Sacral Insufficiency Fractures
Pradeep Chockalingam Snr 2 Physio
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Definition First described by Dr. Lourie in 1982 Sacral insufficiency fracture is a type of
stress fracture characterized by severe incapacitating hip, groin, pelvic, buttock and low back pain. It occur when normal or physiological stresses are placed on weakened bone that has a low elastic resistance. (Paker N & Tekdos D 2006)
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Anatomy and Classification Anatomy
Denis Classification
www.eorthopod.com/public/patient_education/9207/sacral_insufficiency_fractures.html www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Causes Osteoporosis
Paget's disease
Radiation to the
Hip joint replacement
pelvis Steroid use Rheumatoid arthritis Hyperparathyroidism Pregnancy
Lumbosacral fusion Anorexia nervosa Liver diseases &
transplantation Breastfeeding
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Signs & Symptoms Severe pain around
Tenderness around
Buttock
Buttock
Low back
Low back
Sacroiliac
Groin
Hip
Sacroiliac joint
Groin
Restricted hip
Pelvis
movements
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Features
Spontaneous or low velocity trauma Common in females with osteoporosis Associated with 60% of pubic ramus fractures Difficult to identify by normal X-ray Neurological deficit very rare Most of the fractures occur in zone-1 Mostly undiagnosed or misdiagnosed Less than 50% return to baseline mobility Length of stay unilateral: 2-4 weeks, bilateral: 8-36 weeks
Blake SP & Connors AM 2004, Graham G et al. 1994, Paker N & Tekdos D 2006 & Schindler OS et al 2007 www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Diagnostic imaging a) No sign of # in normal b) a
b
c) d) c
d
e) f)
e
X-ray (early) Sclerotic changes in normal X-ray after 4 weeks Bone scan shows abnormal sign CT shows # R ala Bone scan in 8 months CT shows # R iliac in 8 months
f
Blake SP & Connors AM 2004 www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Facts about Pubic Ramus # 25% suffered from dementia Mean length of stay 9 to 25 days All patients in this group needs some mobility aid
at discharge 84% requires extra support at discharge Less than one third return to their baseline mobility within 90 days One year mortality rate is 27% High superior pubic ramus # have poor prognosis compared to the Low superior pubic ramus #
Hill RMF et al 2001, Morris RO et al 2000, Steinitz D et al 2004. www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Management
Adequate rest Pain control Encourage walking with appropriate aid
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Any Changes to Current Practice ?
Feel for tenderness around sacroiliac joint
If pain level high or persist for longer than the
normal time scale, consider to rule-out sacral insufficiency fracture
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Reference Blake SP & Connors AM. Sacral insufficiency fracture:
Pictoral review. B.J.Radiology 2004;77: 891-96 Graham G et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures in the elderly. J.Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76-B: 882-06 Hill RMF et al. Fracture of the pubic rami. J. B&J Sur 2001; 83-B: 1141-44 Morris RO et al. Closed prlvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76: 646650
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep
Reference Paker N & Tekdos D. Sacral insufficiency fracture: A
case report. Turk.P.M.Rehab 2006;52: 129-31 Schindler OS et al. Sacral insufficency fractures. J.Ortho.Sur 2007; 15(3):339-46 Steinitz D et al. All superior pubic ramus fractures are not created equal. Can J Surg 2004; 47-6: 422-25 www.eorthopod.com/public/patient_education/9207/sa cral_insufficiency_fractures.html (Date 07/03/2009)
www.pdfcoke.com/cpradheep