myopia
October 2019 47
Marketing Myopia (team 5)
November 2019 32

More Documents from ""