Decrescenzo Labor Case - Judgment Dismissing Federal Claim
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Decrescenzo Labor Case - Judgment Dismissing Federal Claim as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 132
- Pages: 1
Case 2:09-cv-03984-GHK-E
Document 28
Filed 11/05/2009
Page 1 of 1
1 2
E-FILED: 11/5/09
3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ) INTERNATIONAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) LAURA DECRESCENZO,
CASE NO. CV 09-3984-GHK (Ex) JUDGMENT
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Pursuant to our November 5, 2009 Order, Plaintiff Laura DeCrescenzo’s (“Plaintiff”) federal forced labor claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1595 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims are REMANDED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 5, 2009
_______________________________ GEORGE H. KING United States District Judge
Document 28
Filed 11/05/2009
Page 1 of 1
1 2
E-FILED: 11/5/09
3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ) INTERNATIONAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ ) LAURA DECRESCENZO,
CASE NO. CV 09-3984-GHK (Ex) JUDGMENT
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Pursuant to our November 5, 2009 Order, Plaintiff Laura DeCrescenzo’s (“Plaintiff”) federal forced labor claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1595 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims are REMANDED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 5, 2009
_______________________________ GEORGE H. KING United States District Judge
Related Documents
Decrescenzo Labor Case - Remand Order
June 2020 8
Fitzner Order Dismissing Case
October 2019 22
Culvert Case Summary Judgment
August 2019 28