Defect.ppt

  • Uploaded by: nilu
  • 0
  • 0
  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Defect.ppt as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 372
  • Pages: 10
Construction Defects  An Underwriting Perspective

Definition  Any condition that reduces the value of a

home and triggers the duty to defend under GL insurance • Defect claims trigger duty to defend even though coverage is questionable  Two primary categories • Poor Workmanship: code violations, water seepage, defective plumbing etc.

Definition (Cont.) • Earth Settlement Problems: Expansive soils, improper compaction, poor drainage  Poor workmanship and earth settlement

problems combined with an active plaintiff’s bar and a strong duty to defend produce costly litigation.

Reactions  Underwriting Controls

• Geographic- Withdraw or substantial reductions in problem states (California, Nevada, Colorado) • Focus on small custom homebuilders and commercial trades • No tract or condo builders • Require written contracts with subs

Reactions (Cont.)  Coverage Controls

• • • • •

Excess insurance provision Earth Movement Exclusion Multi Unit Residential Exclusion Homeowner Warranty Exclusion Montrose Endorsement – No coverage for previously reported damage

 Need combination of underwriting controls

and exclusions

Risk Transfer Controls  Need written contracts with subs

• Additional Insured (limited coverage for completed operations) • Indemnification Provision (hold harmless clause)

Risk Transfer (Cont.)  Subs presenting the most exposure to

construction defect claims: • All subs, but especially: – Framers, Roofers and Drywall – Door/Window Installation – Excavation/Grading of Land – Siding Installation – Concrete Construction – All carpentry operations (not just framers)

Future  Relationship between homebuilders and

homebuyers is a dispute oriented relationship  In most states, disputes do not trigger GL insurance (i.e. not an occurrence or PD)  Has potential to spread countrywide if other state courts start ruling for GL duty to defend and California plaintiffs bar seeks countrywide opportunities

Future (Cont.)  Best solution is insured HO Warranties and

avoidance of litigation funded by GL insurance  Beginning to see combined GL/Warranty insurance products  Need to lobby state legislatures to require homebuilders to have insured HO Warranties

Future (Cont.)  California

• Likely to deteriorate as a result of Nov. ‘98 election of Democratic governor and legislature • Plaintiff’s bar is powerful in Democratic Party • Number one priority of plaintiff's bar is return of third party bad faith • Third Party Bad Faith Bill now in California legislature

More Documents from "nilu"

Defect.ppt
November 2019 10
Defects In Construction.pptx
November 2019 17
Charada 1.docx
April 2020 10
Licao Pg Adulto.pdf
June 2020 7