Ias-mains-philosophy-2018-paper-1.pdf
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Ias-mains-philosophy-2018-paper-1.pdf as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,059
- Pages: 5
c
ｾ｡ｭ＠
u"' ｾ＠
s arA-
1 ｾ＠
m ｾ＠
$ ｾ＠
m 71'11
ｭ
ｾ＠
ﾷｾ
"3'tft ｾ＠
11'IWI ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾＯＧｗｬ＠ ｾ＠
ﾷ Ｂｊｭ＠
ｾ＠
Ｍｱｲｾ＠
"«!o ｾｯＩ＠
Ｍｾ＠
ｷＭＱｾ
il ｾ＠
"'IQ, affi" "1R ｾ＠
ｾ＠ 'tfit ｾ＠ ｾＬ＠ ifi w.rrm ria "111IRT ｾＧｩ＠
ｾＢｩ
ﾷ＠
m i\ il ｾ＠
-m m ｾ＠
lt'li ｾ＠
Ｍ ｾ Ｍ Ｄｱ＠
ｾ＠ ＱｦｩＮｬ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1
ｾｉ＠
f.tlrn ｾｄ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ ｾ＠
"Jm ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1i mｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧＩ＠
ｾ＠ ｬｱ ｜ｬ ｬ ｯｦｴｾ＠
t n&;fl iFft ｾ＠ ｦ｣ｬｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｚｵｦ｜ｾｲＮｭ＠
mｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
m
;J!i r.t""itMlid ｾ＠
ｾ＠ Ｇｾ＠
EOT-P-PBLY
·'M lfG"Q.. ｾ［ｦ＾ｬ＠
ｾｔ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
I:J«I< cfi ｾ＠ ｩ＠
ｾ＠
il ｾ＠
ｾ＠
• ｾ＠ ｾ＠
• ｾ＠ Ｇｱｻｾ＠
ｾ＠
:rn1
'qf.fl
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧＱＺｻ＠
'Rf.fiirl ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾＱｚｬＫｦ＠
TJln ｾＬ＠
atR: ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
3l'ftrttffi ｾ＠
ｾ＠
I
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ro
-e ftt:r. 1Jl{ ｾ＠ ｾ＠
T[K%
t
mrr Cfit ｾ
"" m:rmr ift ｾｮ＠ ｾ
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
ﾷ＠
ｾ＠
3ft ｾ＠
ｾ＠
PHlLOSOPHY (PAPER-I) [Time Allowed : Three Hours
IMaximum Marks : 2:50 l
I
QUESTION PAPER SPECD'lC INSTRUCTIONS attempting questionst fPlea.se read eaCh of the roUowing instruc;tiona. carefully ｨ･ｲｯｮＺｾ＠ ihere are EIGHT questions divided in r-wo Sections and printed both in HINDI ;and
in ENGLISH. Candidate bas to attempt FJVE questions in all. Question Nos. 1 and 5 are compulsory and out of the remaining. THREE .a.t'C' to be attempted choosins at lea:s.t ONE question from each Section.
The number of marks carried by a qucstiDn./pElrl is indic:o1ted a.,g a.inst .it. in the Admission Certificate which Answers mu st be: written in the· :medium QU ｬＺｨｯｲｾ･､＠ must be stated clewly on the cover of this Question-cum-Answer IQCAJ Booklet in lhe space provided . No markR wiill be givc;n for answers '"rrltten in a medium. other than the authorized one. Word limit in questions, wherever speccified 1 should be adhered to.
or
questions shall be counted. in sequentiaJ order. Unless struck off; attempt of a Attempts question shall be counted even rf attempted partly. Any page· or portion of the page left blank :struck ofT. in the QU«::stion· cum-Answer Booklet must be ｣ｬｾ｡ｲｹ＠
l
1 P.T.o.
www.examrace.com
I. ｾｦｱｭ＠
t ｾ＠
ｾ＠
150 ｾ＠
i@ "{"Pf'lfll
ｾ＠
lffi;m ｾ＠
ｾ＠
;
Wrmle short answers to the foUo·wing in abm.ll 150 ｷｯ Cflill ｾ＠
{a.J
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
"iJ ｾ
Ｍ
ﾷｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ
Ｌ＠
ｲ､
Ｇ ＲＫｾ］Ｔ＠
tzyJ
]Qxs .. so
ｾ＠ ･｡ｾｨ＠
• -ij
ｾ＠
ｾｦＮｬｃｩｴｏｉ＠
ｾ＠
t;?
"Q"qH
'3m
t
'tffj
ｾＧ＠ ..l!t.re the two
trutb:s-"The Sun will
ＺｲｾｳＮ･＠
tomonow· and "2+2,...4 • of the sam-e necessity
for Humc '] Give reas-o:n s in favour of your answe'r.
tbJ
t"'tu;iitf.t01t
ｾＭ＠
qriif
Ｑ＠
ﾷ ｴｬ ｬ ｾＺｷ
ｾ＿
;;fit if'l{f
t, 'ffiil' m
m ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾｃｆＡｴ､ｩ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
t
ﾷ＠ ｴｯｾ＠
T.s
ｰ｢ｾｴｯｹＬ＠
any pl:llcr; fQr f::reedom ip l...eib..-iz's.
when he s.peaks. of
"pre -e!'ll:J b li s.hed harmony•? D i$c: us$.
ﾷｾ＠
(c)
ｾ＠
t'ｾ＠
ｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
ＧｆＭｾ＠
ｾ＠
i 1
ｾ＠
ｩ｜ｴｾ＠ｆ ｾ＠ How does the notion of "family resemblance' help ｗＱｮ
1tir ｾｦ｀Ａ､
ｧｾｮｳｴ･Ｑ＠
t?
