Graphs And Interpretations

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Graphs And Interpretations as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 6,348
  • Pages: 68
Table 1: Frequency Distribution of the Family Size of Each Family Interviewed

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

5 to 6

27

35%

3 to 4

24

31%

7 and above

15

19%

1 to 2

12

15%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 1: Family Size of Each Family Interviewed

Number of Family Sizes No. of Respondents

30 25 20 15

27

24

10

15

5 0

5 to 6

3 to 4

7 and above

12

1 to 2

The table shows that there are 15% (12 families) are composed of 1 to 42members. About 31% (24 families) are composed of 3 to 4 members, 35% (27 families) are composed of 5 to 6 members, and 19 % (15 families) are composed of 7 or more members.

The family size is greatly affected by economic status. Because of the high cost of living, people choose to have fewer or less number of children that is applicable to their income and financial capacities. The fewer the family members, the better for them, because they can sustain individual needs like education. The family size is also affected by the physiological capabilities of the parents. Inadequate living space and the status of unemployment will hinder the growth of the family size.

The family size of 5 to 6 members has the highest percentage in the data collected gathering 35 percent. The next family size is that composing of 3 to 4 members with 31 percent, family size with 7 or more members with 19 percent, and last, family size with 1 to 2 members with 15 percent.

Table :2 Frequency Distribution of the Families’ Length of Residency

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

6-10 Years

17

22%

0-5 Years

15

19%

31 Years Above

15

19%

16-20 Years

14

18%

26-30 Years

7

9%

21-25 Years

6

8%

11-15 Years

4

5%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure:2 Families’ Length of Residency

No. of Respondents

Length of Residency 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0

17

15

15

14 7

6-10 Years

0-5 Years

31 Years Above

16-20 Years

26-30 Years

6 21-25 Years

The table shows that 19.23% (15 families) has been living for not more than 5 years in Pandacan. A portion of 21.79% (17 families) has been living in Pandacan for not more than 10 years but not less than 6 years. About 5.13% (4 families) has been already living in Pandacan for more than 11 years but not more than 15 years. A fraction of 17.95% (14 families) has been living in Pandacan for not more than 20 years but not less than 16 years. 7.69% (6 families) are living in Pandacan for not more than 25 years but not less than 21 years. 7.69 (6 families) are living for not more than 30 years but not less than 26 years in Pandacan. 20.51% (16 families) are living in Pandacan for more than 30 years.

Length of residency is affected by several factors like Income and Family size and time. If the family income is small, it will be harder for them to transfer to a better place. Those families that are well settled in Pandacan are contented with what they have.

Transferring from one house to another is a big problem. Big appliances and furniture are very hard to move to another place that’s why it is better to stay in 1 place than to move CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Nuclear

55

71%

Extended

19

24%

Matriarchal

3

4%

Patriarchal

1

1%

TOTAL

78

100%

to another. The family size can also affect the family’s capability to move to a better home with good environment. Time is also essential in moving. It is very time-consuming. The availability of a new place is also quite a factor.

Table 3: Frequency Distribution of the Family Structure

Figure 3: Different Types Of Family Structure

The table on Family shows that 70.51% (55 Families) has a nuclear type of family. A fraction of 24.36% (19 families) is extended. A portion of 3.85% (3 families) is Matriarchal type, and 1.28% (1 family) is patriarchal.

The Family Structure is affected by family income and economical status. The family income almost dictates the family size and structure. The family must only accommodate what the income provides. The higher the income, the bigger the family size and structure can get. Economical status works the same as the family income. The nuclear families are separated from their own family because it is herder to sustain 2 families compared to 1 family. The nuclear families are separated because of the high cost of living. Those in extended families perceive poverty as a problem that they can surpass with the help of one another. The dependency ratio also plays a part in this family structure. The high dependency ratio results to the extension of families because they can’t support their own family that’s why they need to ask assistance from their relatives.

