A Project Report on
CONSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL COURTS AND OFFICES
AT
SCHOOL OF LAW MANIPAL UNIVERSITY JAIPUR
Submitted By:
Supervised By:
Name of Student – Tanay Khandelwal
Dr. Sonu Agarwal
Semester- VI
Associate Professor
Section- B
School of Law
Registration No.-161401106
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I hereby acknowledge the help and support of the teachers, who helped me in compiling this project. I thank the faculty and management of Manipal University Jaipur, School of Law, as the resources that were necessary to complete the project were provided by them. I am highly indebted to my teacher “Dr. Sonu Agarwal” for her guidance and constant supervision as well as for providing necessary knowledge regarding the subject at hand and also for her support in completing the project. I would like to express my gratitude towards my parents and friends for their kind cooperation and encouragement which help me in completion of this project.
_______________ TANAY KHANDELWAL
2
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Mr. Tanay khandelwal, student of B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) Semester VI, School of Law Manipal University, Jaipur has completed his Code of Criminal Procdure-II project work entitled “Constitution of Criminal Courts and Offices” under my supervision and guidance. It is further certified that the candidate has made sincere efforts for the completion of this project.
DATE: 16/02/2019 _______________
DR. SONU AGARWAL
3
Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 STRUCTURE, HIERARCHY OF CRIMINAL COURTS IN INDIA ................................................... 5 THE COURT OF SESSION ................................................................................................................... 6 COURTS OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES ........................................................................................... 7 CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................................... 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................. 10 WEBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................... 10
4
INTRODUCTION Administration of justice is the most important function of the state. For this purpose our constitution has set up a Hierarchy of courts. The Supreme Court is the apex body, followed by 25 High Courts which have been created by the Constitution of India, and their jurisdiction and powers are well defined in the constitution itself. The primary duty of the Supreme Court is to ascertain whether the laws are executed and obeyed properly and to see to it that no person is deprived of justice in any court of law. With this purpose in view, the Supreme Court occupies the highest place in our unitary judicial system. Attempt has been made, as far as possible, to ensure its independence and achieve the goal of ensuring justice. The Supreme Court has been equipped with enormous powers. By virtue of its place at the apex of the judicial pyramid, the Supreme Court acts as a great unifying force. We have seen that its decisions and verdicts are binding on any court in India. As a result, there is a good possibility of integration, consistency and cohesion in the entire judicial system of the country. Article 124 of Indian constitution says that there shall be a Supreme Court of India its constitution powers and jurisdictions have been defined from Article 124-147. The Supreme Court is meant to be the highest court of appeal which takes up appeals against the verdict of High Courts. There are 25 High Courts in the country which regulates the working of the Sessions court. The Constitution, by Article 227, provides that every High Court shall so exercise superintendence over all courts and tribunals. The Criminal Procedure Code further provides that every High Court can exercise superintendence over the courts of Judicial Magistrate subordinate to it as to ensure an expeditious and proper disposal of such case by such magistrates.
STRUCTURE, HIERARCHY OF CRIMINAL COURTS IN INDIA Section 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr. P.C.) – Besides the High Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than this Code, there shall be, in every State, the following classes of Criminal Courts, namely :1. Courts of Session; 2. Judicial Magistrates of the first class and, in any metropolitan area, Metropolitan Magistrates; 5
3. Judicial Magistrates of the second class; and 4. Executive Magistrates. It may be noted that the classes of Criminal Courts mentioned in this section are besides the High Courts and the Courts constituted under any law, other than this Code. Thus, the Criminal Courts are: 1. High Courts 2. Courts constituted under any Law other than this Code 3. Courts of Session 4. Judicial Magistrates of the First Class 5. Metropolitan Magistrates in any metropolitan area 6. Judicial Magistrates of the Second Class 7. Executive Magistrates The highest court in each district is the District and Sessions Court. When it exercises its jurisdiction on Code of Civil Procedures it is called District Civil Court. The District court is also a court of Sessions when it exercises its jurisdiction on criminal matters under Code of Criminal Procedure.
THE COURT OF SESSION Section 9 of The Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the Court of Sessions and states that: 1) The State Government shall establish a Court of Session for every sessions division. 2) Every Court of Session shall be presided over by a Judge, to be appointed by the High Court. 3) The High Court may also appoint Additional Sessions Judges and Assistant Sessions Judges to exercise jurisdiction in a Court of Session. There is a Court of Session in each District which is presided over by a Sessions Judge and one or more Additional Sessions Judges. In certain cases, Assistant Sessions Judges are also appointed to work in the Sessions Court. The Sessions Judge or the Additional Sessions
6
Judge is empowered to pass any sentence authorised by law but any sentence of death awarded by him must be confirmed by the High Court to which he is subordinate. The Sessions Court exercises both original and appellate jurisdiction. The appointments of the Sessions Judges, Additional Sessions Judges and Assistant Sessions Judges are made by the High Court of the concerning State with a view to maintaining the independence of the judiciary.
COURTS OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES Section 11 The Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the Court of Sessions and states that: 1) In every district (not being a metropolitan area), there shall be established as many Courts of Judicial Magistrates of the first class and of the second class and at such places, as the State Government may after consultation with the High Court, by notification specify. 2) The presiding officers of such Courts shall be appointed by the High Court.