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
to uphoM that
'L;mguage is a. game, ? Dj6cus5. 315\lilliliUi
tdl trti ｾ＠
3Ur;-llJOI9 ;:r.n
ｾ｜ｩｴ＠
Ri:e 144P1l'i ｾ＠
ｾＮｭ＠
.afu \9-
qffir ｾ＿＠
ｭｮｾｵｴ･
How does S.artrc oonnet;;t
"tfitffi t?'tri ｾ＠ ｾ ＠ｉ ｾ＠
ｴ ｩ ､ｴｹ＠
whh bad :I"ｾ［ｴ
ｩｬ ｴｨ
＿＠
m t 1* -li5tl·'ilru,!:flm ｾ＠
Why does Sartre show that
inautih cnticity :md bad ·raith lead to alienation?· Dist:uss. (eJ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
How does
.2.
ｾＮ＠
ｦＴ
(a)
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
ｓｾＺｲ｡ｷｳｯｮ＠
･ｸｰｬｾｩｮ＠
ＢＱ ｬ ｾ ｡＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ifiit
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
·
1 ｾ＠
ｾ
ｬ＠
lhc: cOPCt.pt of pe!f'SOfl ill his philosophy'? Di.s.cus.s..
Hl,
ftl ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｩｪ ＢｦｩＨｬｾ
ｭｾ
､ｾ＠
ＧＣＦｾｲｩｦｴ＠
lby ｄ｣
ｾｑ＠
ｾ＠
ｱｾｲｦ｣ｴｩＢ＼ｯ､＠
ｩｴ
ｾ＠
t. ｾ＠
'rPmi
＠ｾ t? ｾ＠ ｾ ｾ＠ What is the reason for Lhe difference in the definitions .a nd classificat ions of ｳ ｵ｢ｾＮｩｯｬ｡ｮｴ＠
ｴｩ
ｾ＠
ｳ｣Ｚｯｾ
ｵＺｾ ｣ｳ＠
l) ｾ＠
• .Spinoza !lfid Leibniz in spite of the fact lham mhcy all 20
belonged lo the rationalist school of thought? Diticuss.
fbJ
·r.nq ｾ＠
Cfil
r.Ffi ｾ＠
ｾ＠
Cit ｩｬｾ
ｬ＠
ｾ＠
17n ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｦＮｒＺｉｬｾ＠
f,
ｾ
ﾷ ｩＺｾ＠
｡Ｚｴｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ ｾ
ﾷ＠
w ｾ＠ ｉ＠ ｾ＠
ij J.1T1I ｾ＠ 3m %ｾ ｦ＠
.q
Exp lain the sig,rtiric.an.ce of Ute Kantian. dicr.mn, •understa.nd1ng tnak.es Na1ure •. How far
do you
｡ｧｲｾ･＠
Discuss. G ive
ｲ･Ｎ｡ｾｯｮ
that Hegel's Ab:solutis-m is the culmination of the K!1hl i.an Dualism? Ｎ ｳＮ＠
in favour of your answer.
'15
www.examrace.com
I
ic}
lli1'fi ｾ＠ ｾﾷ
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
iR11 ｒｩｦｴｾ､＠
ｭ｡ｾ＠
ｾ＠
＠ﾷ t! ｾｩｴ＠ i ｾ＠ ｾｴ＠ How cl.Ot;.Si Qulae show t11at t.ne nQtiCJn •a ｭＮ･ｲＺｮｰｨ
3.
f.ti ｾ＠
ｹｾｫ｡
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
{Bj
1ffr
ｬ＠
ｾ＠
ｩ ｡ｗｾｉＧ＠
ｾ＠
itf!o:r
"'qi1 l'J,_q)
a· priori knowledge as discussed by Kant ]$
t)f
article of faith'? Give: r·eason:s fo.r your answer.
ｾ＠
'$1' ｾ＠
ｱｭｮ
ﾷ ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
!'lfijfstiliU ｾ＠
ｾ＠
11-{
ｾＱ＠
ｩＴ Ｑ ｗｾｩｴ＠ Slffti?V.Jt i!j 1FfT ｾ＠
it
ure
V
ｾｩｦｴｬ＠
;;? ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
*
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
lff ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
ｾｉ＠ How does Be:rkeley establis-h tbat Mind and ｾｴＮｳ＠
idea-s alone are real? How do Moo.E'e an.d Russe.U react lo Berkeley,, view in •hiis, regard? Do you find i!lllY diffcr-enoo between Moore's reacticm. and Russell's one? Discus$. 20
(oJ ｾ＠
ＧＵｭＡｾＮＨｬ＠
ｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
'*
m
ｾ＠ ＠ｾ ｾｦｬ＠ Ｂｦｩｾ＠ ? ｾ＠ ｾＮＬｦｩｴ＠ a:M Qflll'l"i ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾＧＢ＠ ｾ［ｊｴｦＮｬｩ＠ ＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ｷ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾｴ ｬ＠ How do the logical positivists show lh.a'l metaphysical sc:okrnccs. arc meHrrirqglcss'?
m
Can their ve rificatilon theory of
s-cientd;ic sentences? (.:;J
m
ifr
ｾ＠
:mt
acOOuPl fot tlbc: meaning;fu_lncss of all
ﾷ ｭｾ｡Ｎｮｩｧ＠
15
Di5(;-'IJS.S..
OSlfG
ｾﾷ＠
t?
t1'1WI3f.l ｾ＠
·m ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾﾷ＠
ｾｑ＠
ｾ＠
.q ｾ＠
fuQ; ｾ＠ ｾ＠
"iffiiT
-qrrf ｾ＠
1? 'ijllf ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧｻＱｴＴＺＢＡｦ
ＢＧ＠
aitlf'ijf4'fi t1 ｾ＠
!-:if ｾ＠ :RR ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＧｬＮｦｾ＠
1t
ｾｉ＠
How d.oc:s Wil1gcnstcin apply the distincGion between "saying' iil.nd "showing" to point ro a single w.ay of appTChc.mting the mos1 dc.-eisivc prob]ems of philosophy? [s. !he justified? Give reason.s for your answeli' _ 4.
