COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES
Pure Tin Plated Leads Problems and Mitigation
Joe Zaccari Military Programs Manager Corfin Industries LLC 603-893-9900 phone
[email protected] www.corfin.com
Presentation Outline :
Reliability problems associated with pure tin plated leads: –
Whiskers
Factors in whisker development – – –
–
Survey of documented failures Examples of tin whisker growth
Solderability
Poor solder joint quality – –
Stress Intermetallic formation Abrasion of the plating
Oxidation Reflow characteristics
Potential solutions to whiskering and solderability problems on Pure Tin Plated component leads: – – – – –
Use as is (case-by-case evaluation) Matte plating Arc with high voltage Conformal coat Hot solder dip
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES
Whiskers Stress Intermetallic Formation Abrasion of Plating
Factors in Whisker Development
Plating Chemistry/Process –
Electroplating Current Density
–
Tin Grain Size and Shape
– –
>0.5 µm and <8 µm more prone
Alloy composition
Submicron Grains “Matte” vs. “Bright” Finish
Use of “Brighteners” and Presence of Impurities Plating Thickness
–
Higher Current Density --> Higher Residual Stress
Pure Sn, Sn-Cu, Sn-Bi, and rarely Sn-Pb
Substrate (Including Base Metal and Barrier Plating Layers) – –
Material (Copper, Brass, Nickel, others) Substrate Preparation (Stamped, Formed, Annealed) G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Factors in Whisker Development
Intermetallic Compound (IMC) Formation • Environmental Stresses – – –
–
Temperature (50°C More Favorable) Temperature Shock/cycling (CTE Mismatches) Humidity (High RH Observed to Increase Whiskering) Applied Pressure (Torque on Fasteners)
It is important to note however that: Many Experiments Show Contradictory Results For These Factors G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
“Public Domain” Whisker Related Failures
Military – –
F-15 Missile programs
Space –
Satellites
Galaxy IV Galaxy VII Solidaridad I Other
Medical –
Phoenix Patriot Missile II Other
Heart Pacemaker
Energy –
Nuclear Regulatory Commission G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Examples of Whiskers
Relay Leads
"Photo courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker "
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Examples of Whiskers
Standard Dual In-Line Package (DIP) IC, Leads are copper based with "pure matte tin plated finish" (confirmed via SEM/EDS).
"Photos courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker "
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Examples of Whiskers
Conformal Coat (Polyurethane) Whiskers Growing Beneath
Whisker Growing Thru
2 mil Thick Coating
~0.25 mil Thick Coating T in W h is ke rs : A ttrib u te s a n d M itig a tio n
"Photos courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/experiment/exp2/ ). "
J a y B ru s s e Q S S G ro u p , In c . @ N A S A G o d d a rd P re se n tatio n to : C a p a c ito r a nd R e s is to r T e ch n o lo g y S ym p o s iu m 2002 N e w O rle a n s , L A M a rc h 2 6 , 2 0 0 2
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES
Solderability Issues
Oxidation Reflow
How Tin Plated lead forming differs from Solder Coating
Lead Form After Plating –
–
Defects such as, poor solder joint quality and degraded long-term reliability can result from forming the leads after the plating has been applied. Exposed base material at the device “toe” when the leads are trimmed to length.
–
Toe fillet quality
Micro-cracks in the plating.
Oxidation of lead surface.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Potential Source of Oxidation
Pre- Plated Lead Frame
Tie Bars Removed
Exposed base metal
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Potential Source of Oxidation
Exposed Base Metal X-Ray EDS Analysis G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Potential Oxidation
Micro Cracks in Plating
Exposed Base Metal
Formed Lead G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Potential Oxidation
12,000x Magnification
3,000x Magnification BSE Image
Plating Flaking Formed Lead G-12 Meeting
12,000x Magnification BSE Image
September 10, 2002
COMPONENT PREPARATION SERVICES
Mitigation Strategies Use
as is (case-by-case evaluation) Arc with high voltage Matte plating Conformal coat Hot solder dip
Mitigation Strategies
Use as is –
Arc w/ high voltage – –
Components may not survive Subjective process
Matte plating –
–
Assumptions required
Eliminates one potential problem but evidence exists that whiskers occur in all tin and tin alloy plated finishes. Matte plating is still susceptible to oxidation.
