Issues Forum May 2008 Behavioural_safety

  • Uploaded by: QBE European Operations Risk Management
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Issues Forum May 2008 Behavioural_safety as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 2,344
  • Pages: 9
BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

INTRODUCTION BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY

“Promoting safe behaviour at work is a critical part of the management of health & safety, because behaviour turns systems and procedures into reality”.1

It is estimated that in up to 80% of work related accidents the employee’s behaviour or their acts or omissions is a contributing factor. HSE research1 concluded that proprietary and in-house behavioural safety processes improve safety when implemented effectively. One study reported an 85% improvement in accident rates. Successful behavioural safety programmes require senior management commitment, suitable resources and effective planning to ensure they fit in with your organisation’s culture and health and safety management system. QBE supports clients who decide to implement behavioural safety processes and this Issues Forum discusses the key elements of successful behavioural safety programmes, with practical advice on how to implement one and the pitfalls to avoid.

2 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

WHAT ARE BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY PROGRAMMES?

Behaviour based safety programmes tend to focus on the observable and measurable behaviours critical to safety at a particular facility. They promote desired behaviours by introducing positive reinforcement and feedback for behaving safely. They should not be confused with inspections and audits of the workplace for unsafe conditions. Behavioural safety programmes should not be seen as a “quick fix” and prior to any programme, organisations should satisfy themselves that the key principles of managing health and safety such as policy; organisational arrangements; planning and implementing; measuring performance; auditing and review are in place.

Naturally, the support, commitment and competence of the management team will be critical to success. Introduced well, behavioural safety programmes should:

HOW DO BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY PROGRAMMES RELATE TO HUMAN FACTORS AND HUMAN FAILURE?

• Engage significant workforce participation

Behavioural safety programmes are a proactive way to encourage desired behaviours and should be considered for introduction, once effective health and safety management systems are in place.

• Improve management visibility • Target specific unsafe behaviours • Collect behavioural safety observational data • Use data to measure safety performance and drive improvements • Consider human factors within safety improvements • Provide focussed feedback to all employees • Enable unsafe acts to be promptly acted upon With a focus on observable practices and targeting personal behaviour, behavioural safety programmes may be particularly effective at improving use of personal protective equipment, use of correct tools, manual handling techniques and improving slip/ trip incidence through housekeeping etc.

3 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

Within your health and safety management system you will have undertaken risk assessments and should have considered “human factors” i.e. how do the demands and ergonomics of the job; the attitude and skill of the individual and the cultural aspects of your organisation impact on how the individual may behave? If not managed effectively, these demands and influences may lead to the types of “human failure” or behaviour within figure 1. Whilst it is possible and desirable to address these behaviours through effective assessment of the job, the individual and your organisation, you should also consider these human factors within any behavioural safety programme you introduce.

TYPES OF HUMAN FAILURE

SLIPS OF ACTION Action ‘not as planned’ SKILL-BASED ERRORS

eg. operating wrong switch

Often occur in familiar tasks, when attention is diverted LAPSES OF MEMORY Forgetful, lost place in task, often caused by distraction ERRORS Action or decision that was not intended RULE-BASED MISTAKES Mistake following changes to familiar task and procedure MISTAKES Wrong thing done although thought to be right

KNOWLEDGE BASED MISTAKES Wrongful reliance on experience in unfamiliar circumstances

HUMAN FAILURES ROUTINE Condoned practice and a normal way of working

VIOLATIONS Deliberate deviation from rule or procedure

SITUATIONAL Caused by pressure of job eg. time pressure, insufficient staff, right equipment not available

EXCEPTIONAL Emergency situations. Breaking rules to solve escalating problems

Figure 1: Types of human failure

4 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

IMPLEMENTING A BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION

OBSERVATION AND FEEDBACK PROCESS

Assess cultural maturity or readiness Modify environment, equipment or systems Gain management & workforce support & ownership Review & goal

Monitor performance

settings

Behavioural safety training Review critical Specify critical

Provide feedback

behaviours

behaviours

Assess cultural

Conduct

maturity or readiness

observations

Figure 2: Key elements found in behavioural safety programmes

CULTURAL MATURITY & READINESS

MANAGEMENT & WORKFORCE SUPPORT

Prior to commencing a behavioural safety programme you should have an established health and safety management system e.g. in line with HS(G)65, “Successful Health and Safety Management” or BS8800 or OHSAS18001. A positive safety culture will also exist in your organisation e.g. senior manager commitment, competent managers leading by example and effective lines of communication and trust within the organisation.