ｾｬＴｦ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
fa}
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
?
1 ｾｌｴｦｩｬ＠
D!'ffi9in ｾ
ｾｉｒ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
ｾ＠
fli!fiAA I ;$
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
cJil ﾷｾ＠
W ＠ｾ 'ir.fr' ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
15
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
fAifR
ｉ＠
Whal i's Epache 1 How docs He:hlcgge.:r reject this method of pnenomenologieaJ reduction'] Explain Heidegger•s concept ·o.f 'betn.g in
cortt;ep·l or a (b)
ｴｲｾｕ
<€t
ｾｳ［＠
·wo.rJd•
opposed tQ tttc:
:w
vgo.
Ｎ ｩｃｾ､Ａ･ｮｴｬ＠
＼ｭｾＱｩｷｦ ｾ＠
ＱＭｾ＠
w4
fuilit"i I ｾ＠
ｾ＠
dffi:
*
ﾷ ｾＭ｡＿ｬｴ＠ ｾＶＺＱ＠
it
ｾ＠
Js tille .relation between the Idea and the World as discuS$edl by Ph.- to l.ogkally ｣ｯｮｳＺｩｾ･ｴＧｊ＠
Discuss Aris;lotle' ,s. ¥iews regarding tills and also give arguments in favour
of JOUr ｾｷ･ (c)
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｲ Ｎ＠
ｾ＠
ffiiii iCI"+' ｾ＠
iti ｾ＠
-q ｾ＠
1.5
<1\1 iirmiti ｾ＠
ｾ
ｾ＠
｣｡Ｚ Ｎ ［ｮｕｩＺＴＱｾ＠
i ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｴｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ＠
.How is R11ssell' s theory of definltc:: descJipLion related lo· bioS Dis.cuss and give reasons tor yo.u:r aRswcr.
3
ｬＮ ｯｾｊＮ｣｡
ｬ＠
Atomism"? 15
I P.T.O. www.examrace.com
Ｕｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
if il
I SBCTJON-B· ｂ＠
ｾ ｾ
'S'lWT 150 lJii(ij
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ
ll •
: ]0>C5 50
Write: short answers 1o the following in about 150 words each :
mｾＨ
qc:tf'f.Wi ｾ＠ ｾｩｎ＼ｴ＠
fa}
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｩ ｊ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ Ｊｾ＠
ｾＮ＠ ｾ＠
'tr1 3fR liiJ ｾ＠
ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾＩ＠
ｾ＠
fcfffi
philosophers explain the diffel'ence of lhc r-elationships in oHhc table and WJ t11e book on the table? Discuss. two cases-(i) the:: brown ｯ ｾ ｯｵｲ＠
(b}
Ｑ＠
ｾＷ
ﾷ ｵｴ ｰ Ｎ ｡､＠
Madhya:mika Bu.ddhirit5 apply the notion of ｐｲ｡ｴｩＮｹｾ theiT doc:trine of $anyata ? Discus:s. ｴｨｾ＠
How ､ｯ
nt.T ii ｾ＠
•
(c)
ｴｨｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ Ｇ Ｇ＠ ｾ＠ ｾｒｬｩｴｻｎｉ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｂｾ＠
Ｇ＠ ｾ＠ ﾷｾ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｍｱ｝ｾ＠
Ｄ･ｾｩｫ｡＠
ｖｾｩ
How do the::
(31PfJ:q;ll4dl ) ｾ＠ ｾＴＱｎｮｲ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾﾷ＠
Ｉ＠ ｾ＠ ｯｦｬＨ､ｊ
:Jiqvf.ftqm ＨＳＱｦｗｾ ｾ＠
ｾﾷ＠
to establish
ｾＱ ｾＱ＠ ｾ
of Brahmnn and What is the difference between lhc: ·md.esctiba'billity ｉａｮｩｲｶ｡｣ｺｹＬｧＯＮ＼Ｑｾ＠ the indcscribabil hy (Anirvacnnlya:ta} of Mayi in the Advaita Vedanta syste.m?
Di:scuss. (d)
ｾ
(e)
ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾｴＧｲ＠
ｬＺｒｾ｣ｦｴ＠
Ｌ＠ ｾ ＼ｾｦｩＧｒ［
v;;rj ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
How do Lho Buddhists und the Nyiya ph.ilosopbers cxp.ta:in our lolowledgc of •the absence o.f the jar on che table·? Answer in de tail. ｾ＠ ｾ＠
m ｾＷ＠
t:% ｾﾷ＠ "ffif; ｾＨ＠
.q
tti®('!JIId
ｾ＠
1tf\
-q
position in thil!) Tegard and give argurru:m.ms
one or many? e.xpbtm I he ｓｾｬｨｫｹ｡＠
Is ｐｵｲｾ｡＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
cf?l ｾ＠ ｾ＠
in support of your answer.
ｾ ｾ＠
6. {i4} ｾＱＴ ｾ＠
m
ｾ＠
ＬＨＤＱｾ＠
ｾ＠
m ｾ＠
m
ｾ＠ ｩｴｅｒｾ＠
1fr11 ｾ ｔｦＮｴｩｪ＠
ｾ＿＠
'*
'fiiR
m ｾ＠
11
ｾ＠ ｾ＼ｔｩｴ Ｇｴｦｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ 'qft ｾＬ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠ -gf, [low do the Naiyayiluis. prove the existence of Godi? Do the: Yoga philosopher5 p!rove God in Lhe same way? Jr yr:s. how'.? And if no. why? Give reasons for your answer. 20
ili ｾ＠ i\
tbJ ｾ＠ Ｊｾ＠
tw ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾｯ｣ＭＱＴ［ｴ
ｬ ｲＺﾷ＠
ｾ＠
.f.t¥rl, c:Al
ｩｦｬﾫｾ
ｲｭ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
'?