Conformal coat –
Shown to be ineffective in some cases G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Mitigation Strategies
Use as is –
When a case-by-case assessment is used some level of assumptions required.
–
No ability to simulate assembly and operation environmental factors for test purposes. Down stream alteration of operational parameters would be problematic.
Assumption is too subjective for high reliability applications.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Mitigation Strategies
Conformal coat – –
Shown to be ineffective in some cases Difficult to determine acceptable application
Are spaces between fine pitch leads filled?
T in W h is k e rs : A ttrib u te s a n d M itig a tio n J a y B ru s s e Q S S G r o u p , In c . @ N A S A G o d d a r d P re s e n ta tio n to : C a p a c ito r a n d R e s is to r T e c h n o lo g y S y m p o s iu m 2002 N e w O rle a n s , L A M a rc h 2 6 , 2 0 0 2
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Mitigation Strategies
Matte plating –
Evidence exists that whiskers occur in all tin and tin alloy plated finishes.
Strict process control required. –
How to establish “out of control” parameters
Matte plating is still susceptible to oxidation.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Mitigation Strategies
Arc w/ high voltage –
Potential for unintended damage to circuitry
–
Potential for immediate damage to circuitry Latent damage potential
Subjective process
Voltage? Duration?
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Mitigation Strategies
Hot Solder Dipping –
–
Users may consider hot solder dipping of tin plated leads (surfaces) using a Sn/Pb based solder. This process will help reduce whisker formation by:
Relieving stress in the tin layer through reflow The addition of an alloying element (Pb).
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Hot Solder Dip Challenges and Successes
Differences between Pure Tin Plated and Solder Coated component lead finishes –
Lead Finish
–
Composition Thickness Shelf life
Lead forming
Hot solder dip process characteristics and capabilities –
Lead pitch/count
Manual vs. robotic handling –
–
– – –
Control of Insertion/removal : Rate Angle Reduction of abrasion and induced stress
Dynamic vs. static solder Nitrogen blanketing
Temperatures and dwell times Percentage of lead covered Package size/material/construction
Environmental Impact of Hot Solder Dip –
Hazardous waste G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead Finishes
Tin Plating vs. Hot Solder Dip –
Hot Solder Dipping is performed in a molten bath
–
No separation of tin/lead (Sn/Pb) occurs during the Solder Coating process. Results in a homogeneous and dense lead finish.
An pure tin coating has a specific crystallinestructure:
Prone to Tin Whisker growth Possibly of micro-cracks “Special” chemicals introduced to affect finish appearance.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead Finishes
Tin Plated coatings need added ingredients within the electrolytic bath to get a proper coating with specific optical and mechanical characteristics. –
If bright and shiny surfaces are required, the electroplated coating tends to be brittle in comparison to hot-dipped coatings.
As there are no chemical additives, Solder Dipped surfaces have little to no out-gasing, bubbling or separation tendencies in higher temperature ranges. G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead Finishes
Hot Solder Dip Lead Finish Characteristics –
The composition of the Solder Coating material exactly matches the solder bath composition.
–
I.e., if 63% tin (Sn) 37% lead (Pb) is used, you will find exactly this 63 / 37 combination on the Dipped lead.
Solder coating composition can be matched to solder paste used in assembly:
During re-flow, both melt at the same temperature and provide a better solder joint.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead Finishes
Hot Solder Dip Lead Finish Characteristics –
Lead finish volume
The volume of solder on a hot solder dip lead is greater than that which can be achieved through plating. – –
–
Solder dipped leads typically have >200µ inches of solder coating vs. as little as 50µ inches for plating Benefit: during re-flow, a greater coverage of the foot, toe, and heel typically occurs.