Table 4 : Frequency Distribution of Dominant Family Members

CLASSIFICATION Father

FREQUENCY 69

PERCENTAGE 88%

Mother

9

12%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 4: Dominant Family Members

The table shows that 88.46% (69 respondents) answered that the father is the dominant member in the family and 11.54% (9 respondents) answered that the mother is the major player.

The dominant member of the family in Jesus St, Pandacan, Manila is the Father. He is also the basic earner. According to the data collected, 72 out of 90 males aging from 18 years and above are employed and only 25 out of 104 among women aging from 18 and above are employed. The dominant member of the family is also affected by the income they gather.

Table 5: Frequency Distribution of Religion of Each Family Assessed

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Roman Catholic

69

89%

Iglesia ni Kristo

8

10%

Born Again

1

1%

Muslim

0

0%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 5 : Frequency Distribution of Religion of Each Family Assessed

The data shows that there are 69 respondents that are Roman Catholic, eight who said that their religion is Iglesia Ni Cristo, one who answered that their religion is born again and none said that they are Muslims.

Most residents in the area have the religion of Roman Catholic since this religion is the most dominant not only within the community but also throughout the country. This is proven by the existence of a church outside the barangay and a small chapel in alley 2. Although it is possible that the high percentage of the said religion on the graph is due to catholic families that are overcrowded or have a large number of family members, in

which the children inherit the same religion as their parents. This therefore increases the numbers of Roman Catholic believers in the area. Residents who are under the religion of “Iglesia ni Cristo” are quite lesser than Roman Catholic but more than Born Again and Muslim, since it is closely associated with the Roman Catholic belief. While “Born Again” and “Muslim” religion believers are quite rare in the community, probably due to oppression or racism among community members.

Table 6: Frequency Distribution ofEducational Attainment

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

No Education

96

26%

H.S Graduate

74

20%

Elementary Level

69

18%

H.S Level

52

14%

College Level

36

9%

Elementary Grad

25

7%

College Graduate

22

6%

TOTAL

374

100%

Figure 6: Families’ Educational Attainment

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

96 69

25

22

Le ve El em l en ta ry G ra Co d lle ge G ra du at e

36

Co lle ge

Le ve l

52

H. S

G

H. S

No

ra du at El e em en ta ry Le ve l

74

Ed uc at io n

No. of Respondents

Educational Attainment

Based on the graph, 96 respondents had no formal education, 74 are HS Graduates, 69 are in the Elementary Level, 52 are in the HS Level, 36 are in the College Level, 25 are Elementary Graduates and finally, 22 are College Graduates.

In Pandacan, educational attainment is greatly affected by family income, family size, resources and facilities iavalable. Family income also dictates the educational attainment. The highest frequency in average family income is the Php 5, 000 and below. Family size also works the same way as the family income. The bigger the family, the higher the family income needs to be to sustain the neccessities of the family members.

Judging from the graph, there are many of them who reached the elementary level, since most of the population are children. These children are expected to study at

the nearby public school where education is free. Some family members are those who continue pursuing their studies in the highschool level. But since some of those who studied in elementary left their studies to work, most students failed to reach highschool, thus lessening percentage of H.S. Level than the Elementary Level on the graph. Since highschool students are teenagers and more capable than small children, they are most susceptible to leave school for work. At the same time, the pressure and difficulty experienced in the highschool level compared to elementary level are too much for some students that they tend to stop studying out of frustration. Therefore most students stop after graduating highschool, the reason why the percentage of H.S. Graduates are quite high. Barely a few reached college level due to financial problems. While college graduates are really rare since most can’t afford to complete their college education and probably couldn’t handle the pressure of studying on a much higher level. This gives both college level and graduates a low percentage. But as observed on the graph, the highest percentage belongs to those who have no education. This is represented by children or infants that are still too young to study and adults who never graduated at any educational level. The most possible reason could be poverty since some parents ended up not finishing their studies due to their work. This sums up to the highest percentage on the graph.

