Evdo, Hspa & Wimax-4

Comparison of 3G(1xEVDO, HSPA) and WiMAX Dr. A.K. Seth

Based on WiMAX Forum Reports 1 and other published literature

Evolution of 3G and WiMAX

SAE / LTE: System Architecture Evolution / Long Term Evolution

2

3

4

5

Comparison of Forward Links 1X versus 1×EV-DO

6

EV-DO Evolutionary Data-Optimized 1x (1xEVDO) is a data optimized evolution of CDMA2000 developed by the 3GPP2. In a 1.25 MHz channel 1xEVDO offers peak data rates of 2.4 Mbps (Rev 0) / 3.1 Mbps (Rev A) in the downlink (DL) and 153.6 kbps (Rev 0) / 1.8 Mbps (Rev A) in the uplink (UL). EVDO-Rev B, which is still in the process of standardization, adds further DL capacity enhancements and is expected to increase the DL peak data rate to 4.9 Mbps in a 1.25 MHz channel. 1xEVDO-Rev 0 has had initial success in South Korea and is now being widely deployed.

7

Important Features of EVDO • Downlink channel is changed from Code Division Multiplex (CDM) to Time Division Multiplex (TDM) to allow full transmission power to a single user. • Downlink power control is replaced by closed loop downlink rate adaptation. • Adaptive Modulation & Coding (AMC) is used • Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) is used • Fast downlink scheduling is used • Soft handoff is replaced by a more bandwidth efficient “virtual” soft handoff

PS: EVDO Rel-A enables VoIP with high data rate and low frame capability in both directions. On the other hand 1xEVDV is aimed to use left over power in standard 1X for data application in both directions (as realized in UMTS Rel.5).

8

EVDO Rel-A 1xEV-DO-Rev 0 was principally designed to support packet data services and not conversational services. In a later release, called 1xEVDO-Rev A, additional enhancements were added to the 1xEV-DO specification. In the forward link, these enhancements include smaller packet sizes, higher DL peak data rate (up to 3.1 Mbps), and multiplexing packets from multiple users in the MAC layer. In the reverse (or up) link, they include support of H-ARQ, AMC, higher peak rates of 1.8 Mbps, and smaller frame size (6.67 milliseconds). With these enhancements in both forward and reverse links, conversational services (e.g. VoIP and gaming) can be supported in the newly enhanced 1xEVDO-Rev A systems.

9

1xEVDO Rel-A Down Link Channel structure 16 Code Spread

(Preamble) TDM

CDM

A

CDM

TDM

CDM

TDM

A

TDM

CDM

10

1x EVDO Rel-A Reverse (Up Link) Channel Structure

A

A

11

EVDO – Rev B A further enhancement to the CDMA2000 standard is 1xEVDORev B (also known as DO Multi-Carrier). This revision to the standard, increases DL spectral efficiency and data throughput by adding 64QAM to the DL modulation scheme. It also provides for dynamic allocation of up to fifteen 1.25 MHz carriers in a 20 MHz bandwidth. As a result, the 1xEVDO-Rev B enhancement will increase the DL peak over the air data rate for a 1.25 MHz carrier to 4.9 Mbps and, by aggregating 3 carriers in a nominal 5 MHz channel bandwidth, will provide a peak DL rate of 14.7 Mbps and a peak UL data rate of 5.4 Mbps.

12

Unused / Allocated Code Capacity for EV-DV / HSDPA

13

HSDPA + HSUPA = HSPA HSPA is an evolutionary path for WCDMA which started with Rel.99 based on VSF. Similar to EVDO the High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) (as defined by 3GPP) is based on MAC level TDM multiplexing in a new Packet Data Shared Channel. This renders peak data rate up to 14 Mbps in a 5 MHz channel. Similarly HighSpeed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) in Rel.6 provides capacity enhancements to the uplink. 14

Special Features of HSDPA • • • • •

Adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) Multi-code operation Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ) Higher DL peak rates (up to 14 Mbps) De-centralized architecture where scheduling functions are moved from the Radio Network Controller (RNC) to Node-B thus reducing latency and enabling fast scheduling. 15

