Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger October 7, 2003 Cycle 2 Group 1A Frank Fadenholz Jennifer Fadenholz Christian Woods Angel Taylor
Outline • Objectives • Background • Experimental Strategy • Results • Error Analysis • Conclusions • Recommendations • References
Objectives and Background
Objectives • Operate shell and tube heat exchanger varying steam flow
• Determine the outside overall heat transfer coefficient (Uo)
• Determine shellside heat transfer (QSS ) • Determine tubeside heat transfer (QTS )
Heat Exchanger Background • Exchange heat between fluids • Latent heat and sensible heat transfer • Common to chemical process industry • Types of heat exchangers – – – –
Air Cooled Double Pipe Spiral Plate and Tube Shell and Tube
Heat Exchanger Background Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers
• Account for 60% of heat exchangers in use today • Can handle large flows, low temperatures and pressures, high temperatures and pressures
• Our shell and tube heat exchanger – Basco Type 500 U-tube Water Heater – 1 Shell Pass – 16 Tubes
Experimental Strategy
Cold Water Inlet
Compressed Air
Steam
ST-V4
Emergency Shutdown Valve
ST-V1
ST-V3
ST-V2
Emergency Shutdown Vavle
TV-04
Should make Labels Larger
FT-01
PRV-05 TT-04
Hot Water Outlet
TT-03
PG-07
Condensate
E-01
T ST-V5
PG-06
FT-02
FV-02
Figure 1. Unit Operations Lab: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (Group 1A)
Experimental Strategy • 5 Runs Total • Varied Steam Valve (TV-04) Position – – – – –
105% open 75% open 65% open 60% open 52% open
• Cooling water flow rate constant
Experimental Strategy • Measured Variables – – – – –
Condensate flow Condensate temperature Cooling water flow Cooling water inlet temperature Cooling water outlet temperature
Heat Exchanger Calculations • Heat transfer rate
• QTS = mCp∆ T • QSS = m∆ H + mCp∆ T
• Overall heat transfer coefficient • Uo = QSS /(Ao*∆ TLM )
• Log mean temperature • ∆ TLM =
((Thi -Tco ) – (Tho – Tci )) / ln[(Thi – Tco ) – (Tho – Tci )]
Simplified Process Flow Diagram Thi
Qin, SS Tci
Qin, TS
Qout, TS Qout, SS
Tho
Tco
Results
Experimental Results Steam Valve Heat Transfer Heat Transfer % Open Rate (QTS ) Rate (QSS ) (btu/hr) (btu/hr)
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (Uo) (btu/lb*F*hr)
105%
276489
275350
211
75%
250275
254588
201
65%
183357
181872
148
60%
134200
133777
112
52%
98289
93757
78
Shellside vs. Tubeside Heat Transfer He at Tr anfe r Rate (Q) Q-tube s ide vs . Q-s he lls ide
Q tubeside (btu/hr)
290000 240000 190000 140000 90000 75000
125000
175000
Qsh ellsid e (btu/hr)
225000
275000
Hate Transfer Rate (btu/hr)
Steam vs. Heat Transfer Rate (QTS , QSS ) 290000 240000 190000 140000 90000 75
125 175 225 Condensate Mass Out (lb/hr) Q-Shellside
Q-Tubeside
275
Steam vs. Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient Heat Transfer Coefficient (btu/lb*F*hr)
300 250 200 150 100 50 50
100
150
200
250
Condensate Mass Out (lb/hr) U inside
U outside
300
Error Analysis
Propagation of Error • Determine the accuracy of measured
variables • Apply the propagation of error equation to each function
k ∂y ∆y = ∑ ∆xi i =1 ∂xi 2
1
2
Variable Measurement Accuracy
• Flow rate of the steam +/- 5 lb/hr • Flow rate of the cooling water +/- 50 lb/hr • Temperature readings +/- 2 °F • Largest sources of error
– Mass flow rate of the steam – Mass flow rate of the cooling water
Calculated Error Values • ∆QTS ≈ +/- 1,000 btu/hr • ∆QSS ≈ +/- 50,000 btu/hr • ∆Uo ≈ +/- 4 btu/lb °F hr • ∆Ui ≈ +/- 4 to +/- 1.6 btu/lb °F hr
Heat Transfer Rate (btu/hr)
Propagation of Error Heat Transfer 340000 290000 240000 190000 140000 90000 75
125
175
225
Condensate Mass Out (lb/hr) Q-tubeside
Q-shellside
275
Propagation of Error Heat Transfer Coefficient Heat Transfer Coefficient (btu/lb*F*hr)
300 250 200 150 100 50 50
100
150
200
250
Condensate Mass Out (lb/hr) U inside
U outside
300
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions • QTS , QSS , Uo all increase as the steam flow rate increases
• QTS , QSS , Uo all have a linear relationship with the mass flow rate of the steam
• Heat transfer rate of the tube side is equal to the heat transfer rate of the shell side
Recommendations • Operation Recommendation – Operate the shell and tube heat exchanger at approximately 75% for sufficient heat transfer and economic efficiency
• Experiment Recommendations – Monitor pressure gauge (PG-07) at low steam rates to prevent a vacuum
References • API Heat Transfer. Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Picture • • • •
www.apiheattransfer.com/en/Products/HeatExchangers/She llAndTube/ Georgia Tech. Propagation of Error. www.swiki.che.gatech.edu/CHE4200. August 2002. Geankoplis, Christie J. Transport Processes and Unit Operations, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall Publishing, Inc. 1993. Heald, C. C. Cameron Hydraulic Data. Liberty Corner, NJ. Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Co. 1998. Peters, Timmerhaus, West. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed. New York, NY. McGaw-Hill Co. Inc., 2003.