Table 7: Frequency Distribution of Employment of Male and Female above 18 years old

CLASSIFICATION

Employed

Unemployed TOTAL

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Male

72

74%

Female

25

26%

Male

18

19%

Female

79

81%

97

100%

Figure 7: Employment of Male and Female above 18 years old

In the Employment graph, 72 males and 25 females are employed. Unemployment is most common in females at 79 and 18 are males.

The outcome of the collation determined the highest type of employment as regular at 48.72% because family members especially the heads and the breadwinners who engage in this type of work hope to rid their families of poverty by settling in definite stable jobs.

Self-employed families/family members prefer having their own businesses to apply their own techniques in endorsing or promoting their products and selling them better. Self-employment tails at 29.49%. Tied at 23.08% are contractual and casual. A contractual type of employment is one of the two least preferred kinds by the families evaluated due to its short course and instability. After completing the designated months or years of work, a person must find a new job, which appears to be quite impractical for some families. The casual type is the most unpredictable of all the categories because it involves sidelines.

Table 8:Frequency Distribution: Type of Occupation of Employed Population

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Blue Collar

82

85%

White Collar

11

14%

Self-Employed

4

5%

TOTAL

97

100%

Figure 8: Type of Occupation of Employed Population

Of the 97 respondents, 84.5 % of the total people employed in the community are labeled as blue collars because they are considerably skilled, while 14% of the total people employed in the community are labeled as white collar employees because they are the ones who work in specific offices. The least of the three categories, the remaining 5% of the community are self-employed.

The occupations of the individuals assessed are mostly related to the extent of their educational attainment. Only a few completed their studies due to lack of financial support. Those who finished their studies are more stable.

Table 9: Frequency Distribution of Type of Employment

CLASSIFICATION Regular

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

38

39%

Self-employed

23

24%

Contractual

18

19%

Casual

18

19%

97

100%

TOTAL Figure 9: Families’ Type of Employment

Type of Employment 40

38

35

No. of Respondents

30 23

25 20

18

18

Contractual

Casual

15 10 5 0 Regular

Self-employed

To describe the status of the type of employment in the community, 38 are regular, 23 are self-employed, and 18 are casual and contractual.

The outcome of the collation determined the highest type of employment as regular at 39% because family members especially the heads and the breadwinners who engage in this type of work hope to rid their families of poverty by settling in definite stable jobs. Self-employed families/family members prefer having their own businesses to apply their own techniques in endorsing or promoting their products and selling them better. Self-employment tails at 24%. Tied at 19% are contractual and casual. A contractual type of employment is one of the two least preferred kinds by the families evaluated due to its short course and instability. After completing the designated months or years of work, a person must find a new job, which appears to be quite impractical for some families. The casual type is the most unpredictable of all the categories because it involves sidelines.

Table 10: Frequency Distribution of Monthly Family Income

CLASSIFICATION below Php 5,000

FREQUENCY 36

PERCENTAGE 46%

above Php 5,001.00 10,000.00

29

37%

above Php 10,001.0015,000.00

6

8%

above Php 15,001.0020,000.00

1

1%

above Php 40,001.0050,000.00

2

3%

above Php 20,001.0030,000.00

2

3%

above Php 30,001.0040,000.00 more than Php 50,001.00 TOTAL

1 1 78

1% 1% 100%

Figure 10: Monthly Family Income

Family Income

36

29 6

2

2

1

1

ab ov e

Ph p

be lo w Ph ab 5 p ov ,0 5, e 01 00 Ph .0 0 0 p ab -1 10 ov ,0 0, e 01 0. Ph .. .0 0 p ab 40 15 ov ,0 ,0 e 0 ... Ph 1. 0 p 0 ab -5 20 ov 0, ,0 e 0. 0 Ph .. 1. 0 p ab 01 30 ov 5, 00 ,0 e ... Ph 1. 0 p 030 20 ,0 m ,0 01 or ... e .0 th 0 an 40 ,0 Ph ... p 50 ,0 01 .0 0

