Jam Of Chontaduro.docx

  • Uploaded by: Marisol Medina Castrillon
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Jam Of Chontaduro.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 545
  • Pages: 6
FINANCIAL PLAN OF CHONTADURO JAM

MARISOL MEDINA CASTRILLON

SERVICIO NACIONAL DE APRENDIZAJE GESTION LOGISTICA FICHA (1017082) 2017

FINANCIAL PLAN OF CHONTADURO JAM

MARISOL MEDINA CASTRILLON

SERVICIO NACIONAL DE APRENDIZAJE GESTION LOGISTICA FICHA (1017082 2017

INTRODUCTION.

This study is carried out in order to investigate the financial items attributed to our project, since they will show us what to expect from this with respect to small, medium and long term costs, thus observing the viability of our business plan carried out in the past, .

Financial analysis.

It was observed as the final cash flow was realized, which is a classic structure in an agricultural investment project, in which investment shows a positive flow in all the periods of the fiscal year, which is a logical reflection If we compare the initial cash flow you have. We must also see that the projections of the following years are positive based on the investments that will be made to obtain better quality with appropriate technologies and better facilities. The project IRR is positive since it shows a result of 2.16%, which shows that the project in time will make the return on investment, in addition its Net Present Value is $ 24,573,621.59 being greater than zero It means that our project is profitable.

Investment plan

UNIT VALUE UNIT

INVESTMENT SHEET DESCRIPTION

JAR GLOBAL UNITY GLOBAL GLOBAL

RAW MATERIAL (DIRECT COSTS)

ADEQUACY MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT RENTING 1 FIRST MONTH (DIRECT COST) PREOPERATIVES (CAMERA AND C, INVIMA REGISTRY, ADVERTISING, ETC) MANUAL OF WORK (Direct Cost) INCIDENTS (Assuming the first month of public services) TOTAL INVESTMENT

UNITY GLOBAL

NUMBER UNITS

TOT AL VAL UE

1.200

2.889.600

2.408 5.000.000

5.000.000

8.000.000

8.000.000

700.000

1

700.000

5.000.000

5.000.000

600.000

810.000 2.239.960 24.639.560

Costs and expenses UNITS

DIRECT (Variables) MATERIA PRIMA (Inputs) WORKFORCE SUPERVISION MAINTENANCE

2.408 225

56

quantity

MONTH

1 YEAR

2 YEARS

3 YEARS

3.6 00 3.6 00

8.668.800

104.025.600

110.267.136

116.883.164

810.000

9.720.000

10.303.200

10.921.392

3.6 00

200.000

2.400.000

2.544.000

2.696.640

PUBLIC SERVICES PARTIAL

61

3.6 00

219.600

2.635.200

2.793.312

2.960.911

9.898.400

118.780.800

125.907.648

133.462.107

700.000

700.000

8.400.000

8.904.000

9.438.240

116.000

116.000

1.392.000

1.475.520

1.564.051

200.000

200.000

2.400.000

2.544.000

2.696.640

150.000

150.000

1.800.000

1.908.000

2.022.480

2.010.000

2.010.000

24.120.000

25.567.200

27.101.232

500.000

500.000

6.000.000

6.360.000

6.741.600

2.976.000

44.112.000

46.758.720

49.564.243

2 YEARS 228.960.00

3 YEARS 242.697.600

2.750

INDIRECT (Fixed) RENT TAXES DEPRECIATION INVESTIGATION AND DEVELOPMENT (technical assistance) ADVERTISING ADMINISTRATION SALES

LOSSES AND PROFITS MONTH

SALES (-) Returns and Discounts

18.000.000

(-) Admission expenses.

0

17.280.000

207.360.000

219.801.60

232.989.696

0

9.898.400

OPERATIONAL GROSS PROFIT (-) Sales Operating Expenses

216.000.000

720.000

OPERATING INCOME (-) Costs of sale

1 YEAR

7.381.600

88.579.200

93.893.952

99.527.589

3.705.600

44.467.200

47.135.232

49.963.346

3.705.600

44.467.200

47.135.232

49.963.346

3.705.600

44.467.200

88.934.400

94.270.464

766.000 2.910.000

OPERATIONAL UTILITY (+) Non-operating income (-) Non-operating expenses NET INCOME BEFORE IMPTO (-) Tax. Of income and complementary NET INCOME (-) Reservations (10%)

370.560

EXERCISE UTILITY

3.335.040

40.020.480

80.040.960

84.843.418

COST ANALYSIS: The costs described above were based on sales of $ 5,000 per bottle, which increased profits. It is recommended to do a more exhaustive analysis for the city of Bogotá since it is seen that it should be launched in a city with greater purchasing power and also in a neighborhood stratum 5 or 6 where it proves that our product is totally innovative.

Related Documents

Jam
October 2019 46
Jam
October 2019 59
Jam
May 2020 45
Jam
June 2020 34
Jam
December 2019 57

More Documents from "Marisol Medina Castrillon"

December 2019 4
May 2020 3
6.pptx
December 2019 12
May 2020 1