Control Channel structure of HSDPA

D = Downlink / Dedicated, P = Physical, S = Shared, C = Control

16

High Speed Downlink Shared Channel (HS-DSCH) The HS-DSCH sub-frame is again 2 milliseconds but is divided into 3 slots of .667 mSec. The HSDSCH supports both QPSK and 16-QAM modulation. In addition it supports multi-code transmission , which translates in mobiles being assigned multiple channelization codes (CCs) in the same HS-DSCH sub-frame, depending on its capability. The same facility can also be used to support multiple UEs in the same sub-frame, i.e. multiplexing of multiple mobiles in the codedomain is allowed. 17

Multiplexing of UEs in the Code Domain

18

Signaling for HS-DSCH on HS-SCCH For each HS-DSCH sub-frame, downlink signaling for the mobile station is carried on the HS-SCCH. This includes Transport Format, Resource Information and HARQ related information. The number of HS-SCCHs can range from one to a maximum of four per mobile station. There is a one to one mapping between the HS-DSCH data subframe and the HS-SCCH control sub-frame with a 2-slot delay between the two as shown in Figure. This allows time for the mobile to set up for HS-DSCH demodulation.

19

HS-DSCH and HS-SCCH Association

20

New Channel on Up Link On the uplink, the new High Speed Dedicated Physical Control Channel (HS-DPCCH) is used to signal HARQ acknowledgement and the Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) to the Node B. The HSDPCCH is a separate code multiplexed uplink channel. Concurrent to high-speed data, regular data and control information may also be transmitted on the Dedicated Physical Data and Control Channels (DPDCH and DPCCH). 21

HS-UPA Similar to 1xEVDO Rel-0, standard HS-DSPA (as illustrated earlier) used same methodology as Rel-99 to carry up link data on UL-DPCH with associated signaling data on UL-DPCCH. The only change was additional HS-DPCCH to carry HARQ - ACK and CQI messages for down link HS-DSCH. Subsequent release (R6) however uses Enhanced Data Channel ( DCH) with Enhanced HS-UPA for up link. This also supports Enhanced HS-DPA for down link. These comprises a number of additional channels. 22

Enhanced DCH (HSDPA & HSUPA)

23

R6 with Enhanced HS-DPA and HS-UPA Down link Enhanced HS-DPA enables Enhanced Data Channel (EDCH) (comprising of E-PDSCH & E-DPCCH) supported by two new code-multiplexed channels on up link viz. E-DCH Dedicated Physical Data Channel (E-DPDCH) and E-DCH Dedicated Physical Control Channel (E-DPCCH). Similarly uplink Enhanced HS-DCH enables E-DCH (comprising of E-DPDCH &E-DPCCH) along with three new code-multiplexed channels viz. E-DCH HARQ Acknowledgement Indicator Channel (E-HICH), E-DCH Absolute Grant Channel (E-AGCH) and E-DCH Relative Grant Channel (E-RGCH).

24

HSUPA Operation Scheduling is an important feature for up link E-DPDCH (along with Scheduling and Transport Format Information) from multiple users. Two fundamental approaches exist in scheduling UE transmissions – Node B controlled rate scheduling, where all uplink transmissions can randomly occur in parallel with the selected rates restricted to keep the total noise rise at the Node B at an acceptable level – Node B controlled time and rate scheduling, where only a subset of UEs with pending data are selected to transmit over a given time interval with selected rates restricted. This is controlled by Absolute Grant (AG) message transmitted by serving Node-B and Relative Grant (RG) message by other Node-B.

25

MIB: Management Information Base LE: License Exempt

26

OFDMA principle

OFDM modulation can be realized with efficient Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT), which enables a large number of sub-carriers (up to 2048) with low complexity. The opposite function is carried out by FFT at receive end.

27

OFDMA Symbol Structure • • •

The OFDMA symbol structure consists of three types of sub-carriers as shown in Figure. Data sub-carriers for data transmission Pilot sub-carriers for estimation and synchronization purposes Null sub-carriers for no transmission: DC carriers

28

Example with 1024 Sub-Carriers Guard Band

11.4 uS

1024 sub-carriers with spacing of 1/91.4 uS = 10.94 KHz 1024 samples in 91.4 uS (only 720+120 in use for data + Pilot)

102.9 uS Sampling frequency = 10.94 KHz x 1024 = 11.2 MHz OFDM Symbol frequency = 1 / 102.9 uS = 9.72 KHz Bandwidth used: 10.94 x (720 +120) = 9.18 MHz Data rate = (1024 x 2) / 102.9 uS = 14 Mbps (based on 16 QAM and ½ coding) 29

Cyclic Prefix for Cancellation of Multipath Interference As discussed Cyclic Prefix (CP) completely eliminates Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI) as long as the CP duration is longer than the channel delay spread. With appendment of the last samples of data portion of the block to the beginning of the data payload the channel appears circularly convolved so that low-complexity frequency domain equalization can be used to recover the original signal.