No. of Respondents

40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0

1

The data shows that 46.15% (36 respondents) have and average family income of below Php 5,000. 37.18% (29 respondents) have an income of not less than Php 5,001 and not more than Php 10,000. 7.69% (6 respondents) have an income of not less than Php 10,000 but not more than Php15,000. 1.28% (1 respondent) has an income of Php 15,000 to Php 20,000. 2.56% (2 respondents) have an income of Php 20,001 to 30,000 pesos. 1.28% (1 respondent) has an income of Php 30,001 to Php 40,000. 2.56% (2 respondents) have Php 40,001 to Php 50,000. 1.28% (1 respondent) has an income of more than Php 50,000.

Monthly income is greatly affected by some factors like educational attainment, source of income, and occupation. Educational attainment is a major factor that affects their family income. Because of the economic status, it is hard to attain/avail good education. Most of the earners did not finish their studies. Occupation also affects their monthly income. Most of them didn’t finish their studies that is why they don’t have good educational backgrounds. 84.5% of the earners In the community is blue collar job or also known as skilled workers. White collar job consists of the professional workers like engineers, doctors, lawyers. Self-employment also affects the monthly family income. 4% of the working population in Pandacan is self-employed. They are dependent on their small business.

Table 11: Frequency Distribution of Dialect Used

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Tagalog

62

79%

Waray

5

6%

Bisaya

4

5%

Bicolano

3

4%

Ilocano

2

3%

Ilonggo

1

1%

Pangalatok

1

1%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 11: Dialect Used

62

3

2

1 Ilo ng go

Bi co la no

Bi sa ya

4

Ilo ca no

5 W ar ay

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Ta ga lo g

No. of Respondents

Different Dialects

In this graph, 79% of interviewees use the dialect Tagalog because for them it is the most commonly used mode of communication in the area. 6% of them use Waray, 5% are accustomed to Bisaya, 6% of them use Bicolano, 5% utilize Ilocano, and 1% of them use Ilonggo and Panggalatok separately.

Most of them grew up in Metro Manila that’s why Tagalog is more comprehensible to them. Some of them learned tagalog so that they can talk and communicate with each other. Some still use provincial dialects because they only migrated to Manila due to a certain belief that life in the city is a “new chance.”

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Filipino

68

87%

English

10

13%

TOTAL

78

100%

Table 12: Frequency Distribution of Language Used

Figure 12: Language Used

On this graph, majority of the families (87%) speak the Filipino language, it is because, they value our own language and it speaks about the loyalty of Filipino blood while 13% of the families interviewed has the ability to speak English due to the universality of the English language and others may have the capability of acquiring it in their education.

Availability of Social and Health Facilities Community members should have health benefits like Basketball court, Botika ng bayan, Day Care Center etc. to promote good and healthy lifestyle within the community.

The benefit of having a drugstore as Botika ng bayan in the community is to help the people in the community to afford cheaper medicines. Also, it is very convenient for them because it is very near to home. The benefit of the health center is to guide the people to achieve a healthy lifestyle. Further, this establishment helps to prevent those diseases that may lead into severe conditions among the families. It also aims to promote wellness and good living. The benefit of having a Day Care center in the community is to help the children be more attentive and knowledgeable with regards to the varying kinds of fun activities. Moreover, it is a step to have a better understanding of different things. The benefit of the barangay hall in the community is to give safety and security to the residents. The benefit of the chapel in the community is to help people in the community to stay in touch with God for guidance. The benefit of having a Basketball court in the community is to help the young become active in the community and to promote the avoidance of engaging in bad vices. The benefits of the instituted Petron Park in the community is to provide the children with fun. In this manner, they can meet new friends to improve their interaction skills. It also a place for relaxation for the parents.