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS: These Courts are on the second lowest level of the Criminal Court structure in India. These Courts may be established by the State Government in consultation with the High Court of the respective State, at such places in the district and in any number by issuing a notification. As per section 29 of CrPC these Courts may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or a fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or both.
In every district (not being a metropolitan area), the High Court shall appoint a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class to be the Chief Judicial Magistrate. A Chief Judicial Magistrate may impose a sentence except
Sentence of death
Imprisonment of life.
Imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
7
A Chief Judicial Magistrate shall be subordinate to the Sessions Judge; and every other Judicial Magistrate shall, subject to the general control of the Sessions Judge, be subordinate to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE (SECTION 16 CR. P.C.): 1) In every metropolitan area, there shall be established as many Courts of Metropolitan Magistrates, and at such places, as the State Government may, after consultation with the High Courts, by notification, specify. 2) The presiding officers of such Courts shall be appointed by the High Court. 3) The jurisdiction and powers of every Metropolitan Magistrate shall extend throughout the metropolitan area.
These Courts are on the second lowest level of the Criminal Court structure in India. A Metropolitan Magistrate who is the first class Magistrate is under the control of sessions Judge and is subordinate to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. The Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and those of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates were created by Section 17 of the Code. Section 18 of the Code also provided for Special Metropolitan Magistrates. The towns having population exceeding one million could be declared as Metropolitan Areas. A Metropolitan magistrate is under the general control of the Sessions Judge and is subordinate to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate As per section 28 of CrPC a Metropolitan Magistrate may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or a fine not exceeding five thousand rupees.
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE SECOND CLASS (SECTION 19 CR. P.C.): These Courts may be established by the State Government in consultation with the High Court of the respective State, at such places in the district and in any number by issuing a notification. The Court at the lowest level is called Judicial Magistrate of the Second Class. This Court is competent to try the case if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or with fine not exceeding five thousand rupees, or with both.
As per section 29 (3) of CrPC, these Courts shall reward imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, or both.
8
EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE (SECTION 20 CrPC)
(i) In every district and in every metropolitan area, the State Government may appoint as many persons as it thinks fit to be Executive Magistrates and shall appoint one of them to be the District Magistrate. (ii) The State Government may appoint any Executive Magistrate to be an Additional District Magistrate and such Magistrate shall have such of the powers of a District Magistrate under this Code or under any other law for the time being in force as may be directed by the State Government. (iii) Whenever, in consequence of the office of District Magistrate becoming vacant, any officer succeeds temporarily to the executive administration of the district, such officer shall, pending the orders of State Government, exercise all the powers and perform all the duties respectively conferred and imposed by this code on the District Magistrate. (iv) The state Government may place an executive magistrate in charge of a sub-division and may relieve him of the charge as occasion requires. The State Government can appoint as many persons as it thinks fit to be Executive Magistrate and one of them to be the District Magistrate in every district and in every metropolitan area. The State Government can also appoint any Executive Magistrates to be an Additional District Magistrate who have powers of a District Magistrate.
CONCLUSION It is of utmost importance that, an advocate should have knowledge about the hierarchy of criminal courts in India as well as the jurisdiction. It is the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which defines the territorial jurisdiction and also general jurisdiction. Section 6 of Cr.P.C. envisaged that there shall be the following classes of criminal Courts, viz., Courts of Session; Judicial Magistrates of the first class, Judicial Magistrates of the second class, and the Executive Magistrates. In the Metropolitan area, the hierarchy is Metropolitan Sessions Judge, and Metropolitan Magistrates. This is apart from the High Courts and the Supreme Court. Section 9, Cr.P.C. further contemplates that the High Court may constitute as many Assistant Sessions Courts as are necessary (depending upon the workload).
9
The jurisdiction and powers including those in respect of criminal matters of the Supreme Court and High Courts are well defined in the Constitution itself. Under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution, every High Court has superintendence over all courts and tribunals throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction. The Criminal Procedure Code further provides that every High Court can exercise superintendence over the courts of Judicial Magistrate subordinate to it as to ensure an expeditious and proper disposal of such case by such magistrate. The Constitution of India has offered an exclusive legal power to the Supreme Court of India and this is one of the reasons why it can take care of enforcing the fundamental rights to the Indian citizens. The Supreme Court has a chief justice, who works with a team of twenty five other judges, all of whom are selected by the President of India.
BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 2. R.V. Kelkar; Criminal Procedure; Eastern Book Company; 5th Edition 2011 3. Ratanlal and Dhirajlal; The Code of Criminal Procedure; Lexis Nexis; 20th Edition 2015
WEBLIOGRAPHY 1. https://advocateguru.com/constitution-and-powers-of-criminal-courts-and-offices/
2. http://www.importantindia.com/12418/powers-and-functions-of-high-court-in-india/ 3. https://www.academia.edu/6378905/Constitution_of_Criminal_Courts_and_Jurisdicti on 4. http://legalseccdose.blogspot.in/2015/01/hierarchy-of-criminal-courts-in-india.html 5. http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/jurisdiction.htm
10