Intellectual Property-: Protection Management & Risks

  • Uploaded by: brainleague
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Intellectual Property-: Protection Management & Risks as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 575
  • Pages: 23
Intellectual PropertyProtection Management & Risks Presented by: Nishant Kewalramani Portfolio Manager

AGENDA  Maximizing

IP for Start UpsProtection Strategy

  Cost

Effective ‘Protection Management’ of IP

  Avoiding  

IP Risks

   

PROTECTION MANAGEMENT

Protection Strategy  Do VCs sign non disclosures?   Strategy: Minimum Expense-

Maximum Advantage   Building 

 

a wall around the IP

PATENTS  Identifying core technology   Make,  Use,  Sell,  Offer for Sale and  Import

area

Technology development Identification Aids  Competitor

Watch-

 Constant update on your competitors  Concentrate on big companies  Decides direction of your core

technology



 Landscape

analysis

 A landscape of all patents in a

technology domain



Pre-Filing Filtering  Do



not approach the patent attorney without Homework!!!

 Understanding



patentability criteria for initial filtering purposes.

 To



begin with- you are the best judge of your invention

 Quality



of patents more important than number of patents

Patentability Requrements INVENTIONS Subject Matter Usefulness Novelty Non-obviousness Specification PATENTS

© Brain League IP Services Pvt. Ltd

Provisional Filing  Only

description of the Invention required

  Secures the priority   12 months for filing

date

complete application with claims

  Better

bargaining position

Multiple inventions in one application  Unity of invention   Divisional application

PCT filing  File

PCT instead of Complete if more time required

  31

months to file national phase applications

  More

expensive than a complete filing

Trademark Filing  Not

as expensive as patents



 Choose

a word that catches attention and is ‘not descriptive’ of the goods and services



 Intent

to Use application/ Proposed to Use  Can get registration without use  Can continue to hold rights over the

Copyright Registration  Inexpensive   Long duration of right   Marketing materials, imp

websites etc.

documents,

  Strengthens the wall of protection   Adds value to the entity

Not Disclosing = Protection  Not

important enough/Cannot be covered under any other IP

  No

registration required for Trade Secret Protection

  Maintain

Secrecy- Employee agreements, non disclosure agreements etc.

Decide what to maintain   PCT

Application ≈ Filing in two jurisdictions

  Stronger

portfolio- negotiating advantage



   



IP RISKS

PATENT RISK  Search not comprehensive   Non accessible data   18 month lag   Non patented material

FIRST SALE EXHAUSTION & PARALLEL IMPORTS  Sale- rights over the item exhausted   Import of patented articles from

other countries.   Can

be due to price discrimination

FTO ANALYSIS  Freedom to Operate   Product analyzed against

national

patents   Also known as Patent   18 month lag   Further Limitations in

Clearance.

India

NOTICE- INNOCENT INFRINGER  Notice-

patent with no./patent pending

  Without

patent no. not considered

notice   Damages may not   Flows both ways

be awarded

Trademark Risk  Non registered user has a right   Cannot use anything resembling

famous mark   If

not registered- proving ‘notice’ very difficult

a

OPEN SOURCE- RISK  Open Source Software   May compel you to make

your

improvement free.   Analyze

the kind of conditions attached with the license.

  



THANK YOU 



[email protected]

Related Documents


More Documents from ""