Fermin V People.docx

  • Uploaded by: Mollyn Paguel
  • 0
  • 0
  • October 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Fermin V People.docx as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 304
  • Pages: 1
Fermin v People GR No. 157643, March 28, 2008 FACTS: Cristy Fermin is the publisher and Bogs Tugas is the editor-in-chief of Gossip Tabloid. The June 14, 1995 headline and lead story of the tabloid says that it is improbable for Annabelle Rama to go to the US should it be true that she is evading her conviction in an estafa case herein the Philippines for she and husband Eddie have more problems to confront there. This was said to be due to their, especially Annabelle's, using fellow Filipinos’ money, failure to remit proceeds to the manufacturing company of the cookware they were selling and not being on good terms with the latter. Annabelle and Eddie filed libel cases against Fermin and Tugas before RTC of QC, Br. 218. RTC found Fermin and Tugas guilty of libel. Tugas was acquitted on account of non-participation but Fermin's conviction was affirmed. Fermin's motion for reconsideration was denied hence, the petition. She argues that she had no knowledge and participation in the publication of the article, that the article is not libelous and discovered by the freedom of the press. ISSUE: WON Cristy Fermin is guilty of libel? HELD: Yes. Proof of knowledge of and participation in the publication is not required if the accused has been specifically identified as “author, editor, or proprietor” or “printer/publisher” of the publication. Petitioner was not only the “publisher,” but also the “president” and “chairperson.” Petitioner’s criminal guilt should be affirmed, whether or not she had actual knowledge and participation. The elements of libel were present. While complainants are considered public figures for being personalities in the entertainment business, media people do not have the unbridled license to malign their honor and dignity by indiscriminately airing fabricated and malicious comments, whether in broadcast media or in print, about their personal lives.

Related Documents

Fermin V People.docx
October 2019 19
Fermin V. Comelec
June 2020 26
Fermin V People Mar 08
April 2020 31
Fiestas De San Fermin
June 2020 17
Contrato Papa Fermin
August 2019 16

More Documents from "LUIS VALVERDE BAZAN"

#5 Digest.docx
October 2019 13
Fermin V People.docx
October 2019 19