Letter From Editor

코리아 메일 - 대한민국 대표메일의 자부심

페이지 1 / 4

편지 읽기

제 목|

Environmental Engineering Science - Decision on Manuscript ID EES-05-0100.R1

다른 편지함으로 옮기기

보낸 사람 | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 받는 사람 | [email protected], [email protected] 도착시간 | 2006.04.15 (토) 23:15 15-Apr-2006 Dear Dr. Indarto: Manuscript ID EES-05-0100.R1 entitled "Conversion of CO2 by Gliding Arc Plasma" which you submitted to Environmental Engineering Science, has been reviewed. The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter. If the reviewer comments do not appear within this email, please check to see if they added their comments as a file attachment. The reviewer(s) have recommended some minor revisions to your manuscript. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. To revise your manuscript, log into http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/environmental and enter your Author Center, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of the manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Please also highlight the changes to your manuscript within the document by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or colored text. Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Center. When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you make to the original manuscript. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Environmental Engineering Science, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Environmental Engineering Science and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, Prof. Shian-chee Wu Editor, Environmental Engineering Science [email protected]

http://mail.korea.com/open.asp?dataurl=personal/paper/Environment...

2006-04-17

코리아 메일 - 대한민국 대표메일의 자부심

페이지 2 / 4

Editor's comments: 1. Please discuss the power efficiency comparing to the CO2 emmision per min-W from the power used to remove CO2/to generate CO. 2. Describe the statistical basis of the statement "The conversion of CO2 slightly decreases from 16.5% to 15% when the gas flow increases." in page 7, line 7 to 9. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author I suggest to add some information about the lack of the previous methods in the introduction section. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This is a much better version compared to the first submission. There are a few questions below along with many typos and corrections still needed in the text. Lines are noted based on 1-60 numbering in LH margin. Page 3 좻 line 27-29 좻 delete ¨numerous amount of〃 Line 36 좻 change brake to break Line 37 좻 change It to This Line 50 좻 change advance to advanced and insert ¨a〃 between using and membrane Page 4 좻 line 27 좻 change electrodes to singular electrode Line 36 좻 change elongate to elongates Page 5 좻 first line 좻 change proves the reaction 1 to proves reaction 1 Line 11 좻 change report…s to report Line 29 좻 change to ¨the effects of different carrier gases on〃 Line 32 좻 change know to assess Page 7 and elsewhere 좻 Figures should follow the sentence wherein they are first introduced. Also on page 7 the % change in CO2 is only 1.5%. Is this statistically significant? Page 7, line 55 좻 change literatures to literature. Page 8, line 26 좻 change electron to electrons Page 9, line 6 좻 change ¨control way of reaction〃 to ¨control the direction of the reaction.〃 Lines 48-50 좻 delete other and make product plural. Page 10, figure 8 should be after first sentence or so. Line 25 좻 change exited to excited 좻 this also occurs in several other places. Line 32 좻 correct Haug etl al. Line 34 좻 Moreover

http://mail.korea.com/open.asp?dataurl=personal/paper/Environment...

2006-04-17