DEFINITION
“An
impression
is
essentially
a
negative or reverse replica of any entity. In dentistry, this replica is of the teeth and its supporting and surrounding structures.”
According to the ability of the set material to be withdrawn over undercuts : Elastic impression materials Hydrocolloid Agar Alginate
Rubbers Polysulfide. Poly silicones. Polyether.
Non-elastic or Rigid impression materials Impression compound ZOE
Ideal Requirements of Impression Materials
1.
Fluid enough to adapt to the oral tissues
2.
Viscous enough to be contained in the tray
3.
In mouth should transform (set) into a rubbery or rigid solid in a reasonable amount of time: setting time less than 7min
•
Set impression should not distort or tear when removed from mouth
•
Impressions must be dimensionally stable until the cast can be poured
Impression should maintain dimensional stability after removal of cast to enable making of a second or third cast from same impression
Biocompatible
Material associated, processing equipment, and processing time should be cost effective
Elastomers or Rubber base Impression materials fulfills most of these
Soft and rubber-like & are known as elastomers or synthetic rubbers.
As per ADA Sp. No. 19 they are called as - non-aqueous Elastomeric dental impression materials.
Liquid polymers which are converted
into solid rubber at room temperature
Contains large molecules with weak
interaction between them, tied together at certain points and form 3D network
Basically
used for dentulous cases
by virtue of their ability of withdrawal from under cuts and their excellent surface detail reproduction.
Types: III.According to chemistry ( setting rxn) 1) Polysulfides 2) Polysilicones – condensation & addition 3) Polyether
2. According to Viscosity 1) Light body or syringe consistency 2) Medium or regular body 3) Heavy body or tray consistency 4) Very heavy body or putty consistency
3. ADA Classification Based on selected elastic properties & dimensional changes 1) Type I 2) Type II 3) Type III
General Properties:
Excellent reproduction of surface details
Generally hydrophobic (except poly ether)
Good elastic properties
(repeated pouring is possible) Dimensional inaccuracies are
lower but exists due to various reasons
Excellent tear strength. Extended shelf-life Generally higher cost Requires tray adhesive or
mechanical interlocking with the tray.
CHARACTERSTICS
Rheological
properties
(viscoelastic )- play major role Introduced
as Viscous pastes-
setting reaction- viscoelastic solids.
imp.
Mat. should be free of any
distortion dev due to strain during its removal, thus the mat. Should be visco elastic i.e. intermediate behavior between elastic solid and viscous liquid.
Supplied as: •
All elastomers - two paste systems (base & catalyst)
•
Putty consistency – supplied in jars
Uses:
Impression material for all applications including
Fixed partial dentures
Dentures and edentulous impressions
Border molding of special trays (poly ether)
Bite registration
As duplicating material for refractory casts
1.
POLY SULFIDES:
Ist elastomer to be introduced mercaptan/Thiokol
Polysulfide First
dental elastomers Indications complete
denture removable fixed partial denture tissue
crown
and bridge
Composition: Base Paste: Liquid
Polysulfide Polymer 80 to 85 %
Inert
-
fillers (Titanium dioxide, zinc sulfate ,copper carbonate or silica) 16 to 18 % Plasticizer-- dibutylpthalate (viscosity) Accelerator---
0.5% Sulfur
Reactor /catalyst/accelerator Paste Lead dioxide
-
60 to 68 %
Dibutylphthalate (plasticizer) - 30 to 35 % Sulfur (accelerator)
-
3%
Retarder --- oleic acid or stearic acid Other substances like Magnesium & deodorants- 2 %
Tray adhesive: Butyl rubber or styrene/acrylonitrile dissolved in a volatile solvent such as chloroform or a ketone.
Chemistry and Setting Reactions The lead dioxide reacts with the poly sulfide polymer Oxidizing agent like lead dioxide initiates polymerization rxn through
Chain lengthening by oxidation of the terminal -SH groups and
Cross-linking between pendant -SH groups.
