Lowen Response

  • Uploaded by: Keith Benson
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Lowen Response as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 431
  • Pages: 2
Keith Benson Curriculum Analysis Dr. Ben Justice 4.18.2008

(I tried to see if I can answer the question in one true paragraph – I don’t know if I did or not)

The reading by Tyack starts off by stating that social studies textbooks are so “dull” but cause much “controversy”. In class last night, you handed out a recent article about Matthew LeClair’s concerns over his AP social studies textbook, the question “Where were the teachers in all this”. This leads me to attempt to rectify the paradox mentioned on the syllabus. It seems to me the controversy does not take place within the schools themselves but occurs at higher bureaucratic levels and among a few “rabble-rousing” students and their parents. Teachers, those who choose to use them, as has already been stated, use them without much objection at all. And this is one area where I wish I could have been more effective in communicating during class at times. Sometimes we sit together in class and discuss what is wrong and ineffective about teaching social studies, but with the exception of a few students, the concept that this profession is a public, governmental position escapes most of us. Teachers are not working in cubicles dealing with inanimate objects, nor are they hired to be revolutionaries necessarily. In addition like most professions, especially those of public service, being the person making waves is looked down upon, even

if the person has a valid, sustainable argument. The phrase “the nail that sticks out, gets hammered down” is a near perfect depiction of teaching social studies in a public school. As a result, most teachers, especially older teachers with tenure, those nearing retirement, or those not confident in the subject find it easier work-wise, and safer occupationally to simply use what tools have been given by their board of education and supervisor. In class, Lowen’s quote about 70 percent of social teachers teaching solely from the textbook in traditional fashion was taken to task, but I would venture to say it is probably even higher. The motivation to do more in the classroom, to go the extra mile, is most times simply not there. (But the motivation to do more in any profession is usually the exception and not the rule.) Add to it, the fear of being told on, fear of getting a negative evaluation, or simply being hassled is usually enough to stop teachers from upsetting the apple cart. Unfortunately, for our students, the message government and politics dictates is communicated unchecked and unchallenged – as wrong as they often are.

Related Documents

Lowen Response
April 2020 10
Response
December 2019 40
Response
November 2019 41
Response
May 2020 27
Response
November 2019 46
Response
November 2019 21

More Documents from ""