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｉ＠ ｾ the BRddhJst s to admit the theory of Na.itat.myavackl and the doctrine for )$ it con$i s.tent of ｎｩｲｶＺｦ［ｵｾ＠
Ｍｳｩｲｭｾ･ｯｵｬＧｹＷ＠
Give:: Jeasons in favour of your answer.
15
4 www.examrace.com
ｾ＠
lc)
GliiRcti ﾷｾＧ＠
ｾ＠
-tT
•f!ifiklll ｾ＠ ｾ＠
1
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
it
ｾ＠
-:;.r14l
ｩｾ
Cfif q:zrr ｾ＠
liow do the Jaina philosophers
･Ｚｾｴｰｊ｡ｲｮ＠
ｾ＿＠
ｬ｣Ｍ ｵＧ＠
ｾ＠
'cc
v;ci
ｾ＠
f'F-«
ｾｉ＠
'bondag,e'7 What, according Co them. js the
cUstmc\iQn ｢ＭｾＱｷ･｣ｮ＠
'liberated sou! ' and ·bound sour ? What do the Jainas think about the: condition of the ·liberated soul'? Dis.cu:ss.
7.
ﾷｾ
'TtrF.a!rt1f,
Ia J ＣｬＢＧｉｾＺｊｏＡ＼ｴｩ＠
ﾷ Ｌ＠
ﾷｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠ Ｇｾﾷ＠
ｾ＠
it ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｖｈｩｾｦ､ｶ｡ｴＬ＠
｣ｴ［ｾ＠
«ohC"\1"11
'Q,ifi
as foun d in the sysccms. of
Dvaifa, Suddb!dvaita and A dn ｴｹ｡｢ｨ･､Ｚｩﾢ＼ｾ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｦ Ｇ＠ ｯｦｾ＠
f.r;wq ｾ
＠ｉ Give a comparative exposition of tile concoepl of ｍｯｫｾ｡Ｎ＠
(b)
ﾷｾ
ｩｴｾ＠ ｬｦｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｑ
ｓＴｦｍｩ ｾｬＧＨｱ
ｬＡＺ Ｇ＠ ｾＥｩｴ＠
l-
Ｎ＠
t? ｾ＠
51idi);Q1 ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾｴ＿
20
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
＠ｴ llow do t.he Advaita Vcdiintjns react to the Prak!,tiparit;JiimavfidEJ of the Sarhkhya philosophy? How do the Samkhyas defend their own position in thi$ r egard? Dis-cuss.
ｾ＠
tcJ
SlkNifi=d ﾷｾ＠
m
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
m..::1;ffi r€1 ｾ＠
Miiyil needed! by both RAm:tnuja and ｓｾｵｫ｡ｲ＠ ilm ﾷｾｑ
(uJ
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1 l1flll'iil ｾ＠
ｾ＠
l5
iRT ｾ＠
＠ｾ ｾ＠ ﾷ ｾﾷ＠ ＳＱｾﾷ＠ t? ｾ＠ ｾ ｾ＠ I-I ow does: R amiinuja refute the doctrine of MlyH as propounded by Sank.ara? Why is ｾＭ＠
8.
IS
Ｇ Ａ＾ＱＴｩｬｦ＼＠ ｾ＠
ｾｦｴ＠ ｾ
·ro ･ｳｴ｡｢ｾｩ＾ｨ＠
Ｚ＠ muiU'IIIlilfill
Cheili ､ｯ｣ｴｲｩｮ･ｳｾＧ＠
Discuss.
<€1 t'Jitfc!l ｾ＠
t? ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
15 ｾ＠
ｾＧＪｲ＠
＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾｒ｜＠ ｾ＠ lffii q;r q1Jf;r ｾｉ＠ Does rhe admis-si on of SvaynmpraJatsa-.•;JdJJ necessarily ｓｶ
｡ ｴ｡ｾｰｲｩｭ ｡ｱｹｶ､Ｚｩ＿＠
ｾ･｡､＠
the admission of
lQ
Discuss after the Nalyayikas, dn; ｍｩｭｾ｡ｫ ｡ｳ＠
and the Advaita
Vcdantins.
20
t?
iRI ｾ＠ GF.'1 ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ '1'mfttl ｭｾＬＮ ａ ｾｬ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾＮ＠ -m ｾ＠ 'fcFm ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｷＱｴＺ ｬ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ftrim ｬｦｾｲｴｩ｜Ｂｔ＠ ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠ :J"lR ｾ＠ "1t.i ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾ ｉ＠ h Cirvaka reje-ction of inference acceptable to the other. system$ of Indian philosophy?
(b}
frnot. why? Do, you think Ltae views of other :sy$tcrns to be justified? 'G ive reasons for your allswer _ ｾ＠
lcJ ｾｱ［Ｉ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
tRJT ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
ii ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾｬ＠
¥<4 1"'iHiJI
q!
.am 1T.iFft m ｾ＠
15
ｾ＠
ｬ＠
What is Evolution ac-cording to Sri Aurobindo? Describe the trunsfonnation and the nature. of gnostic being. in his philos.O:phy.
ｰｲｯ｣･ｳｾ＠
of triple.
