Cr Open House Update

  • Uploaded by: mdeeter
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Cr Open House Update as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,113
  • Pages: 24
CR OPEN HOUSE update COMMUNITY FACILITIES September 2, 2009 Sandi Fowler, City Manager’s Office Dan Thies, OPN Architects

Community Facilities Public Participation Process 

Open House #1 – June 23, 2009 ◦ Review the opportunity & process ◦ 200 Attendees ◦ 279 Feedback responses



Open House #2 – August 18-19, 2009 ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦



Review facility options 591 Citizen attendees 157 City employee attendees 850 Feedback responses

Open House #3 – October 6-7, 2009 ◦ Presentation of recommended options

Engaging the public in the facility rebuilding process…

Summary of Feedback from Open House #1 

Protect or relocate vital City services outside of the Cedar River flood plain.



Create multiple options for Community Facilities as a component of a renewed downtown.



Social sustainability (livability/walkability) should be a priority in future option considerations.



Develop options with accessible and centralized services, and plentiful free parking.



Demonstrate fiscal responsibility – present financial data in future options’ considerations.

Open House #1 Feedback

Open House #2 asked for Input on the Options… 

Return to existing buildings as they were at the time of the flood



Return to existing buildings as they were at the time of the flood, with upgrades to improve sustainability and functionality



Consider new buildings, alternate locations, and the possibility of colocation of programs and services



Consider utilizing another existing building



City Services/ Veteran’s Memorial Building



City Operations/ Public Works Building



Fleet Maintenance



Central Fire



Animal Control



Main Public Library

Existing Buildings/Programs



Intermodal Transportation Facility



Community Safety Center



Neighborhood Centers



Former U.S. Courthouse

Potential Facilities Concepts

Review of Financial Data 

We took a conservative approach to the financial data presented.



The numbers presented in Open House #2 were based on preliminary and operational benchmark data.



The University of Iowa and OPN have a scheduled meeting for evaluation of the financial model.

Financial Review

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

General Feedback Comment Themes



Many supportive comments were received, and people appreciated the chance to give feedback.



Overall, there is a greater understanding of the complexity of the issues and of the decisions that have to be made.



There is a small, vocal minority who still want Westdale Mall to be evaluated for further use.

Open House #2 Feedback



Intermodal Transportation Facility



Low Response Rate



Those who responded would like to see expanded program at the former Pepsi Location.

Potential Facilities Concepts



Community Safety Center



Low Response Rate



Those who responded were positive regarding the concept.

Potential Facilities Concepts



Neighborhood Centers



Low Response Rate



Those who responded were positive regarding the concept.



A handful of respondents feel it should be a lower priority right now.

Potential Facilities Concepts



Former U.S. Courthouse



General majority of respondents had concerns over/with City Ownership and burdens related to the building.



Regarding use, it was preferred to use the building as overflow space for City Hall.

Potential Facilities Concepts

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Veteran’s Memorial / City Services Center



None of the options received a majority, however, Option C was preferred.

Option C – New Building with Program Growth at an Undetermined, Centrally Located Site 

Concern about future flooding of this building remains high.



Respondents have are torn between losing a city landmark versus practical considerations (flood concerns).

Open House #2 Feedback

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Public Works Facility/City Operations



Option B and Option C were equally preferred.



Current Site/Property was preferred regardless of choosing Option B or C.



A proposed continued use of the Fleck Building was a reoccurring theme.

Option B - Return to Pre-Flood Conditions with Flood Mitigation, Code Upgrades, Extensive Mechanical/Functional Update-With Program Growth Option C - New Building with Program Growth at an Undetermined Site

Open House #2 Feedback

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Fleet Maintenance



Overwhelming majority prefer to see Fleet Maintenance consolidated into a single location.



Option C was favored, although no option had the majority.



Single location will allow for efficiencies and cross training.

Option C – New Building, Contains Co-Location with Growth Needs (All New Building Campus on Public Works Site) Option D-Re-Purpose an Existing Building / Site with Co-Location Concept, Including Growth (Remodel Existing Buildings and Add Additions on Public Works Site).

Open House #2 Feedback

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Animal Care and Control



An overwhelming majority of respondents favored building a new facility and co-locating with Kirkwood. 



Respondents were pro Kirkwood involvement for the shared resources potential and educational opportunities.

People would like to see a facility that is healthy for both employees and animals.

Open House #2 Feedback

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Central Fire Station



Respondents commented & expressed a desire to defer to the recommendations of the Cedar Rapids Fire Department and their best practices criteria.



Respondents also expressed that the Central Fire Station offers a vital service and should never be incapacitated during emergencies.



A majority of respondents favored Option C.

Option C - New Building with Program Growth (Undetermined Site).

Open House #2 Feedback

Summary of Feedback from Open House #2 

Main Public Library



An overwhelming majority of respondents favored a new building.



Ample and free parking was a reoccurring theme across all options.



Of the 4 possible sites/locations presented, 2 were predominantly favored:





TrueNorth Block



Former Emerald Knights Block

Future flood risk is still a concern.

Open House #2 Feedback

What are we solving for?

The

WHAT The WHEN The HOW

What’s Next

What - Development of the Implementation Strategy 

Development of the Implementation Strategy for facilities is based on: ◦ City Vision ◦ City Council Goals ◦ Public & Employee Feedback ◦ Key Financial Strategies ◦ Service Delivery



Action and implementation then occurs after City Council approval.

What’s Next

When - Development of the Implementation Strategy

Timing impacts: 

Varies depending upon facility/program



Based upon available financial information



Program reconfiguration

What’s Next

How - Development of the Implementation Strategy Funding impacts: Minimal v. optimal strategies for facilities recovery Research and pursue additional funding sources Context within other financial decisions

FACILITIES + KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES + FLOOD CONTROL + FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE

What’s Next

What additional information do you need?

What’s Next

Open House #3 –Recommended Options Tuesday, October 6 4:00 – 7:00 p.m.

Wednesday, October 7 11:30 a.m. – 1:30 p.m.

Crowne Plaza Ballroom 350 1st Avenue NE

Related Documents

Cr Open House Update
June 2020 1
Open House
June 2020 10
Open House
November 2019 28
Seaa Open House 09
July 2020 0
Open House Flyer
May 2020 5

More Documents from ""

Cr Open House Update
June 2020 1