Table 13: Psychological History

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

No vices

202

79%

Alcohol used

33

13%

Tobacco used

19

7%

Drug used

1

0%

TOTAL

255

100%

Figure 13: Families’ Psychological History

Psychological History No. of Respondents

35 30 25 20

33

15 19

10 5 0

1 Alcohol used

Tobacco used

Drug used

The psychological history of the community relates that 33 respondents use alcohol, 19 prefer the use of tobacco and only 1 engages in drug use.

The most common psychological history in the community is the use of alcohol having the percentage of 13%, since it is one of the most accessible vice in the community. Aside from alcoholic abuse, there is also the prevalence of the use of tobacco (7%), since it is economically accessible, it can be easily bought even under their financial status thus increasing the risk for respiratory diseases.. Drug used is also history in their family but it is the lowest percentage in the graph, since it is expensive they cannot easily bought that can affect their financial status. Majority in the family members assessed in the community admitted, that they don’t have any vices. (79%)

Table 14: Frequency Distribution:Immunization Status of Adult Population (Assessed Only)

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Complete

87

51%

Incomplete

83

49%

TOTAL

170

100%

Figure 14: Immunization Status of Adult Population (Assessed Only)

For adult immunization, 87 are complete and 83 are incomplete,

Of the 170 adult respondents, 51% has complete immunizations. It could either be due to the affordability of the immunizations when they where young or they were able to participate in the government’s health projects such as free vaccination. The minority of the total population has a percentage of 49%. Reasons related to the incompletion of their immunization are usually financial and lack of time to spare.

Table 15: Frequency Distribution: Immunization Status of Children 6 years old and below

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Complete

47

55%

Incomplete

38

45%

TOTAL

85

100%

Figure 15: Immunization Status of Children 6 years old and below

For the immunization of children 6 years and below, 47 are complete and 38 are incomplete.

Immunizations are essential and greatly recommended due to their preventive advantages against certain diseases. They can also lessen the severity of chronic illnesses especially among vulnerable individuals. Of the total of 85 children, 55.3% of them have received immunizations. It could be because most of the families interviewed have stable sources of income and can afford the payment for these immunizations. However, 44.72% of the total population is incomplete. These are the children that belong mostly to low-income families

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Normal

15

54%

Abnormal

5

18%

Questionable

6

21%

Untestable

2

7%

TOTAL

28

100%

Table 16: Frequency Distribtuion of Results of the Metro Manila Development Screening Test

Figure 16: Percentage Relationship of Results of the Metro Manila Development Screening Test

The data shows that 54% of the children who have undergone MMDST are normal, 18% are abnormal, 21% are questionable, and 7% cannot be tested.

In Pandacan, we have assessed children who are already capable for MMDST, ranging from 5 years and below. As the figure shows that majority of the responding children have passed the tests, and 18% failed the tests which was considered abnormal in relation to their age.

Table 17: Frequency Distribution of Consultation for Health Related Problems

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Health Center or Public Doctor

59

76%

Private Doctor

15

19%

Midwife

3

4%

Reflexologist

1

1%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 17: Health Related Problems

Health Consultation No. of Respondents

60 50 40 30

59

20 15

10 0

Health Center or Public Doctor

Private Doctor

3 Midwife

1 Reflexologist

The figure shows that there are 3 families (3.85%) that consult the midwife, 59 families (75.64%) who are consulting their health center doctor, 15 (19.23%) who consult the private doctor, and a family (1.28%) who is consulting the reflexologist.

The highest percentages of families are consulting the health center doctors which show that they are aware of the services that are available in their health centers. Because of the lack of resources, they tend to use the service of the center instead of the private doctor, which only garnered 15 families consulting them. This is where their income becomes questionable, as it restrains them from availing a much higher type of care available at the hospitals.