Management and workforce ownership and support for the behavioural safety process is vital for success of the programme. An effective way of gaining support is to engage employees in the process of selection of the behavioural safety programme and its implementation.

5 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

You should consider either a full time programme co-ordinator or set up a steering group. Steering groups should include respected staff members who are representative of the entire workforce. It is particularly important to involve two groups, namely first line supervisors and, where applicable, union safety reps as research1 has shown their involvement is more likely to result in success.

BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY TRAINING Whatever programme you develop, training in behavioural safety techniques will be required. A training plan for steering group members and subsequent observers will need to be developed. The nature of training should include human factors, identifying critical safety behaviours and communication skills to assist with individual and group feedback.

SPECIFYING CRITICAL SAFETY BEHAVIOURS Your behavioural safety programme will define its objectives and identify the critical safety behaviours (CSB) it will address. Analysis of accident records can identify the CSB that will have the greatest impact on reducing your accident frequency. However, relying solely on accident records has the limitation that infrequent but CSB may be excluded. Your choice of CSB could also be influenced by reviewing staff turnover; absenteeism; task based risk assessments and safe operating procedures; quality of workmanship; near miss and dangerous occurrence reports; audit reports and discussion with the workforce or feedback from employee questionnaires. Once you have determined the CSB to be observed, checklists should be developed, for completion by trained observers.

ESTABLISHING A BASELINE

FEEDBACK

A baseline is often established during the initial period of observations to establish the current level of safe behaviours for the critical behaviours identified. This baseline is useful to measure the programme’s success in changing behaviour.

Positive feedback is one of the most important elements in the process as this is the positive consequence that is introduced to reinforce safe behaviour. Positive reinforcement should be provided consistently over an extended period of time to ensure that safe behaviours become habit.

OBSERVATIONS The frequency of observations and numbers to be conducted will need to be defined. Observations tend to be conducted by peers rather than by superiors. In general, proprietary and in house systems will create checklists for these observations to be recorded on. You should ensure that the behaviours are clearly described to enable the observer to judge consistently whether someone is behaving safely or unsafely.

6 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

Effective feedback requires skill and to be effective for the receiving individual should be done soon after the observation. Positive feedback such as “Excellent work John” can be promoted openly but feedback requesting the individual changes their behaviour is best done in private or could be perceived as punishment. Graphical feedback such as percentage of behaviours observed as safe should be communicated to the workforce e.g. via meetings and notice boards.

GOAL SETTING AND REVIEW

MODIFY ENVIRONMENT

HSE research1 indicated that goal setting increases the amount of behavioural change. Goals need to be realistic and achievable otherwise people may become demotivated.

The observation and feedback process may identify unsafe conditions and barriers to why the individual could not behave safely. Often these fall within the human failures listed above. This information should be collected and used to review risk assessments, followed by actions to create safe systems of work.

Some organisations link goal setting to individual’s appraisals, bonuses and other safety incentive schemes. The nature of goal setting may include the required level of participation and number of observations to be conducted and targets for improving the percentage of observed safe behaviours.

Prompt feedback to staff on the status/ timescale of such improvements is vital to maintain staff commitment to the programme. To ensure such actions are implemented there will need to be suitable senior management commitment and adequate resources allocated to the programme.

MONITOR PERFORMANCE Monitoring improvements in the percentage of safe observations can demonstrate the success of the programme. Where improvements are not being made it is important to investigate this behaviour in detail to identify what barriers exist to behaving safely and to identify the improvements required.

REVIEW LIST OF CRITICAL BEHAVIOURS The list of critical behaviours should be revised periodically with new behaviours added or existing ones replaced. This can be done by periodic review of your accident records or following a period when a critical behaviour has become habit and is consistently observed as safe.