30

Cyclic Prefix

31

WiMAX : Special Advantages All systems support HARQ, Scheduling and Virtual Soft Hand off. WiMAX however supports: – – – – – – – – –

Tolerance to Multipath and Self-Interference Scalable Channel Bandwidth Orthogonal Uplink Multiple Access Support for Spectrally-Efficient TDD Frequency-Selective Scheduling Fractional Frequency Reuse Improved AMC and Error Correction Techniques Fine Quality of Service (QoS) Advanced Antenna Technology

32

Tolerance to Multipath and Self Interference CDMA systems generally require RAKE receivers to combat multipath fading. However, in addition to multipath, other impairments such as frequency offset, Doppler effect and lack of time synchronization can cause CDMA systems to suffer from intra-cell interference As sub-carrier orthogonality is not effected in multipath environment, the OFDMA systems are robust against interference so long as the delay variation is less than cyclic prefix.

33

OFDMA Scalability

OFDMA Scalability is obtained by adjusting FFT size depending on available spectrum

34

Uplink Orthogonality OFDMA allows allocation of different portions of the channel so that there is no (or little) multiple access interference (MAI) between multiple users. OFDMA therefore, can support higher order uplink modulations and achieve higher uplink spectral efficiency. With CDMA, on the other hand, each user transmits over the entire channel. Even though it is possible to construct orthogonal spreading codes, this is rarely done due to the uplink synchronization issues. Orthogonal uplink sub-channels also enables the uplink scheduler to provide better control of the uplink quality and uplink resource allocation. Therefore the uplink performance is more predictable and QoS is better enforced.

35

Support for TDD In spite of need for system-wide frame synchronization, TDD offers following advantages. – TDD enables adjustment of the downlink/uplink ratio on a per cluster basis to efficiently support asymmetric downlink/uplink traffic – as required for all data applications. – TDD assures channel reciprocity for better support of link adaptation, MIMO and other closed loop advanced antenna technologies. – Unlike FDD, which requires a pair of channels, TDD only requires a single channel for both downlink and uplink providing greater flexibility for adaptation to varied global spectrum allocations. – Transceiver design for TDD implementations is less complex and therefore less expensive.

36

WiMAX TDD Structure

37

Frequency Selective Scheduling Both 1xEVDO and HSPA signals occupy entire bandwidth. Mobile WiMAX signals on the other hand only occupy a portion of the bandwidth. In broadband wireless channels, propagation conditions can vary over different portions of the spectrum in different ways for different users. Mobile WiMAX supports frequency selective scheduling to take full advantage of multi-user frequency diversity and improve QoS. WiMAX makes it possible to allocate a subset of sub-carriers to mobile users based on relative signal strength. By allocating a subset of sub-carriers to each MS for which the MS enjoys the strongest path gains, this multi-user diversity technique can achieve significant capacity gains over TDMA/CDMA.

38

Frequency Reuse Mobile WiMAX, 1xEVDO and HSPA all support frequency reuse one, i.e. all cells/sectors operate on one frequency channel to maximize spectrum utilization. However, due to heavy interference in (common frequency) reuse ‘1’ deployment, users at the cell edge may suffer low connection quality. 1xEVDO and HSPA address the interference issue by adjusting the loading of the network. However, the same loading factor is applied to all users within the coverage area, leading to capacity loss by “overprotecting” users that are closer to the base station. In WiMAX the sub-channel reuse pattern can be configured so that users close to the base station operate on the zone with all sub-channels available. While for the edge users, each cell/sector operates on the zone with a fraction of all sub-channels available.

39

Fractional Frequency Reuse with WiMAX

40

AMC with EVDO, HSPA and WiMAX

41

QoS Control WiMAX QoS is specified for each service flow – up and down.The service flow parameters can be dynamically managed through MAC messages to accommodate the dynamic service demand. Furthermore, since the sub-channels are orthogonal, there is no intra-cell interference in either DL or UL. Therefore, the DL and UL link quality and QoS can be easily controlled by the base station scheduler.