Table 18: Frequency Distribution of Materials Used for Home Construction

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Mixed

62

79%

Light

10

13%

Strong

6

8%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 18: Materials Used for Home Construction

Type of Home Materials No. of Respondents

70 60 50 40 30

62

20 10 0

10 Mixed

Light

6 Strong

The data shows that 12.82% (10 respondents) have used light materials to build their home. 79.49% (62 respondents) are using mixed type materials in building their home. 7.69% (6 respondents) are using strong type materials to build their home.

Types of housing materials are affected family income, availability of resources and economical status. As shown in the graph above, most houses in Pandacan are made of mixed wood and concrete with a bungalow type and has less than three bedroom. Due to lack of sources, they cannot afford to build a decent house with good quality materials. Most of them are already contented having a small house with a roof and a place where

they can sleep. They prefer to spend their money for food and medicine rather than building or repairing their house

.

Table 19: Frequency Distribution of Number of Rooms for Sleeping CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

1 room

53

68%

2 rooms

12

15%

3 rooms

6

8%

None

4

5%

4 rooms

3

4%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 19: Frequency Distribution of Number of Rooms for Sleeping

Number of Rooms for Sleeping No. of Respondents

60 50 40 30

53

20 10 0

12 1 room

2 rooms

6 3 rooms

4 None

3 4 rooms

In the specified graph, 53 respondents have only 1 room for sleeping, 12 have 2, 6 have 3, 4 have none at all, and 3 have 4 rooms.

The above data shows the total number of rooms per family, wherein 68% (53 families) have one room. This is because the majority family in this portion has two to five family members secondary to lack of money. The 15% (12 families) in the graph shows the family who has two rooms per house. It shows that these families can afford the expenses of the rent. The 8% (6 families) which have three rooms and the 4% (3

families) which have four rooms per house is said to have extended family aside from that 5% of them has no room probably because they inadequate space to have a room.

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Public

56

72%

Private

22

28%

TOTAL

78

100%

Table 20: Frequency Distribution of Source of Drinking Water Supply

Figure 20: Source of Drinking Water Supply

The table shows that there are 56 families that said that their drinking water is private or from private sources, and 22 families that answered that their source of drinking water are from public source or taken from the faucet.

These data shows that the 56 correspondents for the study confirmed that they classify their drinking water separately from the water that they are availing. It shows the level of awareness the people in Pandacan have in contrast with the sicknesses that can be caused by water-borne diseases. This only exemplifies that Pandacan is well informed of the dangers and threats that are dwelling in the things that they are handling everyday. As for the 22 that answered that their drinking water supply is from a public source, families with the income that ranges 5,000 and below can be the main cause that determines their availability for resources.

Table 21: Frequency Distribution of Respondents Whose Water is Safe To Drink or Not

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Potable

56

72%

Not Potable

22

28%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 21: Relationship of Respondents Whose Water is Safe To Drink or Not

For water potability, 72% of the respondents have potable water sources whereas 28% have non-potable sources.

The percentage rates of the potability of water are greatly measurable through two categories. These two divisions correspond to the two varying ratios of efficient and accessible water and the other portion classified as non-potable, which cover the respondents who live in the said area. Potable is categorized as the greater majority and non-potable as the minority with figures respectively noted 72% and 28%. This serves as proof that most residents use potable source of water.

Table 22: Frequency Distribution of Method of Storing Drinking Water CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Refrigerated

29

37%

Large covered with faucet

28

36%

Large covered without faucet

18

23%

Bottle or Pitcher

2

3%

Direct from faucet

1

1%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 22: Method of Storing Drinking Water

The table shows the data that 29 families have their drinking water stored in a refrigerator, 28 families which have their water stored in a large covered containers with faucet, 18 families that contain their water in a large covered container without faucet, 2 families that have their water in a bottle and a family that gets their drinking water from the faucet.