15
.... s
BS9-8IO www.examrace.com
ｾ｡ｭ＠
u"' ｾ＠
s arA-
1 ｾ＠
m ｾ＠
$ ｾ＠
m 71'11
ｭ
ｾ＠
ﾷｾ
"3'tft ｾ＠
11'IWI ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾＯＧｗｬ＠ ｾ＠
ﾷ Ｂｊｭ＠
ｾ＠
Ｍｱｲｾ＠
"«!o ｾｯＩ＠
Ｍｾ＠
ｷＭＱｾ
il ｾ＠
"'IQ, affi" "1R ｾ＠
ｾ＠ 'tfit ｾ＠ ｾＬ＠ ifi w.rrm ria "111IRT ｾＧｩ＠
ｾＢｩ
ﾷ＠
m i\ il ｾ＠
-m m ｾ＠
lt'li ｾ＠
Ｍ ｾ Ｍ Ｄｱ＠
ｾ＠ ＱｦｩＮｬ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1
ｾｉ＠
f.tlrn ｾｄ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ ｾ＠
"Jm ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1i mｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧＩ＠
ｾ＠ ｬｱ ｜ｬ ｬ ｯｦｴｾ＠
t n&;fl iFft ｾ＠ ｦ｣ｬｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｚｵｦ｜ｾｲＮｭ＠
mｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
m
;J!i r.t""itMlid ｾ＠
ｾ＠ Ｇｾ＠
EOT-P-PBLY
·'M lfG"Q.. ｾ［ｦ＾ｬ＠
ｾｔ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
I:J«I< cfi ｾ＠ ｩ＠
ｾ＠
il ｾ＠
ｾ＠
• ｾ＠ ｾ＠
• ｾ＠ Ｇｱｻｾ＠
ｾ＠
:rn1
'qf.fl
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧＱＺｻ＠
'Rf.fiirl ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾＱｚｬＫｦ＠
TJln ｾＬ＠
atR: ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
3l'ftrttffi ｾ＠
ｾ＠
I
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ro
-e ftt:r. 1Jl{ ｾ＠ ｾ＠
T[K%
t
mrr Cfit ｾ
"" m:rmr ift ｾｮ＠ ｾ
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
ﾷ＠
ｾ＠
3ft ｾ＠
ｾ＠
PHlLOSOPHY (PAPER-I) [Time Allowed : Three Hours
IMaximum Marks : 2:50 l
I
QUESTION PAPER SPECD'lC INSTRUCTIONS attempting questionst fPlea.se read eaCh of the roUowing instruc;tiona. carefully ｨ･ｲｯｮＺｾ＠ ihere are EIGHT questions divided in r-wo Sections and printed both in HINDI ;and
in ENGLISH. Candidate bas to attempt FJVE questions in all. Question Nos. 1 and 5 are compulsory and out of the remaining. THREE .a.t'C' to be attempted choosins at lea:s.t ONE question from each Section.
The number of marks carried by a qucstiDn./pElrl is indic:o1ted a.,g a.inst .it. in the Admission Certificate which Answers mu st be: written in the· :medium QU ｬＺｨｯｲｾ･､＠ must be stated clewly on the cover of this Question-cum-Answer IQCAJ Booklet in lhe space provided . No markR wiill be givc;n for answers '"rrltten in a medium. other than the authorized one. Word limit in questions, wherever speccified 1 should be adhered to.
or
questions shall be counted. in sequentiaJ order. Unless struck off; attempt of a Attempts question shall be counted even rf attempted partly. Any page· or portion of the page left blank :struck ofT. in the QU«::stion· cum-Answer Booklet must be ｣ｬｾ｡ｲｹ＠
l
1 P.T.o.
www.examrace.com
I. ｾｦｱｭ＠
t ｾ＠
ｾ＠
150 ｾ＠
i@ "{"Pf'lfll
ｾ＠
lffi;m ｾ＠
ｾ＠
;
Wrmle short answers to the foUo·wing in abm.ll 150 ｷｯ Cflill ｾ＠
{a.J
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
"iJ ｾ
Ｍ
ﾷｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ
Ｌ＠
ｲ､
Ｇ ＲＫｾ］Ｔ＠
tzyJ
]Qxs .. so
ｾ＠ ･｡ｾｨ＠
• -ij
ｾ＠
ｾｦＮｬｃｩｴｏｉ＠
ｾ＠
t;?
"Q"qH
'3m
t
'tffj
ｾＧ＠ ..l!t.re the two
trutb:s-"The Sun will
ＺｲｾｳＮ･＠
tomonow· and "2+2,...4 • of the sam-e necessity
for Humc '] Give reas-o:n s in favour of your answe'r.
tbJ
t"'tu;iitf.t01t
ｾＭ＠
qriif
Ｑ＠
ﾷ ｴｬ ｬ ｾＺｷ
ｾ＿
;;fit if'l{f
t, 'ffiil' m
m ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾｃｆＡｴ､ｩ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
t
ﾷ＠ ｴｯｾ＠
T.s
ｰ｢ｾｴｯｹＬ＠
any pl:llcr; fQr f::reedom ip l...eib..-iz's.
when he s.peaks. of
"pre -e!'ll:J b li s.hed harmony•? D i$c: us$.
ﾷｾ＠
(c)
ｾ＠
t'ｾ＠
ｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
ＧｆＭｾ＠
ｾ＠
i 1
ｾ＠
ｩ｜ｴｾ＠ｆ ｾ＠ How does the notion of "family resemblance' help ｗＱｮ
1tir ｾｦ｀Ａ､
ｧｾｮｳｴ･Ｑ＠
t?
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
to uphoM that
'L;mguage is a. game, ? Dj6cus5. 315\lilliliUi
tdl trti ｾ＠
3Ur;-llJOI9 ;:r.n
ｾ｜ｩｴ＠
Ri:e 144P1l'i ｾ＠
ｾＮｭ＠
.afu \9-
qffir ｾ＿＠
ｭｮｾｵｴ･
How does S.artrc oonnet;;t
"tfitffi t?'tri ｾ＠ ｾ ＠ｉ ｾ＠
ｴ ｩ ､ｴｹ＠
whh bad :I"ｾ［ｴ
ｩｬ ｴｨ
＿＠
m t 1* -li5tl·'ilru,!:flm ｾ＠
Why does Sartre show that
inautih cnticity :md bad ·raith lead to alienation?· Dist:uss. (eJ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
How does
.2.
