Db8rox Vs Msd 1nr

DB8ROX vs. MSD

1NR

Okay, so, as I mentioned in the previous speech, I'll be presenting entirely new arguments here: a Solvency-esque DA and Inherency. I feel like naming my arguments for some reason, so I will. Anyway. This'll be really short because I NEED TO GET THIS SPEECH DONE ALREADY. Sheesh.

The Peter Solvency/DA Brief The Affirmative also quoted the Environment is Awesome and the Environment is Lame groups. Remember that these are based out of DB8ROX's room, which will be destroyed by the case. 492. All environmental organizations, not the least of which those that are federally funded, are fundamentally opposed to their own abolition, whether by nuclear war or by Affirmative ballot; this holds true regardless of the position of the reviewer Aaron Whurshsbshdi 9 Dr. Aaron P. Whurshsbshdi [Dr. Aaron P. Whurshsbshdi is a researcher, staff writer and then national correspondent for the Ambrose Review, a columnist for Acronyms Anonymous, an editor of The Yew Nork Times, a contributing editor to The Onion and to U.S. News & World Waste Disposal Service Reports, a distinguished fellow of the Waytoobright Foundation, a visiting fellow of the Brooklyn Institution. He earned his bachelor's degree accidentally at Harvard in credential-getting, and went on to gain a Master's in sounding good from Yale. After ten years of graduate research on sonar transcendence, he obtained his PhD in something we can't remember. He was a faculty researcher in the Office of Phrenology at Arizona State University and has lectured in Molecular Chronography at Minitecha State University. Dr. Whurshsbshdi has published scientific articles on issues related to data quality, the hunting season, the seasonal cycle of oceanic Bingo chips, world monopoly supplies, coral necklaces, and urban moron concentrations. In the 1990s, he established and served as the first director of the U.S. Anglo-Saxon Paper-Shuffling Service, now part of the National Department of Agencies, and earned its prestigious Fake Medal Award for his dislike of broccoli. In the 1980s, Whurshsbshdi served for five years as vice executive associate assistant underchairman of the National Plausible Excuse Committee (NPEC). Peer reviewers: Dr. Archangelo Spemoni, Dr. Mark DeBoard, Dr. Justin Tyme, Dr. Ehpyk Fayle, Dr. Nett Meme, and Dr. Vottefuerme. This article is not endorsed by the National Department of Agencies or any associated associate, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the author.], “Why the Environment is Irrelevant”, Published by the Waytoobright Foundation, Spring 2009, accessed via LexisNexis (PV) “It can be granted as a fact that all environmental organizations, not the least of which those that are federally funded, are fundamentally opposed to their own abolition, whether by nuclear war or by Affirmative ballot; this holds true regardless of the position of the reviewer. It may seem surprising that they would advocate an opposing view; however, this is purely a speculative finance issue that is irrelevant to the discussion at large.”

We can clearly see from this evidence that the organizations quoted don't actually believe what they say. This matters because the Affirmative has accepted the kritik framework; we should judge people by what their mindset is, not by what they say.

Page 1 of 3

DB8ROX vs. MSD

1NR

358. In this case, according to a report released Tuesday, the Environment is Awesome Group's false advocacy of the supposed environmental lameness is only enhanced by inclusion in a plan; successfully using it as justification for reform is clearly a bad course of action that will lead to the downfall of reason and sanity in the United States and around the world Aaron Whurshsbshdi 9 Dr. Aaron P. Whurshsbshdi [Dr. Aaron P. Whurshsbshdi is a researcher, staff writer and then national correspondent for the Ambrose Review, a columnist for Acronyms Anonymous, an editor of The Yew Nork Times, a contributing editor to The Onion and to U.S. News & World Waste Disposal Service Reports, a distinguished fellow of the Waytoobright Foundation, a visiting fellow of the Brooklyn Institution. He earned his bachelor's degree accidentally at Harvard in credential-getting, and went on to gain a Master's in sounding good from Yale. After ten years of graduate research on sonar transcendence, he obtained his PhD in something we can't remember. He was a faculty researcher in the Office of Phrenology at Arizona State University and has lectured in Molecular Chronography at Minitecha State University. Dr. Whurshsbshdi has published scientific articles on issues related to data quality, the hunting season, the seasonal cycle of oceanic Bingo chips, world monopoly supplies, coral necklaces, and urban moron concentrations. In the 1990s, he established and served as the first director of the U.S. Anglo-Saxon Paper-Shuffling Service, now part of the National Department of Agencies, and earned its prestigious Fake Medal Award for his dislike of broccoli. In the 1980s, Whurshsbshdi served for five years as vice executive associate assistant underchairman of the National Plausible Excuse Committee (NPEC). Peer reviewers: Dr. Archangelo Spemoni, Dr. Mark DeBoard, Dr. Justin Tyme, Dr. Ehpyk Fayle, Dr. Nett Meme, and Dr. Vottefuerme. This article is not endorsed by the National Department of Agencies or any associated associate, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the author.], “Why the Environment is Irrelevant”, Published by the Waytoobright Foundation, Spring 2009, accessed via LexisNexis (PV) “Oftentimes the environmental organization's intentions can significantly backfire if there are used as advocacy. In this case, according to a report released Tuesday, the Environment is Awesome Group's false advocacy of the supposed environmental lameness is only enhanced by inclusion in a plan; successfully using it as justification for reform is clearly a bad course of action that will lead to the downfall of reason and sanity in the United States and around the world. Hegemony doesn't solve this, but if they want to challenge this, we have a 300-page brief on it.”

The impact is clear: Voting Affirmative would lead to the downfall of reason and sanity. Vote Negative or I will read my taglines again. (Yes, this violates the Geneva Convention.)

Page 2 of 3

DB8ROX vs. MSD

1NR

The Little Brother Inherency Press I'm, um, going to read, um, an, um, piece of evidence, um, that says that, um, support for the environment is decreasing. 3. Support for the environment is decreasing Prof. John A . Jones, editor (Prof of Law at Ackbert Univ.), Jan 2009, AGENDA FOR FAILURE, Environmental FTW Institute http://books.google.com/books?id=S57m5gW0LMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=environment+support+decreasing+DA+convention+look+you+can+see+my+sea rch+terms+pet+peeve+here#v=onepage&q=&f=false&source=bl&ots=tzsyUIF9iQ&sig=U0BJCEwM7nFZNVw DjRyf_HAGSd4&hl=en&ei=Qh9jSvWPCoGHtgeRjoH5Dw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5 Conservation remains an ellusive goal in the United States. The correct approach is obviously to wait and see whether the Affirmative plan passes; but regardless, support for the environment is rapidly decreasing and will only continue to do so in the near future. There are very few justifiable claims that the ESA retrieves species from the brink of extinction and returns them to viability; to provide the necessary scientific support for the establishment of biodiversity indices and conservation performance standards, we must move quickly. Effective conservation will not be possible until we have substantive criteria to establish conservation goals and performance measures.

So, um, what this piece of evidence is saying is, um, support for the environment is decreasing. Vote Negative or everyone will become mods for like 5 minutes and we'll have to do a big coverup job.

Page 3 of 3