Exothermic reaction - 3 to 40 C rise in temp. leaving water as by product. It is accelerated by heat and moisture
PbO2 + S HS - R- SH
Mercaptan + Lead dioxide
HS - R-S-S-R-SH + H2O Poly sulfide +Water
T-butyl hydro peroxide – alternative to PbO2
Polysulfide Reaction --SH
HS---------------------SH =
Pb
S H
O H S
=
=
Pb
-S-S---------------S-S-
=
O
H O S--
O = Pb = O
O
mercaptan + lead dioxide
S + 3PbO + H O 2 S
polysulfide rubber + lead oxide + water
O’Brien Dental Materials & their
Properties: • Unpleasant odor and colour - stains linen & messy to work with • Extremely viscous and sticky - mixing is difficult • Mixing time is 45 seconds • Long setting time of 12.5 (at 370C) - Patient discomfort • Excellent reproduction of surface detail
Dimensional stability: - Curing shrinkage is high 0.45%. It has the highest permanent deformation (3 to 5%) among the elastomers It is hydrophobic - so the mouth should be dried thoroughly before making an impression The shelf life is good (2 years)
Advantages Lower
cost
compared
to silicones and
polyethers Long
working time High tear strength High flexibility Good detail reproduction Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 1996
Disadvantages Poor
dimensional stability
water
by-product pour within one hour single pour Custom
trays
Messy paste-paste
mix
bad
odor may stain clothing Long
setting time Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 1996
Silicone Rubber Impression Material: Developed to over come some of the disadvantages of poly sulfide
Types Based
on
polymerization
the
type
of
reaction
1) Condensation silicones 2) Addition silicones
CONDENSATION SILICONE:
Also known as conventional silicone. •
•
Available in light, medium and putty consistency
Indications
complete crown
dentures
and bridge
COMPOSITION: Base
paste
Accelerator paste
Polydimethyl siloxane Tetraethyl (hydroxyl-terminated) Orthosilicate – (cross linking agent) Colloidal silica or Stannous octoate – microsized metal (catalyst) oxide (filler) 35-75% Color pigments
SETTING REACTION: CH3
OC2H5
OH-Si-OH + C2H5O-Si- OC2H5 Sn octoate CH3
OC2H5
Silicone + CH3CH2OH
Cross-linking between terminal group of the silicon polymers and alkyl silicate to form 3D network
Dimethyl siloxane
+ Tetraethyl orthosilicate
Stannous octate Silicone rubber
+ ethyl
alcohol
Ethyl alcohol – byproduct-evaporate -shrinkage &dimensional instability
Tray adhesive – Polydimethyl siloxane & Ethyl silicate
Properties: • Pleasant odor and color. • Mixing time of 45sec & setting time of 8-9mins. • Excellent reproduction of surface details and highly elastic. • Lesser dimensional stability - high curing shrinkage (0.4 - 0.6%)
permanent
deformation due to shrinkage caused by the evaporation of ethyl alcohol is also high (1-3%).
Hydrophobic
- needs a dry field..
Biologically
inert.
Compatible
with all gypsum
products.
Advantages Better
elastic properties
Clean,
pleasant
Stock
tray
putty-wash
Good
working and setting time
Disadvantages Poor
dimensional stability
high
shrinkage
polymerization evaporation
pour
of ethanol
immediately
within
30 minutes
Hydrophobic poor
wettability
Addition silicones: Also called as polyvinyl siloxanes Better properties than condensation silicones.
Indications crown
and bridge denture bite registration -Improvement over condensation silicones -no by-product
Composition:
Base: Poly (methyl hydrogen siloxane) Other siloxane prepolymers Fillers
Accelerator: Divinyl poly siloxane Other siloxane pre polymers Platinum salt: Catalyst (chloroplatinic acid) Palladium (Hydrogen absorber) Retarders Fillers
SETTING REACTION: CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
Pt salt
Si-H + CH2=CH-Si
Si-CH2-CH2-Si activator
CH3
Vinyl + siloxane
CH3
Silane siloxane
CH3
CH3
Silicone rubber
No by product, but imbalance hydrogen gas air bubbles in the stone models To avoid this palladium /platinum is added.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
Sulfur compounds retard the setting of silicones One source of sulfur contamination is from latex gloves Vinyl gloves should be used
Properties: • Pleasant odor and color • Excellent reproduction of surface details • Mixing time of 45 secs ,setting time of 5-9 mins. • Best dimensional stability - low curing shrinkage (0.17 %)
-
lowest permanent deformation (0.05 – 0.3 %) Stone pouring delayed by 1-2 hours Extremely hydrophobic, some manufacturers add a surfactant (detergent) to make it more hydrophilic Good shelf life of 1-2 yrs Good tear strength (3000gm / cm2)
Advantages Highly
accurate High dimensional stability pour
Stock
up to one week
or custom trays Multiple casts Easy to mix Pleasant odor
Disadvantages Expensive Sulfur
in latex gloves + ferric and Al sulfate in retraction solution inhibits setting
Polishing
teeth with pumice req before impression.
