Evaluating Oral Presentations
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Evaluating Oral Presentations as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 482
- Pages: 3
Colegio Inglés Purranque
Miss Karen Kammel A.
ORAL PRESENTATION: TEACHER EVALUATION Group members: Rating: E—Excellent. Outstanding. Not just acceptable, but really creative and memorable. VG—Very Good. It was very good, but not terribly unique. G—Good. Adequate. F—Fair. Some problems here, but they may come and go. P—Poor. Some really nasty, persistent problems. CATEGORIE
GRADE
The presentation reflected a thorough knowledge of all aspects of the topic.
P F G VG E
The presentation was well- organized.
P F G VG E
The topic was covered in a clear and understandable way.
P F G VG E
Each member of the group was involved in the presentation.
P F G VG E
Audio-visual resources were incorporated and used effectively.
P F G VG E
The group responded effectively to questions posed by the audience.
P F G VG E
Main points were effectively summarized at the end of the presentation.
P F G VG E
Overall grade
P F G VG E
Comments:
Colegio Inglés Purranque
Miss Karen Kammel A.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS: PEER EVALUATION Group members: Please rate each of the following criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 5 – Excellent 4 - Very good 3 – Good 2 - Fair 1 – Poor 1. The presenters spoke clearly.
1
2
3
4
5
2. The presenters spoke at a good volume.
1
2
3
4
5
3. The presenters spoke at a good pace.
1
2
3
4
5
4. The presenters faced the audience.
1
2
3
4
5
5. The presenters appeared relaxed.
1
2
3
4
5
6. The presenters stood up straight.
1
2
3
4
5
7. The presenters used effective hand gestures.
1
2
3
4
5
8. The presenters made eye contact with me.
1
2
3
4
5
9. The introduction caught my attention.
1
2
3
4
5
10. The presenters provided some good examples.
1
2
3
4
5
11. I found this topic interesting.
1
2
3
4
5
Colegio Inglés Purranque
Miss Karen Kammel A.
POWER POINT PRESENTATION: TEACHER EVALUATION Group members: Rating: E—Excellent. Outstanding. Not just acceptable, but really creative and memorable. VG—Very Good. It was very good, but not terribly unique. G—Good. Adequate. F—Fair. Some problems here, but they may come and go. P—Poor. Some really nasty, persistent problems. CATEGORY CORRECTNESS Use of correct definitions or vocabulary, accuracy. ORGANIZATION Overall structure and layout Clear distribution of the topics Use of PP tools Use of visual aids (photos, music) LANGUAGE Use of correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Use of complete sentences, paragraphs. Organization of the ideas (coherente and cohesion)
GRADE
Overall grade Comments:
P F
P F G VG E P P P P
F F F F
G G G G
VG VG VG VG
E E E E
P F G VG E P F G VG E P F G VG E VG E
Miss Karen Kammel A.
ORAL PRESENTATION: TEACHER EVALUATION Group members: Rating: E—Excellent. Outstanding. Not just acceptable, but really creative and memorable. VG—Very Good. It was very good, but not terribly unique. G—Good. Adequate. F—Fair. Some problems here, but they may come and go. P—Poor. Some really nasty, persistent problems. CATEGORIE
GRADE
The presentation reflected a thorough knowledge of all aspects of the topic.
P F G VG E
The presentation was well- organized.
P F G VG E
The topic was covered in a clear and understandable way.
P F G VG E
Each member of the group was involved in the presentation.
P F G VG E
Audio-visual resources were incorporated and used effectively.
P F G VG E
The group responded effectively to questions posed by the audience.
P F G VG E
Main points were effectively summarized at the end of the presentation.
P F G VG E
Overall grade
P F G VG E
Comments:
Colegio Inglés Purranque
Miss Karen Kammel A.
ORAL PRESENTATIONS: PEER EVALUATION Group members: Please rate each of the following criteria on a scale of 1 to 5: 5 – Excellent 4 - Very good 3 – Good 2 - Fair 1 – Poor 1. The presenters spoke clearly.
1
2
3
4
5
2. The presenters spoke at a good volume.
1
2
3
4
5
3. The presenters spoke at a good pace.
1
2
3
4
5
4. The presenters faced the audience.
1
2
3
4
5
5. The presenters appeared relaxed.
1
2
3
4
5
6. The presenters stood up straight.
1
2
3
4
5
7. The presenters used effective hand gestures.
1
2
3
4
5
8. The presenters made eye contact with me.
1
2
3
4
5
9. The introduction caught my attention.
1
2
3
4
5
10. The presenters provided some good examples.
1
2
3
4
5
11. I found this topic interesting.
1
2
3
4
5
Colegio Inglés Purranque
Miss Karen Kammel A.
POWER POINT PRESENTATION: TEACHER EVALUATION Group members: Rating: E—Excellent. Outstanding. Not just acceptable, but really creative and memorable. VG—Very Good. It was very good, but not terribly unique. G—Good. Adequate. F—Fair. Some problems here, but they may come and go. P—Poor. Some really nasty, persistent problems. CATEGORY CORRECTNESS Use of correct definitions or vocabulary, accuracy. ORGANIZATION Overall structure and layout Clear distribution of the topics Use of PP tools Use of visual aids (photos, music) LANGUAGE Use of correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Use of complete sentences, paragraphs. Organization of the ideas (coherente and cohesion)
GRADE
Overall grade Comments:
P F
P F G VG E P P P P
F F F F
G G G G
VG VG VG VG
E E E E
P F G VG E P F G VG E P F G VG E VG E
Related Documents
Evaluating Oral Presentations
June 2020 6
Power Point - Oral Presentations
April 2020 6
Giving Oral Presentations
July 2020 10
Oral Presentations On Technical Topics
May 2020 2
