Delhi High Court 18.12.2008
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Delhi High Court 18.12.2008 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 360
- Pages: 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 661/2008
ABHAY PANDEY and ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anshul Tyagi, Advocate
Versus
UOI and ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Nayak with Mr. A. K. Sharma, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Advocate for respondent no.5. Mr. G. D.Goel, Advocate for respondent no.6. Mr. D. S. Adel, Advocate for respondent no.8. Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate for AICTE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
ORDER 18.12.2008 ***** In compliance of the last order, affidavits of four of the members of the Council of Architecture have been filed on record. Copies of the same be served on counsel for the petitioner and the other respondents by Mr. Nath within a week. Mr. Nath states that there are five members in the Executive Committee and the affidavit of the 5th member, who is in Pune, would be filed as and when the same is received. The same should also be filed within a week with advance copies to all the other counsel.
Mr. Shanti Bhushan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Council of Architecture submits that the Council of Architecture is willing to permit the other students of T.V.B College of Habitat Studies
to continue with their B.Arch course in the G.G.S.I.U and to appear in the examinations. Mr. Shanti Bhushan, learned senior counsel also states that the respondent Council, upon the successful completion of the course by the petitioners and other students of the T.V.B.College of Architecture, shall also be granted registration by the Council. He further assures that the Council of Architecture would conduct an inspection of the facilities provided by the University School of Architecture and Planning within two weeks and a report would be filed in this Court to bring out the deficiencies, if any, so that the same could be rectified by the University.
Counsel for the Architecture may conduct an inspection without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent University and AICTE. To await the inspection report prepared by the Council of Architecture, adjourned to 27.1.2009.
VIPIN SANGHI,J
DECEMBER 18, 2008
ABHAY PANDEY and ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anshul Tyagi, Advocate
Versus
UOI and ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Nayak with Mr. A. K. Sharma, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Advocate for respondent no.5. Mr. G. D.Goel, Advocate for respondent no.6. Mr. D. S. Adel, Advocate for respondent no.8. Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate for AICTE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
ORDER 18.12.2008 ***** In compliance of the last order, affidavits of four of the members of the Council of Architecture have been filed on record. Copies of the same be served on counsel for the petitioner and the other respondents by Mr. Nath within a week. Mr. Nath states that there are five members in the Executive Committee and the affidavit of the 5th member, who is in Pune, would be filed as and when the same is received. The same should also be filed within a week with advance copies to all the other counsel.
Mr. Shanti Bhushan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Council of Architecture submits that the Council of Architecture is willing to permit the other students of T.V.B College of Habitat Studies
to continue with their B.Arch course in the G.G.S.I.U and to appear in the examinations. Mr. Shanti Bhushan, learned senior counsel also states that the respondent Council, upon the successful completion of the course by the petitioners and other students of the T.V.B.College of Architecture, shall also be granted registration by the Council. He further assures that the Council of Architecture would conduct an inspection of the facilities provided by the University School of Architecture and Planning within two weeks and a report would be filed in this Court to bring out the deficiencies, if any, so that the same could be rectified by the University.
Counsel for the Architecture may conduct an inspection without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondent University and AICTE. To await the inspection report prepared by the Council of Architecture, adjourned to 27.1.2009.
VIPIN SANGHI,J
DECEMBER 18, 2008
Related Documents
Delhi High Court 18.12.2008
May 2020 5
Delhi High Court 12.12.2008
May 2020 4
Oj 18122008
November 2019 5
Penang04 - High Court
May 2020 4
High Court Notes 2004
May 2020 5