Short
working time
Lower
tear strength
Possible bubbles
hydrogen gas release on die
palladium
or platinum salts added to absorb gases and act as scavenger
Addition Silicones Surfactants
added
reduce
contact angle improved castability gypsum
wettability?? still
need dry field clinically
Pratten J Dent Res 1987 Mandikos Aust Dent J 1998
Poly ether Rubber Impression material Introduced in Germany in late
1960’s Good mechanical properties and
dimensional stability, but short working time, very stiff material and expensive
Composition: Base Paste Poly ether polymer Colloidal silica (filler) Glycol ether or phthalate (plasticizer)
Accelerator paste Aromatic sulfonate ester (crosslinking agent) Colloidal silica (filler) Phthalate or glycol ether (plasticizer)
Available
as 3 viscosities: light, medium & heavy bodied.
CHEMISTRY & SETTING H
O
REACTION O
H
CH3 – C - CH2 – C – O – R – O – C - CH2 – C - CH + Crosslinked rubber N N CH2-CH2 Polyether + Sulfonic ester Exothermic reaction 4-50 C
CH2-CH2 Crosslinked rubber
Properties: 2. Pleasant odor and taste 3. Mixing time is 30 secs, setting time of 8 mins 4. Dimensional stability is very good. Curing shrinkage is low (0.24%) The permanent deformation is also low (1-2%).
Very stiff (flexibility of 3%), needs extra space, around 4 mm is given. 5. Hydrophilic (moisture control not critical) 6. Shelf life extends upto 2 years
Advantages Highly
accurate Good dimensional stability Stock or dual-arch trays Good surface detail Pour within one week kept
dry
Multiple
casts Good wettability
Disadvantages Expensive Short
working time
Rigid difficult
to remove from undercuts
Bitter
taste Low tear strength Absorbs water changes
dimension
AUTOMATIC DISPENSING & MIXING DEVICES
ADVANTAGES: - More uniform mix - Less air bubbles - Reduced working time
Different methods of making impressions 1. Single mix or mono-phase technique: -
Regular viscosity elastomer is used (addition silicone/polyether)
-
Paste is mixed, part of it is loaded on to the tray & the remaining onto the syringe
-
Syringe material is injected onto the prepared area & tray material is seated over it.
Multiple mix technique
DISADV: Higher viscosity material may displace more fluid wash material
RELINE OR 2-STAGE PUTTY WASH TECHNIQUE • Preliminary impression is made with a putty consistency using a thin plastic sheet or spacer over it (acts as a spacer) • Light body is injected around the prepared tooth • The plastic sheet is removed & putty impression is seated back
ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIALS: PROPERTIES
WORKING AND SETTING TIMES Working time- begins at the start of mixing and ends just before the elastic properties have developed
Setting
time- time elapsing from the beginning of mixing until the curing has advanced sufficiently so that the impression can be removed from the mouth with a minimum of distortion
Increase
in temperature- accelerates
curing time Increase
in viscosity- decrease in working
and setting time
Dimensional stability 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Polymerization shrinkage Loss of byproduct Thermal contraction from oral to room temperature Imbibition Incomplete recovery of deformation because of viscoelastic behavior
Reproduction of oral detail The rubber impression materials are capable of reproducing detail more accurately than can be transferred to the stone die or cast
ELASTICITY Elastic properties of elastomeric impression materials improve with an increase in curing time in the mouth Permanent deformation following strain in compression increases in following orderaddition silicone, condensation silicone, polyether and polysulfide
Tear strength Measures
the resistance to fracture of elastomeric material subjected to a tensile force acting perpendicular to a surface flaw Biocompatibility Polysulfide- lowest cell death count Polyether- highest cell toxicity
Elastomeric Impression Materials Rapidly
remove
decreases
permanent deformation chains
recoil
from a recoverable distance increases
strength
tear Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 1996
Comparison of Properties Working longest
time to shortest
agar
> polysulfide > silicones > alginate = polyether
Setting
time
shortest
to longest
alginate
< polyether < agar < silicones < polysulfide O’Brien Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
Stiffness most
to least
polyether
> addition silicone > condensation silicone > polysulfide = hydrocolloids
Tear
strength
greatest
to least
polysulfide
> addition silicone > polyether > condensation silicone >> hydrocolloids O’Brien Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
Cost lowest
to highest
alginate
< agar = polysulfide
Dimensional best
stability
to worst
addition
silicone > polyether > polysulfide > condensation silicone > hydrocolloid Phillip’s 1996 O’Brien Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
Wettability best
to worst
hydrocolloids >
polyether > hydrophilic addition silicone > polysulfide > hydrophobic addition silicone = condensation silicone
Castability best
to worst
hydrocolloids >
hydrophilic addition silicone > polyether > polysulfide > hydrophobic addition silicone = condensation silicone O’Brien Dental Materials & their Selection 1997
Thank you