42

QoS Control

43

Applications with Different QoS

44

Smart Antenna In CDMA-based systems, the signals occupy the entire bandwidth. Since the processing complexity for smart antenna technologies scales with the channel bandwidth, supporting advanced antenna technologies in broadband wireless channels poses a more significant challenge than it does with Mobile WiMAX. Both 1xEVDO and HSPA support simple transmit diversity and the HSPA standard has an option to support Beam-forming. In general however, the use of advanced antenna technologies in current 1xEVDO and HSPA solutions has been limited.

45

Continued Since OFDM/OFDMA converts a frequency selective wideband channel into multiple flat narrow band subcarriers it is far easier to support smart antenna technologies. Mobile WiMAX supports a full range of smart antenna technologies to enhance performance including Beam-forming, STC (Space Time Coding) and SM (Spatial Multiplexing). These technologies can improve both system coverage and capacity.

46

Continued WiMAX also supports dynamic switching between the smart antenna technologies to maximize the benefit based on channel conditions. Spatial Multiplexing (SM) for example, improves peak throughput but, when channel conditions are poor, the Packet Error Rate (PER) can be high and thus the coverage area where target PER is met may be limited. Space Time Coding (STC) on the other hand provides large coverage regardless of the channel condition but does not improve the peak throughput. Mobile WiMAX supports Adaptive MIMO Switching (AMS) is used between multiple MIMO modes to maximize spectral efficiency with no reduction in coverage area

47

Adoptive MIMO Switch

48

Advanced Antennae Switching

49

MBS: Managed Bandwidth service, CQICH: Channel Qual ity Indicator Channel PKMv2: Private Key Management v2, EAP: Extensible Authentication Protocol

50

51

Quantitative Comparison Quantitative comparison of Mobile WiMAX, 1xEVDO and HSPA system performance is handled using the commonly accepted 1xEVDV evaluation methodology. Following are baseline configurations for WiMAX, EVDO and HSPA as well as propagation and mixed user models, as used in simulation.

52

EVDO, HSPA and WiMAX Parameters

53

Mobile WiMAX and 3G Parameters

54

Mobile WiMAX OFDMA Parameters

55

Multipath Channel Models for Comparision

56

Throughput Comparision

DL:UL = 1:1, 3:1

57

Spectral Efficiency Comparison

DL:UL = 1:1, 3:1 58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

Thank you

66

Comparison of WiMAX Rel-d and Rel-e • Fixed WiMAX: 802.16 – 2004 (802.16d) – 150 fixed trials on 3.5 GHZ TDD and FDD

• Universal WiMAX: 802.16 – 2005 (802.16e) – Limited trials AT&T, CTC Telecom Wisconsin and plans in middle East, Africa, Sri Lanka etc.

67

WiMAX-d and WiMAX-e Profile Comparision

68

WiMAX-d Frame

Small unit allocation with full OFDM symbol (all sub-carriers) allocated to a user at a time

69

802.16-e Frame

Unit allocation is large with smaller segment of subcarriers allocated to a user – improves efficiency

70

VoIP Improvements with 802.16e

• Small Overhead with Header compression (Rel-d Overhead ~ 4 x payload) •Silence suppression with ertPS (Enhanced Real Tme Packet service) 71

Advanced Antenna Technologies • Rel-d specifies advanced antenna mechanism but not selected in profiles. Similarly MIMO is limited to simple diversity coding techniques (e.g. 2x1 Alamounti scheme with 1 3 dB gain) • Rel-e profile supports multiple antenna solutions starting with beam forming solutions for cell range, interference and capacity increase.

72

Interference Mitigation with Beam Forming

73

Link Budget Comparison (Rel-d / Rel-d+ and Rel-e)

74

CDF vs SINR with and without Beam Forming

Rel-e provides more spectral efficiency and higher coverage

75

Scheduling Services, Usage and QoS parameters

76

WiMAX Network Reference Model

77

WiMAX Network - IP based Architecture

COTS: Commercial Off The Shelf

78

WiMAX Downlink Budget

PUSC: Partially Used Sub Carrier 79

WiMAX Uplink Margin

PUSC: Partially Used Sub Carrier

80

Mobile WiMAX Physical Data Rates

81