The figure shows how well the people in Pandacan live which is why majority have their drinking waters stored in a refrigerator. Even though they live with only 5,000 and below as monthly income, they tend to make sure of the sterility of their drinking water because it is one of the simple ways to make sure their family is in a healthy condition. They are properly aware of the threats and diseases that can arise from drinking unclean water. Also another major answer is the container with faucet, which is the type of container that is being bought by families who are considering the cleanliness of their drinking water. Out of the 78 families that are targets of this study, the bulk rests in the greater segment of the families that keep their drinking water in a sterile and clean place, and it shows the knowledge of each family in terms of water containment.

Table 23: Frequency Distribution of Cooking Facilities Available In Each Family

Figure 23: Cooking Facilities Available In Each Family

CLASSIFICATION Gas stove

FREQUENCY 55

PERCENTAGE 71%

Fiewood/charcoal

18

23%

Electric stove

5

6%

TOTAL

78

100%

Cooking Facilities 60

55

No. of Repondents

50 40 30 18

20 10

5

0 Gas stove

Fiewood/charcoal

Electric stove

Out of 78 respondents, 70.51% are using gas stove, 18% are using firewood/charcoal and 6.41% are using electric stove.

Based on the results, families in the community are using gas stove due to low income and can’t afford to buy much higher quality stoves. Some families are using charcoal/firewood because these families are less fortunate than families using gas stove and for them it is convenient to use firewood/charcoal. Only a few families are capable of purchasing electric stoves. They only represent about 6.41% of the total assessed population.

Table 24: Frequencty Distrubution of Families With Open or Blind Drainage

Figure 24: Families With Open or Blind Drainage

Types of Drainage

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Open Drainage

37

47%

Blind Drainage 53%

Open Drainage 47%

Blind Drainage

41

53%

TOTAL

78

100%

In the types of drainage, 53% of the total assessed population have blind drainage and only 47% have open ones.

The result of the data collation proved that there is only a small disparity between families who have open drainage and those who have blind ones. The portion 52.56% referring to the families with blind drainage barely differs with the fraction 47.44%. According to the interviewees, they have never experienced any negative health related illnesses resulting from having either of the given forms of systems. What’s important for them is having the facility.

Table 25: Frequency Distribution of Methods of Keeping Garbage

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Not Covered

54

71%

None

22

28%

Covered

2

3%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 25: Methods of Keeping Garbage

Container of Garbage

60

54

50 40 No. of 30 Respondents

22

20 10 0

2 Not Covered

None

Covered

Out of the 78 respondents, 54 do not cover their trash can, only 2 cover theirs, and a large 22 have no waste container at all.

The greater majority at 71% are not able to respond to proper waste containment. According to the families classified in this segment, they are quite contented with placing their trash in plastic bags and leaving them for the garbage collector to gather.

Following the majority at only 3% are those families who are keen enough to promote environmental sanitation and good health within and outside their respective houses by covering their waste until the time of collection. The residual portion of the total population which 28% does not have any garbage can at all. They either discard their trash in their neighbors’ trash can or dispose it anywhere.

Table 26: Percentage Relationship of Families With Different Ways Disposing Food

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Collected

74

95%

Open Dumping

4

5%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 26: With Different Ways Disposing Food Ways of Disposing Garbage

Open Dumping 5%

Collected 95%

Of the total assessed population, 95% adhere to waste collection while only 5% prefer open dumping.

As a result of the data collation, 94.87% was determined as the portion of the assessed families who participate in garbage collection rather than utilizing other waste disposal methods. The aim of this kind of disposal is to promote discipline among the

community members and encourage them not to throw their garbage anywhere. The remaining 5.13% of the community are still greatly in favor of open dumping.

Table 27: Percntage Relationship of Toilet Ownership of Families

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Owned

66

85%

Shared

12

15%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 27: Toilet Ownership of Families Toilet Ownership

Shared 15%

Owned 85%

The graph contains valid data that 85% of the respondents have their own toilets and 15% share theirs with other families.

As a result of the analysis of data, 84.62% of the families that we assessed have their own private toilet inside their house while 15.38% had to share with other families because their house is only rented, and some families live in one house. These families who share toilets have low incomes and can’t afford to have their own house and their own toilet.

