Culture Lect 2

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Culture Lect 2 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,635
  • Pages: 4
EXPLORING OUR SCHOOL CULTURE • • • •

What is school culture? What does school culture look like? Do schools have different cultures? Effective vs Ineffective – Improving vs Declining School cultures. 4 typologies of schools – Moving schools – Cruising schools – Strolling schools – Struggling schools – Sinking schools. • 4 Existing Teaching Cultures (A. Hargreaves; 1994) – Individualism – Collaboration – Contrived collegiality – Balkanisation 1

• Exploring our school culture – the direct methods of diagnosis – the indirect methods of diagnosis

2

WHAT IS SCHOOL CULTURE? • • • • •

Language and rituals Norms that evolve in working groups Dominant values espoused by an organisation Philosophy that guides an organisation’s policy Rules of the game of getting along within the organisation • The climate conveyed in an organisation (Schein 1995) • These frames reflect the organisation’s culture but they are not its “basic assumptions”.

• The 4 types of School Culture (Handy and Aitken (1986) – The Club culture – The Role culture – The Task culture – The person culture • Social Cohesion vs Social Control in schools – The ‘formal’ school culture – The ‘welfarist’ school culture – The ‘hothouse’ school culture – The ‘survivaist’ school culture

• Changing our school Culture 3

Basic Assumptions and Beliefs: • • • •

the deeper level within an organisation that are shared by members that operate unconsciously define in a basic “taken-for-granted” fashion an organisation’s view of itself and its environment.

• These are the heart of school culture and what makes it so hard to grasp and change. “The way we do things around here” (Deal and Kennedy

4

• Each school has its own mindset of school life in relation to what occurs in its external environment. • A school’s culture is shaped by: – Its history – Its context (parents, Ed. Devision, Political and economic forces, NMC, MUT, external context. – The people in it (the potential for clashes of values between the adults and students in a school is considerable (Hargreaves et al., 1996)

,1983)

5

6

1



What does School Culture look like?

Several cultures within a school: –

• School Culture is expressed through 3 interrelated dimensions: • Professional relationships: the way people relate to and work together. • Organisational arrangements: the management of schools’ structures, systems and physical environment. • Opportunities for learning: the extent of the learning focus for both students and adults – learning enriched and learning impoverished schools.

• 1. 2. 3. 4.

Pupil culture, teacher culture, leadership culture, support staff culture, parent culture…

4 existing teacher cultures: Individualism; classrooms as egg-crates where autonomy, isolation and insulation prevails Collaboration; teachers choose, spontaneously and voluntarily to work together without an external control agenda. Contrived collegiality; collaborative working relationships are compulsorily imposed, with fixed times and places set for collaboration. Balkanisation; where teachers are neither isolated nor work as a whole group. (A. Hargreaves, 1994)

7

8

9

• Moving schools; effective, broad range of pupil learning outcomes, people within actively work together to respond to the changing context, know where they are going, have systems and the will and the skill. • Cruising schools; league tables and other rankings based on exam results rather than ‘value added’, their students achieve in spite of their teaching qualities, possess underpinning norms of contentment, goal diffusion, top-down leadership, reactive, conformist, • Strolling schools; moving towards some kind of school improvement at an inadequate rate compared with the pace of change, neither effective nor ineffective; • Struggling schools; ineffective, in spite of their unproductive results they struggle hard and invest considerable energy to improve, they have the will despite lacking the skills. • Sinking schools; ineffective, staff out of apathy not prepared or able to undergo change, isolation, blame and loss of faith dominate, failure is blamed on inadequate parenting or unprepared children, common in deprived areas. 10

4 typologies of schools

Do Schools have different Cultures? Improving

Declining

Moving

Cruising

Effective

Struggling

Strolling

Sinking

Ineffective

‘The rapidly accelerating pace of change make standing still impossible. Schools either get better or worse’.

Handy and Aitken (1986): 4 types of school Culture

Exploring our School Culture •

Who is to be involved in making the diagnosis –





Involve as many people as possible so as to uncover very different perceptions of aspects of the school’s culture – head, teachers, students, parents, advisers, consultants… The involvement of people in the diagnosis may motivate them to engage later in the change process within the school.



• •

The school as a friendly matrix of teams which achieve a range of planned tasks to solve organizational problems.

The Person Culture (a cluster) –

11

The school as a set of job-boxes co-ordinated to execute the work of the organization, which the head manages through a formal system.