ｾＮ＠
ｦＴ
(a)
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
ｓｾＺｲ｡ｷｳｯｮ＠
･ｸｰｬｾｩｮ＠
ＢＱ ｬ ｾ ｡＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ifiit
ｬ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
·
1 ｾ＠
ｾ
ｬ＠
lhc: cOPCt.pt of pe!f'SOfl ill his philosophy'? Di.s.cus.s..
Hl,
ftl ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｩｪ ＢｦｩＨｬｾ
ｭｾ
､ｾ＠
ＧＣＦｾｲｩｦｴ＠
lby ｄ｣
ｾｑ＠
ｾ＠
ｱｾｲｦ｣ｴｩＢ＼ｯ､＠
ｩｴ
ｾ＠
t. ｾ＠
'rPmi
＠ｾ t? ｾ＠ ｾ ｾ＠ What is the reason for Lhe difference in the definitions .a nd classificat ions of ｳ ｵ｢ｾＮｩｯｬ｡ｮｴ＠
ｴｩ
ｾ＠
ｳ｣Ｚｯｾ
ｵＺｾ ｣ｳ＠
l) ｾ＠
• .Spinoza !lfid Leibniz in spite of the fact lham mhcy all 20
belonged lo the rationalist school of thought? Diticuss.
fbJ
·r.nq ｾ＠
Cfil
r.Ffi ｾ＠
ｾ＠
Cit ｩｬｾ
ｬ＠
ｾ＠
17n ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｦＮｒＺｉｬｾ＠
f,
ｾ
ﾷ ｩＺｾ＠
｡Ｚｴｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ ｾ
ﾷ＠
w ｾ＠ ｉ＠ ｾ＠
ij J.1T1I ｾ＠ 3m %ｾ ｦ＠
.q
Exp lain the sig,rtiric.an.ce of Ute Kantian. dicr.mn, •understa.nd1ng tnak.es Na1ure •. How far
do you
｡ｧｲｾ･＠
Discuss. G ive
ｲ･Ｎ｡ｾｯｮ
that Hegel's Ab:solutis-m is the culmination of the K!1hl i.an Dualism? Ｎ ｳＮ＠
in favour of your answer.
'15
www.examrace.com
I
ic}
lli1'fi ｾ＠ ｾﾷ
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
iR11 ｒｩｦｴｾ､＠
ｭ｡ｾ＠
ｾ＠
＠ﾷ t! ｾｩｴ＠ i ｾ＠ ｾｴ＠ How cl.Ot;.Si Qulae show t11at t.ne nQtiCJn •a ｭＮ･ｲＺｮｰｨ
3.
f.ti ｾ＠
ｹｾｫ｡
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
{Bj
1ffr
ｬ＠
ｾ＠
ｩ ｡ｗｾｉＧ＠
ｾ＠
itf!o:r
"'qi1 l'J,_q)
a· priori knowledge as discussed by Kant ]$
t)f
article of faith'? Give: r·eason:s fo.r your answer.
ｾ＠
'$1' ｾ＠
ｱｭｮ
ﾷ ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
!'lfijfstiliU ｾ＠
ｾ＠
11-{
ｾＱ＠
ｩＴ Ｑ ｗｾｩｴ＠ Slffti?V.Jt i!j 1FfT ｾ＠
it
ure
V
ｾｩｦｴｬ＠
;;? ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
*
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
lff ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
ｾｉ＠ How does Be:rkeley establis-h tbat Mind and ｾｴＮｳ＠
idea-s alone are real? How do Moo.E'e an.d Russe.U react lo Berkeley,, view in •hiis, regard? Do you find i!lllY diffcr-enoo between Moore's reacticm. and Russell's one? Discus$. 20
(oJ ｾ＠
ＧＵｭＡｾＮＨｬ＠
ｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
'*
m
ｾ＠ ＠ｾ ｾｦｬ＠ Ｂｦｩｾ＠ ? ｾ＠ ｾＮＬｦｩｴ＠ a:M Qflll'l"i ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾＧＢ＠ ｾ［ｊｴｦＮｬｩ＠ ＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ｷ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾｴ ｬ＠ How do the logical positivists show lh.a'l metaphysical sc:okrnccs. arc meHrrirqglcss'?
m
Can their ve rificatilon theory of
s-cientd;ic sentences? (.:;J
m
ifr
ｾ＠
:mt
acOOuPl fot tlbc: meaning;fu_lncss of all
ﾷ ｭｾ｡Ｎｮｩｧ＠
15
Di5(;-'IJS.S..
OSlfG
ｾﾷ＠
t?
t1'1WI3f.l ｾ＠
·m ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾﾷ＠
ｾｑ＠
ｾ＠
.q ｾ＠
fuQ; ｾ＠ ｾ＠
"iffiiT
-qrrf ｾ＠
1? 'ijllf ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾＧｻＱｴＴＺＢＡｦ
ＢＧ＠
aitlf'ijf4'fi t1 ｾ＠
!-:if ｾ＠ :RR ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＧｬＮｦｾ＠
1t
ｾｉ＠
How d.oc:s Wil1gcnstcin apply the distincGion between "saying' iil.nd "showing" to point ro a single w.ay of appTChc.mting the mos1 dc.-eisivc prob]ems of philosophy? [s. !he justified? Give reason.s for your answeli' _ 4.
ｾｬＴｦ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
fa}
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
?
