Criminal Appeals Order (the Order's Criminal)

ATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEP 0 2 2009 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK SUSAN HERBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, 09-10661-CC

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, JOHN ROBERTS Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ORDER: On August 3, 2009, the Court dismissed this appeal sua sponte as frivolous and entirely without merit. The dismissal order permitted Appellant to file a motion for reconsideration of this order, provided that such motion could not exceed twenty (20) pages in length. This is the page limit set by the Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure. See Fed.R.App.P. 27(d)(2). The Rules also provide that only one side of a page may be used, that text must be double-spaced, and that margins must be at least one inch on all four sides. See 27(d)(I)(A) and (D). Appellant has submitted a "Motion to Reconsider which is single-spaced and doublesided and has page margins of no more than one-half inch on each side.

Properly formatted Appellant's motion would exceed eighty (80) pages in length four times the limit set by the Rules and this Court's order. The Clerk is therefore directed to return the "Motion to Reconsider" unfiled.

The Clerk is further directed to accept no further filings in this closed appeal.

/s/ Frank A Hull UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE Frank Hull, I have lost count of what is wrong with this order. Let’s start with: you may not instruct a clerk to commit what is a crime, you may not ask me to do what is impossible, you are not to hold me to rules I never agreed to play by in order to keep me out (you, not me has a law license although you don’t act like it) and since you can’t know WHAT I might file next you can’t ‘pre-emtively’ tell the clerk not to file it. How can you know until you see it and what could I have already said that’s so dangerous that you refused to acknowledge it and want it out of your files? Maybe...........I won my case so your fat ass can now be sued off the bench. That’s right kids: Liability ensued on 11/05/08 the day the US officially defaulted by failing to respond to a pro se case of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction. I appealed both government contracts and the US defaulted thus no officer is now acting under the authority of the US, get it? The US still hasn’t responded but somebody else did: John Roberts thus I won and the US lost, lol. John Roberts or his agent could not act unless I moved him with my reasoning thus I won. Now judges

can no longer violate the law with impunity as now as effective means of dissolving them exists. Thanks to this order? As Hull PROVED my claim has not once been addressed – that every word has been ignored and denied - and even went so far as to try to pull it from the files via an order I now enter SCOTUS as an original case, again. If he hadn’t done this I’d only enter upon a Writ of Cert. Basically he instructed the clerk to pull the constitution, the one of Founders wrote, from the court files. LOLOLOLOLOL! Hey Hull: DOES AN ARGUMENT AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION EXIST??? LOLOLOOL!