7 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

PITFALLS TO AVOID With effective planning and implementation your behavioural safety programme should be a success. Some common pitfalls that you will need to address include: • Lack of senior management commitment • Adverse behaviour created by insufficient risk assessment and creation of unrealistic rules and safety procedures

REFERENCES/ FURTHER READING

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Strategies to promote safe behaviour as part of a health and safety management system (Contract research report 430/2002) Download at: www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_htm/ 2002/crr02430.htm

Jon Lawrence joined QBE in 2001 and has over 20 years experience within the insurance industry primarily in the field of liability risk management. Jon specialises in health and safety management systems and assists clients to reduce their risk exposures and to mitigate potential losses. He is a Chartered Safety and Health Practitioner and member of IOSH.

1

Reducing error and influencing behaviour HS(G)48 HSE Books www.hsebooks.co.uk

• The programme is not “owned” by everyone in the organisation

HSE Website www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors

• Insufficient trust between management and employees

Behavioural Safety – Kicking bad Habits (IOSH) Download at: www.iosh.co.uk/files/technical/ Behaviouralsafety%2Epdf

• Some “off the peg” or consultant led programmes may not fit well with your organisation’s culture • Ensure the system is in your own management style, language and presentation • Observational feedback not seen as fair and just • Workforce concerns over “spying” or perception of a blame culture

CONCLUSION Behavioural safety programmes can be an effective tool for reducing accident frequency. They will require a concerted effort from both managers and employees and therefore it is essential that suitable planning and resource is allocated prior to the commencement of any programme.

8 BEHAVIOURAL SAFETY QBE ISSUES FORUM MAY 2008

Jon Lawrence, Risk Manager

QBE Plantation Place, 30 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 3BD t: + 44 (0)20 7105 4000 f: + 44 (0)20 7105 4019 [email protected] www.QBEeurope.com

Dear reader Thank you for taking the trouble to read this publication. QBE Risk Management believe that best practice organisations are those where senior individuals facilitate and engage in the processes of sensible risk management. We make this document available to all interest parties in an effort to share knowledge and promote good practise. Our services are available only to clients insured by QBE in Europe. Our insurance products are sold through insurance brokers. We cannot offer advisory services to anyone else, however we would be delighted to hear if you have found this document useful or believe there are risk management issues that do not receive appropriate attention in the media. Regards QBE Risk Management Team email: [email protected] www.QBEeurope.com/RM

Disclaimer This document has been produced by QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited (“QIEL”). QIEL is a company member of the QBE Insurance Group. Readership of this Forum does not create an insurer-client, advisor-client, or other business or legal relationship. This Forum provides information about the law to help you understand and manage risk within your organisation. Legal information is not the same as legal advice. This Forum does not purport to provide a definitive statement of the law and is not intended to replace, nor may it be relied upon as a substitute for specific legal or other professional advice. QIEL has acted in good faith to provide an accurate Forum. However, QIEL and the QBE Group do not make any warranties or representations of any kind about the contents of this Forum, the accuracy or timeliness of its contents, or the information or explanations (if any) given. QIEL and the QBE Group do not have any duty to you, whether in contract, tort, under statute or otherwise with respect to or in connection with this Forum or the information contained within it. QIEL and the QBE Group have no obligation to update this report or any information contained within it. To the fullest extent permitted by law, QIEL and the QBE Group disclaim any responsibility or liability for any loss or damage suffered or cost incurred by you or by any other person arising out of or in connection with your or any other person’s reliance on this Report or on the information contained within it and for any omissions or inaccuracies.

QBE European Operations Plantation Place 30 Fenchurch Street London EC3M 3BD tel +44 (0)20 7105 4000 fax +44 (0)20 7105 4019

QBE European Operations is a trading name of QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited, no.01761561 ('QIEL'), QBE Underwriting Limited, no. 01035198 ('QUL'), QBE Management Services (UK) Limited, no. 03153567 ('QMSUK') and QBE Underwriting Services (UK) Limited, no. 02262145 ('QSUK'), whose registered offices are at Plantation Place, 30 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 3BD. All four companies are incorporated in England and Wales. QIEL and QUL are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. QUL is a Lloyd's managing agent. QMSUK and QSUK are both Appointed Representatives of QIEL and QUL.

Related Documents


More Documents from ""