Table 28: Percentage Relationship of Presence of Breeding Sites in Houses

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Yes

59

76%

No

19

24%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 28: Presence of Breeding Sites in Houses Presence of Breeding Sites

No 24%

Yes 76%

From the households assessed, 76% were found to have breeding sites of insects and pests, and only 24% were clear.

Based on the graph, 75.64% of the households have breeding sites of mosquitoes, insects and other pests. They are not able to maintain the cleanliness of their surroundings and most trash bins are not properly covered, making it a perfect breeding site for pests. 24.36% of the families assessed have no breeding sites because they were able to somehow maintain cleanliness, probably because they have time to clean their surroundings.

Table 29: Frequency Distribution of Status of Reproductive Women; Pregnant vs. Not Pregnant

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Pregnant

6

3%

Not Pregnant

186

97%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 29: Status of Reproductive Women; Pregnant vs. Not Pregnant

For the pregnancy state of women, only 6 are pregnant and the remaining 186 are not.

In Barangay 836, District 91, it is apparent that pregnancy is not prevalent in their population. In this community with a total assessed population of 374, 192 are female respondents. Within this range, only six are pregnant. Due to the profusion of family planning methods, they are now engaged and aware of controlling their population. They are aware that total population is elevating rapidly, so as to control it, use effective family planning methods.

Table 30: Frequency Distribution of Family Planning Methods

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Natural Method

58

74%

Pills

18

23%

Ligation

2

3%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 30: Family Planning Methods Methods of Family Planning 58 60 50 40 No. of 30 Respondents

18

20 10 0

2 Natural Method

Pills

Ligation

Out of 78 respondents, 58 prefer the natural method, 10 use pills, and 2 resort to ligation.

The outcome of the collation determined the highest type of family planning method as the Natural Method at 74.36% because the couples want a safe and easy and

affordable type of family method. They want this kind of means because it is easy to use and there are no side effects in their body and also in their relationship. The second type of family method is the Pills at 23.08%, because couples found out that the pills are much safer than the other type of family planning. The couples also said that pills are easy to use because it is taken in via oral route. The other type of family planning method is the Ligation at 2.56%, because some couples want to have a permanent type of family planning method. Family planning has devoted considerable attention to studying the determinants of women's fertility and method of family planning to be used. While it has been assumed that family planning programs have beneficial consequences for women's lives, there has been little research that evaluates the impact of family planning on women's personal, social, or economic conditions.

With that, women in Pandacan give too much emphasis on the use of natural method because it is economical and practical. Instead of providing money on buying pills and other methods, they paved away with it and buy first the things needed like foods for the family and other basic necessities.

Table 31: Frequency Distribution of Member of the Family Diagnosed with Tuberculosis

CLASSIFICATION

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE

Yes

76

97%

No

2

3%

TOTAL

78

100%

Figure 31: Member of the Family Diagnosed with Tuberculosis Presence of Tuberculosis

Yes 3%

Yes No

No 97%

The presence of tuberculosis was determined at 97% for those who are clear and 3% for those who have the disease.

Depending on the total population of families, 2 families were assessed to have to have the presence of Pulmonary tuberculosis. A manifestation of cough and colds in more than two weeks was observed. These 2 families have consulted a Public medical doctor instead of a private doctor due to an insufficiency in the family income and the affordability of consultation expenses. Good thing, the other family members were not diagnosed with PTB. People who were diagnosed to have the occurrence of pulmonary tuberculosis do take their medicines regularly offered by the DOTS program of the health center, helping them eliminate the accumulation of this communicable disease. At times, diagnosed people need assistance through their “treatment partner”. This can be their wives or other family members, but there are some who doesn’t need any assistance at all.

Related Documents

Graphs And Interpretations
November 2019 7
Interpretations
June 2020 9
Graphs
June 2020 18
Graphs
November 2019 37