Inter-metallic Development
Set up from the very beginning. Benefit: very good bonding between the core material and the Solder Coating.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Tin Plated vs. Solder Coated Lead Finishes
Lead Finish Characteristics –
Shelf life
Typically two years or more, for a post-lead form, hot solder dipped component. – –
Shelf life for a pre-lead form, Solder Dipped component is typically a year or less. –
This is the result of a relatively thick, homogeneous coating. This shelf life can be shorter if the leads are solder dipped prior to being trimmed and formed.
This is primarily the result of a base metal exposure at the foot, resulting in poor toe fillets.
Shelf life for a tin plated component is typically a year or less, due to oxidation. –
This can account for PCB de-wetting problems during re-flow.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Hot Solder Dip Challenges and Successes
Solder dipping formed leads: –
Problems with “hand dipping” formed leads .........
Bridging
Icicles Solder Build-up
Solder Build-up Solder Build-up
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Hot Solder Dip Challenges and Successes
Hot-Solder dipping –
Hot-tin dipped parts should come from controlled production lines.
While the very process of applying a molten layer minimizes internal stresses, coating application must be uniform in thickness. Hot Solder Dipped parts are still prone to abrasion and surface compressive stresses during handling. –
–
Hands free processing greatly reduces this risk.
The effectiveness of hot solder dipping is limited to those surfaces that can be safely subjected to a hot dipping process without introducing thermal damage.
For this reason, solder dipping is frequently limited to areas no closer than 10 to 50 mils from the component body where glass to metal seals are used. G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Solder dipping formed leads: –
Keys for success
Nitrogen atmosphere –
–
–
–
The solder pot is equipped with an inert gas enclosure around the solder wave, with stainless steel gas diffusers that provide a non-turbulent protective gas cover over the wave. The controlled atmosphere reduces dross formation on the solder wave, promotes wetting and ensures uniform solder coverage of the component leads. The process of solder coating component leads is greatly enhanced by the inerting process, with the virtual elimination of icicles and flags as surface tension is greatly decreased.. A stainless steel shroud that covers the rear of the solder pot, including the pump area, is injected with inert gas to reduce the formation of dross and black powder from the pump shaft. G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Solder dipping formed leads: –
Keys for success
Control of insertion and removal speed & angle – – –
Viscosity and surface tension effects on adjacent leads Control of solder wicking onto lead Control of solder run off
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Solder dipping formed leads: –
Keys for success
Dynamic solder wave –
–
Solder pot is designed to draw solder from the base of the pot, minimizing the possibility of recirculating dross through the wave. The pot has its own thermally protected D.C. motor driven pump which provides for precise wave height control
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Component Packages –
Plastic, Tinning up to package
–
SOT SOIC TSOP, TSSOP QFP
Ceramic packages
LCC Flat packs Quad packs –
–
Quad pack lead counts up to 442
2” by 4” Ceramic Hybrid packages
Metal cans/Hybrid packages, tinning to within 0.010 inch of package
Component bases as well as leads can be solder coated G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Component Leads –
Straight lead TAB devices
–
Gull wing flat pack and quad packs
–
Lead width 0.003 in. Lead spacing 0.015 in. Lead width: 0.06 - 0.23 mm Lead pitch: 0.4mm Lead thickness: 0.05 - .015mm
Hybrid packages
Lead diameter: 0.01”
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities Pitch
0.4 (.015)
0.5 (.020)
0.64(.025)
X
X
X
X
Width 0.006
0.13
X
X
0.19
0.23
X
0.3
X
X
X
X
Dimensions are in millimeters (inches)
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Current Robotic Lead Finish System Capabilities
Solder dipping formed leads:
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Hot Solder Dip Challenges and Successes
Environmental Impact –
Hazardous waste
Process water is only waste product – – –
Lead levels in waste water is many time below levels allowable into municipal sewer systems. Hazardous waste generation is in the “household” classification. All other materials are recycled Solder ( tin & lead)
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002
Conclusion
Pure tin-plated component leads are susceptible to whisker formation Failures due to tin whiskers are a real problem. Hot solder dip is a viable solution to tin whisker problems on electronic components regardless of lead dimensions.
G-12 Meeting
September 10, 2002