February 4th,2009

  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View February 4th,2009 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 476
  • Pages: 3
Wed. Feb. 4th = The Culture of Scarcity: Socio-economic divisions and Bacon's Rebellion (1670s) The Culture of Scarcity: Socio-economic divisions and Bacon's Rebellion (1670s) 1. Why so few slaves in early- to mid-1600s Virginia, despite the huge amount of cheap labor needed to grow tobacco? A. Overpopulation & tensions in England, plus offer of headrights & benefitrs of indentured servitude in the colonies create a large supply of English laborers (early 1600s) B. Planters can hire indentured servants (2/3 of all immigrants in 1600s) cheaper than buying slaves [see 1st chart below]

2. Tensions build by late-1600s A. Navigation Acts (1660-98) cut supply of slaves to British colonies i. England's wars with the Netherlands (1660-64) closes the Dutch slave trade into the English colonies ii. Mercantilism forbids trade with any non-English colonies (including Portuguese, Spanish & Dutch trade in slaves) [see 2nd chart below] B. The downside of growth i. quantity of headrights & freedom dues decreases over time ii. quality (accessibility) of lands given decreases, increasing the anxieties of recent freedmen (ex-servants) C. Bacon's Rebellion i. fears of Indian wars increase (1675-76) ii. to deter Indian attacks, Governor Berkeley builds forts in the Backcountry, paid for by a poll tax [see 3rd chart, below] iii. ex-indentured servants find a leader in Nathaniel Bacon, former counselor to Gov'r Berkeley a. Bacon's demands reveal divisions between Backcountry farmers and Tidewater planters b. rebels attack plantations and sack (loot & burn) Jamestown, before Bacon dies of dysentery

iv. Legacy: the mystery of Bacon's and his followers' motives i. personal power struggle with Gov'r Berkeley? ii. class struggle between farmers and planters? iii. colonists' greed for more land? iv. anti-tax/anti-big-government ideology? v. excuse for racist attack on Indians? Review of AMST themes: * land as source of real economic power and the basis for political power (voting) * "free" still an economic/financial (not racial) status for most of 1600s ----------------------------------CHARTS:

c.1620s-1650s Cost of Labor in Colonial Virginia: Indentured servants: * availability = high * cost = L.500-1,000 * life expectancy = low * term of service = 5-10 years (average) Slaves: * availability = low * cost = L.1,500 * life expectancy = low * term of service = life (+ children until age 21) -----------------------------------

c.1660s-1680s Cost of Labor in Colonial Virginia: Indentured servants: * availability = low * cost = L.1,000-1,200 * life expectancy = high * term of service = 5-7 years (average) Slaves: * availability = very low

* cost = L.2,000 * life expectancy = high * term of service = life (+ children until age 21) ----------------------------------1670s farming economy in Virginia, Backcountry vs. Tidewater Volume of land & crops: low vs. high Distance to coast: far vs. close Cost of transporting crops to market/port: far vs. close Potential profit: low vs. high Could afford poll tax? no (Backcountry farmers) vs. yes (Tidewater planters)

Related Documents

February
December 2019 34
February
October 2019 36
February
December 2019 38
February 2008
October 2019 20
February 2006
November 2019 24
February 2009
April 2020 41