The Task Culture (a grid) –

school’s internal review, views of students/parents, evidence that comes to you as feedback

the school as an informal club of like-minded people whose task is t achieve the mission of the head who is at the centre of things.

The Role Culture (a pyramid) –

A. Direct methods of diagnosis B. Indirect methods of diagnosis •

The Club Culture (a spider’s web) –

The school as a minimally organised resource for the development of its members’ talents and exercise of the9ir skills. 12

2

• In practice participants will rarely identify the school with a single type and will be influenced by the labels. • Large schools (secondary) display a degree of balkanization and collaboration and individualism may characterize different parts of the school or different aspects of life in school. • Successful schools get ‘the right mix at the right time’, an appropriately dynamic model of how school cultures work, but difficult to capture in a written diagnostic instrument (Handy and Aitken, 1986).

SOCIAL CONTROL

HIGH

HIGH

LOW

HOTHOUSE

WELFARIST

FORMAL

SURVIVALIST

SOCIAL COHESION LOW

13

• Schools require social control over teachers and students so that they work together in orderly ways, concentrate on teaching and learning and avoid the possibility of distraction and delay • At the same time schools have to maintain social cohesion, social relationships that are satisfying, supportive and sociable.

14

4 types of school cultures according to whether the social control and social cohesion dimensions are high or low. A. The formal school culture; (high social control, low social cohesion) – – – –

puts pressure on students to achieve learning goals but weak with regards social cohesion between staff and students. school life is orderly, scheduled, disciplined with a strong work ethic. academic expectations are high, with a low tolerance for those who don’t live up to them for students staff are relatively strict, though institutional loyalty is valued. The school is often a ‘tight ship’ fostering ‘traditional values’.

15

B. The ‘welfarist’ school culture; (high social cohesion, low social control) •



the focus is on individual students development within a nurturing environment and child – centred educational philosophy work pressure is low; so academic goals get a lower priority then social cohesion goals of social adjustment. The ‘caring’ school with a strong pastoral system.

17

16

C. The ‘hot house’ school culture’; (high social cohesion, high social control) • all are under pressure to participate actively in the full range of school life. • expectations of work, personal development and team spirit are high. • teachers are enthusiastic and committed and want the students to be the same.

18

3

D. The ‘survivalist’ school culture; (low social cohesion, low social control) • failing school – social relations are poor, teachers striving to maintain basic control and allowing students to avoid academic work. • lessons move at a leisurely pace. • students under-achieve. • teachers feel unsupported by senior colleagues and enjoy little professional satisfaction. • the ethos is often one of insecurity and low moral.

RECULTURING • A challenge of transforming mind-sets, paradigms, images, metaphors, beliefs, and shared meanings that sustain existing….realities and of creating a detailed language and code of behaviour through which the desired new reality can be lived on a daily basis…. It is about inventing what amounts to a new way of life. (Morgan 1997) • ‘the process of developing new values, beliefs and norms. For systemitic reform it involves building new conceptions about instruction….. And new forms of professinalism for teachers….. (Fullan, 1996) • This is no task for the faint hearted.

19

• If schools are to become professional communities and to continue to be effective in the future, they will need to build structures which promote: Interrelationships and Interconnections • Develop cultures that promote: Collegiality and Individuality. • Not only must school’s culture promote group learning but it must honour individuals, because creativity and novelty will be required to deal with an unknowable future. Cultures and counter-cultures will need to interact to find innovative solutions to complex and unpredictable circumstances. (Fink and Stoll 1998) 21

20

• •

The orientation of these cultures is one of continuous learning and improvement. They are characterised by; – – – – –



collaboration opportunism, adaptability partnerships, alliances

Membership of groups overlaps and shifts over time to meet the needs of the circumstance and context. 22

“Changing schools is not just about changing curricula, teaching and learning strategies, assessment, structures, and roles and responsibilities. It does not just happen by producing plans as a result of external inspections or by setting targets because data, even valid and sensitively analysed data, suggests that all pupils or certain groups of pupils could be doing better. It requires an understanding of and respect for the different meanings and interpretations people bring to educational initiatives, and the nurturing of the garden within which new ideas can bloom” (Stoll, 1999).

23

4

Related Documents

Culture Lect 2
November 2019 4
Culture Lect 2
November 2019 2
Culture Lect 1
November 2019 4
Culture Lect 1
November 2019 3
Lect 2
November 2019 15
Lect 2
November 2019 11