1 ｾｌｴｦｩｬ＠
D!'ffi9in ｾ
ｾｉｒ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ＨｾＩ＠
ｾ＠
fli!fiAA I ;$
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
cJil ﾷｾ＠
W ＠ｾ 'ir.fr' ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
15
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
fAifR
ｉ＠
Whal i's Epache 1 How docs He:hlcgge.:r reject this method of pnenomenologieaJ reduction'] Explain Heidegger•s concept ·o.f 'betn.g in
cortt;ep·l or a (b)
ｴｲｾｕ
<€t
ｾｳ［＠
·wo.rJd•
opposed tQ tttc:
:w
vgo.
Ｎ ｩｃｾ､Ａ･ｮｴｬ＠
＼ｭｾＱｩｷｦ ｾ＠
ＱＭｾ＠
w4
fuilit"i I ｾ＠
ｾ＠
dffi:
*
ﾷ ｾＭ｡＿ｬｴ＠ ｾＶＺＱ＠
it
ｾ＠
Js tille .relation between the Idea and the World as discuS$edl by Ph.- to l.ogkally ｣ｯｮｳＺｩｾ･ｴＧｊ＠
Discuss Aris;lotle' ,s. ¥iews regarding tills and also give arguments in favour
of JOUr ｾｷ･ (c)
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｲ Ｎ＠
ｾ＠
ffiiii iCI"+' ｾ＠
iti ｾ＠
-q ｾ＠
1.5
<1\1 iirmiti ｾ＠
ｾ
ｾ＠
｣｡Ｚ Ｎ ［ｮｕｩＺＴＱｾ＠
i ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｴｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ＠
.How is R11ssell' s theory of definltc:: descJipLion related lo· bioS Dis.cuss and give reasons tor yo.u:r aRswcr.
3
ｬＮ ｯｾｊＮ｣｡
ｬ＠
Atomism"? 15
I P.T.O. www.examrace.com
Ｕｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
if il
I SBCTJON-B· ｂ＠
ｾ ｾ
'S'lWT 150 lJii(ij
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ
ll •
: ]0>C5 50
Write: short answers 1o the following in about 150 words each :
mｾＨ
qc:tf'f.Wi ｾ＠ ｾｩｎ＼ｴ＠
fa}
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｩ ｊ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ Ｊｾ＠
ｾＮ＠ ｾ＠
'tr1 3fR liiJ ｾ＠
ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾＩ＠
ｾ＠
fcfffi
philosophers explain the diffel'ence of lhc r-elationships in oHhc table and WJ t11e book on the table? Discuss. two cases-(i) the:: brown ｯ ｾ ｯｵｲ＠
(b}
Ｑ＠
ｾＷ
ﾷ ｵｴ ｰ Ｎ ｡､＠
Madhya:mika Bu.ddhirit5 apply the notion of ｐｲ｡ｴｩＮｹｾ theiT doc:trine of $anyata ? Discus:s. ｴｨｾ＠
How ､ｯ
nt.T ii ｾ＠
•
(c)
ｴｨｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ Ｇ Ｇ＠ ｾ＠ ｾｒｬｩｴｻｎｉ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｂｾ＠
Ｇ＠ ｾ＠ ﾷｾ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｍｱ｝ｾ＠
Ｄ･ｾｩｫ｡＠
ｖｾｩ
How do the::
(31PfJ:q;ll4dl ) ｾ＠ ｾＴＱｎｮｲ＠
ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾﾷ＠
Ｉ＠ ｾ＠ ｯｦｬＨ､ｊ
:Jiqvf.ftqm ＨＳＱｦｗｾ ｾ＠
ｾﾷ＠
to establish
ｾＱ ｾＱ＠ ｾ
of Brahmnn and What is the difference between lhc: ·md.esctiba'billity ｉａｮｩｲｶ｡｣ｺｹＬｧＯＮ＼Ｑｾ＠ the indcscribabil hy (Anirvacnnlya:ta} of Mayi in the Advaita Vedanta syste.m?
Di:scuss. (d)
ｾ
(e)
ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾｴＧｲ＠
ｬＺｒｾ｣ｦｴ＠
Ｌ＠ ｾ ＼ｾｦｩＧｒ［
v;;rj ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
How do Lho Buddhists und the Nyiya ph.ilosopbers cxp.ta:in our lolowledgc of •the absence o.f the jar on che table·? Answer in de tail. ｾ＠ ｾ＠
m ｾＷ＠
t:% ｾﾷ＠ "ffif; ｾＨ＠
.q
tti®('!JIId
ｾ＠
1tf\
-q
position in thil!) Tegard and give argurru:m.ms
one or many? e.xpbtm I he ｓｾｬｨｫｹ｡＠
Is ｐｵｲｾ｡＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
cf?l ｾ＠ ｾ＠
in support of your answer.
ｾ ｾ＠
6. {i4} ｾＱＴ ｾ＠
m
ｾ＠
ＬＨＤＱｾ＠
ｾ＠
m ｾ＠
m
ｾ＠ ｩｴｅｒｾ＠
1fr11 ｾ ｔｦＮｴｩｪ＠
ｾ＿＠
'*
'fiiR
m ｾ＠
11
ｾ＠ ｾ＼ｔｩｴ Ｇｴｦｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ 'qft ｾＬ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠ -gf, [low do the Naiyayiluis. prove the existence of Godi? Do the: Yoga philosopher5 p!rove God in Lhe same way? Jr yr:s. how'.? And if no. why? Give reasons for your answer. 20
ili ｾ＠ i\
tbJ ｾ＠ Ｊｾ＠
tw ｾ＠
ﾷ ｾｯ｣ＭＱＴ［ｴ
ｬ ｲＺﾷ＠
ｾ＠
.f.t¥rl, c:Al
ｩｦｬﾫｾ
ｲｭ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
'?
