PEER REVIEW CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST Reviewer _____ Country Reviewed___
Introduction and purpose The Peer Review of plans aims at ensuring that country plans address the FIVE Dakar commitments: • Getting results by scaling up health related MDGs 1,4,5,6,7 by reviewing and using existing policies, sector plans, roadmaps and other opportunities; • Strengthening evidence base – streamlining and taking integrated community approaches to scale and monitor for results; • Leveraging resources through strategic partnerships with other UN agencies, partners and governments. • Developing effective Communication and advocacy strategies based on evidence for results; • Measuring results by establishing and supporting credible tracking systems development. Plans will be reviewed for the purpose of improving them looking at both the PROCESS of development as well as the QUALITY of the plan.
Checklist for AARM Plans
p e er re vi e w
Please fill out the following: 1. Process is participatory and inclusive 2. CO has developed a clear advocacy strategy a scale up plan an investment case 3. Health related MDGs Scale up plan has: adequate sitan and trends analysis strategy to operate at scale including HR considerations plans developed for health related MDG4 – Child mortality reduction plans developed for health related MDG5 –Maternal Mortality reduction plans developed for health related MDG1 – Nutrition plans developed for health-related MDG7– Water and Sanitation plans developed for health related MDG6 – HIV and AIDS plans developed for health related MDG6 – Malaria evidence based for strategies proposed includes activities to strengthen evidence base includes strategic partnerships strengthening effective resources leveraging strategy resulting in additional funding implementation plan with clear targets, roles, and time frame plans budgeted 4. Investment plan is costed using MBB 5. Programme communication strategy included with the aim of results in behaviour change in a key outcome area 6. Includes clear system of tracking progress
Strengths of the Plan and Process
Yes
Part ially
No
Comments
p e er re vi e w
Weaknesses
Actions and Suggestions for improvement