Interior Designer Board Exam Result Perfomrance (ranking) Of Schools For Sept.oct. 2009 Board Exam

  • Uploaded by: LEz
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Interior Designer Board Exam Result Perfomrance (ranking) Of Schools For Sept.oct. 2009 Board Exam as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 472
  • Pages: 1
PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER (INTERIOR DESIGN LICENSURE EXAMINATION) REPEATERS

FIRST TIMERS

SCHOOL PASSED FAILED COND TOTAL ASSUMPTION COLLEGE-MAKATI COLLEGE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT OF MANILA DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY-COLLEGE OF SAINT BENILDE DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY-MANILA EASTERN VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY (LIT)TACLOBAN EULOGIO (AMANG) RODRIGUEZ INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LA CONSOLACION COLLEGE-BACOLOD CITY MAPUA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY PALAWAN COLLEGE OF ARTS & TRADES PALAWAN STATE UNIVERSITY-P. PRINCESA PHILIPPINE SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN PHILIPPINE WOMEN'S COLLEGE OF DAVAO PHILIPPINE WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY-MANILA POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-MAINSTA. MESA SAINT SCHOLASTICA'S COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF SAINT LOUIS-TUGUEGARAO UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES-DILIMAN

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

% % % PASSED FAILED COND TOTAL PASSED FAILED COND TOTAL PASSED PASSED PASSING

2

1

0

3

67%

0

0

1

1

0%

2

1

1

4

50%

0

4

0

4

0%

1

0

0

1

100%

1

4

0

5

20%

3

9

1

13

23%

2

0

0

2

100%

5

9

1

15

33%

0

0

0

0

0%

0

3

0

3

0%

0

3

0

3

0%

1

4

1

6

17%

1

0

1

2

50%

2

4

2

8

25%

0

2

0

2

0%

0

0

0

0

0%

0

2

0

2

0%

1

1

0

2

50%

0

0

0

0

0%

1

1

0

2

50%

0

5

1

6

0%

1

1

0

2

50%

1

6

1

8

13%

0

1

0

1

0%

0

0

0

0

0%

0

1

0

1

0%

1

0

0

1

100%

0

0

0

0

0%

1

0

0

1

100%

13

8

1

22

59%

1

5

0

6

17%

14

13

1

28

50%

1

0

1

2

50%

0

0

0

0

0%

1

0

1

2

50%

0

2

0

2

0%

0

0

0

0

0%

0

2

0

2

0%

7

3

1

11

64%

1

0

0

1

100%

8

3

1

12

67%

4

2

0

6

67%

0

0

0

0

0%

4

2

0

6

67%

0

0

0

0

0%

0

1

0

1

0%

0

1

0

1

0%

4

7

1

12

33%

0

0

0

0

0%

4

7

1

12

33%

3

2

1

6

50%

2

3

2

7

29%

5

5

3

13

38%

48

27

6

81

59%

7

3

1

11

64%

55

30

7

92

60%

11

1

1

13

85%

4

0

0

4

100%

15

1

1

17

88%

NOTHING FOLLOWS---------------------Any discrepancy in the performance of schools listed above is entirely unintentional on the part of the Professional Regulation Commission but rather due to miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves in the application forms. Concerned schools may write the Commission for correction.

Related Documents


More Documents from "LEz"