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｉ＠ ｾ the BRddhJst s to admit the theory of Na.itat.myavackl and the doctrine for )$ it con$i s.tent of ｎｩｲｶＺｦ［ｵｾ＠
Ｍｳｩｲｭｾ･ｯｵｬＧｹＷ＠
Give:: Jeasons in favour of your answer.
15
4 www.examrace.com
ｾ＠
lc)
GliiRcti ﾷｾＧ＠
ｾ＠
-tT
•f!ifiklll ｾ＠ ｾ＠
1
ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
it
ｾ＠
-:;.r14l
ｩｾ
Cfif q:zrr ｾ＠
liow do the Jaina philosophers
･Ｚｾｴｰｊ｡ｲｮ＠
ｾ＿＠
ｬ｣Ｍ ｵＧ＠
ｾ＠
'cc
v;ci
ｾ＠
f'F-«
ｾｉ＠
'bondag,e'7 What, according Co them. js the
cUstmc\iQn ｢ＭｾＱｷ･｣ｮ＠
'liberated sou! ' and ·bound sour ? What do the Jainas think about the: condition of the ·liberated soul'? Dis.cu:ss.
7.
ﾷｾ
'TtrF.a!rt1f,
Ia J ＣｬＢＧｉｾＺｊｏＡ＼ｴｩ＠
ﾷ Ｌ＠
ﾷｾ
ﾷ＠ ｾ＠ Ｇｾﾷ＠
ｾ＠
it ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｖｈｩｾｦ､ｶ｡ｴＬ＠
｣ｴ［ｾ＠
«ohC"\1"11
'Q,ifi
as foun d in the sysccms. of
Dvaifa, Suddb!dvaita and A dn ｴｹ｡｢ｨ･､Ｚｩﾢ＼ｾ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｦ Ｇ＠ ｯｦｾ＠
f.r;wq ｾ
＠ｉ Give a comparative exposition of tile concoepl of ｍｯｫｾ｡Ｎ＠
(b)
ﾷｾ
ｩｴｾ＠ ｬｦｾ＠
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
Ｑ
ｓＴｦｍｩ ｾｬＧＨｱ
ｬＡＺ Ｇ＠ ｾＥｩｴ＠
l-
Ｎ＠
t? ｾ＠
51idi);Q1 ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾｴ＿
20
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
＠ｴ llow do t.he Advaita Vcdiintjns react to the Prak!,tiparit;JiimavfidEJ of the Sarhkhya philosophy? How do the Samkhyas defend their own position in thi$ r egard? Dis-cuss.
ｾ＠
tcJ
SlkNifi=d ﾷｾ＠
m
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
m..::1;ffi r€1 ｾ＠
Miiyil needed! by both RAm:tnuja and ｓｾｵｫ｡ｲ＠ ilm ﾷｾｑ
(uJ
ｾ＠
ｾ＠
1 l1flll'iil ｾ＠
ｾ＠
l5
iRT ｾ＠
＠ｾ ｾ＠ ﾷ ｾﾷ＠ ＳＱｾﾷ＠ t? ｾ＠ ｾ ｾ＠ I-I ow does: R amiinuja refute the doctrine of MlyH as propounded by Sank.ara? Why is ｾＭ＠
8.
IS
Ｇ Ａ＾ＱＴｩｬｦ＼＠ ｾ＠
ｾｦｴ＠ ｾ
·ro ･ｳｴ｡｢ｾｩ＾ｨ＠
Ｚ＠ muiU'IIIlilfill
Cheili ､ｯ｣ｴｲｩｮ･ｳｾＧ＠
Discuss.
<€1 t'Jitfc!l ｾ＠
t? ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
15 ｾ＠
ｾＧＪｲ＠
＠ｾ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾｒ｜＠ ｾ＠ lffii q;r q1Jf;r ｾｉ＠ Does rhe admis-si on of SvaynmpraJatsa-.•;JdJJ necessarily ｓｶ
｡ ｴ｡ｾｰｲｩｭ ｡ｱｹｶ､Ｚｩ＿＠
ｾ･｡､＠
the admission of
lQ
Discuss after the Nalyayikas, dn; ｍｩｭｾ｡ｫ ｡ｳ＠
and the Advaita
Vcdantins.
20
t?
iRI ｾ＠ GF.'1 ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ '1'mfttl ｭｾＬＮ ａ ｾｬ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｾＮ＠ -m ｾ＠ 'fcFm ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ｷＱｴＺ ｬ ｾ＠ ｾ＠ ftrim ｬｦｾｲｴｩ｜Ｂｔ＠ ｾ＿＠ ｾ＠ :J"lR ｾ＠ "1t.i ｾ ﾷ＠ ｾ ｉ＠ h Cirvaka reje-ction of inference acceptable to the other. system$ of Indian philosophy?
(b}
frnot. why? Do, you think Ltae views of other :sy$tcrns to be justified? 'G ive reasons for your allswer _ ｾ＠
lcJ ｾｱ［Ｉ
ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾ＠
tRJT ｾ＿＠
ｾ＠
ii ｾ＠ ｾ＠
ｾｬ＠
¥<4 1"'iHiJI
q!
.am 1T.iFft m ｾ＠
15
ｾ＠
ｬ＠
What is Evolution ac-cording to Sri Aurobindo? Describe the trunsfonnation and the nature. of gnostic being. in his philos.O:phy.
ｰｲｯ｣･ｳｾ＠
of triple.
15
.... s
BS9-8IO www.examrace.com
More Documents from "Udit Raj Bora"
Ias-mains-philosophy-2018-paper-1.pdf
May 2020 16
Il-form-test-schedule-psychology-final.pdf
May 2020 14
Ias-mains-literature-english-paper-1-2018.pdf
May 2020 14
Interesting Sunday Projects
December 2019 80
Beatit.pdf
May 2020 22